Dems- please quit whining about Garland

Soros' Pussy Hatters are in full meltdown-mode. They'll never stop whining. I find it hilarious. Great entertainment. :)
 
CryAss2.jpg
 
Soros' Pussy Hatters are in full meltdown-mode. They'll never stop whining. I find it hilarious. Great entertainment. :)

Every court needs its Jesters. Seems the ancient Fool's Hat has been replaced with another one; with an adolescent's headgear representation of human female reproductive anatomy. May they wear it proudly and, most humorously, for the rest of their nation's entertainment.
 
Soros' Pussy Hatters are in full meltdown-mode. They'll never stop whining. I find it hilarious. Great entertainment. :)

Every court needs its Jesters. Seems the ancient Fool's Hat has been replaced with another one; with an adolescent's headgear representation of human female reproductive anatomy. May they wear it proudly and, most humorously, for the rest of their nation's entertainment.

Yeah, they really don't see that rational common sense Americans see them as dumb nutters. They're an embarrassment for the Democratic Party. They might just be helping the Republicans win a few more elections come November. I'm grateful they're around. Great entertainment. :)
 
Given the performance by Schumer and his posse, the idea that this fiasco was an embarrassment to Democrats just won't wash. It was business as usual.
 
But even before Obama had named Garland, and in fact only hours after Scalia's death was announced, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell declared any appointment by the sitting president to be null and void. He said the next Supreme Court justice should be chosen by the next president — to be elected later that year.
 
But even before Obama had named Garland, and in fact only hours after Scalia's death was announced, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell declared any appointment by the sitting president to be null and void. He said the next Supreme Court justice should be chosen by the next president — to be elected later that year.

And so if they went through the process and he was still voted down, would you on the left have been any happier? Would you not be bringing it up today?

It's more temper tantrum nonsense. Kavanaugh only received one Democrat vote, and the only reason for that is because we already had enough votes to confirm.
 
Dimms know they would be taking a victory lap had they blocked the confirmation.

Don’t be hypocrites. I know it’s difficult for you guys
 
Last edited:
But even before Obama had named Garland, and in fact only hours after Scalia's death was announced, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell declared any appointment by the sitting president to be null and void. He said the next Supreme Court justice should be chosen by the next president — to be elected later that year.

And so if they went through the process and he was still voted down, would you on the left have been any happier? Would you not be bringing it up today?

It's more temper tantrum nonsense. Kavanaugh only received one Democrat vote, and the only reason for that is because we already had enough votes to confirm.
Garland is a moderate with a sterling record. If Republicans refused to seat him on party line vote...they would have looked really bad. He likely would have been confirmed...but we'll never know because McConnell refused to even consider giving him even a hearing
 
But even before Obama had named Garland, and in fact only hours after Scalia's death was announced, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell declared any appointment by the sitting president to be null and void. He said the next Supreme Court justice should be chosen by the next president — to be elected later that year.

And so if they went through the process and he was still voted down, would you on the left have been any happier? Would you not be bringing it up today?

It's more temper tantrum nonsense. Kavanaugh only received one Democrat vote, and the only reason for that is because we already had enough votes to confirm.
Garland is a moderate with a sterling record. If Republicans refused to seat him on party line vote...they would have looked really bad. He likely would have been confirmed...but we'll never know because McConnell refused to even consider giving him even a hearing

And the Democrats don't look bad by voting party line on Kavanaugh as well?
 
You all refused to give an up and down vote to John Bolton back in the day, even though he was as "entitled" to a hearing and vote as anyone else.

What goes around comes around.

Democrats Block a Vote on Bolton for the Second Time
You realize that Bolton is the neocon's neocon right?

Last I heard...Trumpers weren't too fond of neocons.

Has that changed already?


The point was that the Libs never allowed Bolton to be put up for a vote in the Senate.

And Bolton wasn't the only one, Judge Pickering was a highly qualified jurist chosen by Dubya for a federal judgeship.

And again, the libs didn't allow votes.


For Liberal to whine about Garland not getting a vote, when they did the same thing with Bush's appointees, shows their hypocrisy.
 
But even before Obama had named Garland, and in fact only hours after Scalia's death was announced, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell declared any appointment by the sitting president to be null and void. He said the next Supreme Court justice should be chosen by the next president — to be elected later that year.
Yup. Just like he declared, shortly after Obama was elected, he would do everything possible to obstruct and make him a one term memory. The Republican memory is quit deficient when it comes to the conduct of their own.
 

Forum List

Back
Top