Daily Presidential Tracking Poll

just to make sure the k00ks got to see this awesome news!!!!!:oops:

It's just all the people who couldn't afford their loans in the first place letting them go.

It's got to happen at some point.

Meanwhile the economy is otherwise showing every sign of receovery.

Which makes me happy. :clap2:

It should make you all happy too, but it doesn't, because you all don't really care about the country when your party can't take credit for success.
 
Who started fannie and freddie which boomed the sub prime.

Fannie and Freddie were only responsible for roughly a quarter of the Sub-Primes. The rest of the mess was caused by private mortgage lenders and the Wall Street financial industry.
 
RealClearPolitics - RealClearPolitics Poll Averages

For those interested in comparing the Rasmussen poll with several others, follow the link. Clearly Rasmussen is not the be all end all of polls. In fact it is out of sync with the rest. How can that be? And why would someone post only one poll (unless, OMG, the post is for propaganda purposes!)?
 
RealClearPolitics - RealClearPolitics Poll Averages

For those interested in comparing the Rasmussen poll with several others, follow the link. Clearly Rasmussen is not the be all end all of polls. In fact it is out of sync with the rest. How can that be? And why would someone post only one poll (unless, OMG, the post is for propaganda purposes!)?

The rest?

Really???

RCP includes the CBS News poll with a difference of 22 points, and you don't consider THAT an outlier?

You shitstains are incredble....:lol:
 
RealClearPolitics - RealClearPolitics Poll Averages

For those interested in comparing the Rasmussen poll with several others, follow the link. Clearly Rasmussen is not the be all end all of polls. In fact it is out of sync with the rest. How can that be? And why would someone post only one poll (unless, OMG, the post is for propaganda purposes!)?

The rest?

Really???

RCP includes the CBS News poll with a difference of 22 points, and you don't consider THAT an outlier?

You shitstains are incredble....:lol:

vulgar insults aside - that is exactly why poll averages provide a better snapshot than does a single one of the outliers.
 
RealClearPolitics - RealClearPolitics Poll Averages

For those interested in comparing the Rasmussen poll with several others, follow the link. Clearly Rasmussen is not the be all end all of polls. In fact it is out of sync with the rest. How can that be? And why would someone post only one poll (unless, OMG, the post is for propaganda purposes!)?

The rest?

Really???

RCP includes the CBS News poll with a difference of 22 points, and you don't consider THAT an outlier?

You shitstains are incredble....:lol:

vulgar insults aside - that is exactly why poll averages provide a better snapshot than does a single one of the outliers.

Except many of you libs want to discount Rassmusen as an outlier but say nothing about SeeBSNews and even that other meaningless one from ABC.WashCompost...

Barry is sliding, boys & girls... You can spin it as much as you want, but people are noticing that the emperor has no clothes...
 
The rest?

Really???

RCP includes the CBS News poll with a difference of 22 points, and you don't consider THAT an outlier?

You shitstains are incredble....:lol:

vulgar insults aside - that is exactly why poll averages provide a better snapshot than does a single one of the outliers.

Except many of you libs want to discount Rassmusen as an outlier but say nothing about SeeBSNews and even that other meaningless one from ABC.WashCompost...

Barry is sliding, boys & girls... You can spin it as much as you want, but people are noticing that the emperor has no clothes...

I discount ALL outliers - you don't see me posting a left-leaning outlier constantly now do you? Nope - I always hearken back to the RCP average and other averages.

The "dropping like a stone" piece of wishful thinking just isn't there - try clicking your heels three times when you say it - maybe that will help.
 
I discount ALL outliers - you don't see me posting a left-leaning outlier constantly now do you? Nope - I always hearken back to the RCP average and other averages.

The "dropping like a stone" piece of wishful thinking just isn't there - try clicking your heels three times when you say it - maybe that will help.

No need to click heels, nobraininnahead... Open your eyes... Even INCLUDING all the outliers the graph shows a marked downturn in your 0ssiah's approval... Facts are facts dispite your blindness to them....
 
RealClearPolitics - RealClearPolitics Poll Averages

For those interested in comparing the Rasmussen poll with several others, follow the link. Clearly Rasmussen is not the be all end all of polls. In fact it is out of sync with the rest. How can that be? And why would someone post only one poll (unless, OMG, the post is for propaganda purposes!)?

The rest?

Really???

RCP includes the CBS News poll with a difference of 22 points, and you don't consider THAT an outlier?

You shitstains are incredble....:lol:
no kidding
the outliers are CNN, SeeBS, ABC

Gallop, Rasmussen, Fox News, Marist are all within 6 points of eachother
 
RealClearPolitics - RealClearPolitics Poll Averages

For those interested in comparing the Rasmussen poll with several others, follow the link. Clearly Rasmussen is not the be all end all of polls. In fact it is out of sync with the rest. How can that be? And why would someone post only one poll (unless, OMG, the post is for propaganda purposes!)?

Right, because of those they poll:

TPM Election Central | Talking Points Memo | Grading The National Polls: Rasmussen In First, Gallup And Zogby Last

Grading The National Polls: Rasmussen In First, Gallup And Zogby Last
By Eric Kleefeld - November 5, 2008, 2:46PM

So looking back on our polling obsession about this race, which pollsters actually did the best job of calling this race, comparing the final polls to the actual results?

Taking a look at the national polls, who was correct in predicting Barack Obama at around 52%, and who got the right margin of a six-point popular vote win over John McCain?

Take a look at these final polls:

Rasmussen: Obama 52%, McCain 46%
GWU: Obama 49%, McCain 44%

Research 2000: Obama 51% McCain 46%

Zogby: Obama 54%, McCain 43%

IBD/TIPP: Obama 48%, McCain 42%

ABC/WaPo: Obama 53%, McCain 44%

CBS: Obama 51%, McCain 42%

Fox News: Obama 50%, McCain 43%

Ipsos/McClatchy: Obama 50%, McCain 42%.

Hotline/Diageo: Obama 50%, McCain 45%

Gallup: Obama 53%, McCain 42%​

Most of these polls were on target with Obama winning by five to seven points, and quite a few of them had him in the neighborhood of 52% support. The first prize goes to Rasmussen for nailing the 52%-46% figure exactly. Research 2000 is close behind with their 51%-46% figure. Gallup was way off in giving Obama an 11-point win, but they did have Obama's support at just over the true result of 52%. And Zogby also gave Obama an 11-point lead, at a 54% level of support.

Also, the final Pew poll allocated its undecideds based on demographics and answers to key issue questions. Their prediction: Obama 52%, McCain 46%
 
The rest?

Really???

RCP includes the CBS News poll with a difference of 22 points, and you don't consider THAT an outlier?

You shitstains are incredble....:lol:

vulgar insults aside - that is exactly why poll averages provide a better snapshot than does a single one of the outliers.

Except many of you libs want to discount Rassmusen as an outlier but say nothing about SeeBSNews and even that other meaningless one from ABC.WashCompost...

Barry is sliding, boys & girls... You can spin it as much as you want, but people are noticing that the emperor has no clothes...

His 'slide' ended 2 months ago.
 
RealClearPolitics - RealClearPolitics Poll Averages

For those interested in comparing the Rasmussen poll with several others, follow the link. Clearly Rasmussen is not the be all end all of polls. In fact it is out of sync with the rest. How can that be? And why would someone post only one poll (unless, OMG, the post is for propaganda purposes!)?

Right, because of those they poll:

TPM Election Central | Talking Points Memo | Grading The National Polls: Rasmussen In First, Gallup And Zogby Last

Grading The National Polls: Rasmussen In First, Gallup And Zogby Last
By Eric Kleefeld - November 5, 2008, 2:46PM

So looking back on our polling obsession about this race, which pollsters actually did the best job of calling this race, comparing the final polls to the actual results?

Taking a look at the national polls, who was correct in predicting Barack Obama at around 52%, and who got the right margin of a six-point popular vote win over John McCain?

Take a look at these final polls:

Rasmussen: Obama 52%, McCain 46%
GWU: Obama 49%, McCain 44%

Research 2000: Obama 51% McCain 46%

Zogby: Obama 54%, McCain 43%

IBD/TIPP: Obama 48%, McCain 42%

ABC/WaPo: Obama 53%, McCain 44%

CBS: Obama 51%, McCain 42%

Fox News: Obama 50%, McCain 43%

Ipsos/McClatchy: Obama 50%, McCain 42%.

Hotline/Diageo: Obama 50%, McCain 45%

Gallup: Obama 53%, McCain 42%​

Most of these polls were on target with Obama winning by five to seven points, and quite a few of them had him in the neighborhood of 52% support. The first prize goes to Rasmussen for nailing the 52%-46% figure exactly. Research 2000 is close behind with their 51%-46% figure. Gallup was way off in giving Obama an 11-point win, but they did have Obama's support at just over the true result of 52%. And Zogby also gave Obama an 11-point lead, at a 54% level of support.

Also, the final Pew poll allocated its undecideds based on demographics and answers to key issue questions. Their prediction: Obama 52%, McCain 46%

I'm amazed more people don't see the GLARING FLAW in that 'study'. Who wants to be the first to point it out?
 
RealClearPolitics - RealClearPolitics Poll Averages

For those interested in comparing the Rasmussen poll with several others, follow the link. Clearly Rasmussen is not the be all end all of polls. In fact it is out of sync with the rest. How can that be? And why would someone post only one poll (unless, OMG, the post is for propaganda purposes!)?

Right, because of those they poll:

TPM Election Central | Talking Points Memo | Grading The National Polls: Rasmussen In First, Gallup And Zogby Last

Grading The National Polls: Rasmussen In First, Gallup And Zogby Last
By Eric Kleefeld - November 5, 2008, 2:46PM

So looking back on our polling obsession about this race, which pollsters actually did the best job of calling this race, comparing the final polls to the actual results?

Taking a look at the national polls, who was correct in predicting Barack Obama at around 52%, and who got the right margin of a six-point popular vote win over John McCain?

Take a look at these final polls:

Rasmussen: Obama 52%, McCain 46%
GWU: Obama 49%, McCain 44%

Research 2000: Obama 51% McCain 46%

Zogby: Obama 54%, McCain 43%

IBD/TIPP: Obama 48%, McCain 42%

ABC/WaPo: Obama 53%, McCain 44%

CBS: Obama 51%, McCain 42%

Fox News: Obama 50%, McCain 43%

Ipsos/McClatchy: Obama 50%, McCain 42%.

Hotline/Diageo: Obama 50%, McCain 45%

Gallup: Obama 53%, McCain 42%​

Most of these polls were on target with Obama winning by five to seven points, and quite a few of them had him in the neighborhood of 52% support. The first prize goes to Rasmussen for nailing the 52%-46% figure exactly. Research 2000 is close behind with their 51%-46% figure. Gallup was way off in giving Obama an 11-point win, but they did have Obama's support at just over the true result of 52%. And Zogby also gave Obama an 11-point lead, at a 54% level of support.

Also, the final Pew poll allocated its undecideds based on demographics and answers to key issue questions. Their prediction: Obama 52%, McCain 46%

I'm amazed more people don't see the GLARING FLAW in that 'study'. Who wants to be the first to point it out?

Please, genius, do so.
 

I'm amazed more people don't see the GLARING FLAW in that 'study'. Who wants to be the first to point it out?

Please, genius, do so.

Obama didn't win 52 - 46. The nonsense you posted was prematurely compiled based on premature, inaccurate election results. Go look at the official results.

Genius.

The funniest part of this is, the wingnut Rasmussen worshippers don't even care that they're using the wrong data to claim that Rasmussen was the closest poll. I'm guessing you don't either.
 
Last edited:
vulgar insults aside - that is exactly why poll averages provide a better snapshot than does a single one of the outliers.

Except many of you libs want to discount Rassmusen as an outlier but say nothing about SeeBSNews and even that other meaningless one from ABC.WashCompost...

Barry is sliding, boys & girls... You can spin it as much as you want, but people are noticing that the emperor has no clothes...

His 'slide' ended 2 months ago.

Only to the ill informed... Charts are trending down, not up, oh Idiot from Ithica....
 
Rasmussen IS the outlier... that isn't a "lib" thing (though please define "lib" that's simple fact based on all poll results.

The only ones that come in below 50% are fauxnews and rasmussen.

the average is about 53% approval.

what on earth are you talking about? do you make this stuff up as you go along?
 

Forum List

Back
Top