Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your non-sequitur aside, I'm not seeking your forgiveness. I'm seeking consistency in the fanatical position that some sins are acceptable whereas others are not.
You said Democrats controlled the Congress. You can't get any dumber than saying that than actually trying [and failing] to defend such idiocy. The Democrats controlled the House, not the Congress. They didn't control the Senate and they didn't control the Executive branch.You dumbfuck. Even the House can't pass a budget without the approval of the Senate and the president. Don't you know that??
But even dumber than that -- you said Democrats controlled the Congress during those years. How fucking rightarded is that?
All spending bills have to originate in the House and the Dems had the balls to make the GOP respect that.
Too bad historical facts are inconvenient to your lies.
But fear not, your ignorance in U.S. civics was noted.
Again, I said nothing about Judaism being a sin. I said the Bible states eating cloved hoofed beasts is a sin...And BTW, where does the Bible say that keeping kosher is a sin? or being Jewish?
You lie, lie, lie but still lie some more.
Leviticus 11
7 and the swine, though he divide the hoof and is cloven-footed, yet he cheweth not the cud, he is unclean to you.
8 Of their flesh shall ye not eat, and their carcass shall ye not touch; they are unclean to you.
9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat.
10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you.
11 They shall be even an abomination unto you: ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall hold their carcasses in abomination.
I thought the only thing unforgiveable was blasphemy?
Not an expert on the bible, so pardon if I am in error.
Very handy. Everything you know is relevant. Everything you don't know is irrelevant, and therefore not worth knowing.
What a comfortable little cocoon you live in.
Does comprehension frequently escape you? There is plenty I don't know that is relevant.
If you don't know it, how do you know it is irrelevant, stupid ass?
Sounds as if some of you are a little intimidated with maybe being tempted or something.
Again, sin is sin. If what you're saying is true, that sinners must stop their sinful ways, that would apply to folks like Robertson, who continue to sin by eating cloved hoofed animals, eat shellfish, or wear clothes made from blended fabrics. Unless they stop their sinning ways, why would they still be accepted into the kingdom of G-d, but not homosexuals?
I don't know what to tell you. You conveniently continue to ignore that Jesus was the fulfillment of the old Law and that a new system was put into place by the hand of God through Jesus.
You insist that we cater to your notion that the OT still applies. Our belief and conviction is that it doesn't.
If that's what you think I'm saying then you don't understand what I'm saying. I'm not saying Christians should be adhering to OT laws. I'm saying that homosexuality is just one of the many sins defined in the Bible and that it's hypocritical to claim that gays are the only Christ accepting sinners who will be denied the kingdom of G-d for their sins.
Sin is sin. Again, show me where the Bible says only certain sins are condemnable....
He didn't say that, you did.
So if all sins are treated the same, how is Robertson, an unrepentant hog eater, going to inherit the kingdom of G-d, whereas homosexuals are not?
Either they're all "in" or they're all "out," isn't that right?
No one is forcing any "queer agenda" on me.
Sounds as if some of you are a little intimidated with maybe being tempted or something.
Why else are folks so hell bent on worrying what gay folks do and think?
But folks that spend their cash have a right to bitch and moan all they want and the ones paying the cash and obtaining the X on the contract rule the day.
Be they gay, queer, straight, bipolar or homosapien.
But watch out for them thespians.
I thought the only thing unforgiveable was blasphemy?
Not an expert on the bible, so pardon if I am in error.
blas·pheme
[blas-feem, blas-feem] Show IPA
verb (used with object), blas·phemed, blas·phem·ing.
1.
to speak impiously or irreverently of (God or sacred things).
Jude 1:
3 Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.
4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ....
...7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.
8 Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities....
...16 These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their mouth speaketh great swelling words, having men's persons in admiration because of advantage.
17 But, beloved, remember ye the words which were spoken before of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ;
18 How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts.
19 These be they who separate themselves, sensual, having not the Spirit....
...22 And of some have compassion, making a difference:
23 And others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by the flesh.
No one is forcing any "queer agenda" on me.
Sounds as if some of you are a little intimidated with maybe being tempted or something.
Why else are folks so hell bent on worrying what gay folks do and think?
But folks that spend their cash have a right to bitch and moan all they want and the ones paying the cash and obtaining the X on the contract rule the day.
Be they gay, queer, straight, bipolar or homosapien.
But watch out for them thespians.
Because the queers at GLAAD threatened Cracker Barel and A+E for not punishing Phil Robertson for speaking about his religious beliefs.
If that doesn't bother you, little fascist, then fuck off we are not addressing you, shit pants.
No one is forcing any "queer agenda" on me.
Sounds as if some of you are a little intimidated with maybe being tempted or something.
Why else are folks so hell bent on worrying what gay folks do and think?But folks that spend their cash have a right to bitch and moan all they want and the ones paying the cash and obtaining the X on the contract rule the day.
Be they gay, queer, straight, bipolar or homosapien.
But watch out for them thespians.
No one is forcing any "queer agenda" on me.
Sounds as if some of you are a little intimidated with maybe being tempted or something.
Why else are folks so hell bent on worrying what gay folks do and think?
But folks that spend their cash have a right to bitch and moan all they want and the ones paying the cash and obtaining the X on the contract rule the day.
Be they gay, queer, straight, bipolar or homosapien.
But watch out for them thespians.
Because the queers at GLAAD threatened Cracker Barel and A+E for not punishing Phil Robertson for speaking about his religious beliefs.
If that doesn't bother you, little fascist, then fuck off we are not addressing you, shit pants.
You are obviously in the closet. Everyone can see you though.
No one is forcing any "queer agenda" on me.
Sounds as if some of you are a little intimidated with maybe being tempted or something.
Why else are folks so hell bent on worrying what gay folks do and think?But folks that spend their cash have a right to bitch and moan all they want and the ones paying the cash and obtaining the X on the contract rule the day.
Be they gay, queer, straight, bipolar or homosapien.
But watch out for them thespians.
Because it is the Christians duty to worry about sinners, to save as many sinners from eternal death as we can.
Every single one of us are sinners and without Christ's birth and death none of us would have a chance at eternal life.
Because the queers at GLAAD threatened Cracker Barel and A+E for not punishing Phil Robertson for speaking about his religious beliefs.
If that doesn't bother you, little fascist, then fuck off we are not addressing you, shit pants.
You are obviously in the closet. Everyone can see you though.
heheheh, lolol
No one is forcing any "queer agenda" on me.
Sounds as if some of you are a little intimidated with maybe being tempted or something.
Why else are folks so hell bent on worrying what gay folks do and think?
But folks that spend their cash have a right to bitch and moan all they want and the ones paying the cash and obtaining the X on the contract rule the day.
Be they gay, queer, straight, bipolar or homosapien.
But watch out for them thespians.
Because the queers at GLAAD threatened Cracker Barel and A+E for not punishing Phil Robertson for speaking about his religious beliefs.
If that doesn't bother you, little fascist, then fuck off we are not addressing you, shit pants.
I agree with what you said in principle and love the cat picture...lol..
It's just that all the "fagtivist".."commie assholes" and such tends to alienate people who otherwise agree with your basic stance of pushing back at the gay agenda. If you're looking for numbers on your side to combat numbers on the opposing side, grandma always said it's best to lure flies with honey and not vinegar. You get that, right?
I mean, I'm kind of a "commie asshole" when it comes to other topics like wanting universal healthcare, green energy and such. And I have a thick skin so your comments just make me laugh. But some "commie assholes" who are on your side about the gay marriage thing and what's happening to Duck Dynasty etc might get really offended if they are on the fence and decide to side with the gays just to spite "people like you". So you can see how if you are engaged in a cause to defeat another cause, that that might be counterproductive. No?
Why is it only people on the right have to watch how they say things. The left calls us arsonist, terrorist, bigots, racist, granny killers, polluters and a myriad of other names and no one tells them they need to tone it down because they won't win friends or influence people. Their tactics have proven effective but by some magic circumstance it won't work for us, can you explain that?
Those on the left that call you "arsonists and terrorists" and mean it should be ashamed of themselves.
That being said, the doctrine of the left is acceptance of same sex marriage, a woman's right to reproductive choice, benefits for same sex couples, equal pay for women. The policies of the right is to oppose all of those things.
This is why "it won't work" for you.