Democrat Trump-Bashers Proven Wrong on North Korea

[protectionist]

How interesting it is on August 25, 2017, to look back to August 10, and see what confident talking liberals were saying about President Trump's tough North Korea talk

On that day, on the PBS Charlie Rose talk show, a former advisor to Hillary Clinton, Jake Sullivan, criticized Trump's "fire & fury" words as too strong. He said this kind of talk was dangerous and could cause war. He said a better approach was to work with China to soften NK.

Other Democrats also condemned Trump's warnings as reckless saber rattling.

With the benefit of hindsight, we can see how wrong Sullivan was that day. We can now see how it was the tough talk of President Trump that caused NK to moderate, and not attack Guam, or anywhere else.

And if Trump had followed the plan of his Democrat critics, and followed Obama wimp diplomacy ? The results may have been catastrophic with South Korea, Guam, and maybe even Japan attacked, like countries were attacked after Chamberlain appeased Hitler.

 

[protectionist]

As for Sullivan's China idea, that already ran its course in July, and the Chinese, instead of cutting trade with NK. they increased it 65%, as Trump noted in a tweet.

Sullivan knew the China idea had passed, but he needed something to say, when he had nothing to say

 

[BULLDOG]

T

How interesting it is on August 25, 2017, to look back to August 10, and see what confident talking liberals were saying about President Trump's tough North Korea talk

On that day, on the PBS Charlie Rose talk show, a former advisor to Hillary Clinton, Jake Sullivan, criticized Trump's "fire & fury" words as too strong. He said this kind of talk was dangerous and could cause war. He said a better approach was to work with China to soften NK.

Other Democrats also condemned Trump's warnings as reckless saber rattling.

With the benefit of hindsight, we can see how wrong Sullivan was that day. We can now see how it was the tough talk of President Trump that caused NK to moderate, and not attack Guam, or anywhere else.

And if Trump had followed the plan of his Democrat critics, and followed Obama wimp diplomacy ? The results may have been catastrophic with South Korea, Guam, and maybe even Japan attacked, like countries were attacked after Chamberlain appeased Hitler.

The only reason Trump's childish sabre rattling didn't start a nuclear war, is because even Kim, who is known to be a spoiled unstable tyrant, was more mature than Trump and dialed the rhetoric back. Trump was ready to kill countless people for his ego.

 

[my2¢]

Never bought notion that the North Koreans had the wherewithal to launch an offensive strike. The rhetoric coming out of the regime over there is propaganda to convince the natives that the guy with the funny haircut is protecting their butts.

 

[BULLDOG]

Never bought notion that the North Koreans had the wherewithal to launch an offensive strike. The rhetoric coming out of the regime over there is propaganda to convince the natives that the guy with the funny haircut is protecting their butts.

Yep, and the bloated orange fool wants to take it seriously.

 

[xband]

How interesting it is on August 25, 2017, to look back to August 10, and see what confident talking liberals were saying about President Trump's tough North Korea talk

On that day, on the PBS Charlie Rose talk show, a former advisor to Hillary Clinton, Jake Sullivan, criticized Trump's "fire & fury" words as too strong. He said this kind of talk was dangerous and could cause war. He said a better approach was to work with China to soften NK.

Other Democrats also condemned Trump's warnings as reckless saber rattling.

With the benefit of hindsight, we can see how wrong Sullivan was that day. We can now see how it was the tough talk of President Trump that caused NK to moderate, and not attack Guam, or anywhere else.

And if Trump had followed the plan of his Democrat critics, and followed Obama wimp diplomacy ? The results may have been catastrophic with South Korea, Guam, and maybe even Japan attacked, like countries were attacked after Chamberlain appeased Hitler.

Glorious Leader, Kim Jong Un promised merciless retaliation against Trump.

 

[protectionist]

T

How interesting it is on August 25, 2017, to look back to August 10, and see what confident talking liberals were saying about President Trump's tough North Korea talk

On that day, on the PBS Charlie Rose talk show, a former advisor to Hillary Clinton, Jake Sullivan, criticized Trump's "fire & fury" words as too strong. He said this kind of talk was dangerous and could cause war. He said a better approach was to work with China to soften NK.

Other Democrats also condemned Trump's warnings as reckless saber rattling.

With the benefit of hindsight, we can see how wrong Sullivan was that day. We can now see how it was the tough talk of President Trump that caused NK to moderate, and not attack Guam, or anywhere else.

And if Trump had followed the plan of his Democrat critics, and followed Obama wimp diplomacy ? The results may have been catastrophic with South Korea, Guam, and maybe even Japan attacked, like countries were attacked after Chamberlain appeased Hitler.

The only reason Trump's childish sabre rattling didn't start a nuclear war, is because even Kim, who is known to be a spoiled unstable tyrant, was more mature than Trump and dialed the rhetoric back. Trump was ready to kill countless people for his ego.

You are either lost in the woods, or you're embarrassed to admit the dumb Democrats weak approach (Neville Chamberlain; Barrack Obama) was a flunk, and the tough Trump MO was a success

Not only was Trump proven right, so were the American people for electing him for exactly this reason

 

[protectionist]

Never bought notion that the North Koreans had the wherewithal to launch an offensive strike. The rhetoric coming out of the regime over there is propaganda to convince the natives that the guy with the funny haircut is protecting their butts.

Maybe YOU never bought it but the American people sure did, with a large majority being very worried

Very possible the NK nut might have hit Guam, SK, and/or Japan if Trump had followed Democrat wimp approach.

 

[protectionist]

Never bought notion that the North Koreans had the wherewithal to launch an offensive strike. The rhetoric coming out of the regime over there is propaganda to convince the natives that the guy with the funny haircut is protecting their butts.

Yep, and the bloated orange fool wants to take it seriously.

Actually, his current light tan looks quite good.

 

[protectionist]

How interesting it is on August 25, 2017, to look back to August 10, and see what confident talking liberals were saying about President Trump's tough North Korea talk

On that day, on the PBS Charlie Rose talk show, a former advisor to Hillary Clinton, Jake Sullivan, criticized Trump's "fire & fury" words as too strong. He said this kind of talk was dangerous and could cause war. He said a better approach was to work with China to soften NK.

Other Democrats also condemned Trump's warnings as reckless saber rattling.

With the benefit of hindsight, we can see how wrong Sullivan was that day. We can now see how it was the tough talk of President Trump that caused NK to moderate, and not attack Guam, or anywhere else.

And if Trump had followed the plan of his Democrat critics, and followed Obama wimp diplomacy ? The results may have been catastrophic with South Korea, Guam, and maybe even Japan attacked, like countries were attacked after Chamberlain appeased Hitler.

Glorious Leader, Kim Jong Un promised merciless retaliation against Trump.

His current quiet is very merciful.

 

[protectionist]

More egg on Democrats' faces. 40 clueless House Democrats sent a letter to Tillerson, asking him to rein Trump in from what they called reckless talk

Tillerson blew them off. Last thing we need is more Obama candy-ass approach.

 

[BULLDOG]

Never bought notion that the North Koreans had the wherewithal to launch an offensive strike. The rhetoric coming out of the regime over there is propaganda to convince the natives that the guy with the funny haircut is protecting their butts.

Yep, and the bloated orange fool wants to take it seriously.

Actually, his current light tan looks quite good.

Sure, if you go for that orange spray tan look with raccoon like circles around your eyes.

 

[protectionist]

Never bought notion that the North Koreans had the wherewithal to launch an offensive strike. The rhetoric coming out of the regime over there is propaganda to convince the natives that the guy with the funny haircut is protecting their butts.

Yep, and the bloated orange fool wants to take it seriously.

Actually, his current light tan looks quite good.

Sure, if you go for that orange spray tan look with raccoon like circles around your eyes.

Just can't handle it that your liar hag got beat, can you ? lol

Dopey Democrats. How could they ever expect her to win ?

 

[BULLDOG]

Never bought notion that the North Koreans had the wherewithal to launch an offensive strike. The rhetoric coming out of the regime over there is propaganda to convince the natives that the guy with the funny haircut is protecting their butts.

Yep, and the bloated orange fool wants to take it seriously.

Actually, his current light tan looks quite good.

Sure, if you go for that orange spray tan look with raccoon like circles around your eyes.

Just can't handle it that your liar hag got beat, can you ? lol

Dopey Democrats. How could they ever expect her to win ?

Sure, I wish she would have won, but that election was over long time ago. She lost. The problem now is the unqualified inept fool that did win. Doesn't matter who you wanted to win, we have to deal with the fool we got.

 

[protectionist]

Never bought notion that the North Koreans had the wherewithal to launch an offensive strike. The rhetoric coming out of the regime over there is propaganda to convince the natives that the guy with the funny haircut is protecting their butts.

Yep, and the bloated orange fool wants to take it seriously.

Actually, his current light tan looks quite good.

Sure, if you go for that orange spray tan look with raccoon like circles around your eyes.

Just can't handle it that your liar hag got beat, can you ? lol

Dopey Democrats. How could they ever expect her to win ?

Sure, I wish she would have won, but that election was over long time ago. She lost. The problem now is the unqualified inept fool that did win. Doesn't matter who you wanted to win, we have to deal with the fool we got.

So to try to cover your embarrassment at being proved wrong, you pretend that Trump isn't succeeding. Well however you twist it, the egg is still all over your face.

Economy's doing great too. We just laugh at you guys.

 

[my2¢]

Never bought notion that the North Koreans had the wherewithal to launch an offensive strike. The rhetoric coming out of the regime over there is propaganda to convince the natives that the guy with the funny haircut is protecting their butts.

Maybe YOU never bought it but the American people sure did, with a large majority being very worried

Very possible the NK nut might have hit Guam, SK, and/or Japan if Trump had followed Democrat wimp approach.

Trump's rattling too I took mostly for home consumption. I very much doubt he conveyed anything to North Korea that they didn't already know through past speak softly but carry a big stick approach.

 

[HappyJoy]

It's been 2 weeks, I don't see the point of declaring partisan victory. Especially considering that N. Korea has threatened to attack Guam in the past, this isn't the first time.

 

[Dim Bulb]

It's been 2 weeks, I don't see the point of declaring partisan victory.

There was almost certainly some back channel stuff going on. Rhetoric is an afterthought. If I had to guess, NK and US reps met, perhaps through an intermediary and agreed to ratchet their actions down. This freed up both sides to yammer their nonsense and bellicosity to the credulous. I would suspect we asked for no missile launch and they asked for the "command only" nature of the August joint military exercise to be loudly proclaimed by us to be "routine annual changeover" calibration and to move no hard military assets, all of which happened. The yammering class can focus on the rhetoric but the thinking man should focus on the details that made the deal. President Trump and Kim can play to their audiences by continuing their blather while the real diplomacy happens. There was probably an explicit discussion of continuing bellicose rhetoric by both sides in the same way that President Trump told the Mexican President that about the wall.

 

[HappyJoy]

It's been 2 weeks, I don't see the point of declaring partisan victory.

There was almost certainly some back channel stuff going on. Rhetoric is an afterthought. If I had to guess, NK and US reps met, perhaps through an intermediary and agreed to ratchet their actions down. This freed up both sides to yammer their nonsense and bellicosity to the credulous. I would suspect we asked for no missile launch and they asked for the "command only" nature of the August joint military exercise to be loudly proclaimed by us to be "routine annual changeover" calibration and to move no hard military assets, all of which happened. The yammering class can focus on the rhetoric but the thinking man should focus on the details that made the deal. President Trump and Kim can play to their audiences by continuing their blather while the real diplomacy happens. There was probably an explicit discussion of continuing bellicose rhetoric by both sides in the same way that President Trump told the Mexican President that about the wall.

I have no idea what's going on between these two a-holes. They both probably just leave it up to others (or at least should) to run their countries.

 

[BlindBoo]

Oh Please President "WWF" has been practicing that "Fire and Fury" line for decades. When that Fat-ass shoots off his mouth he is an embarrassment to this country.