Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 68,959
- 34,411
Go watch pro raslin thenI've got no dog in this fight but I do adore watching dysfunction in this nation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Go watch pro raslin thenI've got no dog in this fight but I do adore watching dysfunction in this nation.
There does have to be.. Trump was busted for defaming her, not rape.. Trumps words were evidence.
Trump did more than deny. Tara Reade changed stories several tiimes and discredited herself.What, denying an allegation is considered defamation now?
son of a bitch, Tara reads needs to come back and get in on some of this action. Wonder how much she can get from Biden for him denying he fingered her?
I'm reminded of Brewster's Millions with Richard Pryor.83.3 million. 65 million in punative damages. Trump needs to learn how to shut his fat mouth.
There doesn't have to be, she can take the exact same suit against Clinton, and only on her word be awarded millions. She never got real justice, so I hope she does exactly that.
Tara Reade was a Russian plant.What, denying an allegation is considered defamation now?
son of a bitch, Tara reads needs to come back and get in on some of this action. Wonder how much she can get from Biden for him denying he fingered her?
Except Broaddrick submitted TWO affadavits saying he didn't.Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick.
It's not an allegation anymore you dumb Simp. It's a legal conclusion. No, you don't get to keep defaming someone after it's been adjudicated in court that that is in fact what you're doing.
It's time for the cult to buck up and stop looking for false equivalences.You don't think the Clintons defamed Juanita Broaddrick when she made her allegations?
What about Tara Reade and the Bidens? Lawyers are looking for big paydays..
I'm talking about Juanita Broaddrick and Clinton. I hope she's paying attention and sues Clinton for a big payday, all she needs is her word in court.
Still….83 million is just ridiculous. Trump denying her allegation did not cause an 83 million dollar loss in her life.
This is lawfare, plain and simple.
I expect this to be on appeal…forever.
That Girl..
He didn't know Michael Cohen either.Doesn’t matter, just because a court ruled on a case doesn’t mean you give up your right to deny it. What, you think that because trump was found liable by a court that he has not now ADMIT to it?
You can keep protesting your innocence as long as you want, and that’s not defamation.
He still maintains he doesn’t know her, saying so doesn’t equate to defamation.
The bulk of the fine is punitive. That's what it takes to get through to Trump's fat brain to STFU.Still….83 million is just ridiculous. Trump denying her allegation did not cause an 83 million dollar loss in her life.
You don't think the Clintons defamed Juanita Broaddrick when she made her allegations?
What about Tara Reade and the Bidens? Lawyers are looking for big paydays..
When in doubt, when you have no argument left to make, when all you have shit sandwich....bring in Clinton.
The worst form of false equivalence. The two are hardly same, you whataboutery is for shit.
Tara Reade was a Russian plant.
Judge did.Jury found she was lying., She claimed she was raped. Jury didn't believe her.
This all they have folks, false equilvance. Lame ass whataboutery. Dude, you are having great success at looking pathetic.