Dear GOP blog trolls: Drop Benghazi, Nobody Cares About Manufactuired Old News

What Do You Think About Benghazi?

  • It's important. We need to know every detail.

    Votes: 68 67.3%
  • Ambivalent, don't really care even if it's found dems did something wrong.

    Votes: 1 1.0%
  • It has the opposite effect the GOP wants: now I'm suspicious of THEM.

    Votes: 26 25.7%
  • other, see my post

    Votes: 6 5.9%

  • Total voters
    101
Study: Bush, aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war





This is why no one believes that those conservatives who have seized on the Benghazi story are motivated by justice. Even Fox News couldn't spin that count.

So those of you who are crying government corruption, or claiming that those of us who see Benghazi as a non-story "don't care" about the deaths of four Americans: just stop.

Dear Paperman: Even if nobody believes the motivations of petitioners,
where they do have a valid argument, that objection should be redressed.

Even if rape happens to a prostitute, a convict in jail, or someone else with zero reputation or no good motive at all by our assessment, it is still a crime and not excusable to be dismissed just because we don't relate to the victim.

We need to quit this habit of overlooking wrongs for politics, because when it is our turn to object to wrongdoing, we don't want that ignored just because someone doesn't agree with our politics. That is why corporate crooks get away with rooking taxpayers left and right; perhaps if we stood together and went after all corruption equally we might stop these abuses.

I agree with the heart of everything you've said. But my post was directed at Benghazi Truthers, who climb on their high horse when argued with and claim they are motivated by a search for "the truth" and suggest others don't care about dead Americans. Since this story is being transparently pushed for political points with a fervor not seen for any other, non-Obama-related scandal, I find that incredibly disingenuous.

Moreover, I consider it dishonest to go after people here who genuinely want to know why our government acted the way it did in Benghazi, without going after the people who tried to say that Bush was involved in the 9/11/01 attacks. We all have our kooks, your heart is in the right place, but you must know that Benghazi is a conspiracy, and the evidence is pointing in that direction. This isn't some wild goose chase. Maybe our politicians don't care, but we do.
 
Ambivalent

A political appointee who funneled arms around the mid-east was abandoned to fate by his political boss.

:eusa_boohoo:
 
The old guard at the GOP learns slow... Maybe they're senile?

WASHINGTON) -- Republicans are again calling for a joint committee to investigate the Obama administration's handling of the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya on Sept. 11, 2012 that left four Americans dead, including Ambassador Chris Stevens.

Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire say that there are still no clear answers as to what happened on the night of the siege that was initially blamed on a mob protesting an anti-Islam film produced in the U.S.

GOP lawmakers have charged the White House with trying to cover up the facts in order to burnish President Obama's foreign policy credentials during a heated reelection bid.

Speaking for his colleagues, McCain told reporters at a press briefing Wednesday, "We will not stop until this issue is completely well known to the American people.

Read On ABC News Radio: GOP Senators Pushing Again for Joint Committee on*Benghazi - Politics News - ABC News Radio
So, yeah. We get it. You want to witch hunt Hillary & the dems over this curiously manufactured crisis that happened, again, on "9-11" just on the eve of a pivotal election year 2012.

We all know about how middle voter people tend to vote when they are afraid of a crisis: republican, obviously...the "father figure" party. So what were terrorists thinking striking so close to a pivotal American election when doing so would surely give the GOP an advantage...when they know the GOP is the party all-about invading their countries, meddling in their affairs and all about oil? Doesn't add up.

Anyway...

Even if it did make sense and the dems were negligent, it's OLD NEWS and the GOP's illegal invasion of Iraq where tens of thousands were killed pales the story of Benghazi, where less than 10 Americans were killed.

Again, doesn't add up.

The more the GOP harps on Benghazi, the more people in the middle will lean left. It has become beyond obvious what is going on. If the GOP wants a chance, they should pay attention to the yawns and the switching of channels when they start up on it again. It's hard to stump to a crowd when they're walking away..
Ever heard this sort of argument before?: "Why do the REPs keep harping on an issue that nobody wants to hear about anymore? Don't they understand that by continuing to do so they are only losing votes? Why don't they just stop bringing the matter up?".
The hilarious part is of course if in fact this were the case any LIB with two brain cells to rub together would keep their mouth shut and let those 'Stuuuuupid' REPs run their mouths and lose the election by bringing the 'old news' up nobody whats to hear about.
But LIBs are too fucking dumb to understand such a simple concept.
We'll see the result of all the LIB 'free advice' in the fall. LOL
 
The old guard at the GOP learns slow... Maybe they're senile?

WASHINGTON) -- Republicans are again calling for a joint committee to investigate the Obama administration's handling of the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya on Sept. 11, 2012 that left four Americans dead, including Ambassador Chris Stevens.

Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire say that there are still no clear answers as to what happened on the night of the siege that was initially blamed on a mob protesting an anti-Islam film produced in the U.S.

GOP lawmakers have charged the White House with trying to cover up the facts in order to burnish President Obama's foreign policy credentials during a heated reelection bid.

Speaking for his colleagues, McCain told reporters at a press briefing Wednesday, "We will not stop until this issue is completely well known to the American people.

Read On ABC News Radio: GOP Senators Pushing Again for Joint Committee on*Benghazi - Politics News - ABC News Radio
So, yeah. We get it. You want to witch hunt Hillary & the dems over this curiously manufactured crisis that happened, again, on "9-11" just on the eve of a pivotal election year 2012.

We all know about how middle voter people tend to vote when they are afraid of a crisis: republican, obviously...the "father figure" party. So what were terrorists thinking striking so close to a pivotal American election when doing so would surely give the GOP an advantage...when they know the GOP is the party all-about invading their countries, meddling in their affairs and all about oil? Doesn't add up.

Anyway...

Even if it did make sense and the dems were negligent, it's OLD NEWS and the GOP's illegal invasion of Iraq where tens of thousands were killed pales the story of Benghazi, where less than 10 Americans were killed.

Again, doesn't add up.

The more the GOP harps on Benghazi, the more people in the middle will lean left. It has become beyond obvious what is going on. If the GOP wants a chance, they should pay attention to the yawns and the switching of channels when they start up on it again. It's hard to stump to a crowd when they're walking away..

It's amusing to watch you liberals do this song and dance, Sil...

The Obama Administration lies to the American people...hides key evidence from Congress...stonewalls the investigation into Benghazi every step of the way...and then when Freedom of Information lawsuits FINALLY reveal what they did...you declare that it's "OLD NEWS".

It's only "OLD" because Barry & Friends have spent the better part of a year and a half lying to the American people about what happened in Benghazi. This is the Administration that had the nerve to label itself "the most transparent Administration in history" right before they made the Nixon White House look honest.

That's what you're here defending...
 
The old guard at the GOP learns slow... Maybe they're senile?

WASHINGTON) -- Republicans are again calling for a joint committee to investigate the Obama administration's handling of the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya on Sept. 11, 2012 that left four Americans dead, including Ambassador Chris Stevens.

Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire say that there are still no clear answers as to what happened on the night of the siege that was initially blamed on a mob protesting an anti-Islam film produced in the U.S.

GOP lawmakers have charged the White House with trying to cover up the facts in order to burnish President Obama's foreign policy credentials during a heated reelection bid.

Speaking for his colleagues, McCain told reporters at a press briefing Wednesday, "We will not stop until this issue is completely well known to the American people.

Read On ABC News Radio: GOP Senators Pushing Again for Joint Committee on*Benghazi - Politics News - ABC News Radio
So, yeah. We get it. You want to witch hunt Hillary & the dems over this curiously manufactured crisis that happened, again, on "9-11" just on the eve of a pivotal election year 2012.

We all know about how middle voter people tend to vote when they are afraid of a crisis: republican, obviously...the "father figure" party. So what were terrorists thinking striking so close to a pivotal American election when doing so would surely give the GOP an advantage...when they know the GOP is the party all-about invading their countries, meddling in their affairs and all about oil? Doesn't add up.

Anyway...

Even if it did make sense and the dems were negligent, it's OLD NEWS and the GOP's illegal invasion of Iraq where tens of thousands were killed pales the story of Benghazi, where less than 10 Americans were killed.

Again, doesn't add up.

The more the GOP harps on Benghazi, the more people in the middle will lean left. It has become beyond obvious what is going on. If the GOP wants a chance, they should pay attention to the yawns and the switching of channels when they start up on it again. It's hard to stump to a crowd when they're walking away..

It's amusing to watch you liberals do this song and dance, Sil...

The Obama Administration lies to the American people...hides key evidence from Congress...stonewalls the investigation into Benghazi every step of the way...and then when Freedom of Information lawsuits FINALLY reveal what they did...you declare that it's "OLD NEWS".

It's only "OLD" because Barry & Friends have spent the better part of a year and a half lying to the American people about what happened in Benghazi. This is the Administration that had the nerve to label itself "the most transparent Administration in history" right before they made the Nixon White House look honest.

That's what you're here defending...

They called Nixon a Crook, the most dishonest President we ever had - yet the evidence against Obama and Company is overwhelming in comparison to what Nixon was charged with - absolutely overwhelming -yet he gets away with it.

The same of The Clinton Regime - he should be twiddling his thumbs in a Federal Prison for the next several decades , yet he walked away scott free WTF !!!

The only Democrat we've had since Kennedy got whacked, that was a decent and honest Man was Jimmy Carter - Wake the Fuck up People - You've lost your Country.

Lyndon Johnson - Racist, Gangster, possible murderer
Richard Nixon - Great Leader / Took the Blame for Johnsons Screw Ups / Crooked
Gerald Ford - Warren Commission cover up ... Nixon Lackey / Crooked
Jimmy Carter - Poor Leader - Great Humanitarian
Ronald Reagan - Great Leader / Should be on Mt. Rushmore
Geo. H W Bush SR - okay guy - not a great leader
Bill Clinton - WTF !!!
George W. Bush - Poor Judgement - Iraq
Barrack Obama - Holy Shit - This was a Bad Dream Right ?
 
Last edited:
Nutters have managed to put together an impressive string of lies regarding what happened at Benghazi and after. False claims, words taken out of context, intentionally misleading testimony......all easily debunked or explained in context.
 
Drop Benghazi, Nobody Cares About Manufactuired Old News. I doubt the families of Chris Stevens,Tyrone Woods, Glen Doherty, and Sean Smith feel this way.

You forgot a few. How about all the men and women who went to fight in the Iraq invasion, courtesy of the lies the GOP told Congress, who either died, were mutilated and/or have PTSD for life? You'll need more bandwidth to list all of them..

Very old talking point and one that has been debunked many times.
 
The Libs are still uniting around their talking points.
Truth is Obama put getting reelected ahead of his Constitutional responsibilities and lied to cover up for it. We not only need to know the whole truth, somebody or bodies should go to prison for this.
Obstruction of justice, perjury, at the least, negligent homicide, maybe.
 
Drop Benghazi, Nobody Cares About Manufactuired Old News. I doubt the families of Chris Stevens,Tyrone Woods, Glen Doherty, and Sean Smith feel this way.

You forgot a few. How about all the men and women who went to fight in the Iraq invasion, courtesy of the lies the GOP told Congress, who either died, were mutilated and/or have PTSD for life? You'll need more bandwidth to list all of them..

Courtesy of lies the GOP told ....yeah Okay ... but I would hardly callthem Lies , more like unsubstantiated facts which came from both sides of the fence.

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003


So when did these clowns join the GOP ???
 
Last edited:
what A LOT of rw hacks here don't seem to know is that "facility" was owned/operated by a certain *cough* "agency" of the gov't :eusa_shhh: and the rw morans keep broadcasting it to the world, w/ their partisan witch hunts, to score cheap political points :eusa_clap:

a few of them MAY be aware of this but they put party before country :( :up: today's Repubs :rolleyes: THIS is why you people keep losing elections :boohoo:
 
Last edited:
It would be a joyous day to see Obama and Hillary wearing their brand new orange jump suits, unfortunately it would not bring back the four innocent people whom they so callously and cruelly abandoned.

Yes, even in January, 2013, Hillary was tired of it all and dismissing it as irrelevant. It made no difference to her then, but her tune may have changed, since. Her decision whether to run in `16 may hinge upon the outcome of an ongoing investigation.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
what A LOT of rw hacks here don't seem to know is that "facility" was owned/operated by a certain *cough* "agency" of the gov't :eusa_shhh: and the rw morans keep broadcasting it to the world, w/ their partisan witch hunts, to score cheap political points :eusa_clap:

a few of them MAY be aware of this but they put party before country :( :up: today's Repubs :rolleyes: THIS is why you people keep losing elections :lol: :boohoo:

There are some RW Morans

Such as Jerry Moran from Kansas , Jim Moran from Iowa, Stacey Moran from New York.

So what are you trying to broadcast to the World - that you're a MORON or that there are right wingers named Moran ?

But ...hey ...What Difference does it Make !!!
 
Last edited:
what A LOT of rw hacks here don't seem to know is that "facility" was owned/operated by a certain *cough* "agency" of the gov't :eusa_shhh: and the rw morans keep broadcasting it to the world, w/ their partisan witch hunts, to score cheap political points :eusa_clap:

a few of them MAY be aware of this but they put party before country :( :up: today's Repubs :rolleyes: THIS is why you people keep losing elections :lol: :boohoo:

There are some RW Morans

Such as Jerry Moran from Kansas , Jim Moran from Iowa, Stacey Moran from New York.

So what are you trying to broadcast to the World - that you're a MORON or that there are right wingers named Moran ?

But ...hey ...What Difference does it Make !!!

^^^^doesn't get the reference^^^^
 
The old guard at the GOP learns slow... Maybe they're senile?

WASHINGTON) -- Republicans are again calling for a joint committee to investigate the Obama administration's handling of the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya on Sept. 11, 2012 that left four Americans dead, including Ambassador Chris Stevens.

Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire say that there are still no clear answers as to what happened on the night of the siege that was initially blamed on a mob protesting an anti-Islam film produced in the U.S.

GOP lawmakers have charged the White House with trying to cover up the facts in order to burnish President Obama's foreign policy credentials during a heated reelection bid.

Speaking for his colleagues, McCain told reporters at a press briefing Wednesday, "We will not stop until this issue is completely well known to the American people.

Read On ABC News Radio: http://abcnewsradioonline.com/politics-news/gop-senators-pushing-again-for-joint-committee-on-benghazi.html#ixzz30Zi9C35D]GOP Senators Pushing Again for Joint Committee on*Benghazi - Politics News - ABC News Radio[/COLOR]
So, yeah. We get it. You want to witch hunt Hillary & the dems over this curiously manufactured crisis that happened, again, on "9-11" just on the eve of a pivotal election year 2012.

We all know about how middle voter people tend to vote when they are afraid of a crisis: republican, obviously...the "father figure" party. So what were terrorists thinking striking so close to a pivotal American election when doing so would surely give the GOP an advantage...when they know the GOP is the party all-about invading their countries, meddling in their affairs and all about oil? Doesn't add up.

Anyway...

Even if it did make sense and the dems were negligent, it's OLD NEWS and the GOP's illegal invasion of Iraq where tens of thousands were killed pales the story of Benghazi, where less than 10 Americans were killed.

Again, doesn't add up.

The more the GOP harps on Benghazi, the more people in the middle will lean left. It has become beyond obvious what is going on. If the GOP wants a chance, they should pay attention to the yawns and the switching of channels when they start up on it again. It's hard to stump to a crowd when they're walking away..

Your link is Old News ~ Thursday, April 10, 2014.... You can try to keep on spinning that old news but it's not going to change the facts.
Liberals along with the suck butt MSM are coming out full force to try to make this go away. Not going to happen.
Judicial Watch: Benghazi Documents Point to White House on Misleading Talking Points | Judicial Watch
:laugh2:
 
Last edited:
what A LOT of rw hacks here don't seem to know is that "facility" was owned/operated by a certain *cough* "agency" of the gov't :eusa_shhh: and the rw morans keep broadcasting it to the world, w/ their partisan witch hunts, to score cheap political points :eusa_clap:

a few of them MAY be aware of this but they put party before country :( :up: today's Repubs :rolleyes: THIS is why you people keep losing elections :lol: :boohoo:

There are some RW Morans

Such as Jerry Moran from Kansas , Jim Moran from Iowa, Stacey Moran from New York.

So what are you trying to broadcast to the World - that you're a MORON or that there are right wingers named Moran ?

But ...hey ...What Difference does it Make !!!

^^^^doesn't get the reference^^^^

Doesn't agree with it . But Hey .... What Difference does it Make !!!
 
The Libs are still uniting around their talking points.
Truth is Obama put getting reelected ahead of his Constitutional responsibilities and lied to cover up for it. We not only need to know the whole truth, somebody or bodies should go to prison for this.
Obstruction of justice, perjury, at the least, negligent homicide, maybe.

Give Obama a Break, show a little empathy - after all , this is his first real job.
 
Does anyone really expect ignorant white trash Southern Republicans to drop Benghazi? These are the same people who still fly their Confederate flags as if its something to be proud of. They don't know how to lose. They still want abortion outlawed, they still think that they can outlaw gay marriage, and they still want the drug war to continue even after you show them that marijuana saved America during World War II. They are complaining about someone using the argument that "that was two years ago," but when someone points out that we're still paying off the trillions of dollars squandered by fiscal conservatives on Iraq over lies, these people use the excuse that "that was six years ago." These people can't be reasoned with, they refuse to learn or advance, and they can't admit that they are wrong. All that the Republican party can do is try to tear Obama down to make him look as bad as Bush, but they get that entirely wrong because they're morons. They have to do this because they know that they don't have any realistic ideas for America.

George W. Bush needs to hang for war crimes. Whatever that you think Benghazi was, Iraq was infinitely worse. You can quote Democrats talking about WMD all day long but the official government documents say that the Bush administration used false information to justify the invasion. The official government documents are online at the National Security Archives at GWU.edu, not that anyone is going to read them.

https://www.google.com/search?q=gwu+iraq&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:eek:fficial&client=firefox-a&channel=sb
https://www.google.com/search?q=gwu+torture&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:eek:fficial&client=firefox-a&channel=sb
https://www.google.com/search?q=curveball+lied&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:eek:fficial&client=firefox-a&channel=sb
 
Does anyone really expect ignorant white trash Southern Republicans to drop Benghazi? These are the same people who still fly their Confederate flags as if its something to be proud of. They don't know how to lose. They still want abortion outlawed, they still think that they can outlaw gay marriage, and they still want the drug war to continue even after you show them that marijuana saved America during World War II. They are complaining about someone using the argument that "that was two years ago," but when someone points out that we're still paying off the trillions of dollars squandered by fiscal conservatives on Iraq over lies, these people use the excuse that "that was six years ago." These people can't be reasoned with, they refuse to learn or advance, and they can't admit that they are wrong. All that the Republican party can do is try to tear Obama down to make him look as bad as Bush, but they get that entirely wrong because they're morons. They have to do this because they know that they don't have any realistic ideas for America.

George W. Bush needs to hang for war crimes. Whatever that you think Benghazi was, Iraq was infinitely worse. You can quote Democrats talking about WMD all day long but the official government documents say that the Bush administration used false information to justify the invasion. The official government documents are online at the National Security Archives at GWU.edu, not that anyone is going to read them.

https://www.google.com/search?q=gwu+iraq&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:eek:fficial&client=firefox-a&channel=sb
https://www.google.com/search?q=gwu+torture&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:eek:fficial&client=firefox-a&channel=sb
https://www.google.com/search?q=curveball+lied&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:eek:fficial&client=firefox-a&channel=sb

These are the same people who still fly their Confederate flags as if its something to be proud of.

I never have to delve deeply into your posts to find the half truths and blatant ignorance.

The Confederate flag “southern cross” was never the official flag of the C.S.A. The Confederate flag is a symbol of heritage, not a symbol of hate.

The flag symbolizes a Southern society that regrettably included slavery as a component. To write the usage and display of the Confederate flag off as hateful because of this component, however, is a buffoonish ill informed conclusion.

H-K-Edgerton-150x200.jpg


Former Civil Rights Leader Defends Flying Confederate Flag

As for the rest of your post - sorry - I'll try and contain myself ...lmao
 
Last edited:
Nutters have managed to put together an impressive string of lies regarding what happened at Benghazi and after. False claims, words taken out of context, intentionally misleading testimony......all easily debunked or explained in context.

What's amazing to me, Laugher is that liberals like yourself haven't figured out that the lies the Obama White House told were NOT for the benefit of conservatives...because we haven't believed much of anything that's come out of Barry's mouth for quite some time...no, the lies that they told were for liberals like you. What's you don't seem to grasp is that it's YOU that the Obama people think are stupid enough to buy the narrative that they've put out...that it's YOU who can look at that classified email and not realize that you got punked by these people!
 
Nutters have managed to put together an impressive string of lies regarding what happened at Benghazi and after. False claims, words taken out of context, intentionally misleading testimony......all easily debunked or explained in context.

What's amazing to me, Laugher is that liberals like yourself haven't figured out that the lies the Obama White House told were NOT for the benefit of conservatives...because we haven't believed much of anything that's come out of Barry's mouth for quite some time...no, the lies that they told were for liberals like you. What's you don't seem to grasp is that it's YOU that the Obama people think are stupid enough to buy the narrative that they've put out...that it's YOU who can look at that classified email and not realize that you got punked by these people!

What lies?
 

Forum List

Back
Top