Mojo2
Gold Member
- Oct 28, 2013
- 6,210
- 1,026
- 190
I don't buy it.
They no longer had a navy or air force to project their armies.
A simple food and trade embargo would have sufficed (enforced by our unchallenged navy).
There was no reason to even attack the Japanese mainland.
I think it was a bunch of sick and demented fucks that wanted to demonstrate the power of their new toy to the communist USSR.
Admiral William Leahy – the highest ranking member of the U.S. military from 1942 until retiring in 1949, who was the first de facto Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and who was at the center of all major American military decisions in World War II – wrote (pg. 441):
It is my opinion that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons.
The lethal possibilities of atomic warfare in the future are frightening. My own feeling was that in being the first to use it, we had adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and children.
This country is being run by murderous sociopaths.
If the Japs had been defeated why did the fighting continue even past the 15th of August 1945?
backmarkerS_E 7 points 1 year ago
Fighting continued right up to the announcement of the surrender on 15th August 1945, though the United States had frozen its combat actions on 14th August 1945. As a result, it is near impossible to tell who fired the last shot before the surrender, though my educated guess would be a Chinese, Japanese or Soviet soldier.
Fighting, however, continued beyond the surrender. The Imperial Japanese Army did not communicate the cease-fire order to the Kwantung Army in Manchuria until the 20th August 1945, meaning that fighting between Soviet-Mongolian and the Kwantung Army continued until that date. Japanese soldiers in China had not completed their surrender until 9th September 1945, and there were isolated incidents of fighting up until that point.
Japanese garrisons on the Kuril Islands did not surrender until 23rd August 1945. The Battle of Shumshu was the final battle in the campaign, and saw 1,534 soldiers killed.
Because Japanese soldiers were conducting jungle warfare on isolated islands in the Pacific, a number of soldiers kept fighting after the surrender, either as they did not find out about the surrender, or they suspected reports of the surrender might have been enemy propaganda.
The last confirmed holdout was Teruo Nakamura, who was found on Morotai in Indonesia in December 1974, but it seems that he didn't fire his rifle for much of his time on the island as he feared that he would attract attention by doing so, so I don't think he would have fired the last shots.
Before him, Hiroo Onoda was found on the Lubang Island in the Philippines. Despite having seen a leaflet in October 1945 that declared the war was over, he and his fellow soldiers thought it was probably enemy propaganda, so continued fighting. Onoda is a good bet for having fired the last shots, as he and his fellow soldiers (who all died before his discovery) believed they were conducting a guerilla war, and killed 30 Filipinos, and was involved in a shoot-out with the police as recently as 19th October 1972. When discovered he only agreed to surrender if he was given a command to do so by his commanding officer. The Japanese government tracked down his commanding officer, who was by then a book-seller, who flew to Lubang and ordered Onoda to surrender.
Source: Japanese Army Stragglers
It's possible that there were further holdouts, but unlikely. There were two Japanese soldiers who joined communist guerillas in Thailand and were fighting until 1991, but I would exclude this as being part of the Second World War.
backmarkerS E comments on When was the last shot of World War 2 fired