Can We Please Get Rid of the Pledge?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dumping the pledge is just another attempt by the left to create division where unity can grow, to erase history so they can rewrite it, to make the roots of socialism take root. There is nothing wrong with sharing a pledge amongst the races and classes. The OP is simply spreading anarchy, hate and slavery to his ideas.

Socialist critter that I often am, I always liked that the Pledge was written by a socialist.

But even more - what I liked was it's idea of one nation undivided, after the horror of our civil war - we'd never be divided again. It should remind us that, despite partisanship we are after all - all Americans. We may have differing ideas of what it means to be American, of the direction our country should take but we all want what's best and in the end, we are American.

Yet part of that American tradition is the Pledge, flag and national anthem. The OP is driving us toward a nation of self serving anarchists.

There's nothing liberal about the OP, liberal isn't saying that things you don't like should be removed from view or got rid of.

There's nothing liberal about Leftists, what they are is Leftist Totalitarians, this is the Alt-Left, the children of Marx and Trotsky and Saul Alinsky amongst us now.
 
You haven't got the slightest idea of what my "position" is. Hell, you're too stupid to figure out that I didn't compose the article in the OP, yet you keep posting as if I wrote it. You didn't know the Pledge was written by a socialist, yet you are accusing "the left" of wanting to "make the roots of socialism take root." Hilarious.

:laugh2:

You are the OP author and have stated nothing contrary to the position taken in that OP. There is little doubt you are a liberal socialist. Socialists have devolved considerably since the writing of the pledge.

Why is some socialism so bad? It gives morality to capitalism.

"Why is some socialism so bad?"

Venezuela is the latest example.

Venezuala is more than "some socialism" - it's when you add the dictator and subtract capitalism you run into problems. I'm a firm believer in capitalism as the best economic engine and socialism as a means of tempering the ethical excesses of capitalism.
 
Dumping the pledge is just another attempt by the left to create division where unity can grow, to erase history so they can rewrite it, to make the roots of socialism take root. There is nothing wrong with sharing a pledge amongst the races and classes. The OP is simply spreading anarchy, hate and slavery to his ideas.

Socialist critter that I often am, I always liked that the Pledge was written by a socialist.

But even more - what I liked was it's idea of one nation undivided, after the horror of our civil war - we'd never be divided again. It should remind us that, despite partisanship we are after all - all Americans. We may have differing ideas of what it means to be American, of the direction our country should take but we all want what's best and in the end, we are American.

Yet part of that American tradition is the Pledge, flag and national anthem. The OP is driving us toward a nation of self serving anarchists.

There's nothing liberal about the OP, liberal isn't saying that things you don't like should be removed from view or got rid of.

There's nothing liberal about Leftists, what they are is Leftist Totalitarians, this is the Alt-Left, the children of Marx and Trotsky and Saul Alinsky amongst us now.

I disagree...that's like comparing all rightists to Mussolini.
 
You haven't got the slightest idea of what my "position" is. Hell, you're too stupid to figure out that I didn't compose the article in the OP, yet you keep posting as if I wrote it. You didn't know the Pledge was written by a socialist, yet you are accusing "the left" of wanting to "make the roots of socialism take root." Hilarious.

:laugh2:

You are the OP author and have stated nothing contrary to the position taken in that OP. There is little doubt you are a liberal socialist. Socialists have devolved considerably since the writing of the pledge.

Why is some socialism so bad? It gives morality to capitalism.

There is no morality in creating lazy and dependent people.

There is no morality in sweatshops either.

Then quit letting illegals in that work under the table, under cuts poor workers low wages already.
How long has Coyote been bringing in illegals, this is news to me, do we need rotten tomatoes to get her to stop it?
 
You are the OP author and have stated nothing contrary to the position taken in that OP. There is little doubt you are a liberal socialist. Socialists have devolved considerably since the writing of the pledge.

Why is some socialism so bad? It gives morality to capitalism.

There is no morality in creating lazy and dependent people.

There is no morality in sweatshops either.

Then quit letting illegals in that work under the table, under cuts poor workers low wages already.
How long has Coyote been bringing in illegals, this is news to me, do we need rotten tomatoes to get her to stop it?

Damn...the secret is out now :(
 
You haven't got the slightest idea of what my "position" is. Hell, you're too stupid to figure out that I didn't compose the article in the OP, yet you keep posting as if I wrote it. You didn't know the Pledge was written by a socialist, yet you are accusing "the left" of wanting to "make the roots of socialism take root." Hilarious.

:laugh2:

You are the OP author and have stated nothing contrary to the position taken in that OP. There is little doubt you are a liberal socialist. Socialists have devolved considerably since the writing of the pledge.

Why is some socialism so bad? It gives morality to capitalism.

There is no morality in creating lazy and dependent people.

"There is no morality in creating lazy and dependent people."

The Left need as many of those lazy and dependent people as possible, these are a huge block of their voters, this is also the same reason they keep black people on the Plantation of Welfare Dependency.
 
[QUOT
Nationalism is disgusting. Expressing extreme pride in the state -- especially when you had no fucking say in the matter -- is disgusting. What sort of idiot takes that much pride in something they had no choice in? Oh, your parents happened to have fucked in the USA? Congratulations. Wow.

As the author wrote, anything reminiscent of a totalitarian regime is wrong. I know you love authoritarianism, so you have a hard time wrapping your head around this concept. After all, you're "proud" of something you had no say in.

This is the best paragraph in the article, "Now I know that many people think the Pledge is simply an affirmation of their respect for the flag, their love for the country, and their gratitude to the men and women who fought in America’s wars. But that’s not what it is. The Pledge is an attempt to impose conformity on the masses and compel them to click their heels and proclaim their devotion to the Fatherland. That’s not how it’s supposed to work in a democracy. In a democracy, the representatives of the state are supposed to pledge their loyalty to the people and to the laws that protect them. That’s the correct relationship between the state and the people. The Pledge turns that whole concept on its head."


You fucking communist bastard...


You have no God Damn respect for the men who fought for your God Damn freedom, saved the world twice in two wars..

Promoted freedom around the world, and brought the world into the 21 st century..


No other country on earth can say that, sure we have our bad points liberals and conservatives both.


But we are human after all

No nation in the history of earth can claim all the good we did..


You are a fucking piece of shit...

.

Way to fly off the handle there, ya loon. Talk about unhinged...

1. Not a communist, you drooling moron.
2. No one fought for "my freedom" since 1776, so shut the fuck up with your bullshit.
3. "Promoted freedom around the world," like how we did in Iraq you mean? lol
4. Get fucked.

1. You are a communist prick

2.No one fought for your freedom since 1776? Read a history book..you stupid commie pig.

3. The Kurds are not free ? Iraq don't have free elections?

You uneducated moron.

4. Suck my left nut..

Just a couple of thoughts here....

Communism arose, directly, as a result of the huge gap between the haves and have nots, and the rampant abuse of the workers and poor. In it's initial formation - it was good and just and needed. There was a lot of abuse if you weren't one of the entitled. It led to horrific abuses of course - but it's origins were legitimate.

Second - this whole thing about "free elections" is bullshit. As if that is the SUPREME marker of a free and democratic society. Without all the institutions necessary for democracy - education, equality, protection of minorities, an independent judiciary, a means to tackle corruption and a peaceful transfer of power - the vote means NOTHING.

Third - your left nut is far smaller then your right nut. Is this some sort of sucko bait and switch?



Saaaaasyy what?

Lmfao


Communism was flawed at the beginning , it was an ideology that looked good on paper to intellectual morons, but any 3rd grader who ever ran a lemonade stand. could of told you it was crap.

Free elections are as free as they can be, where else but in america you need an ID to survive, but to vote all you need to say your name is joe smoe in chicago and vote early and often.



.
I have had to show an ID for 37 years to vote in 8 different states.............Even in states that had no voter ID laws...
 
I guess you guys think the fire department, libraries, the police department and the post office are "bad?"

Conservatism really is a mental illness.
 
You haven't got the slightest idea of what my "position" is. Hell, you're too stupid to figure out that I didn't compose the article in the OP, yet you keep posting as if I wrote it. You didn't know the Pledge was written by a socialist, yet you are accusing "the left" of wanting to "make the roots of socialism take root." Hilarious.

:laugh2:

You are the OP author and have stated nothing contrary to the position taken in that OP. There is little doubt you are a liberal socialist. Socialists have devolved considerably since the writing of the pledge.

Why is some socialism so bad? It gives morality to capitalism.

There is no morality in creating lazy and dependent people.

"There is no morality in creating lazy and dependent people."

The Left need as many of those lazy and dependent people as possible, these are a huge block of their voters, this is also the same reason they keep black people on the Plantation of Welfare Dependency.
No one forces people to be on welfare, it is not a system of forcing people onto the rolls...and GOP members are a large part of welfare, what is their excuse? GOP plantation mentality?
 
I guess you guys think the fire department, libraries, the police department and the post office are "bad?"

Conservatism really is a mental illness.
I like that we have a privately funded military, not some form of socialist military...
 
Dumping the pledge is just another attempt by the left to create division where unity can grow, to erase history so they can rewrite it, to make the roots of socialism take root. There is nothing wrong with sharing a pledge amongst the races and classes. The OP is simply spreading anarchy, hate and slavery to his ideas.

Socialist critter that I often am, I always liked that the Pledge was written by a socialist.

But even more - what I liked was it's idea of one nation undivided, after the horror of our civil war - we'd never be divided again. It should remind us that, despite partisanship we are after all - all Americans. We may have differing ideas of what it means to be American, of the direction our country should take but we all want what's best and in the end, we are American.

Yet part of that American tradition is the Pledge, flag and national anthem. The OP is driving us toward a nation of self serving anarchists.

There's nothing liberal about the OP, liberal isn't saying that things you don't like should be removed from view or got rid of.

There's nothing liberal about Leftists, what they are is Leftist Totalitarians, this is the Alt-Left, the children of Marx and Trotsky and Saul Alinsky amongst us now.

I disagree...that's like comparing all rightists to Mussolini.

Every day for many months pretty much every Leftist here has compared The Donald to Benito Mussolini and Herr Hitler, every day the MSM are doing the same, yet this is considered rational and acceptable to the LeftistBots.
 
The Pledge of Allegiance is not an expression of patriotism. It is a loyalty oath that one normally associates with totalitarian regimes. People who love freedom, should be appalled by the idea our children are being coerced to stand and declare their support for the state. This is the worst form of indoctrination and it is completely anathema to the principals articulated in the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights. I cannot imagine outspoken libertarians like Thomas Jefferson or Tom Paine ever proclaiming their loyalty to the state when they correctly saw the state as the greatest threat to individual freedom. Which it is.

Now I know that many people think the Pledge is simply an affirmation of their respect for the flag, their love for the country, and their gratitude to the men and women who fought in America’s wars. But that’s not what it is. The Pledge is an attempt to impose conformity on the masses and compel them to click their heels and proclaim their devotion to the Fatherland. That’s not how it’s supposed to work in a democracy. In a democracy, the representatives of the state are supposed to pledge their loyalty to the people and to the laws that protect them. That’s the correct relationship between the state and the people. The Pledge turns that whole concept on its head.

Now I’d have no problem if our schoolchildren recited the Preamble to the Declaration of Independence before class every day:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

That’s great stuff, unfortunately, the people who run this country would never allow it. They’d never allow our kids to recite an incendiary, revolutionary document like that every day for fear it would incite violence against the state. What they want is “good Germans”, not revolutionaries, not freedom-loving populists, and not well-informed, critical thinking individuals who can see through the sham of their jingoistic propaganda. They want people who are going to follow the rules, do what they’re told, fight the wars, and perform their worktime drudgery for 30 or 40 years until they’re carted off to the glue factory. That’s what they want. Reciting the Pledge fits perfectly with this dumbed-down version of permanent indentured servitude. It provides the ideological foundation for bovine acquiescence to the demands of the state and the crooks who run it behind the tri-color banner.

The fact that institutions like the Pledge are never challenged in a public format, points to deeper problems with the media and the way our kids are being educated. And while I don’t have time to talk about that now, it makes me wonder where are the people to question these silly recitations that undermine democracy and personal liberty? Why are their voices never heard?
---------------------------------

Read the rest here:
Can We Please Get Rid of the Pledge?

Interesting perspective, one that I've shared for years but never bothered to articulate as well as this author did. Your thoughts?
The pledge is not going anywhere, but you can leave anytime, or stay and pull your hair out, we do not care.

Nah, I think I'll stay here and annoy you for as long as possible.

Ignorance isn't annoying, it is merely ignorance.
 
Dumping the pledge is just another attempt by the left to create division where unity can grow, to erase history so they can rewrite it, to make the roots of socialism take root. There is nothing wrong with sharing a pledge amongst the races and classes. The OP is simply spreading anarchy, hate and slavery to his ideas.

Socialist critter that I often am, I always liked that the Pledge was written by a socialist.

But even more - what I liked was it's idea of one nation undivided, after the horror of our civil war - we'd never be divided again. It should remind us that, despite partisanship we are after all - all Americans. We may have differing ideas of what it means to be American, of the direction our country should take but we all want what's best and in the end, we are American.

Yet part of that American tradition is the Pledge, flag and national anthem. The OP is driving us toward a nation of self serving anarchists.

There's nothing liberal about the OP, liberal isn't saying that things you don't like should be removed from view or got rid of.

There's nothing liberal about Leftists, what they are is Leftist Totalitarians, this is the Alt-Left, the children of Marx and Trotsky and Saul Alinsky amongst us now.
Man, those three guys sure got laid a lot...
 
Why is some socialism so bad? It gives morality to capitalism.

There is no morality in creating lazy and dependent people.

There is no morality in sweatshops either.

Then quit letting illegals in that work under the table, under cuts poor workers low wages already.
How long has Coyote been bringing in illegals, this is news to me, do we need rotten tomatoes to get her to stop it?

Damn...the secret is out now :(

You'll need a bigger basement now :eek-52:
 
I guess you guys think the fire department, libraries, the police department and the post office are "bad?"

Conservatism really is a mental illness.

As an interesting diversion...we, the US, are I think pretty unique in that our libraries, museums and galleries and zoos are free - open to anyone. They can educate anyone with the curiousity and ability to get there regardless of class - it, along with our public education system are one of the huge equalizers in our society. There are other countries where families have to pay to educate their children.
 
Why is some socialism so bad? It gives morality to capitalism.

There is no morality in creating lazy and dependent people.

There is no morality in sweatshops either.

Then quit letting illegals in that work under the table, under cuts poor workers low wages already.
How long has Coyote been bringing in illegals, this is news to me, do we need rotten tomatoes to get her to stop it?

Damn...the secret is out now :(

It is worse than you think. Lucy has discovered our war plans against Western Civilization!
 
:laugh2:es morality to capitalism.[/QUO
You pansies pick the stupidest shit to whine about. Find your nearest safe space & take shelter pussy

Not "whining" about it, prison bitch boi. I found the article and I thought it was interesting and I knew it would get you guys riled up, so I thought it would be an interesting topic.
You are indeed whining about it. There is nothing remotely interesting about the Left's agenda to dismantle the America we all grew up in. Hiding behind the article is pointless. You posted it so own it crybaby

The America my grandmother grew up in did not allow her to work after marriage. The America my mother grew up in rarely accepted women into PHD programs in sciences, or allowed women to earn credit independent of her husband...the America I grew up in, is far better but we have yet to elect a woman president. Which America are we dismantling?


Why is electing a woman president so important to you?

Don't you just want the best president possible?

I could care less if the president is a liberal or a democrat. Black, yellow, Brown or White. A woman, a guy, a lesbo, or a homo


As long as they are fair to everyone, willing to compromise across the aisle, understand /follow the constitution , not a liar. Not corrupt and a strong leader..no big deal to me who it is


.

A woman in and of itself is not important. But there have been excellent women, who could have been elected but were not. So IS the best president being elected - when a woman can't even get past the primaries? Are American women so inferior that India, the British, even Pakistan elect a woman before we do?


I was thinking about what your response would be as I posted it.

You have to remember the U.S. is only 200 plus years old.

I also never talked to you here before and not sure if you ever read my posts like other mods do.

But I said it a hundred times I love my governor Nikki Halley. I loved Thatcher, I love the new pm of great Britain Mays. We only have like 6 woman governors today 3 repubs , 3 democrats?

A question for you? Why does libs hate woman republicans? How come so few of liberal senators, governors?

Also I am still astonished how few black senators we have had the only one today is South Carolinas Tim Scott
 
Dumping the pledge is just another attempt by the left to create division where unity can grow, to erase history so they can rewrite it, to make the roots of socialism take root. There is nothing wrong with sharing a pledge amongst the races and classes. The OP is simply spreading anarchy, hate and slavery to his ideas.

Socialist critter that I often am, I always liked that the Pledge was written by a socialist.

But even more - what I liked was it's idea of one nation undivided, after the horror of our civil war - we'd never be divided again. It should remind us that, despite partisanship we are after all - all Americans. We may have differing ideas of what it means to be American, of the direction our country should take but we all want what's best and in the end, we are American.

Yet part of that American tradition is the Pledge, flag and national anthem. The OP is driving us toward a nation of self serving anarchists.

There's nothing liberal about the OP, liberal isn't saying that things you don't like should be removed from view or got rid of.

There's nothing liberal about Leftists, what they are is Leftist Totalitarians, this is the Alt-Left, the children of Marx and Trotsky and Saul Alinsky amongst us now.

I disagree...that's like comparing all rightists to Mussolini.

Every day for many months pretty much every Leftist here has compared The Donald to Benito Mussolini and Herr Hitler, every day the MSM are doing the same, yet this is considered rational and acceptable to the LeftistBots.
I see the Don as a spoiled brat, always buying his way through life and squashing peoples ability to live with what they have, but he likes to take away...
 
The Pledge of Allegiance is not an expression of patriotism. It is a loyalty oath that one normally associates with totalitarian regimes. People who love freedom, should be appalled by the idea our children are being coerced to stand and declare their support for the state. This is the worst form of indoctrination and it is completely anathema to the principals articulated in the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights. I cannot imagine outspoken libertarians like Thomas Jefferson or Tom Paine ever proclaiming their loyalty to the state when they correctly saw the state as the greatest threat to individual freedom. Which it is.

Now I know that many people think the Pledge is simply an affirmation of their respect for the flag, their love for the country, and their gratitude to the men and women who fought in America’s wars. But that’s not what it is. The Pledge is an attempt to impose conformity on the masses and compel them to click their heels and proclaim their devotion to the Fatherland. That’s not how it’s supposed to work in a democracy. In a democracy, the representatives of the state are supposed to pledge their loyalty to the people and to the laws that protect them. That’s the correct relationship between the state and the people. The Pledge turns that whole concept on its head.

Now I’d have no problem if our schoolchildren recited the Preamble to the Declaration of Independence before class every day:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

That’s great stuff, unfortunately, the people who run this country would never allow it. They’d never allow our kids to recite an incendiary, revolutionary document like that every day for fear it would incite violence against the state. What they want is “good Germans”, not revolutionaries, not freedom-loving populists, and not well-informed, critical thinking individuals who can see through the sham of their jingoistic propaganda. They want people who are going to follow the rules, do what they’re told, fight the wars, and perform their worktime drudgery for 30 or 40 years until they’re carted off to the glue factory. That’s what they want. Reciting the Pledge fits perfectly with this dumbed-down version of permanent indentured servitude. It provides the ideological foundation for bovine acquiescence to the demands of the state and the crooks who run it behind the tri-color banner.

The fact that institutions like the Pledge are never challenged in a public format, points to deeper problems with the media and the way our kids are being educated. And while I don’t have time to talk about that now, it makes me wonder where are the people to question these silly recitations that undermine democracy and personal liberty? Why are their voices never heard?
---------------------------------

Read the rest here:
Can We Please Get Rid of the Pledge?

Interesting perspective, one that I've shared for years but never bothered to articulate as well as this author did. Your thoughts?

As a kid I detested the pledge

It always seemed the height of hypocrisy- forcing kids to 'pledge' to be patriotic.

I always figured if I wasn't patriotic, I wouldn't hesitate to lie and say I was.

As an adult it irritates me less, but it still strikes me as hypocrisy.

I am a patriotic American- you don't have to force me to pledge it as part of the collective.

If you were a patriotic American you would not have to be forced to pledge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top