Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You mean 40 years later. Yet, all you douchebags claim Jaunita Brodderick can't be believed for the very same reason.
Automatic as opposed to over 30 years?Show us when it surfaced before.
So because they didn't automatically run to the authorities right away (of who Moore worked closely with as he was a prosecutor), that makes what Moore did OK?
Automatic as opposed to over 30 years?
Nope...they'll elect him like they elected a pussy grabber president.Here's the thing...if the guy is guilty Conservatives across the board will demand his incarceration.
Liberals on the other hand will defend the likes of Roman Polanski till the bitter end and actually promote the behavior of these idiots.
Automatic as opposed to over 30 years?
Which of course was never proven and they all magically disappeared once the election was over,imagine that.
Here's the thing...if the guy is guilty Conservatives across the board will demand his incarceration.
Liberals on the other hand will defend the likes of Roman Polanski till the bitter end and actually promote the behavior of these idiots.
correct
seen it over and over
The con that you're playing is that there is any way to prove this exists. So since no way to prove it exists of course you ask that it gets proven while defending him with all your might.
None of you are defending Weinstein or Spacey or Cosby. Hell you guys even defended O'Reilly and he didnt believe it himself and paid out 30 million.
i am not defending anyone
i am however pointing out what kind of hypocrites you and yours are
Technically nothing until convicted, but Hollywood has known all about it for years, by admission.
And the Washington post quoted 30 different people to confirm Moore.
So The Washington Post has a conviction with evidence. Make me laugh again.
No, I said they quoted 30 different people.
Who?
30 different people vs 1 Molester.
Who you got?
So because I believe 30 people over 1 that shows that I have a problem? But you not being able to explain how to reach the solution you presented is totally normal?
No man, it’s the fact that you can’t see that all’s the sex stuff doesn’t matter a bit. It’s the lying. It’s that simple. I understand you need selatious sex and all that, but sorry man, if this sticks, it will be for lying. Nothing else.
If we are in a time where a 30 year old tries to fuck a 14 year old isnt a problem. We have a problem. Again YES the lying is the problem, we both agree with that. But when I asked HOW DO YOU PROVE HE IS LYING?
You have no answer. I have one. Offer both of them a lie detector test since the stakes and the allegation is terrible. Voila, anyone who tries to sidestep loses credibility and cant complain anymore and whoever tries to belittle the process preemptively is also suspect. Easy. Either that or keep crying in the press and hope the child fucker label doesnt stick...but why gamble with that shit?
Take that up with the woman mom. Aperantly she was cool with it.
See? Here you believe the word of the victim but only if you can blame the mother for leaving her daughter with someone in a courthouse for a minute but Moore asking and picking her up isnt his fault? Is Moore at fault for anything?
Right here you admit it’s all likely a McConnel hit job, and here you are jacking off and lapping it up like a dog. You are more excited about 14 year olds having sex then heading the story. That and you are to stupid to see it for what it is. It’s pointless to go on with you. Stick with Alex Jones.
If Moore did it is the issue. Why are you going after everyone EXCEPT the accused child molester? Is Moore at fault for at least getting the phone number of a 14 year old girl?
Any mother that would let an adult man screw their daughter should be in prision with the dude that did the screwing. But it’s a question that will be asked. See, you are blinded by your team not winning allot, so you idiots gobble it all up. 4 weeks out of an election and all you want to talk about is sex with children, or murdering them in the womb.
And the Washington post quoted 30 different people to confirm Moore.
So The Washington Post has a conviction with evidence. Make me laugh again.
No, I said they quoted 30 different people.
Who?
30 different people vs 1 Molester.
Who you got?
What I've got is one accuser who pops up after decades just prior to an election, and one accused who denies the accusation. Pushme-Pullyu.
What you have is 30 unnamed (therefore fictional until identified) supposed "confirmers" allegedly interviewed by a reporter from a premier Democratic Party newsletter.
Let's see what shakes out, eh?
So The Washington Post has a conviction with evidence. Make me laugh again.
No, I said they quoted 30 different people.
Who?
30 different people vs 1 Molester.
Who you got?
What I've got is one accuser who pops up after decades just prior to an election, and one accused who denies the accusation. Pushme-Pullyu.
What you have is 30 unnamed (therefore fictional until identified) supposed "confirmers" allegedly interviewed by a reporter from a premier Democratic Party newsletter.
Let's see what shakes out, eh?
How can we "lets see" when you've dismissed everything outright?
Except there are 30 other people who confirmed it indepently. Oh right, but in order to make it fair you throw all their words out the window because you need names. Oh, but the 4 names you do have those memories are thrown out too so the only persons word being considered is whose?Word against word with decades in between and no substantiation.
Except there are 30 other people who confirmed it indepently. Oh right, but in order to make it fair you throw all their words out the window because you need names. Oh, but the 4 names you do have those memories are thrown out too so the only persons word being considered is whose?Word against word with decades in between and no substantiation.
Except there are 30 other people who confirmed it indepently. Oh right, but in order to make it fair you throw all their words out the window because you need names. Oh, but the 4 names you do have those memories are thrown out too so the only persons word being considered is whose?Word against word with decades in between and no substantiation.
I would hit the accuser with a massive law suit and drag the bugs through the screen door.
Which of course was never proven and they all magically disappeared once the election was over,imagine that.
They didn't disappear...Fox News just stopped covering them. That's why you haven't heard about it.
What cash???Jim....did Moore have a penchant for very young girls when he was in his 30's?Bullshit. If what these women say is true, Moore should spend time behind bars. If not, then they should.
But to dismiss it out of hand, is tacit approval of it, if he did it.
And if you want to talk about desperate and sick, how about Alabama State Auditor Jim Zeigler and his comments?
He said, "Even if you accept the Washington Post’s report as being completely true, it’s much ado about very little. "
Thats right, a fellow republican thinks a sitting judge kissing and fondling a 14 year old girl is "...much ado about very little".
Of course, Zeigler didn't stop there.
“He’s clean as a hound’s tooth,” Ziegler claimed, before relying on Scripture to defend Moore.
“Take the Bible. Zachariah and Elizabeth for instance. Zachariah was extremely old to marry Elizabeth and they became the parents of John the Baptist,” Ziegler says choosing his words carefully before invoking Christ. “Also take Joseph and Mary. Mary was a teenager and Joseph was an adult carpenter. They became parents of Jesus.”
“There’s just nothing immoral or illegal here,” Ziegler concluded. “Maybe just a little bit unusual.”
1. More was not a sitting judge at the time this was said to have happened.
2. The lying little whore has zero proof to support her accusations.
3. Why wait till it is most convenient for the Democrats to try to dry up funding for Moore among donors without him having any time to disprove the slander? Oh, wait, because it is all a pack of lies, and smear from the usual suspects who accuse the GOP of being KKK every election and of wanting to run down little minority children while flying a Confederate Battle Flag.
Seriously, if you think these charges have any merit at all you are an idiot.
Why does it matter whether Moore was a judge or a prosecutor or asst prosecutor or an intern to a judge or what ever??? Did he work at the courthouse?
The issue is whether he was 32 and she was 14...isn't it?
Why are you calling her a whore?
If we are going to go with unsubstantiated rumor.... It's not the Democrats doing this, it's McConnell from what I heard....
The woman is a REPUBLICAN and voted for Trump.
Lol, prove she voted for Trump, lol.
This woman is an obvious smear operative being played by the Dems and that makes her a whore.
Anyone that will lie for cash is a whore and a slanderer.
What's the difference between what Roy Moore allegedly did and Anthony Weiner?except allegedly Moore actually touched this younger girl....and Weiner was more of a cyber sex thing?
Weiner was in real time, and convicted on evidence. Moore's accusers appeared suddenly after decades have passed, sans anything but a story.
