Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bullshit. New York had to invent a law to go after him. Ex post facto. Against the 6th. The corrupt judge told the jury you can choose a law he broke, the DA wasn't required to prove an actual law had been broken, and he didn't. There is no underlying crime that was shown to have occurred, there's your 5th and 8th.The Jury said he did.
He is facing charges from his own actions. Not some witch-hunt.
These Marxist swine are stupid, and lying scum.You're citing lawfare to excuse THIS lawfare?
GTFOH!!!!!
Good gosh you are stupid. That's not all the 5th does.The Fifth Amendment is right against self incrimination.
Trump had a Grand Jury. He had the right against self incrimination.
As for due process. That’s been covered. I need specifics. Not just vague claims made in a shout.
Find another defendant who has ever been hit with a gag order.
You won't.
Gag orders are for the DEFENSE! They exist to protect the Rights of the ACCUSED!
Not the prosecution!
Never, in the history of this country has the accused been hit with a gag order.
Ever!
Good gosh you are stupid. That's not all the 5th does.
So, you are ignorant AND a liar.
The Fifth Amendment is right against self incrimination.
Trump had a Grand Jury. He had the right against self incrimination.
As for due process. That’s been covered. I need specifics. Not just vague claims made in a shout.
Yeah, and they were never used you moron.Well I have this. A law journal article from 1976 that discussed Gag orders on Defendants.
So you were saying?
Note. Just because you don’t know doesn’t mean it never happened. A ten second Google search would have turned up a few thousand pages.
The post directly below yours. You are to be informed of which crime you are accused of. The prosecution never did that.Ok of the five rights covered in the Fifth. Which was violated and how?
Bullshit. New York had to invent a law to go after him. Ex post facto. Against the 6th. The corrupt judge told the jury you can choose a law he broke, the DA wasn't required to prove an actual law had been broken, and he didn't. There is no underlying crime that was shown to have occurred, there's your 5th and 8th.
You are simply clueless to what the COTUS says about political prosecution.
Or you're a liar.
I'm going with the latter.
Yeah, and they were never used you moron.
He wasn't informed of what he is guilty, and neither was the jury.
Do you really want to stake a claim on this, I mean really? Gonna look foolish when it's appealed
New York law never mentions the secondary crime making this a felony, has to be a convicted crime by the defendant, to make the falsifying business record crime... a felony. The defendant could simply be covering up something illegal, done by others, the way the law is written.
Merchan followed the NY Law, Bragg followed the NY Law.... with charging him for the falsifying of business records as a felony because the evidence showed he was guilty of his business falsifying his business records to illegally reimburse Cohen for his straw donation....to Trump's political campaign, via the Stormy payment to shut her up for his political purposes.
Trump is claiming he was not charged with the secondary law broken, so he was not given due process.....if I am understanding this correctly?
Savannah, maybe I can make it clearer.For the last several pages I keep asking for specifics. And the Trump Fanboys keep screaming it just is, or you know.
In my home, when I was growing up, the old Man had two books he considered sacred. The first was the Bible. The second was a book he had gotten in college going for his degree in Criminal Justice. It was the Constitution annotated. That is the constitution with Supreme Court decisions defining it.
So my education from an early age was God and the Constitution. I joined the Army to defend one, and begged the protection of the other in my endeavor.
Claims of violations of the Constitution mean a lot to me. So I am always willing to listen and consider. My record on this board supports that.
However. I am not willing to just agree blindly. I want details. I want the information to make an informed decision. I’m probably one of the very few that read the decision from the Colorado Supreme Court on Trump and the ballot. I read every page.
So claims that I just know are rejected. Argue your point. Make reference and link to articles. Reference Supreme Court decisions. Even the dissents may support your claims.
But so far. Your claims are without merit or merit or even sanity.
The appeals court could rule the law itself, unconstitutional....higher ups in the judicial system than Bragg and Merchan would have to rule on that...
Go read a book on the COTUS. Good heavens you are ignorant.That’s not true. All prosecutions are after the fact. You can’t prosecute someone for something they haven’t done yet.
Link to the Supreme Court precedent. Or tell me what the Cotus says. Because you might be right. But your argument has to be more than this is bullshit.
New York city's certainly is. Criminals run free, people who try to defend themselves are indicted.The appeals court could rule the law itself, unconstitutional....higher ups in the judicial system than Bragg and Merchan would have to rule on that...
Our judicial system is NOT broken...!! Have a little faith, my friend...!
Best tweet of the day.
And you know he's right.
Go read a book on the COTUS. Good heavens you are ignorant.
You lost the argument dude.
