toomuchtime_
Gold Member
- Dec 29, 2008
- 20,030
- 4,945
- 280
There was no personal attack. I just pointed out to you that the reasons you gave for disliking Trump, calling him dangerous, threatening violence, were all based on what you imagine to be Trumps personal qualities rather than his politics and policies, and when I pointed it out to you you seemed confused.I understand you don't like the words, but they fairly sum up what you said.In other words, all these violent thoughts of yours are based only on a personal dislike for Trump.You mean effective and you are already not effective. Polls show Trump is personally not popular but that the majority of Americans expect him to do a good job on major issues such as the economy and the fight against terrorism. So all of this insane ranting and raving about Trump has made him unpopular but has not persuaded voters that he will not do a good job. On the other hand, Obama's popularity is soaring, but in the campaign, no one paid any attention to his advocacy of Clinton or his criticisms of Trump. The WH characterizes this as having a hard time transferring his personal popularity to other politicians or issues, but what it really means is that Americans want a more effective president and they believe they have found him in Donald Trump, despite the fact they don't seem to like him personally.
I'm not really interested in polls or public opinion. My own assessment of Trump is not good. He strikes me as an ignorant, petty jerk. I hope I'm wrong. But if he's the authoritarian idiot I'm assuming, I'll fight him every inch of the way.
Nope. Wrong words.
No, they don't. You're trying to degenerate the debate into personal attacks. Not interested.