Erik Erikson's RED STATE disinvites Trump after "blood" comments about Megyn Kelly

[paulitician]

I think it's dangerous. If you're into isolationism, no problem I guess. But I support maintaining friendships abroad.

And he talks without thinking. He is too thin skinned.

He speaks his mind. I think it's very refreshing. And he's not nearly as thin-skinned and paranoid as Hillary Clinton is. She's very easily rattled. Without a script she's all done. She can't handle the heat. Trump can.

Maybe he could focus on his policies more and go attention whoring less if he wants to be taken seriously by more than a quarter of the Republican party as he is now

Tell that to the Media. He presented his Income Tax plan this week. They could have asked him about it.

I generally don't go research something because without adding any value someone invites me to. This is one of those cases.

What did Kelly ask him you object to exactly? I think her questions about his comments on women is perfectly reasonable. And someone who wants to be President has to be able to handle questions they don't want to hear. Well, unless they are a Democrat. But Trump isn't

It was an absurd question. It had nothing to do with being President. And the same type of absurd question wasn't directed at any other Candidate.

It was a blatant coordinated attack on the man. It was about her, not the Candidate. Fox News really does owe its viewers an apology. The debate was a very sad sham.

 

[rightwinger]

And he talks without thinking. He is too thin skinned.

He speaks his mind. I think it's very refreshing. And he's not nearly as thin-skinned and paranoid as Hillary Clinton is. She's very easily rattled. Without a script she's all done. She can't handle the heat. Trump can.

Maybe he could focus on his policies more and go attention whoring less if he wants to be taken seriously by more than a quarter of the Republican party as he is now

Tell that to the Media. He presented his Income Tax plan this week. They could have asked him about it.

I generally don't go research something because without adding any value someone invites me to. This is one of those cases.

What did Kelly ask him you object to exactly? I think her questions about his comments on women is perfectly reasonable. And someone who wants to be President has to be able to handle questions they don't want to hear. Well, unless they are a Democrat. But Trump isn't

It was an absurd question. It had nothing to do with being President. And the same type of absurd question wasn't directed at any other Candidate.

It was a blatant coordinated attack on the man. It was about her, not the Candidate. Fox News really does owe its viewers an apology. The debate was a very sad sham.

No other candidate had a record of saying such offensive things to women

Yes it is appropriate, especially when it looks like the Democratic candidate will be a woman and over half the voters are women. Republicans have been perceived as having a war on women....asking a candidate whether his past statements will hurt him was appropriate

 

[cereal_killer]

Trumps popularity continues to roll like thunder and strike like lightning. Black dems voting for Trump? Oh my!!!

 

[paulitician]

He speaks his mind. I think it's very refreshing. And he's not nearly as thin-skinned and paranoid as Hillary Clinton is. She's very easily rattled. Without a script she's all done. She can't handle the heat. Trump can.

Maybe he could focus on his policies more and go attention whoring less if he wants to be taken seriously by more than a quarter of the Republican party as he is now

Tell that to the Media. He presented his Income Tax plan this week. They could have asked him about it.

I generally don't go research something because without adding any value someone invites me to. This is one of those cases.

What did Kelly ask him you object to exactly? I think her questions about his comments on women is perfectly reasonable. And someone who wants to be President has to be able to handle questions they don't want to hear. Well, unless they are a Democrat. But Trump isn't

It was an absurd question. It had nothing to do with being President. And the same type of absurd question wasn't directed at any other Candidate.

It was a blatant coordinated attack on the man. It was about her, not the Candidate. Fox News really does owe its viewers an apology. The debate was a very sad sham.

No other candidate had a record of saying such offensive things to women

Yes it is appropriate, especially when it looks like the Democratic candidate will be a woman and over half the voters are women. Republicans have been perceived as having a war on women....asking a candidate whether his past statements will hurt him was appropriate

Bullshite! Her question had nothing to do with being President. It was about promoting herself. American Journalism is dead.

 

[rightwinger]

Maybe he could focus on his policies more and go attention whoring less if he wants to be taken seriously by more than a quarter of the Republican party as he is now

Tell that to the Media. He presented his Income Tax plan this week. They could have asked him about it.

I generally don't go research something because without adding any value someone invites me to. This is one of those cases.

What did Kelly ask him you object to exactly? I think her questions about his comments on women is perfectly reasonable. And someone who wants to be President has to be able to handle questions they don't want to hear. Well, unless they are a Democrat. But Trump isn't

It was an absurd question. It had nothing to do with being President. And the same type of absurd question wasn't directed at any other Candidate.

It was a blatant coordinated attack on the man. It was about her, not the Candidate. Fox News really does owe its viewers an apology. The debate was a very sad sham.

No other candidate had a record of saying such offensive things to women

Yes it is appropriate, especially when it looks like the Democratic candidate will be a woman and over half the voters are women. Republicans have been perceived as having a war on women....asking a candidate whether his past statements will hurt him was appropriate

Bullshite! Her question had nothing to do with being President. It was about promoting herself. American Journalism is dead.

It had everything to do with GETTING to be president without the womens vote

 

[Synthaholic]

All you're doing I joining the bash trump bandwagon using the hate card to try to derail. Trump has insulted women or minorities no matter how hard you try to paint it that way. But keep trying, if it makes you feel better. Every time you do, you just piss of the voters some more, and Trumps poll numbers go up.
As good ole Clint used to say ? "Go ahead. Make my day."

Guy, if Trump got the nomination, I'd probably go out and buy a bunch of lottery tickets because my luck would have gotten so good.

Trump would not only give Hillary the Presidency, the GOP would probably lose the House and Senate as well.

You seem to have lost track of current events. Hillary's going to jail. Obama has already chosen Biden to be the candidate, with the Justice Dept (FBI) getting ready to arrest Hillary. Sanders won't back off since he considers Biden just another Republican, Dems have a split ticket.
Trump already has the GOP nom, and the presidency is looking like a cakewalk for him,as the Dems are in disarray.

And you're still a political moron.

 

[Synthaholic]

Again big fish in a small pond

Doesn't show they know a thing about the workings of the big pond. Both Hillary and Biden have swam in the big pond

Again big fish in a small pond

The BIGGEST fish in that small pond.

Both Hillary and Biden have swam in the big pond

pilot fish.

They didn't lead, they didn't make the decisions.

Biden has never made the decisions, and Hillary only made the decisions about the design on the new White House dinnerware, or who to invite to her Rose Garden parties.

Both Hillary and Biden have functioned on the world stage. That is a very big pond

Republicans may have proved they can pick on workers and demean teachers in their state. Even though they may be able to see Russia from their house doesn't mean they know a thing about the geopolitical issues with Russia

Both Hillary and Biden have functioned on the world stage. That is a very big pond

and neither have been in a position to make a decision. What part of that do you not get?

Republicans may have proved they can pick on workers and demean teachers in their state.

Yawn

Even though they may be able to see Russia from their house doesn't mean they know a thing about the geopolitical issues with Russia

You do know that it was Tina Fey that made that comment in a Saturday Night Live appearance, right?

Or have you repeated it for so long, you've convinced yourself that Palin said it?

So far, all you've come up with is, Hillary and Biden sat on the bench while quarterback Obama played the game.

Which doesn't qualify them to go in and play.

In an emergency, Biden would have to...

But he's already lost his chance to be quarterback

Been watching this tit-for-tat between you two gentlemen for a while.

You have some good points.

Saying that Hillary sat on the bench is not one of them.

Using your logic, Ronald Reagan also sat on the bench, for 12 years.

Not very impressive, eh?

Huckabee and Jeb Bush have been out of the game for over a decade
Cruz, Rubio, Paul have just gotten into the game

Trump, Carson and Fiorino have never played the game

Which really points once again to Kasich, the only one who worries me.

 

[Synthaholic]

Trumps popularity continues to roll like thunder and strike like lightning. Black dems voting for Trump? Oh my!!!

They're impressed by the bling.

This is why I keep saying don't count Trump out. He could come out for legal weed, forgiveness of student debt, and breaking up the Wall Street titans, getting a bunch of young Democratic support. And it doesn't mean he would lose the wingnut GOP vote, either.

 

[kaz]

And he talks without thinking. He is too thin skinned.

He speaks his mind. I think it's very refreshing. And he's not nearly as thin-skinned and paranoid as Hillary Clinton is. She's very easily rattled. Without a script she's all done. She can't handle the heat. Trump can.

Maybe he could focus on his policies more and go attention whoring less if he wants to be taken seriously by more than a quarter of the Republican party as he is now

Tell that to the Media. He presented his Income Tax plan this week. They could have asked him about it.

I generally don't go research something because without adding any value someone invites me to. This is one of those cases.

What did Kelly ask him you object to exactly? I think her questions about his comments on women is perfectly reasonable. And someone who wants to be President has to be able to handle questions they don't want to hear. Well, unless they are a Democrat. But Trump isn't

It was an absurd question. It had nothing to do with being President. And the same type of absurd question wasn't directed at any other Candidate.

It was a blatant coordinated attack on the man. It was about her, not the Candidate. Fox News really does owe its viewers an apology. The debate was a very sad sham.

So you don't object to any specific question, you just don't like her, got it.

The question, big guy, was what question he objected to. He never gave one. The question was not what sweeping unsupported accusations you can make

 

[kaz]

Maybe he could focus on his policies more and go attention whoring less if he wants to be taken seriously by more than a quarter of the Republican party as he is now

Tell that to the Media. He presented his Income Tax plan this week. They could have asked him about it.

I generally don't go research something because without adding any value someone invites me to. This is one of those cases.

What did Kelly ask him you object to exactly? I think her questions about his comments on women is perfectly reasonable. And someone who wants to be President has to be able to handle questions they don't want to hear. Well, unless they are a Democrat. But Trump isn't

It was an absurd question. It had nothing to do with being President. And the same type of absurd question wasn't directed at any other Candidate.

It was a blatant coordinated attack on the man. It was about her, not the Candidate. Fox News really does owe its viewers an apology. The debate was a very sad sham.

No other candidate had a record of saying such offensive things to women

Yes it is appropriate, especially when it looks like the Democratic candidate will be a woman and over half the voters are women. Republicans have been perceived as having a war on women....asking a candidate whether his past statements will hurt him was appropriate

Bullshite! Her question had nothing to do with being President. It was about promoting herself. American Journalism is dead.

Again, what question did you object to? I'm not saying you can't come up with any. I didn't watch the debate and I didn't see a comprehensive list of her questions. The ones I saw though I did not object to, but that was only apparently a small set of them

 

[mudwhistle]

Mark Levin didn't appreciate Megyn's line of questioning.

Mark Levin Goes Off on Fox Megyn Kelly over Debate They Had Ratings Agenda Mediaite

 

[Mertex]

Hmmmm, I am strongly considering keeping a list of all those wild-and-wooly cons here in USMB who just love Donald Trump right now and who think he can do no wrong, just to see how many are going to completely disavow him when he implodes...

"he wasn't a real Conservative!"
"he was a DEM plant, fer fux sakes!"
"he's too good for the GOP. Go Don, go!!"

They'll circle the wagons around Jeb Bush....the one the establishment Republicans want....they always get their way, the Teabags are not that strong.

 

[Mertex]

It was an absurd question. It had nothing to do with being President. And the same type of absurd question wasn't directed at any other Candidate.

Certainly you can't be that naive. Do you realize that women made up 53% of the vote in 2012? Of course it has something to do with being President.....no woman in her right mind would want a President who puts women down like Trump does, I certainly wouldn't vote for one even if he was a Democrat. And it wasn't directed at the other candidates because they haven't been as blunt as Trump in insulting women. The fact that they all want to cut funding to Planned Parenthood, an organization that is most helpful to women's health care is not being overlooked, but Trump has taken it to a new level.



Women made up about 53% of the electorate in the previous two presidential elections, and have favored the Democratic nominee in every presidential election since 1992. In 2008, Obama won 56% of the female vote. In 2012, he won 55%. Democrats are hopeful the former first lady, senator and secretary of state Hillary Clinton will surpass those numbers, should she become the party’s nominee.

The most important thing is how party and conservative movement responds when Trump implodes

Ellen Carmichael
“My sense is that the GOP won’t go for a guy who basically is making the same jabs at women that an 11-year-old in my sixth grade class did to my classmate and supports a British-style socialist healthcare system for the United States,” said Mair, the Republican strategist.
Donald Trump and the war on women GOP confident mogul will lose the battle US news The Guardian

 

[Mertex]

The BIGGEST fish in that small pond.

pilot fish.

They didn't lead, they didn't make the decisions.

Biden has never made the decisions, and Hillary only made the decisions about the design on the new White House dinnerware, or who to invite to her Rose Garden parties.

Both Hillary and Biden have functioned on the world stage. That is a very big pond

Republicans may have proved they can pick on workers and demean teachers in their state. Even though they may be able to see Russia from their house doesn't mean they know a thing about the geopolitical issues with Russia

Both Hillary and Biden have functioned on the world stage. That is a very big pond

and neither have been in a position to make a decision. What part of that do you not get?

Republicans may have proved they can pick on workers and demean teachers in their state.

Yawn

Even though they may be able to see Russia from their house doesn't mean they know a thing about the geopolitical issues with Russia

You do know that it was Tina Fey that made that comment in a Saturday Night Live appearance, right?

Or have you repeated it for so long, you've convinced yourself that Palin said it?

So far, all you've come up with is, Hillary and Biden sat on the bench while quarterback Obama played the game.

Which doesn't qualify them to go in and play.

In an emergency, Biden would have to...

But he's already lost his chance to be quarterback

Been watching this tit-for-tat between you two gentlemen for a while.

You have some good points.

Saying that Hillary sat on the bench is not one of them.

Using your logic, Ronald Reagan also sat on the bench, for 12 years.

Not very impressive, eh?

Huckabee and Jeb Bush have been out of the game for over a decade
Cruz, Rubio, Paul have just gotten into the game

Trump, Carson and Fiorino have never played the game

Which really points once again to Kasich, the only one who worries me.

Not to worry.......he's not the favorite of the Establishment Republicans, Bush is.....and I'm thinking they're going to find some way to get Bush as their candidate even if Faux has to go to war with Trump.

 

[Dot Com]

No other candidate had a record of saying such offensive things to women

Yes it is appropriate, especially when it looks like the Democratic candidate will be a woman and over half the voters are women. Republicans have been perceived as having a war on women....asking a candidate whether his past statements will hurt him was appropriate

 

[tinydancer]

He speaks his mind. I think it's very refreshing. And he's not nearly as thin-skinned and paranoid as Hillary Clinton is. She's very easily rattled. Without a script she's all done. She can't handle the heat. Trump can.

Maybe he could focus on his policies more and go attention whoring less if he wants to be taken seriously by more than a quarter of the Republican party as he is now

Tell that to the Media. He presented his Income Tax plan this week. They could have asked him about it.

I generally don't go research something because without adding any value someone invites me to. This is one of those cases.

What did Kelly ask him you object to exactly? I think her questions about his comments on women is perfectly reasonable. And someone who wants to be President has to be able to handle questions they don't want to hear. Well, unless they are a Democrat. But Trump isn't

It was an absurd question. It had nothing to do with being President. And the same type of absurd question wasn't directed at any other Candidate.

It was a blatant coordinated attack on the man. It was about her, not the Candidate. Fox News really does owe its viewers an apology. The debate was a very sad sham.

No other candidate had a record of saying such offensive things to women

Yes it is appropriate, especially when it looks like the Democratic candidate will be a woman and over half the voters are women. Republicans have been perceived as having a war on women....asking a candidate whether his past statements will hurt him was appropriate

Well that's about as appropriate as asking Hillary if she could guarantee to the men and women of America that her husband won't use the Oval Office as a place to get blow jobs from a WH intern again.

You know. Asking a candidate if her husband's past behavior will repeat itself.

 

[tinydancer]

Kelly has really screwed up. Making the debate about herself and her agenda and not the candidates. What a bitch.

 

[tinydancer]

Mark Levin didn't appreciate Megyn's line of questioning.

Mark Levin Goes Off on Fox Megyn Kelly over Debate They Had Ratings Agenda Mediaite

I loved Mark's line. He nailed it with this. "It wasn't a Republican candidate debate. It was a National Enquirer debate".

Spot on!

 

[Mertex]

Maybe he could focus on his policies more and go attention whoring less if he wants to be taken seriously by more than a quarter of the Republican party as he is now

Tell that to the Media. He presented his Income Tax plan this week. They could have asked him about it.

I generally don't go research something because without adding any value someone invites me to. This is one of those cases.

What did Kelly ask him you object to exactly? I think her questions about his comments on women is perfectly reasonable. And someone who wants to be President has to be able to handle questions they don't want to hear. Well, unless they are a Democrat. But Trump isn't

It was an absurd question. It had nothing to do with being President. And the same type of absurd question wasn't directed at any other Candidate.

It was a blatant coordinated attack on the man. It was about her, not the Candidate. Fox News really does owe its viewers an apology. The debate was a very sad sham.

No other candidate had a record of saying such offensive things to women

Yes it is appropriate, especially when it looks like the Democratic candidate will be a woman and over half the voters are women. Republicans have been perceived as having a war on women....asking a candidate whether his past statements will hurt him was appropriate

Well that's about as appropriate as asking Hillary if she could guarantee to the men and women of America that her husband won't use the Oval Office as a place to get blow jobs from a WH intern again.

You know. Asking a candidate if her husband's past behavior will repeat itself.

Bill Clinton isn't the one running for office. So why would Hillary have to answer for him. Only a conservative would come up with such a retarded comparison.

 

[Mertex]

Mark Levin didn't appreciate Megyn's line of questioning.

Mark Levin Goes Off on Fox Megyn Kelly over Debate They Had Ratings Agenda Mediaite

I loved Mark's line. He nailed it with this. "It wasn't a Republican candidate debate. It was a National Enquirer debate".

Spot on!

It was a Republican debate....no matter how much the GOP tries to intellectualize their presentation of their trainload of clowns.......they still end up with a sterling circus performance. Go Trump!