jillian
Princess
As for the hospital's potential liability, we are not given any information as to why this woman died and/or if there was any direct negligence committed by the hospital that led to her death. What I find hilarious though, is the fact that a Catholic Hospital would argue that these two babies that died were not human beings. I would agree with that assessment if the fetuses were in their early stages, but at 28 weeks, both could have survived outside the mother's womb given adequate care. Survivability of babies born at 27 to 28 weeks is over 95% today. I really don't see how any hospital could claim that these fetuses were not viable. Worse yet, is the fact that the court agreed with them.
The lawyers for the hospital said the babies were not babies in accordance with State law.
The hospital did not claim the babies were not viable.
The State Law agreed with them.
Time to change the laws of the state???
FWIW-This is a tiny hospital, basically in the middle of nowhere, who happened to save my child's life.
but if they aren't "babies" for all purposes, doesn't that shoot their anti-choice arguments in the foot?
states can't give lesser protections than the federal government.