Can you imagine how the rw would react if Obama told 3 GOP rednecks to go back to their shitholes?

[francoHFW]

You know, the shitholes like MS, AL, or LA.

The RW would blow up.

As usual, Trump supporters either don’t care about Trump’s remarks about the dem women because they are racist or they aren’t racist but once again go into denial mode because they can’t handle admitting any of Trump’s faults.

Do you mean like Obama telling GOP members that they have to sit in the back of the bus?

*****SMILE*****

That is what usually happens when you lose an election that bad. But thanks for the racist Outlook....

 

[francoHFW]

One thing about having the orange racist in charge, we find out every day what racist bigoted intolerant brainwashed scumbags the GOP is made of....

You're an idiot.

Mario Cuomo said Ronald Reagan made blaming the poor acceptable. Along with 30 years of garbage propaganda. could not have anything to do with 35 years of GOP give away to the rich and screwing everybody else, brainwashed functional moron.

Obama and Clinton were president for 16 years, couldn't fix it.

Why were they such weak ass twats?

Pure Republican obstruction like the last 50 years, brainwashed ignoramus.

Why are Republicans, even in the minority, so much more powerful than weak ass Dem twats?

pure lockstep bought off hypocrites...and all they care about is cutting taxes on the rich and giant corporations and screwing everybody else. They have reconciliation for that, and they have their crap filibuster rule to obstruct reform.it's a great scam for screwing their GOP voters who are brain washed functional morons like you LOL.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You're an idiot.

Mario Cuomo said Ronald Reagan made blaming the poor acceptable. Along with 30 years of garbage propaganda. could not have anything to do with 35 years of GOP give away to the rich and screwing everybody else, brainwashed functional moron.

Obama and Clinton were president for 16 years, couldn't fix it.

Why were they such weak ass twats?

Pure Republican obstruction like the last 50 years, brainwashed ignoramus.

Why are Republicans, even in the minority, so much more powerful than weak ass Dem twats?

pure lockstep bought off hypocrites...and all they care about is cutting taxes on the rich and giant corporations and screwing everybody else. They have reconciliation for that, and they have their crap filibuster rule to obstruct reform.it's a great scam for screwing their GOP voters who are brain washed functional morons like you LOL.

I agree, weak ass Dem twats are the worst.

 

[jc456]

and then he will be called a racist and will get 40% of the vote and we can finally get some reform going in this country. 35 years of giveaway to the rich and screw job for everyone else under the brainwashed BS GOP are ruining the country and the middle class...

The country is more successful now than since 1969-what are you talking about? I'm middle class and that is true for me.

He called you a liar! He’s a condescending peck leftist fk

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

when government hands free shit to loser lazy leftists by stealing money from the middle class, the middle class is affected. So why aren't you promoting getting rid of free shit! step up loser, sound off and tell these give away geniuses to go fk off. opportunity is what drives success in america and you don't want it. damn you're a loser.

opportunity is from cheap college and training which you people have screwed up totally the last 35 years. Only garbage propaganda makes it possible, brainwashed functional Moron.

lowest black and hispanic unemployment since records have been kept on the subject. there's that. you ignore it because it doesn't fit what your puppet masters tell you! nice strings btw!

 

[jc456]

and then he will be called a racist and will get 40% of the vote and we can finally get some reform going in this country. 35 years of giveaway to the rich and screw job for everyone else under the brainwashed BS GOP are ruining the country and the middle class...

The country is more successful now than since 1969-what are you talking about? I'm middle class and that is true for me.

He called you a liar! He’s a condescending peck leftist fk

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

Numbers don't lie, but liars figure-this is wrong on two counts-first, on a personal level, my savings rose after Reagan. Second, savings depend upon the individual to save-not buy the latest gadget-I have no sympathy for those with no self discipline-look at the obesity in the US-the food they bought could pay off their credit cards.

Yes yes 35 years of giveaway to the rich and screwing everybody else has nothing to do with it. As long as you're doing well, everyone is, right brain-washed functional moron?

what giveaways? you didn't present the giveaway. what was it?

 

[jc456]

You're an idiot.

Mario Cuomo said Ronald Reagan made blaming the poor acceptable. Along with 30 years of garbage propaganda. could not have anything to do with 35 years of GOP give away to the rich and screwing everybody else, brainwashed functional moron.

Obama and Clinton were president for 16 years, couldn't fix it.

Why were they such weak ass twats?

Pure Republican obstruction like the last 50 years, brainwashed ignoramus.

Why are Republicans, even in the minority, so much more powerful than weak ass Dem twats?

pure lockstep bought off hypocrites...and all they care about is cutting taxes on the rich and giant corporations and screwing everybody else. They have reconciliation for that, and they have their crap filibuster rule to obstruct reform.it's a great scam for screwing their GOP voters who are brain washed functional morons like you LOL.

do the tax cuts to the corporations end up in jobs for americans? can you answer that? i doubt it.

 

[francoHFW]

Mario Cuomo said Ronald Reagan made blaming the poor acceptable. Along with 30 years of garbage propaganda. could not have anything to do with 35 years of GOP give away to the rich and screwing everybody else, brainwashed functional moron.

Obama and Clinton were president for 16 years, couldn't fix it.

Why were they such weak ass twats?

Pure Republican obstruction like the last 50 years, brainwashed ignoramus.

Why are Republicans, even in the minority, so much more powerful than weak ass Dem twats?

pure lockstep bought off hypocrites...and all they care about is cutting taxes on the rich and giant corporations and screwing everybody else. They have reconciliation for that, and they have their crap filibuster rule to obstruct reform.it's a great scam for screwing their GOP voters who are brain washed functional morons like you LOL.

I agree, weak ass Dem twats are the worst.

Miss the point much? LOL

 

[francoHFW]

Mario Cuomo said Ronald Reagan made blaming the poor acceptable. Along with 30 years of garbage propaganda. could not have anything to do with 35 years of GOP give away to the rich and screwing everybody else, brainwashed functional moron.

Obama and Clinton were president for 16 years, couldn't fix it.

Why were they such weak ass twats?

Pure Republican obstruction like the last 50 years, brainwashed ignoramus.

Why are Republicans, even in the minority, so much more powerful than weak ass Dem twats?

pure lockstep bought off hypocrites...and all they care about is cutting taxes on the rich and giant corporations and screwing everybody else. They have reconciliation for that, and they have their crap filibuster rule to obstruct reform.it's a great scam for screwing their GOP voters who are brain washed functional morons like you LOL.

do the tax cuts to the corporations end up in jobs for americans? can you answer that? i doubt it.

Nope, just more money for stockholders.

 

[francoHFW]

The country is more successful now than since 1969-what are you talking about? I'm middle class and that is true for me.

He called you a liar! He’s a condescending peck leftist fk

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

Numbers don't lie, but liars figure-this is wrong on two counts-first, on a personal level, my savings rose after Reagan. Second, savings depend upon the individual to save-not buy the latest gadget-I have no sympathy for those with no self discipline-look at the obesity in the US-the food they bought could pay off their credit cards.

Yes yes 35 years of giveaway to the rich and screwing everybody else has nothing to do with it. As long as you're doing well, everyone is, right brain-washed functional moron?

what giveaways? you didn't present the giveaway. what was it?

the GOP has cut the rich tax rate so much now we have a flat tax system if you count all taxes. That's enough but there's much more...

 

[jc456]

Obama and Clinton were president for 16 years, couldn't fix it.

Why were they such weak ass twats?

Pure Republican obstruction like the last 50 years, brainwashed ignoramus.

Why are Republicans, even in the minority, so much more powerful than weak ass Dem twats?

pure lockstep bought off hypocrites...and all they care about is cutting taxes on the rich and giant corporations and screwing everybody else. They have reconciliation for that, and they have their crap filibuster rule to obstruct reform.it's a great scam for screwing their GOP voters who are brain washed functional morons like you LOL.

do the tax cuts to the corporations end up in jobs for americans? can you answer that? i doubt it.

Nope, just more money for stockholders.

but that didn't happen. so I supposed you are wrong yet again. lowest unemployment in 60 years and lowest unemployment for blacks and hispanics in recorded history. you're mistaken as always.

 

[Muhammed]

You know, the shitholes like MS, AL, or LA.

The RW would blow up.

As usual, Trump supporters either don’t care about Trump’s remarks about the dem women because they are racist or they aren’t racist but once again go into denial mode because they can’t handle admitting any of Trump’s faults.

Do you have any reason to believe that Trump's tweet was racist? If so, feel free to explain how you came to that conclusion.

 

[jc456]

He called you a liar! He’s a condescending peck leftist fk

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

Numbers don't lie, but liars figure-this is wrong on two counts-first, on a personal level, my savings rose after Reagan. Second, savings depend upon the individual to save-not buy the latest gadget-I have no sympathy for those with no self discipline-look at the obesity in the US-the food they bought could pay off their credit cards.

Yes yes 35 years of giveaway to the rich and screwing everybody else has nothing to do with it. As long as you're doing well, everyone is, right brain-washed functional moron?

what giveaways? you didn't present the giveaway. what was it?

the GOP has cut the rich tax rate so much now we have a flat tax system if you count all taxes. That's enough but there's much more...

what does this have to do with the OP exactly?

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

I did, and I was curious where you fit in in your explanation.

educated people do not demand more welfare and hate the rich, but Democrats do

Well when they have assorted steel items hanging and pierced all over their face, purple hair, black fingernail polish and lipstick, tattoos everywhere and wearing circus clothes, no one wants to hire them, and that's the radical, indoctrinated democrats. They want to continue their free ride, so when they hear someone is offering them more free stuff, they vote for them. They don't really want a job anyway. That would require they clean themselves up and be responsible and actually work for a living, and that would cut into their perpetually offended game and protesting time.

One thing about having the orange racist in charge, we find out every day what racist bigoted intolerant brainwashed scumbags the GOP is made of....

You're an idiot.

Mario Cuomo said Ronald Reagan made blaming the poor acceptable. Along with 30 years of garbage propaganda. could not have anything to do with 35 years of GOP give away to the rich and screwing everybody else, brainwashed functional moron.

smart people emulate the rich, they they don't hate them

 

[francoHFW]

Pure Republican obstruction like the last 50 years, brainwashed ignoramus.

Why are Republicans, even in the minority, so much more powerful than weak ass Dem twats?

pure lockstep bought off hypocrites...and all they care about is cutting taxes on the rich and giant corporations and screwing everybody else. They have reconciliation for that, and they have their crap filibuster rule to obstruct reform.it's a great scam for screwing their GOP voters who are brain washed functional morons like you LOL.

do the tax cuts to the corporations end up in jobs for americans? can you answer that? i doubt it.

Nope, just more money for stockholders.

but that didn't happen. so I supposed you are wrong yet again. lowest unemployment in 60 years and lowest unemployment for blacks and hispanics in recorded history. you're mistaken as always.

Too bad they don't count all the blacks and Hispanics in prison or who have given up looking. Just a little better than under Obama anyway, with the worst inequality and upward Mobility ever and in the modern world and just getting worse. Great for the rich -screw everybody else.

 

[francoHFW]

educated people do not demand more welfare and hate the rich, but Democrats do

Well when they have assorted steel items hanging and pierced all over their face, purple hair, black fingernail polish and lipstick, tattoos everywhere and wearing circus clothes, no one wants to hire them, and that's the radical, indoctrinated democrats. They want to continue their free ride, so when they hear someone is offering them more free stuff, they vote for them. They don't really want a job anyway. That would require they clean themselves up and be responsible and actually work for a living, and that would cut into their perpetually offended game and protesting time.

One thing about having the orange racist in charge, we find out every day what racist bigoted intolerant brainwashed scumbags the GOP is made of....

You're an idiot.

Mario Cuomo said Ronald Reagan made blaming the poor acceptable. Along with 30 years of garbage propaganda. could not have anything to do with 35 years of GOP give away to the rich and screwing everybody else, brainwashed functional moron.

smart people emulate the rich, they they don't hate them

I just hate the greedy idiot racist bigoted lyingbrainwashing scumbag GOP rich d u h....

 

[francoHFW]

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

Numbers don't lie, but liars figure-this is wrong on two counts-first, on a personal level, my savings rose after Reagan. Second, savings depend upon the individual to save-not buy the latest gadget-I have no sympathy for those with no self discipline-look at the obesity in the US-the food they bought could pay off their credit cards.

Yes yes 35 years of giveaway to the rich and screwing everybody else has nothing to do with it. As long as you're doing well, everyone is, right brain-washed functional moron?

what giveaways? you didn't present the giveaway. what was it?

the GOP has cut the rich tax rate so much now we have a flat tax system if you count all taxes. That's enough but there's much more...

what does this have to do with the OP exactly?

Of course Obama never would have done that....

 

[francoHFW]

You know, the shitholes like MS, AL, or LA.

The RW would blow up.

As usual, Trump supporters either don’t care about Trump’s remarks about the dem women because they are racist or they aren’t racist but once again go into denial mode because they can’t handle admitting any of Trump’s faults.

Do you have any reason to believe that Trump's tweet was racist? If so, feel free to explain how you came to that conclusion.

65% believe it was racist, 35% are brainwashed racists LOL

 

[Third Party]

Why are Republicans, even in the minority, so much more powerful than weak ass Dem twats?

pure lockstep bought off hypocrites...and all they care about is cutting taxes on the rich and giant corporations and screwing everybody else. They have reconciliation for that, and they have their crap filibuster rule to obstruct reform.it's a great scam for screwing their GOP voters who are brain washed functional morons like you LOL.

do the tax cuts to the corporations end up in jobs for americans? can you answer that? i doubt it.

Nope, just more money for stockholders.

but that didn't happen. so I supposed you are wrong yet again. lowest unemployment in 60 years and lowest unemployment for blacks and hispanics in recorded history. you're mistaken as always.

Too bad they don't count all the blacks and Hispanics in prison or who have given up looking. Just a little better than under Obama anyway, with the worst inequality and upward Mobility ever and in the modern world and just getting worse. Great for the rich -screw everybody else.

As a working man and stock holder, these things are great for America and workers. Any black man could have worked where I have and gotten the same benefits. I say man because some of the work I did was pretty rough. You did have to speak and read and write English.

 

[jc456]

Why are Republicans, even in the minority, so much more powerful than weak ass Dem twats?

pure lockstep bought off hypocrites...and all they care about is cutting taxes on the rich and giant corporations and screwing everybody else. They have reconciliation for that, and they have their crap filibuster rule to obstruct reform.it's a great scam for screwing their GOP voters who are brain washed functional morons like you LOL.

do the tax cuts to the corporations end up in jobs for americans? can you answer that? i doubt it.

Nope, just more money for stockholders.

but that didn't happen. so I supposed you are wrong yet again. lowest unemployment in 60 years and lowest unemployment for blacks and hispanics in recorded history. you're mistaken as always.

Too bad they don't count all the blacks and Hispanics in prison or who have given up looking. Just a little better than under Obama anyway, with the worst inequality and upward Mobility ever and in the modern world and just getting worse. Great for the rich -screw everybody else.

your policies put them there and hold them there. plantation lover.

 

[jc456]

Well when they have assorted steel items hanging and pierced all over their face, purple hair, black fingernail polish and lipstick, tattoos everywhere and wearing circus clothes, no one wants to hire them, and that's the radical, indoctrinated democrats. They want to continue their free ride, so when they hear someone is offering them more free stuff, they vote for them. They don't really want a job anyway. That would require they clean themselves up and be responsible and actually work for a living, and that would cut into their perpetually offended game and protesting time.

One thing about having the orange racist in charge, we find out every day what racist bigoted intolerant brainwashed scumbags the GOP is made of....

You're an idiot.

Mario Cuomo said Ronald Reagan made blaming the poor acceptable. Along with 30 years of garbage propaganda. could not have anything to do with 35 years of GOP give away to the rich and screwing everybody else, brainwashed functional moron.

smart people emulate the rich, they they don't hate them

I just hate the greedy idiot racist bigoted lyingbrainwashing scumbag GOP rich d u h....

you love the plantation owning dems though don't you? keep those blacks impoverished is your motto.