Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,452
- 82,511
LOL
That link doesn't work either, ya fucking moron.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
so yoj admit you can confirm he said it. Gotcha. Why would you expect me to prove he denied it? especially when the Committee wasn’t even willing to hear from him….clearly they didn’t want to know what he had to actually sayI never said he said it. You're thoroughly confused. But you claim he didn't say it. Yet you can't quote him or Engel denying he said it.
Trump did not attempt to grab the wheel. That would be ridiculous. It did not happen. Thus, it was all a lie.
There is no evidence he did so. None whatsoever.
The hearsay has been refuted as false, but it would be inadmissible anyway.
It is all one more big fat lie.
Tony Ornato did not brief Cassidy Hutchinson that Trump tried to lunge at Secret Service agent: sources
Sources close to the U.S. Secret Service and former Trump Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations Tony Ornato tell Fox News that the Trump did not lunge at an agent on January 6.www.foxnews.com
so yoj admit you can confirm he said it. Gotcha. Why would you expect me to prove he denied it? especially when the Committee wasn’t even willing to hear from him….clearly they didn’t want to know what he had to actually say
your entire Committee’s narrative is based on a woman who’s admitted she is willing to commit perjury, and who’s testimony is nothing it hearsay, within hearsay, within hearsay…
that’s why it’s a joke
agreed nobody, nobody can. confirm what this admitted perjurer has said, and nobody on the committee was interested in doing that. zero credibilityIt's never been confirmed or refuted. Anyone who says it has been is full of shit.
No one on the left has any credibilityagreed nobody, nobody can. confirm what this admitted perjurer has said, and nobody on the committee was interested in doing that. zero credibility
The Agents were called in to testify. Ornato said he didn't recall his conversation with Hutchinson. I posted the link for you yesterday, you lying piece of shit.
Jan. 6 Report Leaves Questions About What Happened in Trump’s S.U.V. (Published 2022)
Witnesses had less detailed recollections than the account provided by Cassidy Hutchinson of a furious president reaching for the steering wheel when told he could not go to the Capitol.www.nytimes.com
Still can't manage a single post without crying like a little bitch about Trump, and obsessive over his ass.Ornatto was a Trump appointee who owed his job to him. Hutchinson had what to gain by lying? So she could be subjected to attacks by Trump's asseaters & hacks who themselves are nothing but a bunch of liars themselves?
Take you for example who wil never get that brown smudge off your nose from having it stuffed in Trump's ass.
Still can't manage a single post without crying like a little bitch about Trump, and obsessive over his ass.She's not a perjurer, but Trump is.
Trump, who's ass your head is buried in.
Who confirmed Hutchinson's hearsay?It's never been confirmed or refuted. Anyone who says it has been is full of shit.
Who confirmed Hutchinson's hearsay?
Nodody?
Dismissed, Troll.
Exactly. Anyone can run their mouth, lets see them testify it under oath.Lol, looking forward to that testimony. Until then nothing is debunked.
First of all, there is no requirement for anyone to disprove her hearsay. However, the SS has said they are free to testify about the alleged conversation, and reports have both of them calling her a liar.LOL
And by "dismissed," you mean you still can't prove Ornata didn't tell her that story.
They offered to. Nazi Piglosi refused to call them to testify about her lies, Simp.Exactly. Anyone can run their mouth, lets see them testify it under oath.
He doesn't have to prove that. Even if he did tell her, it's hearsay.LOL
And by "dismissed," you mean you still can't prove Ornata didn't tell her that story.
First of all, there is no requirement for anyone to disprove her hearsay. However, the SS has said they are free to testify about the alleged conversation, and reports have both of them calling her a liar.
So, what exactly do you have, Simp? Hearsay by one person with nothing to back it up.
He doesn't have to prove that. Even if he did tell her, it's hearsay.
I do? Where does it say I have to prove anything to a reality denying Simp like you?Actually, you have to prove she lied since you accused her of lying. We both know you can't so your bullshit claim remains the same bullshit you always intended it to be.
I do? Where does it say I have to prove anything to a reality denying Simp like you?
There is ample evidence her hearsay has been disputed by those who were actually there. Add to that the fact her claims are physically impossible and any thinking person knows she is lying. That leaves you out, Halfwit.