Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There's a good Christian. You can feel better about yourself by poking fun at someone with medical issues.You're having difficulty paying attention. You have failed to offer a response to posts of mine and to posts of others without mindless babble. It is you who mindlessly drones on about magical gods without ever offering anything but juvenile cut and paste.
Have you not looked back through tens of pages and noticed your childish pattern of spamming with gargantuan fonts?
This latest post of spam was yet another desperate plea for my attention. You're a love struck schoolboy with big, weepy doe-eyes looking for attention who has crossed over into creepy stalking.
You're delusional.
again proving my pointyes I have, faux Christian
My dad can beat up your dad.
failed dodge.wrong again.....Although the Declaration of Independence mentioned Natures God and the Creator, the Constitution made no reference to a divine being, Christian or otherwise, and the First Amendment explicitly forbid the establishment of any official church or creed. There is also a story, probably apocryphal, that Benjamin Franklins proposal to call in a chaplain to offer a prayer when a particularly controversial issue was being debated in the Constitutional Convention prompted Hamilton to observe that he saw no reason to call in foreign aid. If there is a clear legacy bequeathed by the founders, it is the insistence that religion was a private matter in which the state should not interfere.That's not what the Founding Fathers thought. They believed in the Natural Law, that is, that God's law is written on every man's heart. Many cultures around the world that don't have a Holy Book believe in a god.
In recent decades Christian advocacy groups, prompted by motives that have been questioned by some, have felt a powerful urge to enlist the Founding Fathers in their respective congregations. But recovering the spiritual convictions of the Founders, in all their messy integrity, is not an easy task. Once again, diversity is the dominant pattern. Franklin and Jefferson were deists, Washington harbored a pantheistic sense of providential destiny, John Adams began a Congregationalist and ended a Unitarian, Hamilton was a lukewarm Anglican for most of his life but embraced a more actively Christian posture after his son died in a duel.
One quasi-religious conviction they all shared, however, was a discernible obsession with living on in the memory of posterity. One reason the modern editions of their papers are so monstrously large is that most of the Founders were compulsively fastidious about preserving every scrap of paper they wrote or received, all as part of a desire to leave a written record that would assure their secular immortality in the history books. (When John Adams and Jefferson discussed the possibility of a more conventional immortality, they tended to describe heaven as a place where they could resume their ongoing argument on earth.) Adams, irreverent to the end, declared that, if it could ever be demonstrated conclusively that no future state existed, his advice to every man, woman, and child was to take opium. The only afterlife which they considered certain was in the memory of subsequent generations, which is to say us. In that sense, these very blog posts are a testimonial to their everlasting life.
The U.S. Founding Fathers: Their Religious Beliefs | Britannica Blog
Daws, have you been following Strawman Loki's example??? I said nothing about the Constitution. So nice teardown of your made up argument for me.
failed dodge.wrong again.....Although the Declaration of Independence mentioned “Nature’s God” and the “Creator,” the Constitution made no reference to a divine being, Christian or otherwise, and the First Amendment explicitly forbid the establishment of any official church or creed. There is also a story, probably apocryphal, that Benjamin Franklin’s proposal to call in a chaplain to offer a prayer when a particularly controversial issue was being debated in the Constitutional Convention prompted Hamilton to observe that he saw no reason to call in foreign aid. If there is a clear legacy bequeathed by the founders, it is the insistence that religion was a private matter in which the state should not interfere.
In recent decades Christian advocacy groups, prompted by motives that have been questioned by some, have felt a powerful urge to enlist the Founding Fathers in their respective congregations. But recovering the spiritual convictions of the Founders, in all their messy integrity, is not an easy task. Once again, diversity is the dominant pattern. Franklin and Jefferson were deists, Washington harbored a pantheistic sense of providential destiny, John Adams began a Congregationalist and ended a Unitarian, Hamilton was a lukewarm Anglican for most of his life but embraced a more actively Christian posture after his son died in a duel.
One quasi-religious conviction they all shared, however, was a discernible obsession with living on in the memory of posterity. One reason the modern editions of their papers are so monstrously large is that most of the Founders were compulsively fastidious about preserving every scrap of paper they wrote or received, all as part of a desire to leave a written record that would assure their secular immortality in the history books. (When John Adams and Jefferson discussed the possibility of a more conventional immortality, they tended to describe heaven as a place where they could resume their ongoing argument on earth.) Adams, irreverent to the end, declared that, if it could ever be demonstrated conclusively that no future state existed, his advice to every man, woman, and child was to “take opium.” The only afterlife which they considered certain was in the memory of subsequent generations, which is to say us. In that sense, these very blog posts are a testimonial to their everlasting life.
The U.S. Founding Fathers: Their Religious Beliefs | Britannica Blog
Daws, have you been following Strawman Loki's example??? I said nothing about the Constitution. So nice teardown of your made up argument for me.
the article goes right to heart of the f.f. thought about god ....faux christian asshat.
since your comments have no context at all, anywhere ,the need to brag is all yours.again proving my pointMy dad can beat up your dad.
Yes, my sarcasm did prove how childish you are, feeling the need to take my comments out of context and then brag about how much better you are.
another failed dodge.failed dodge.Daws, have you been following Strawman Loki's example??? I said nothing about the Constitution. So nice teardown of your made up argument for me.
the article goes right to heart of the f.f. thought about god ....faux christian asshat.
It says nothing about their beliefs, only about the structure of the government. Try again, Spanky.
My founders were better than your founders. I've forgotten more about the founders than Daws ever learned. Look Daws, I can be as mature as you.
Obviously your massive wealth wasn't spent on education.
There's a good Christian. You can feel better about yourself by poking fun at someone with medical issues.You're delusional.
Wow, you don't know how bad you just put her down. She is a college professor. You know what college is, don't you?
Oregon professor: Climate change skeptics diseased, need treatment - Spokane Conservative | Examiner.com
When I dream about you at night, this is the picture that comes to mind...
All kidding aside, I located this pic of Rugged Touch from her Islam hating forum days...
my guess is U.r. is a Kobe Bryant sausage spanker kind of guy or guns and ammo ?All kidding aside, I located this pic of Rugged Touch from her Islam hating forum days...
Yet more of your pathetic attempts at begging for my attention.
What's strange is that during you frequent episodes of masturbation, is that the image you pleasure yourself to?
my guess is U.r. is a Kobe Bryant sausage spanker kind of guy or guns and ammo ?All kidding aside, I located this pic of Rugged Touch from her Islam hating forum days...
Yet more of your pathetic attempts at begging for my attention.
What's strange is that during you frequent episodes of masturbation, is that the image you pleasure yourself to?
Now, if you'll excuse me, dear emotional cripple from the surreal frontiers of fringe lunacy, good day/evening to you, and thanks again - for your twisted insight, entertainment, and continued existence as far away from me as possible.
Now, if you'll excuse me, dear emotional cripple from the surreal frontiers of fringe lunacy, good day/evening to you, and thanks again - for your twisted insight, entertainment, and continued existence as far away from me as possible.
Could it be really true? Please tell me you aren't joking? You are finally leaving the thread forever!?!?!?!
"Ann Gauger and I have shown that Darwin's mechanism cannot accomplish what appears to be one of the more favorable functional transitions among proteins. Specifically, we've presented experimental evidence that the protein pictured here on the left cannot evolve to perform the function of the protein shown on the right, despite their striking similarity and the generous assumptions we granted.
We completely agree with Moran that this exact transition never happened in the history of enzyme evolution (and said as much in our paper). But evidently we expect more of Darwin's theory than he does. In particular, we expect it to conform to the established norm of offering universal principles instead of just-so stories."
Are We Reaching a Consensus that Evolution Is Past Its Prime? - Evolution News & Views
Soon folks are going to start waking up to the fantasy that is the TOE. People will look back and wonder how so many educated people (Daws, Loki, and Hollie excluded) could have fallen for the Darwinian myth.
Wow, post up a couple of pics and the peanut gallery goes crazy!!!! ... projecting all their own sick, twisted, and deviant materialistic behaviors on me. Ewwwwww! Gross.
