Escaping Christianity

Can you guys start your own thread? This thread is all about me and my hard struggling with Jesus.
"Hard struggling"? Is that some kind of sexual position?

No. Missionary is a sexual position.
So, are you catcher or a pitcher?

I am independent.
Is that a way of saying that all you do is masturbate?

No. It was just an unique observation .
 
I am not sure why my posts don't make any sense.

Oh please, don’t insult my intelligence...you’re not fooling me

I remain unsure as to what things I have said that don't make any sense. I will try to clarify. I am a pretty good communicator. I'm not sure what I messed up in my message.

Is the opening post confusing or was it another post in this thread?
you’re not making any sense to me.

I can take this one of two ways.

1. I am not making sense to you.
2. You do not like what I am saying.

I will base my post on the assumption that you mean to say that I do not make sense to you.

I am deeply entrenched in Christianity. That includes my entire extended family, my wife's entire extended family and all the friends I have. I love the social aspects of Christianity. I love the philosophy of Christianity. I love the Bible with unwavering passion. Christian people are wonderful to be around. They are amazing people.

Say, "yes" if you are with me so far. Stop me if any of that is confusing.

3. They are incapable of understanding and blame you.

However being deeply entrenched in Christianity doesn't make you a worthy person to teach it. There are wolves in sheep's clothing, and the bible has nothing nice to say about church leaders who lead but don't have faith themselves.

The Bible is sharper than any two edged sword. I am sure it didn't have nice things to say all the time.
It has specficially harsh things to say about people who mislead innocents while pretending to be faithful. And trust me, it isn't only those in biblical times who find those types particularly foul. If you have no faith get the hell away from the children of those who do. You don't belong there.
 
No. They didn’t. The original meaning has been lost through time but it’s not hard to figure it out if one is serious about seeking the truth and is objective in their pursuit.

I don’t believe you are.
You sound like an unlettered ignoramus. Just sayin.
No, you sound like a religious zealot, ignoring the obvious.

God does not exist. It's a fallacy, made up to make you an army. And protect a leader with your life.

That's all it is... It's really that simple. The leader who claims he's God, or talks directly to god, is the leader. And will profit from victory.

The original texts that the religions are based on, were written 2000 years before someone figured out how to take advantage of them, and make them monotheistic killer religions.
A religious zealot is someone who attacks others for their religious beliefs. The only fool doing that is you.

How many times must I bring up the sins your religion committed in the crusades and inquisitions. The most horrific crimes and torture ever. Even beats Hitler...

But it's ok with you peeps.
1. It was a thousand years ago.
2. No, it wasn't worse. Maybe a total of 30,000 people died, but most historians put the numbers much, much lower.
3. The crusades were a response to the encroachment of muslim thugs, who were conquering and slaughtering their way through Africa, the Middle East and were at the gates of France. The crusades were people who chose to go to the Middle East to protect the victims of muslims.
.
1. It was a thousand years ago.

you have no shame, koshergrl -

images


nor a soul.
Says the guy at war with Christianity.
 
No. They didn’t. The original meaning has been lost through time but it’s not hard to figure it out if one is serious about seeking the truth and is objective in their pursuit.

I don’t believe you are.
You sound like an unlettered ignoramus. Just sayin.
No, you sound like a religious zealot, ignoring the obvious.

God does not exist. It's a fallacy, made up to make you an army. And protect a leader with your life.

That's all it is... It's really that simple. The leader who claims he's God, or talks directly to god, is the leader. And will profit from victory.

The original texts that the religions are based on, were written 2000 years before someone figured out how to take advantage of them, and make them monotheistic killer religions.
A religious zealot is someone who attacks others for their religious beliefs. The only fool doing that is you.

How many times must I bring up the sins your religion committed in the crusades and inquisitions. The most horrific crimes and torture ever. Even beats Hitler...

But it's ok with you peeps.
You can’t be serious.

The most horrific crimes ever committed were by militant atheists such as yourself, Roy.

And that was less than 100 years ago. Or have you forgotten the 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by militant atheist regimes?

Besides, the crusades halted the Muslim advance into Europe and the inquisition was a response to Cathar aggression who just happened to be socialists like yourself.

C’mon, Reverend Roy. Wake the fuck up.
.
And that was less than 100 years ago. Or have you forgotten the 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by militant atheist regimes?

your a stooge. bing

View attachment 279367

your cohorts just have pretty faces, down deep they are as evil as you.
How many times do I have to tell you that the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses using terror and violence to dissuade blacks - who were Republicans - from voting?

Can you tell me why you give a hall pass the atheistic regimes of the 20th century which committed the greatest atrocities in the history of mankind? Could it be that you are a communist per chance?

And lastly, your main problem with me is that I am a Christian. Yes, I do believe that God loved man so much that he was born into this world to testify to the truth and suffer death for our sins to reconcile justice with mercy. Yes, I do believe that if I have enough faith God will manifest his spirit into the host so that I may devour God for no other reason than I asked him to.

What's it to you?

So you go right ahead and tell me that my religion is wrong and that I'm going to hell, just like any other good religious fanatic would do.
 
No, you sound like a religious zealot, ignoring the obvious.

God does not exist. It's a fallacy, made up to make you an army. And protect a leader with your life.

That's all it is... It's really that simple. The leader who claims he's God, or talks directly to god, is the leader. And will profit from victory.

The original texts that the religions are based on, were written 2000 years before someone figured out how to take advantage of them, and make them monotheistic killer religions.
A religious zealot is someone who attacks others for their religious beliefs. The only fool doing that is you.

How many times must I bring up the sins your religion committed in the crusades and inquisitions. The most horrific crimes and torture ever. Even beats Hitler...

But it's ok with you peeps.
You can’t be serious.

The most horrific crimes ever committed were by militant atheists such as yourself, Roy.

And that was less than 100 years ago. Or have you forgotten the 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by militant atheist regimes?

Besides, the crusades halted the Muslim advance into Europe and the inquisition was a response to Cathar aggression who just happened to be socialists like yourself.

C’mon, Reverend Roy. Wake the fuck up.
.
And that was less than 100 years ago. Or have you forgotten the 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by militant atheist regimes?

your a stooge. bing

View attachment 279367

your cohorts just have pretty faces, down deep they are as evil as you.
How many times do I have to tell you that the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses using terror and violence to dissuade blacks - who were Republicans - from voting?

Can you tell me why you give a hall pass the atheistic regimes of the 20th century which committed the greatest atrocities in the history of mankind? Could it be that you are a communist per chance?

And lastly, your main problem with me is that I am a Christian. Yes, I do believe that God loved man so much that he was born into this world to testify to the truth and suffer death for our sins to reconcile justice with mercy. Yes, I do believe that if I have enough faith God will manifest his spirit into the host so that I may devour God for no other reason than I asked him to.

What's it to you?

So you go right ahead and tell me that my religion is wrong and that I'm going to hell, just like any other good religious fanatic would do.
.
being a liar, unfortunately for you, does not afford your type the opportunity to rewrite recorded history ... that you let it be recorded in the first place was your error.

upload_2019-9-15_19-41-5.jpeg


the bible belt, christianity is the synonym the kkk is used for to represent their world view through the christian bible to this very day.


Can you tell me why you give a hall pass the atheistic regimes of the 20th century

for the most part it was a reaction for self defense and the well being of their respective societies, your religious angle was never a primary role in any of those upheavals as the religious participated on both sides of those conflicts.

there is a lack of remorse if any by the participants on whichever view is chosen. it's far from over the deceitful are who presently continue to have the upperhand.
 
A religious zealot is someone who attacks others for their religious beliefs. The only fool doing that is you.

How many times must I bring up the sins your religion committed in the crusades and inquisitions. The most horrific crimes and torture ever. Even beats Hitler...

But it's ok with you peeps.
You can’t be serious.

The most horrific crimes ever committed were by militant atheists such as yourself, Roy.

And that was less than 100 years ago. Or have you forgotten the 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by militant atheist regimes?

Besides, the crusades halted the Muslim advance into Europe and the inquisition was a response to Cathar aggression who just happened to be socialists like yourself.

C’mon, Reverend Roy. Wake the fuck up.
.
And that was less than 100 years ago. Or have you forgotten the 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by militant atheist regimes?

your a stooge. bing

View attachment 279367

your cohorts just have pretty faces, down deep they are as evil as you.
How many times do I have to tell you that the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses using terror and violence to dissuade blacks - who were Republicans - from voting?

Can you tell me why you give a hall pass the atheistic regimes of the 20th century which committed the greatest atrocities in the history of mankind? Could it be that you are a communist per chance?

And lastly, your main problem with me is that I am a Christian. Yes, I do believe that God loved man so much that he was born into this world to testify to the truth and suffer death for our sins to reconcile justice with mercy. Yes, I do believe that if I have enough faith God will manifest his spirit into the host so that I may devour God for no other reason than I asked him to.

What's it to you?

So you go right ahead and tell me that my religion is wrong and that I'm going to hell, just like any other good religious fanatic would do.
.
being a liar, unfortunately for you, does not afford your type the opportunity to rewrite recorded history ... that you let it be recorded in the first place was your error.

View attachment 279488

the bible belt, christianity is the synonym the kkk is used for to represent their world view through the christian bible to this very day.


Can you tell me why you give a hall pass the atheistic regimes of the 20th century

for the most part it was a reaction for self defense and the well being of their respective societies, your religious angle was never a primary role in any of those upheavals as the religious participated on both sides of those conflicts.

there is a lack of remorse if any by the participants on whichever view is chosen. it's far from over the deceitful are who presently continue to have the upperhand.
Ok, you asked for it.

Very few people today know that in 1808 Congress abolished the slave trade. That's because by the 1820's, most of the Founding Fathers were dead and Thomas Jefferson's party, the Democratic Party, which was founded in 1792, had become the majority party in Congress. With this new party a change in congressional policy on slavery emerged. The 1789 law that prohibited slavery in federal territory was reversed when the Democratic Congress passed the Missouri Compromise in 1820. Several States were subsequently admitted as slave States. Slavery was being officially promoted by congressional policy by a Democratically controlled Congress.

Missouri Compromise - Wikipedia

16th United States Congress - Wikipedia


The Democratic party policy of promoting slavery ignored the principles in the founding document.

"The first step of the slaveholder to justify by argument the peculiar institutions [of slavery] is to deny the self-evident truths of the Declaration of Independence. He denies that all men are created equal. He denies that they have inalienable rights." President John Quincy Adams, The Hingham Patriot, June 29, 1839

In 1850 the Democrats passed the Fugitive Slave Law. That law required Northerners to return escaped slaves back into slavery or pay huge fines. The Fugitive Slave Law made anti-slavery citizens in the North and their institutions responsible for enforcing slavery. The Fugitive Slave Law was sanctioned kidnapping. The Fugitive Slave Law was disastrous for blacks in the North. The Law allowed Free Blacks to be carried into slavery. 20,000 blacks from the North left the United States and fled to Canada. The Underground Railroad reached its peak of activity as a result of the Fugitive Slave Law.

Fugitive Slave Act - 1850

Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 - Wikipedia

Fugitive Slave Act

31st United States Congress - Wikipedia In 1854, the Democratically controlled Congress passed another law strengthening slavery, the Kansas-Nebraska act. Even though slavery was expanded into federal territories in 1820 by the Democratically controlled Congress, a ban on slavery was retained in the Kansas Nebraska territory. But through the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Democrats vastly expanded the national area where slavery was permitted as the Kansas and Nebraska territories comprised parts of Colorado, Wyoming, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana, and Idaho. The Democrats were pushing slavery westward across the nation.

The History Place - Abraham Lincoln: Kansas-Nebraska Act

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas–Nebraska_Act

Frederick Douglas believed that the 3/5th clause is an anti-slavery clause. Not a pro-slavery clause. Frederick Douglas believed that the Constitution was an anti-slavery document.

(1860) Frederick Douglass, “the Constitution of the United States: Is It Pro-Slavery or Anti-slavery?” | The Black Past: Remembered and Reclaimed

What Did Frederick Douglass Believe About the U.S. Constitution? | The Classroom | Synonym

http://townhall.com/columnists/kenb...onstitution_did_not_condone_slavery/page/full

And so did others.

In May of 1854, following the passage of these pro-slavery laws in Congress, a number of anti-slavery Democrats along with some anti-slavery members from other parties, including the Whigs, Free-Soilers, and Emancipationists formed a new party to fight slavery and secure equal civil rights. The name of the new party? The Republican Party. It was named the Republican Party because they wanted to return to the principles of freedom set forth in the governing documents of the Republic before pro-slavery members of Congress had perverted those original principles.

History of the United States Republican Party - Wikipedia

Republican Party founded - Mar 20, 1854 - HISTORY.com

Republican Party - The Republican Party In The New Millennium

The Rise and Fall of Jim Crow. Jim Crow Stories . Republican Party | PBS

"The Democratic Party had become the dominant political party in America in the 1820s, [30] and in May 1854, in response to the strong pro-slavery positions of the Democrats, several anti-slavery Members of Congress formed an anti-slavery party – the Republican Party. [31] It was founded upon the principles of equality originally set forth in the governing documents of the Republic. In an 1865 publication documenting the history of black voting rights, Philadelphia attorney John Hancock confirmed that the Declaration of Independence set forth “equal rights to all. It contains not a word nor a clause regarding color. Nor is there any provision of the kind to be found in the Constitution of the United States.”

The History of Black Voting Rights [Great read!]

In 1856, the Democratic platform strongly defended slavery. According to the Democrats of 1856, ending slavery would be dangerous and would ruin the happiness of the people.

“All efforts of the abolitionists... are calculated to lead to the most alarming and dangerous consequences and all such efforts have an inevitable tendency to diminish the happiness of the people.” McKee, The National...Platforms, Democratic Platform of 1856, p.91

In 1857, a Democratically controlled Supreme Court delivered the Dred Scott decision, declaring that blacks were not persons or citizens but instead were property and therefore had no rights. In effect, Democrats believed slaves were property that could be disposed of at the will of its owner.

Democrats on the Court announced that "blacks had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the Negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and sold, and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic, whenever a profit could be made by it." Dred Scott at 407 (1856)

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

The History Place - Abraham Lincoln: Dred Scott Decision

Dred Scott

Dred Scott: Democratic Reaction

The Democratic Platform for 1860 supported both the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 and the Dred Scott decision of 1857. The Democrats even handed out copies of the Dred Scott decision with their platform to affirm that it was proper to hold African Americans in bondage.

2. Inasmuch as difference of opinion exists in the Democratic party as to the nature and extent of the powers of a Territorial Legislature, and as to the powers and duties of Congress, under the Constitution of the United States, over the institution of slavery within the Territories, Resolved, That the Democratic party will abide by the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States upon these questions of Constitutional Law.

6. Resolved, That the enactments of the State Legislatures to defeat the faithful execution of the Fugitive Slave Law, are hostile in character, subversive of the Constitution, and revolutionary in their effect.

Avalon Project - Democratic Party Platform; June 18, 1860

The Republican platform of 1860, on the other hand, blasted both the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 and the Dred Scott decision of 1857 and announced its continued intent to end slavery and secure equal civil rights for black Americans.

2. That the maintenance of the principles promulgated in the Declaration of Independence and embodied in the Federal Constitution, "That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed," is essential to the preservation of our Republican institutions; and that the Federal Constitution, the rights of the states, and the Union of the states, must and shall be preserved.

5. That the present Democratic Administration has far exceeded our worst apprehension in its measureless subserviency to the exactions of a sectional interest, as is especially evident in its desperate exertions to force the infamous Lecompton constitution upon the protesting people of Kansas - in construing the personal relation between master and servant to involve an unqualified property in persons - in its attempted enforcement everywhere, on land and sea, through the intervention of congress and of the federal courts, of the extreme pretensions of a purely local interest, and in its general and unvarying abuse of the power entrusted to it by a confiding people.

7. That the new dogma that the Constitution of its own force carries slavery into any or all of the territories of the United States, is a dangerous political heresy, at variance with the explicit provisions of that instrument itself, with cotemporaneous exposition, and with legislative and judicial precedent, is revolutionary in its tendency and subversive of the peace and harmony of the country.

8. That the normal condition of all the territory of the United States is that of freedom; that as our republican fathers, when they had abolished slavery in all our national territory, ordained that no "person should be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law," it becomes our duty, by legislation, whenever such legislation is necessary, to maintain this provision of the constitution against all attempts to violate it; and we deny the authority of congress, of a territorial legislature, or of any individuals, to give legal existence to slavery in any territory of the United States.

9. That we brand the recent re-opening of the African Slave Trade, under the cover of our national flag, aided by perversions of judicial power, as a crime against humanity, and a burning shame to our country and age, and we call upon congress to take prompt and efficient measures for the total and final suppression of that execrable traffic.

10. That in the recent vetoes by the federal governors of the acts of the Legislatures of Kansas and Nebraska, prohibiting slavery in those territories, we find a practical illustration of the boasted democratic principle of non- intervention and popular sovereignty, embodied in the Kansas-Nebraska bill, and a demonstration of the deception and fraud involved therein.
Republican Party National Platform, 1860


Republicans freed the slaves, Democrats in the North and the South fought against it.

January 31, 1865
13th Amendment banning slavery was passed by U.S. House of Representatives with unanimous Republican support and intense Democrat opposition.

April 8, 1865
13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. Senate with 100% Republican support and 63% Democrat opposition.

November 22, 1865
Republicans denounce Democrat legislature of Mississippi for enacting “Black Codes,” which institutionalized racial discrimination.

February 5, 1866
U.S. Rep. Thaddeus Stevens (R-PA) introduces legislation, successfully opposed by Democrat President Andrew Johnson, to implement “40 acres and a mule” relief by distributing land to former slaves.

April 9, 1866
Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Johnson’s veto, and the Civil Rights Act of 1866, conferring rights of citizenship on African-Americans, becomes law.

May 10, 1866
U.S. House passes the Republicans’ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process and equal protection of the laws to all citizens, with 100% of Democrats voting no.

June 8, 1866
U.S. Senate passes the Republicans’ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process and equal protection of the law to all citizens, where 94% of Republicans vote yes and 100% of Democrats vote no.

January 8, 1867
Republicans override Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto of law granting voting rights to African-Americans in D.C.

July 19, 1867
Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto of legislation protecting voting rights of African-Americans.

March 30, 1868
Republicans begin impeachment trial of Democrat President Andrew Johnson, who declared: “This is a country for white men, and by God, as long as I am President, it shall be a government of white men”.
 
A religious zealot is someone who attacks others for their religious beliefs. The only fool doing that is you.

How many times must I bring up the sins your religion committed in the crusades and inquisitions. The most horrific crimes and torture ever. Even beats Hitler...

But it's ok with you peeps.
You can’t be serious.

The most horrific crimes ever committed were by militant atheists such as yourself, Roy.

And that was less than 100 years ago. Or have you forgotten the 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by militant atheist regimes?

Besides, the crusades halted the Muslim advance into Europe and the inquisition was a response to Cathar aggression who just happened to be socialists like yourself.

C’mon, Reverend Roy. Wake the fuck up.
.
And that was less than 100 years ago. Or have you forgotten the 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by militant atheist regimes?

your a stooge. bing

View attachment 279367

your cohorts just have pretty faces, down deep they are as evil as you.
How many times do I have to tell you that the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses using terror and violence to dissuade blacks - who were Republicans - from voting?

Can you tell me why you give a hall pass the atheistic regimes of the 20th century which committed the greatest atrocities in the history of mankind? Could it be that you are a communist per chance?

And lastly, your main problem with me is that I am a Christian. Yes, I do believe that God loved man so much that he was born into this world to testify to the truth and suffer death for our sins to reconcile justice with mercy. Yes, I do believe that if I have enough faith God will manifest his spirit into the host so that I may devour God for no other reason than I asked him to.

What's it to you?

So you go right ahead and tell me that my religion is wrong and that I'm going to hell, just like any other good religious fanatic would do.
.
being a liar, unfortunately for you, does not afford your type the opportunity to rewrite recorded history ... that you let it be recorded in the first place was your error.

View attachment 279488

the bible belt, christianity is the synonym the kkk is used for to represent their world view through the christian bible to this very day.


Can you tell me why you give a hall pass the atheistic regimes of the 20th century

for the most part it was a reaction for self defense and the well being of their respective societies, your religious angle was never a primary role in any of those upheavals as the religious participated on both sides of those conflicts.

there is a lack of remorse if any by the participants on whichever view is chosen. it's far from over the deceitful are who presently continue to have the upperhand.

I'm not done yet.

So when did blacks start voting for Democrats? When reconstruction ended and federal troops were pulled back. Why did they start voting for Democrats? That's easy. They did so to keep from getting lynched. There are 13 Congressional Volumes which detail how the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses from BLACK REPUBLICANS through force and intimidation.

Full text of "Report of the Joint select committee appointed to inquire in to the condition of affairs in the late insurrectionary states : so far as regards the execution of the laws, and the safety of the lives and property of the citizens of the United States and Testimony taken"

Black political participation in Reconstruction | The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History

"Blacks made up the overwhelming majority of southern Republican voters, forming a coalition with “carpetbaggers” and “scalawags” (derogatory terms referring to recent arrivals from the North and southern white Republicans, respectively). A total of 265 African-American delegates were elected, more than 100 of whom had been born into slavery. Almost half of the elected black delegates served in South Carolina and Louisiana, where blacks had the longest history of political organization; in most other states, African Americans were underrepresented compared to their population. In all, 16 African Americans served in the U.S. Congress during Reconstruction; more than 600 more were elected to the state legislatures, and hundreds more held local offices across the South."

Articles: The Secret Racist History of the Democratic Party

"In almost every Southern state, the Republican Party was actually formed by blacks, not whites. Case in point is Houston, Texas, where 150 blacks and 20 whites created the Republican Party of Texas. But perhaps most telling of all with respect to the Republican Party’s achievements is that black men were continuously elected to public office. For example, 42 blacks were elected to the Texas legislature, 112 in Mississippi, 190 in South Carolina, 95 representatives and 32 senators in Louisiana, and many more elected in other states -- all Republican. Democrats didn’t elect their first black American to the U.S. House until 1935!"

"By the mid-1860s, the Republican Party’s alliance with blacks had caused a noticeable strain on the Democrats’ struggle for electoral significance in the post-Civil War era. This prompted the Democratic Party in 1866 to develop a new pseudo-secret political action group whose sole purpose was to help gain control of the electorate. The new group was known simply by their initials, KKK (Ku Klux Klan). This political relationship was nationally solidified shortly thereafter during the 1868 Democratic National Convention when former Civil War General Nathan Bedford Forrest was honored as the KKK’s first Grand Wizard. But don’t bother checking the Democratic National Committee’s website for proof. For many years, even up through the 2012 Presidential Election, the DNC had omitted all related history from 1848 to 1900 from their timeline -- half a century worth! Nevertheless, this sordid history is still well documented. There’s even a thirteen-volume set of Congressional investigations dating from 1872 detailing the Klan’s connection to the Democratic Party. The official documents, titled Report of the Joint Select Committee to Inquire Into the Condition of Affairs in the Late Insurrectionary States, irrefutably proves the KKK’s prominent role in the Democratic Party."

September 3, 1868

25 African-Americans in the Georgia legislature, all Republicans, were expelled by the Democrat majority. They were later reinstated by a Republican-controlled Congress.

September 12, 1868

Civil rights activist Tunis Campbell and all other African-Americans in the Georgia Senate – all Republicans – were expelled by the Democrat majority. They were later be reinstated by a Republican-controlled Congress.

October 7, 1868

Republicans denounce the Democratic Party’s national campaign theme: “This is a white man’s country: Let white men rule”.

October 22, 1868

While campaigning for re-election, U.S. Rep. James Hinds (R-AR) is assassinated by Democrat terrorists who were organized as the Ku Klux Klan.

December 10, 1869

Republican Gov. John Campbell of Wyoming Territory signs First-in-nation law granting women the right to vote and to hold public office.

February 3, 1870

After passing the U.S. House of Representatives with 98% Republican support and 97% Democrat opposition, the Republicans’ 15th Amendment is ratified, which granted the right to vote to all Americans regardless of race.

May 31, 1870

President Ulysses S. Grant signs the Republicans’ Enforcement Act, providing stiff penalties for depriving civil rights to any Americans.

June 22, 1870

The Republican-controlled Congress creates the U.S. Department of Justice to safeguard the civil rights of African-Americans against Democrats in the South.

September 6, 1870

Women vote in Wyoming during the first election after women’s suffrage legislation was signed into law by Republican Gov. John Campbell.

February 28, 1871

Republican Congress passes Enforcement Act providing federal protection for African-American voters.

April 20, 1871

The Republican-controlled Congress enacts the Ku Klux Klan Act, outlawing Democratic Party-affiliated terrorist groups which oppressed African-Americans.

October 10, 1871

Following warnings by Philadelphia Democrats against blacks voting, African-American Republican civil rights activist Octavius Catto was murdered by a Democratic Party operative, and his military funeral was attended by thousands.

October 18, 1871

After violence was committed against Republicans in South Carolina, Republican President Ulysses S. Grant deploys U.S. troops to combat Democrat terrorists who formed the Ku Klux Klan.

November 18, 1872

Susan B. Anthony arrested for voting, after boasting to Elizabeth Cady Stanton that she voted for “the Republican ticket, straight”.

January 17, 1874

Armed Democrats seize the Texas state government, ending Republican efforts to racially integrate the Texas government.

September 14, 1874

Democrat white supremacists seize Louisiana statehouse in attempt to overthrow the racially-integrated administration of Republican Governor William Kellogg. 27 people were killed.

March 1, 1875

The Civil Rights Act of 1875, guaranteeing access to public accommodations without regard to race, was signed by Republican President Ulysses S. Grant. The law passed with 92% Republican support over 100% Democrat opposition.

"Black men participated in Georgia politics for the first time during Congressional Reconstruction (1867-76). Between 1867 and 1872 sixty-nine African Americans served as delegates to the constitutional convention (1867-68) or as members of the state legislature.

Democrats used terror, intimidation, and the Ku Klux Klan to "redeem" the state. One quarter of the black legislators were killed, threatened, beaten, or jailed. In the December 1870 elections the Democrats won an overwhelming victory. In 1906 W. H. Rogers from McIntosh County was the last black legislator to be elected before blacks were legally disenfranchised in 1908."

Black Legislators during Reconstruction

"One of the most vivid examples of collusion between the KKK and Democratic Party was when Democrat Senator Wade Hampton ran for the governorship of South Carolina in 1876. The Klan put into action a battle plan to help Democrats win, stating: “Every Democrat must feel honor bound to control the vote of at least one Negro by intimidation…. Democrats must go in as large numbers…and well-armed.” An issue of Harper’s Weekly that same year illustrated this mindset with a depiction of two white Democrats standing next to a black man while pointing a gun at him. At the bottom of the depiction is a caption that reads: “Of Course He Wants To Vote The Democratic Ticket!”"

"The Klan’s primary mission was to intimidate Republicans -- black and white. In South Carolina, for example, the Klan even passed out “push cards” -- a hit list of 63 (50 blacks and 13 whites) “Radicals” of the legislature pictured on one side and their names listed on the other. Democrats called Republicans radicals not just because they were a powerful political force, but because they allowed blacks to participate in the political process. Apparently, this was all too much for Democrats to bear.

By 1875, Republicans, both black and white, had worked together to pass over two dozen civil rights bills. Unfortunately, their momentum came to a screeching halt in 1876 when the Democratic Party took control of Congress. Hell bent on preventing blacks from voting, Southern Democrats devised nearly a dozen shady schemes, like requiring literacy tests, misleading election procedures, redrawing election lines, changing polling locations, creating white-only primaries, and even rewriting state constitutions. Talk about disenfranchising black voters!

There were also lynchings, but not what you might think. According to the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law, between 1882 and 1964 an estimated 3,446 blacks and 1,279 whites were lynched at the hands of the Klan."


Articles: The Secret Racist History of the Democratic Party
 
I am not sure why my posts don't make any sense.

Oh please, don’t insult my intelligence...you’re not fooling me

I remain unsure as to what things I have said that don't make any sense. I will try to clarify. I am a pretty good communicator. I'm not sure what I messed up in my message.

Is the opening post confusing or was it another post in this thread?
you’re not making any sense to me.

I can take this one of two ways.

1. I am not making sense to you.
2. You do not like what I am saying.

I will base my post on the assumption that you mean to say that I do not make sense to you.

I am deeply entrenched in Christianity. That includes my entire extended family, my wife's entire extended family and all the friends I have. I love the social aspects of Christianity. I love the philosophy of Christianity. I love the Bible with unwavering passion. Christian people are wonderful to be around. They are amazing people.

Say, "yes" if you are with me so far. Stop me if any of that is confusing.

3. They are incapable of understanding and blame you.

However being deeply entrenched in Christianity doesn't make you a worthy person to teach it. There are wolves in sheep's clothing, and the bible has nothing nice to say about church leaders who lead but don't have faith themselves.

The Bible is sharper than any two edged sword. I am sure it didn't have nice things to say all the time.
It has specficially harsh things to say about people who mislead innocents while pretending to be faithful. And trust me, it isn't only those in biblical times who find those types particularly foul. If you have no faith get the hell away from the children of those who do. You don't belong there.
.
It has specficially harsh things to say about people who mislead innocents while pretending to be faithful. And trust me, it isn't only those in biblical times who find those types particularly foul. If you have no faith get the hell away from the children of those who do. You don't belong there.

that is a universal truth everyone appreciates that seems to be the OP's point for the thread -

Christianity in the 4th century was dominated in its early stage by Constantine the great and the First Council of Nicaea of 325, which was the beginning of the period of the First seven Ecumenical Councils (325–787), and in its late stage by the Edict of Thessalonica of 380, which made Nicene Christianity the state church of the Roman Empire.


the christian bible was written by the very crucifiers that took the innocent life in the 1st century and construed their version in the 4th century as representing the events of the 1st. look no further than yourself for the continuance of that crime being falsely taught through the ages as attested by recorded history.
 
I am not sure why my posts don't make any sense.

Oh please, don’t insult my intelligence...you’re not fooling me

I remain unsure as to what things I have said that don't make any sense. I will try to clarify. I am a pretty good communicator. I'm not sure what I messed up in my message.

Is the opening post confusing or was it another post in this thread?
you’re not making any sense to me.

I can take this one of two ways.

1. I am not making sense to you.
2. You do not like what I am saying.

I will base my post on the assumption that you mean to say that I do not make sense to you.

I am deeply entrenched in Christianity. That includes my entire extended family, my wife's entire extended family and all the friends I have. I love the social aspects of Christianity. I love the philosophy of Christianity. I love the Bible with unwavering passion. Christian people are wonderful to be around. They are amazing people.

Say, "yes" if you are with me so far. Stop me if any of that is confusing.

3. They are incapable of understanding and blame you.

However being deeply entrenched in Christianity doesn't make you a worthy person to teach it. There are wolves in sheep's clothing, and the bible has nothing nice to say about church leaders who lead but don't have faith themselves.

The Bible is sharper than any two edged sword. I am sure it didn't have nice things to say all the time.
It has specficially harsh things to say about people who mislead innocents while pretending to be faithful. And trust me, it isn't only those in biblical times who find those types particularly foul. If you have no faith get the hell away from the children of those who do. You don't belong there.
.
It has specficially harsh things to say about people who mislead innocents while pretending to be faithful. And trust me, it isn't only those in biblical times who find those types particularly foul. If you have no faith get the hell away from the children of those who do. You don't belong there.

that is a universal truth everyone appreciates that seems to be the OP's point for the thread -

Christianity in the 4th century was dominated in its early stage by Constantine the great and the First Council of Nicaea of 325, which was the beginning of the period of the First seven Ecumenical Councils (325–787), and in its late stage by the Edict of Thessalonica of 380, which made Nicene Christianity the state church of the Roman Empire.


the christian bible was written by the very crucifiers that took the innocent life in the 1st century and construed their version in the 4th century as representing the events of the 1st. look no further than yourself for the continuance of that crime being falsely taught through the ages as attested by recorded history.
Thanks for bringing up the KKK. It allowed me to post the true history.

Keep doing it because I'd like to get the message out to more people.
 
I remain unsure as to what things I have said that don't make any sense. I will try to clarify. I am a pretty good communicator. I'm not sure what I messed up in my message.

Is the opening post confusing or was it another post in this thread?
I can take this one of two ways.

1. I am not making sense to you.
2. You do not like what I am saying.

I will base my post on the assumption that you mean to say that I do not make sense to you.

I am deeply entrenched in Christianity. That includes my entire extended family, my wife's entire extended family and all the friends I have. I love the social aspects of Christianity. I love the philosophy of Christianity. I love the Bible with unwavering passion. Christian people are wonderful to be around. They are amazing people.

Say, "yes" if you are with me so far. Stop me if any of that is confusing.

3. They are incapable of understanding and blame you.

However being deeply entrenched in Christianity doesn't make you a worthy person to teach it. There are wolves in sheep's clothing, and the bible has nothing nice to say about church leaders who lead but don't have faith themselves.

The Bible is sharper than any two edged sword. I am sure it didn't have nice things to say all the time.
It has specficially harsh things to say about people who mislead innocents while pretending to be faithful. And trust me, it isn't only those in biblical times who find those types particularly foul. If you have no faith get the hell away from the children of those who do. You don't belong there.
.
It has specficially harsh things to say about people who mislead innocents while pretending to be faithful. And trust me, it isn't only those in biblical times who find those types particularly foul. If you have no faith get the hell away from the children of those who do. You don't belong there.

that is a universal truth everyone appreciates that seems to be the OP's point for the thread -

Christianity in the 4th century was dominated in its early stage by Constantine the great and the First Council of Nicaea of 325, which was the beginning of the period of the First seven Ecumenical Councils (325–787), and in its late stage by the Edict of Thessalonica of 380, which made Nicene Christianity the state church of the Roman Empire.


the christian bible was written by the very crucifiers that took the innocent life in the 1st century and construed their version in the 4th century as representing the events of the 1st. look no further than yourself for the continuance of that crime being falsely taught through the ages as attested by recorded history.
Thanks for bringing up the KKK. It allowed me to post the true history.

Keep doing it because I'd like to get the message out to more people.
Thanks for bringing up the KKK. It allowed me to post the true history.

Keep doing it because I'd like to get the message out to more people.

simple, just say bible belt - everyone knows kkk is shorthand for who they are.
 
How many times must I bring up the sins your religion committed in the crusades and inquisitions. The most horrific crimes and torture ever. Even beats Hitler...

But it's ok with you peeps.
You can’t be serious.

The most horrific crimes ever committed were by militant atheists such as yourself, Roy.

And that was less than 100 years ago. Or have you forgotten the 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by militant atheist regimes?

Besides, the crusades halted the Muslim advance into Europe and the inquisition was a response to Cathar aggression who just happened to be socialists like yourself.

C’mon, Reverend Roy. Wake the fuck up.
.
And that was less than 100 years ago. Or have you forgotten the 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by militant atheist regimes?

your a stooge. bing

View attachment 279367

your cohorts just have pretty faces, down deep they are as evil as you.
How many times do I have to tell you that the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses using terror and violence to dissuade blacks - who were Republicans - from voting?

Can you tell me why you give a hall pass the atheistic regimes of the 20th century which committed the greatest atrocities in the history of mankind? Could it be that you are a communist per chance?

And lastly, your main problem with me is that I am a Christian. Yes, I do believe that God loved man so much that he was born into this world to testify to the truth and suffer death for our sins to reconcile justice with mercy. Yes, I do believe that if I have enough faith God will manifest his spirit into the host so that I may devour God for no other reason than I asked him to.

What's it to you?

So you go right ahead and tell me that my religion is wrong and that I'm going to hell, just like any other good religious fanatic would do.
.
being a liar, unfortunately for you, does not afford your type the opportunity to rewrite recorded history ... that you let it be recorded in the first place was your error.

View attachment 279488

the bible belt, christianity is the synonym the kkk is used for to represent their world view through the christian bible to this very day.


Can you tell me why you give a hall pass the atheistic regimes of the 20th century

for the most part it was a reaction for self defense and the well being of their respective societies, your religious angle was never a primary role in any of those upheavals as the religious participated on both sides of those conflicts.

there is a lack of remorse if any by the participants on whichever view is chosen. it's far from over the deceitful are who presently continue to have the upperhand.

I'm not done yet.

So when did blacks start voting for Democrats? When reconstruction ended and federal troops were pulled back. Why did they start voting for Democrats? That's easy. They did so to keep from getting lynched. There are 13 Congressional Volumes which detail how the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses from BLACK REPUBLICANS through force and intimidation.

Full text of "Report of the Joint select committee appointed to inquire in to the condition of affairs in the late insurrectionary states : so far as regards the execution of the laws, and the safety of the lives and property of the citizens of the United States and Testimony taken"

Black political participation in Reconstruction | The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History

"Blacks made up the overwhelming majority of southern Republican voters, forming a coalition with “carpetbaggers” and “scalawags” (derogatory terms referring to recent arrivals from the North and southern white Republicans, respectively). A total of 265 African-American delegates were elected, more than 100 of whom had been born into slavery. Almost half of the elected black delegates served in South Carolina and Louisiana, where blacks had the longest history of political organization; in most other states, African Americans were underrepresented compared to their population. In all, 16 African Americans served in the U.S. Congress during Reconstruction; more than 600 more were elected to the state legislatures, and hundreds more held local offices across the South."

Articles: The Secret Racist History of the Democratic Party

"In almost every Southern state, the Republican Party was actually formed by blacks, not whites. Case in point is Houston, Texas, where 150 blacks and 20 whites created the Republican Party of Texas. But perhaps most telling of all with respect to the Republican Party’s achievements is that black men were continuously elected to public office. For example, 42 blacks were elected to the Texas legislature, 112 in Mississippi, 190 in South Carolina, 95 representatives and 32 senators in Louisiana, and many more elected in other states -- all Republican. Democrats didn’t elect their first black American to the U.S. House until 1935!"

"By the mid-1860s, the Republican Party’s alliance with blacks had caused a noticeable strain on the Democrats’ struggle for electoral significance in the post-Civil War era. This prompted the Democratic Party in 1866 to develop a new pseudo-secret political action group whose sole purpose was to help gain control of the electorate. The new group was known simply by their initials, KKK (Ku Klux Klan). This political relationship was nationally solidified shortly thereafter during the 1868 Democratic National Convention when former Civil War General Nathan Bedford Forrest was honored as the KKK’s first Grand Wizard. But don’t bother checking the Democratic National Committee’s website for proof. For many years, even up through the 2012 Presidential Election, the DNC had omitted all related history from 1848 to 1900 from their timeline -- half a century worth! Nevertheless, this sordid history is still well documented. There’s even a thirteen-volume set of Congressional investigations dating from 1872 detailing the Klan’s connection to the Democratic Party. The official documents, titled Report of the Joint Select Committee to Inquire Into the Condition of Affairs in the Late Insurrectionary States, irrefutably proves the KKK’s prominent role in the Democratic Party."

September 3, 1868

25 African-Americans in the Georgia legislature, all Republicans, were expelled by the Democrat majority. They were later reinstated by a Republican-controlled Congress.

September 12, 1868

Civil rights activist Tunis Campbell and all other African-Americans in the Georgia Senate – all Republicans – were expelled by the Democrat majority. They were later be reinstated by a Republican-controlled Congress.

October 7, 1868

Republicans denounce the Democratic Party’s national campaign theme: “This is a white man’s country: Let white men rule”.

October 22, 1868

While campaigning for re-election, U.S. Rep. James Hinds (R-AR) is assassinated by Democrat terrorists who were organized as the Ku Klux Klan.

December 10, 1869

Republican Gov. John Campbell of Wyoming Territory signs First-in-nation law granting women the right to vote and to hold public office.

February 3, 1870

After passing the U.S. House of Representatives with 98% Republican support and 97% Democrat opposition, the Republicans’ 15th Amendment is ratified, which granted the right to vote to all Americans regardless of race.

May 31, 1870

President Ulysses S. Grant signs the Republicans’ Enforcement Act, providing stiff penalties for depriving civil rights to any Americans.

June 22, 1870

The Republican-controlled Congress creates the U.S. Department of Justice to safeguard the civil rights of African-Americans against Democrats in the South.

September 6, 1870

Women vote in Wyoming during the first election after women’s suffrage legislation was signed into law by Republican Gov. John Campbell.

February 28, 1871

Republican Congress passes Enforcement Act providing federal protection for African-American voters.

April 20, 1871

The Republican-controlled Congress enacts the Ku Klux Klan Act, outlawing Democratic Party-affiliated terrorist groups which oppressed African-Americans.

October 10, 1871

Following warnings by Philadelphia Democrats against blacks voting, African-American Republican civil rights activist Octavius Catto was murdered by a Democratic Party operative, and his military funeral was attended by thousands.

October 18, 1871

After violence was committed against Republicans in South Carolina, Republican President Ulysses S. Grant deploys U.S. troops to combat Democrat terrorists who formed the Ku Klux Klan.

November 18, 1872

Susan B. Anthony arrested for voting, after boasting to Elizabeth Cady Stanton that she voted for “the Republican ticket, straight”.

January 17, 1874

Armed Democrats seize the Texas state government, ending Republican efforts to racially integrate the Texas government.

September 14, 1874

Democrat white supremacists seize Louisiana statehouse in attempt to overthrow the racially-integrated administration of Republican Governor William Kellogg. 27 people were killed.

March 1, 1875

The Civil Rights Act of 1875, guaranteeing access to public accommodations without regard to race, was signed by Republican President Ulysses S. Grant. The law passed with 92% Republican support over 100% Democrat opposition.

"Black men participated in Georgia politics for the first time during Congressional Reconstruction (1867-76). Between 1867 and 1872 sixty-nine African Americans served as delegates to the constitutional convention (1867-68) or as members of the state legislature.

Democrats used terror, intimidation, and the Ku Klux Klan to "redeem" the state. One quarter of the black legislators were killed, threatened, beaten, or jailed. In the December 1870 elections the Democrats won an overwhelming victory. In 1906 W. H. Rogers from McIntosh County was the last black legislator to be elected before blacks were legally disenfranchised in 1908."

Black Legislators during Reconstruction

"One of the most vivid examples of collusion between the KKK and Democratic Party was when Democrat Senator Wade Hampton ran for the governorship of South Carolina in 1876. The Klan put into action a battle plan to help Democrats win, stating: “Every Democrat must feel honor bound to control the vote of at least one Negro by intimidation…. Democrats must go in as large numbers…and well-armed.” An issue of Harper’s Weekly that same year illustrated this mindset with a depiction of two white Democrats standing next to a black man while pointing a gun at him. At the bottom of the depiction is a caption that reads: “Of Course He Wants To Vote The Democratic Ticket!”"

"The Klan’s primary mission was to intimidate Republicans -- black and white. In South Carolina, for example, the Klan even passed out “push cards” -- a hit list of 63 (50 blacks and 13 whites) “Radicals” of the legislature pictured on one side and their names listed on the other. Democrats called Republicans radicals not just because they were a powerful political force, but because they allowed blacks to participate in the political process. Apparently, this was all too much for Democrats to bear.

By 1875, Republicans, both black and white, had worked together to pass over two dozen civil rights bills. Unfortunately, their momentum came to a screeching halt in 1876 when the Democratic Party took control of Congress. Hell bent on preventing blacks from voting, Southern Democrats devised nearly a dozen shady schemes, like requiring literacy tests, misleading election procedures, redrawing election lines, changing polling locations, creating white-only primaries, and even rewriting state constitutions. Talk about disenfranchising black voters!

There were also lynchings, but not what you might think. According to the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law, between 1882 and 1964 an estimated 3,446 blacks and 1,279 whites were lynched at the hands of the Klan."


Articles: The Secret Racist History of the Democratic Party

Nobody is going to read all that. You know that. Right?
 
No, you sound like a religious zealot, ignoring the obvious.

God does not exist. It's a fallacy, made up to make you an army. And protect a leader with your life.

That's all it is... It's really that simple. The leader who claims he's God, or talks directly to god, is the leader. And will profit from victory.

The original texts that the religions are based on, were written 2000 years before someone figured out how to take advantage of them, and make them monotheistic killer religions.
A religious zealot is someone who attacks others for their religious beliefs. The only fool doing that is you.

How many times must I bring up the sins your religion committed in the crusades and inquisitions. The most horrific crimes and torture ever. Even beats Hitler...

But it's ok with you peeps.
You can’t be serious.

The most horrific crimes ever committed were by militant atheists such as yourself, Roy.

And that was less than 100 years ago. Or have you forgotten the 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by militant atheist regimes?

Besides, the crusades halted the Muslim advance into Europe and the inquisition was a response to Cathar aggression who just happened to be socialists like yourself.

C’mon, Reverend Roy. Wake the fuck up.
.
And that was less than 100 years ago. Or have you forgotten the 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by militant atheist regimes?

your a stooge. bing

View attachment 279367

your cohorts just have pretty faces, down deep they are as evil as you.
How many times do I have to tell you that the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses using terror and violence to dissuade blacks - who were Republicans - from voting?

Can you tell me why you give a hall pass the atheistic regimes of the 20th century which committed the greatest atrocities in the history of mankind? Could it be that you are a communist per chance?

And lastly, your main problem with me is that I am a Christian. Yes, I do believe that God loved man so much that he was born into this world to testify to the truth and suffer death for our sins to reconcile justice with mercy. Yes, I do believe that if I have enough faith God will manifest his spirit into the host so that I may devour God for no other reason than I asked him to.

What's it to you?

So you go right ahead and tell me that my religion is wrong and that I'm going to hell, just like any other good religious fanatic would do.
Omg, you are so brainwashed into you religion....

First, there is no atheistic regime in the 20th century. You're a friggin idiot for even trying that shit...

And you think the KKK is a democratic thing.... I don't believe in political parties. They're all evil. But if I did, it would be the other party...

I think you're a flat out repub, and believe in end-of-world shit. And you want to make as much money as you can in the meantime. You're a snake-oil salseman.

You are not following the values of christ.
 
How many times must I bring up the sins your religion committed in the crusades and inquisitions. The most horrific crimes and torture ever. Even beats Hitler...

But it's ok with you peeps.
You can’t be serious.

The most horrific crimes ever committed were by militant atheists such as yourself, Roy.

And that was less than 100 years ago. Or have you forgotten the 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by militant atheist regimes?

Besides, the crusades halted the Muslim advance into Europe and the inquisition was a response to Cathar aggression who just happened to be socialists like yourself.

C’mon, Reverend Roy. Wake the fuck up.
.
And that was less than 100 years ago. Or have you forgotten the 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by militant atheist regimes?

your a stooge. bing

View attachment 279367

your cohorts just have pretty faces, down deep they are as evil as you.
How many times do I have to tell you that the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses using terror and violence to dissuade blacks - who were Republicans - from voting?

Can you tell me why you give a hall pass the atheistic regimes of the 20th century which committed the greatest atrocities in the history of mankind? Could it be that you are a communist per chance?

And lastly, your main problem with me is that I am a Christian. Yes, I do believe that God loved man so much that he was born into this world to testify to the truth and suffer death for our sins to reconcile justice with mercy. Yes, I do believe that if I have enough faith God will manifest his spirit into the host so that I may devour God for no other reason than I asked him to.

What's it to you?

So you go right ahead and tell me that my religion is wrong and that I'm going to hell, just like any other good religious fanatic would do.
.
being a liar, unfortunately for you, does not afford your type the opportunity to rewrite recorded history ... that you let it be recorded in the first place was your error.

View attachment 279488

the bible belt, christianity is the synonym the kkk is used for to represent their world view through the christian bible to this very day.


Can you tell me why you give a hall pass the atheistic regimes of the 20th century

for the most part it was a reaction for self defense and the well being of their respective societies, your religious angle was never a primary role in any of those upheavals as the religious participated on both sides of those conflicts.

there is a lack of remorse if any by the participants on whichever view is chosen. it's far from over the deceitful are who presently continue to have the upperhand.
Ok, you asked for it.

Very few people today know that in 1808 Congress abolished the slave trade. That's because by the 1820's, most of the Founding Fathers were dead and Thomas Jefferson's party, the Democratic Party, which was founded in 1792, had become the majority party in Congress. With this new party a change in congressional policy on slavery emerged. The 1789 law that prohibited slavery in federal territory was reversed when the Democratic Congress passed the Missouri Compromise in 1820. Several States were subsequently admitted as slave States. Slavery was being officially promoted by congressional policy by a Democratically controlled Congress.

Missouri Compromise - Wikipedia

16th United States Congress - Wikipedia


The Democratic party policy of promoting slavery ignored the principles in the founding document.

"The first step of the slaveholder to justify by argument the peculiar institutions [of slavery] is to deny the self-evident truths of the Declaration of Independence. He denies that all men are created equal. He denies that they have inalienable rights." President John Quincy Adams, The Hingham Patriot, June 29, 1839

In 1850 the Democrats passed the Fugitive Slave Law. That law required Northerners to return escaped slaves back into slavery or pay huge fines. The Fugitive Slave Law made anti-slavery citizens in the North and their institutions responsible for enforcing slavery. The Fugitive Slave Law was sanctioned kidnapping. The Fugitive Slave Law was disastrous for blacks in the North. The Law allowed Free Blacks to be carried into slavery. 20,000 blacks from the North left the United States and fled to Canada. The Underground Railroad reached its peak of activity as a result of the Fugitive Slave Law.

Fugitive Slave Act - 1850

Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 - Wikipedia

Fugitive Slave Act

31st United States Congress - Wikipedia In 1854, the Democratically controlled Congress passed another law strengthening slavery, the Kansas-Nebraska act. Even though slavery was expanded into federal territories in 1820 by the Democratically controlled Congress, a ban on slavery was retained in the Kansas Nebraska territory. But through the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Democrats vastly expanded the national area where slavery was permitted as the Kansas and Nebraska territories comprised parts of Colorado, Wyoming, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana, and Idaho. The Democrats were pushing slavery westward across the nation.

The History Place - Abraham Lincoln: Kansas-Nebraska Act

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas–Nebraska_Act

Frederick Douglas believed that the 3/5th clause is an anti-slavery clause. Not a pro-slavery clause. Frederick Douglas believed that the Constitution was an anti-slavery document.

(1860) Frederick Douglass, “the Constitution of the United States: Is It Pro-Slavery or Anti-slavery?” | The Black Past: Remembered and Reclaimed

What Did Frederick Douglass Believe About the U.S. Constitution? | The Classroom | Synonym

http://townhall.com/columnists/kenb...onstitution_did_not_condone_slavery/page/full

And so did others.

In May of 1854, following the passage of these pro-slavery laws in Congress, a number of anti-slavery Democrats along with some anti-slavery members from other parties, including the Whigs, Free-Soilers, and Emancipationists formed a new party to fight slavery and secure equal civil rights. The name of the new party? The Republican Party. It was named the Republican Party because they wanted to return to the principles of freedom set forth in the governing documents of the Republic before pro-slavery members of Congress had perverted those original principles.

History of the United States Republican Party - Wikipedia

Republican Party founded - Mar 20, 1854 - HISTORY.com

Republican Party - The Republican Party In The New Millennium

The Rise and Fall of Jim Crow. Jim Crow Stories . Republican Party | PBS

"The Democratic Party had become the dominant political party in America in the 1820s, [30] and in May 1854, in response to the strong pro-slavery positions of the Democrats, several anti-slavery Members of Congress formed an anti-slavery party – the Republican Party. [31] It was founded upon the principles of equality originally set forth in the governing documents of the Republic. In an 1865 publication documenting the history of black voting rights, Philadelphia attorney John Hancock confirmed that the Declaration of Independence set forth “equal rights to all. It contains not a word nor a clause regarding color. Nor is there any provision of the kind to be found in the Constitution of the United States.”

The History of Black Voting Rights [Great read!]

In 1856, the Democratic platform strongly defended slavery. According to the Democrats of 1856, ending slavery would be dangerous and would ruin the happiness of the people.

“All efforts of the abolitionists... are calculated to lead to the most alarming and dangerous consequences and all such efforts have an inevitable tendency to diminish the happiness of the people.” McKee, The National...Platforms, Democratic Platform of 1856, p.91

In 1857, a Democratically controlled Supreme Court delivered the Dred Scott decision, declaring that blacks were not persons or citizens but instead were property and therefore had no rights. In effect, Democrats believed slaves were property that could be disposed of at the will of its owner.

Democrats on the Court announced that "blacks had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the Negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and sold, and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic, whenever a profit could be made by it." Dred Scott at 407 (1856)

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

The History Place - Abraham Lincoln: Dred Scott Decision

Dred Scott

Dred Scott: Democratic Reaction

The Democratic Platform for 1860 supported both the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 and the Dred Scott decision of 1857. The Democrats even handed out copies of the Dred Scott decision with their platform to affirm that it was proper to hold African Americans in bondage.

2. Inasmuch as difference of opinion exists in the Democratic party as to the nature and extent of the powers of a Territorial Legislature, and as to the powers and duties of Congress, under the Constitution of the United States, over the institution of slavery within the Territories, Resolved, That the Democratic party will abide by the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States upon these questions of Constitutional Law.

6. Resolved, That the enactments of the State Legislatures to defeat the faithful execution of the Fugitive Slave Law, are hostile in character, subversive of the Constitution, and revolutionary in their effect.

Avalon Project - Democratic Party Platform; June 18, 1860

The Republican platform of 1860, on the other hand, blasted both the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 and the Dred Scott decision of 1857 and announced its continued intent to end slavery and secure equal civil rights for black Americans.

2. That the maintenance of the principles promulgated in the Declaration of Independence and embodied in the Federal Constitution, "That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed," is essential to the preservation of our Republican institutions; and that the Federal Constitution, the rights of the states, and the Union of the states, must and shall be preserved.

5. That the present Democratic Administration has far exceeded our worst apprehension in its measureless subserviency to the exactions of a sectional interest, as is especially evident in its desperate exertions to force the infamous Lecompton constitution upon the protesting people of Kansas - in construing the personal relation between master and servant to involve an unqualified property in persons - in its attempted enforcement everywhere, on land and sea, through the intervention of congress and of the federal courts, of the extreme pretensions of a purely local interest, and in its general and unvarying abuse of the power entrusted to it by a confiding people.

7. That the new dogma that the Constitution of its own force carries slavery into any or all of the territories of the United States, is a dangerous political heresy, at variance with the explicit provisions of that instrument itself, with cotemporaneous exposition, and with legislative and judicial precedent, is revolutionary in its tendency and subversive of the peace and harmony of the country.

8. That the normal condition of all the territory of the United States is that of freedom; that as our republican fathers, when they had abolished slavery in all our national territory, ordained that no "person should be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law," it becomes our duty, by legislation, whenever such legislation is necessary, to maintain this provision of the constitution against all attempts to violate it; and we deny the authority of congress, of a territorial legislature, or of any individuals, to give legal existence to slavery in any territory of the United States.

9. That we brand the recent re-opening of the African Slave Trade, under the cover of our national flag, aided by perversions of judicial power, as a crime against humanity, and a burning shame to our country and age, and we call upon congress to take prompt and efficient measures for the total and final suppression of that execrable traffic.

10. That in the recent vetoes by the federal governors of the acts of the Legislatures of Kansas and Nebraska, prohibiting slavery in those territories, we find a practical illustration of the boasted democratic principle of non- intervention and popular sovereignty, embodied in the Kansas-Nebraska bill, and a demonstration of the deception and fraud involved therein.
Republican Party National Platform, 1860


Republicans freed the slaves, Democrats in the North and the South fought against it.

January 31, 1865
13th Amendment banning slavery was passed by U.S. House of Representatives with unanimous Republican support and intense Democrat opposition.

April 8, 1865
13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. Senate with 100% Republican support and 63% Democrat opposition.

November 22, 1865
Republicans denounce Democrat legislature of Mississippi for enacting “Black Codes,” which institutionalized racial discrimination.

February 5, 1866
U.S. Rep. Thaddeus Stevens (R-PA) introduces legislation, successfully opposed by Democrat President Andrew Johnson, to implement “40 acres and a mule” relief by distributing land to former slaves.

April 9, 1866
Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Johnson’s veto, and the Civil Rights Act of 1866, conferring rights of citizenship on African-Americans, becomes law.

May 10, 1866
U.S. House passes the Republicans’ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process and equal protection of the laws to all citizens, with 100% of Democrats voting no.

June 8, 1866
U.S. Senate passes the Republicans’ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process and equal protection of the law to all citizens, where 94% of Republicans vote yes and 100% of Democrats vote no.

January 8, 1867
Republicans override Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto of law granting voting rights to African-Americans in D.C.

July 19, 1867
Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto of legislation protecting voting rights of African-Americans.

March 30, 1868
Republicans begin impeachment trial of Democrat President Andrew Johnson, who declared: “This is a country for white men, and by God, as long as I am President, it shall be a government of white men”.
OMG, I was right, you're a racist. Can I see you KKK card?
 
What exactly is wrong with black people?

And tell me how your religion dictates it?
 
You can’t be serious.

The most horrific crimes ever committed were by militant atheists such as yourself, Roy.

And that was less than 100 years ago. Or have you forgotten the 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by militant atheist regimes?

Besides, the crusades halted the Muslim advance into Europe and the inquisition was a response to Cathar aggression who just happened to be socialists like yourself.

C’mon, Reverend Roy. Wake the fuck up.
.
And that was less than 100 years ago. Or have you forgotten the 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by militant atheist regimes?

your a stooge. bing

View attachment 279367

your cohorts just have pretty faces, down deep they are as evil as you.
How many times do I have to tell you that the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses using terror and violence to dissuade blacks - who were Republicans - from voting?

Can you tell me why you give a hall pass the atheistic regimes of the 20th century which committed the greatest atrocities in the history of mankind? Could it be that you are a communist per chance?

And lastly, your main problem with me is that I am a Christian. Yes, I do believe that God loved man so much that he was born into this world to testify to the truth and suffer death for our sins to reconcile justice with mercy. Yes, I do believe that if I have enough faith God will manifest his spirit into the host so that I may devour God for no other reason than I asked him to.

What's it to you?

So you go right ahead and tell me that my religion is wrong and that I'm going to hell, just like any other good religious fanatic would do.
.
being a liar, unfortunately for you, does not afford your type the opportunity to rewrite recorded history ... that you let it be recorded in the first place was your error.

View attachment 279488

the bible belt, christianity is the synonym the kkk is used for to represent their world view through the christian bible to this very day.


Can you tell me why you give a hall pass the atheistic regimes of the 20th century

for the most part it was a reaction for self defense and the well being of their respective societies, your religious angle was never a primary role in any of those upheavals as the religious participated on both sides of those conflicts.

there is a lack of remorse if any by the participants on whichever view is chosen. it's far from over the deceitful are who presently continue to have the upperhand.

I'm not done yet.

So when did blacks start voting for Democrats? When reconstruction ended and federal troops were pulled back. Why did they start voting for Democrats? That's easy. They did so to keep from getting lynched. There are 13 Congressional Volumes which detail how the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses from BLACK REPUBLICANS through force and intimidation.

Full text of "Report of the Joint select committee appointed to inquire in to the condition of affairs in the late insurrectionary states : so far as regards the execution of the laws, and the safety of the lives and property of the citizens of the United States and Testimony taken"

Black political participation in Reconstruction | The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History

"Blacks made up the overwhelming majority of southern Republican voters, forming a coalition with “carpetbaggers” and “scalawags” (derogatory terms referring to recent arrivals from the North and southern white Republicans, respectively). A total of 265 African-American delegates were elected, more than 100 of whom had been born into slavery. Almost half of the elected black delegates served in South Carolina and Louisiana, where blacks had the longest history of political organization; in most other states, African Americans were underrepresented compared to their population. In all, 16 African Americans served in the U.S. Congress during Reconstruction; more than 600 more were elected to the state legislatures, and hundreds more held local offices across the South."

Articles: The Secret Racist History of the Democratic Party

"In almost every Southern state, the Republican Party was actually formed by blacks, not whites. Case in point is Houston, Texas, where 150 blacks and 20 whites created the Republican Party of Texas. But perhaps most telling of all with respect to the Republican Party’s achievements is that black men were continuously elected to public office. For example, 42 blacks were elected to the Texas legislature, 112 in Mississippi, 190 in South Carolina, 95 representatives and 32 senators in Louisiana, and many more elected in other states -- all Republican. Democrats didn’t elect their first black American to the U.S. House until 1935!"

"By the mid-1860s, the Republican Party’s alliance with blacks had caused a noticeable strain on the Democrats’ struggle for electoral significance in the post-Civil War era. This prompted the Democratic Party in 1866 to develop a new pseudo-secret political action group whose sole purpose was to help gain control of the electorate. The new group was known simply by their initials, KKK (Ku Klux Klan). This political relationship was nationally solidified shortly thereafter during the 1868 Democratic National Convention when former Civil War General Nathan Bedford Forrest was honored as the KKK’s first Grand Wizard. But don’t bother checking the Democratic National Committee’s website for proof. For many years, even up through the 2012 Presidential Election, the DNC had omitted all related history from 1848 to 1900 from their timeline -- half a century worth! Nevertheless, this sordid history is still well documented. There’s even a thirteen-volume set of Congressional investigations dating from 1872 detailing the Klan’s connection to the Democratic Party. The official documents, titled Report of the Joint Select Committee to Inquire Into the Condition of Affairs in the Late Insurrectionary States, irrefutably proves the KKK’s prominent role in the Democratic Party."

September 3, 1868

25 African-Americans in the Georgia legislature, all Republicans, were expelled by the Democrat majority. They were later reinstated by a Republican-controlled Congress.

September 12, 1868

Civil rights activist Tunis Campbell and all other African-Americans in the Georgia Senate – all Republicans – were expelled by the Democrat majority. They were later be reinstated by a Republican-controlled Congress.

October 7, 1868

Republicans denounce the Democratic Party’s national campaign theme: “This is a white man’s country: Let white men rule”.

October 22, 1868

While campaigning for re-election, U.S. Rep. James Hinds (R-AR) is assassinated by Democrat terrorists who were organized as the Ku Klux Klan.

December 10, 1869

Republican Gov. John Campbell of Wyoming Territory signs First-in-nation law granting women the right to vote and to hold public office.

February 3, 1870

After passing the U.S. House of Representatives with 98% Republican support and 97% Democrat opposition, the Republicans’ 15th Amendment is ratified, which granted the right to vote to all Americans regardless of race.

May 31, 1870

President Ulysses S. Grant signs the Republicans’ Enforcement Act, providing stiff penalties for depriving civil rights to any Americans.

June 22, 1870

The Republican-controlled Congress creates the U.S. Department of Justice to safeguard the civil rights of African-Americans against Democrats in the South.

September 6, 1870

Women vote in Wyoming during the first election after women’s suffrage legislation was signed into law by Republican Gov. John Campbell.

February 28, 1871

Republican Congress passes Enforcement Act providing federal protection for African-American voters.

April 20, 1871

The Republican-controlled Congress enacts the Ku Klux Klan Act, outlawing Democratic Party-affiliated terrorist groups which oppressed African-Americans.

October 10, 1871

Following warnings by Philadelphia Democrats against blacks voting, African-American Republican civil rights activist Octavius Catto was murdered by a Democratic Party operative, and his military funeral was attended by thousands.

October 18, 1871

After violence was committed against Republicans in South Carolina, Republican President Ulysses S. Grant deploys U.S. troops to combat Democrat terrorists who formed the Ku Klux Klan.

November 18, 1872

Susan B. Anthony arrested for voting, after boasting to Elizabeth Cady Stanton that she voted for “the Republican ticket, straight”.

January 17, 1874

Armed Democrats seize the Texas state government, ending Republican efforts to racially integrate the Texas government.

September 14, 1874

Democrat white supremacists seize Louisiana statehouse in attempt to overthrow the racially-integrated administration of Republican Governor William Kellogg. 27 people were killed.

March 1, 1875

The Civil Rights Act of 1875, guaranteeing access to public accommodations without regard to race, was signed by Republican President Ulysses S. Grant. The law passed with 92% Republican support over 100% Democrat opposition.

"Black men participated in Georgia politics for the first time during Congressional Reconstruction (1867-76). Between 1867 and 1872 sixty-nine African Americans served as delegates to the constitutional convention (1867-68) or as members of the state legislature.

Democrats used terror, intimidation, and the Ku Klux Klan to "redeem" the state. One quarter of the black legislators were killed, threatened, beaten, or jailed. In the December 1870 elections the Democrats won an overwhelming victory. In 1906 W. H. Rogers from McIntosh County was the last black legislator to be elected before blacks were legally disenfranchised in 1908."

Black Legislators during Reconstruction

"One of the most vivid examples of collusion between the KKK and Democratic Party was when Democrat Senator Wade Hampton ran for the governorship of South Carolina in 1876. The Klan put into action a battle plan to help Democrats win, stating: “Every Democrat must feel honor bound to control the vote of at least one Negro by intimidation…. Democrats must go in as large numbers…and well-armed.” An issue of Harper’s Weekly that same year illustrated this mindset with a depiction of two white Democrats standing next to a black man while pointing a gun at him. At the bottom of the depiction is a caption that reads: “Of Course He Wants To Vote The Democratic Ticket!”"

"The Klan’s primary mission was to intimidate Republicans -- black and white. In South Carolina, for example, the Klan even passed out “push cards” -- a hit list of 63 (50 blacks and 13 whites) “Radicals” of the legislature pictured on one side and their names listed on the other. Democrats called Republicans radicals not just because they were a powerful political force, but because they allowed blacks to participate in the political process. Apparently, this was all too much for Democrats to bear.

By 1875, Republicans, both black and white, had worked together to pass over two dozen civil rights bills. Unfortunately, their momentum came to a screeching halt in 1876 when the Democratic Party took control of Congress. Hell bent on preventing blacks from voting, Southern Democrats devised nearly a dozen shady schemes, like requiring literacy tests, misleading election procedures, redrawing election lines, changing polling locations, creating white-only primaries, and even rewriting state constitutions. Talk about disenfranchising black voters!

There were also lynchings, but not what you might think. According to the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law, between 1882 and 1964 an estimated 3,446 blacks and 1,279 whites were lynched at the hands of the Klan."


Articles: The Secret Racist History of the Democratic Party

Nobody is going to read all that. You know that. Right?
Couldn’t care less what others do or don’t do. My obligation was satisfied when I provided the history.
 
You can’t be serious.

The most horrific crimes ever committed were by militant atheists such as yourself, Roy.

And that was less than 100 years ago. Or have you forgotten the 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by militant atheist regimes?

Besides, the crusades halted the Muslim advance into Europe and the inquisition was a response to Cathar aggression who just happened to be socialists like yourself.

C’mon, Reverend Roy. Wake the fuck up.
.
And that was less than 100 years ago. Or have you forgotten the 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by militant atheist regimes?

your a stooge. bing

View attachment 279367

your cohorts just have pretty faces, down deep they are as evil as you.
How many times do I have to tell you that the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses using terror and violence to dissuade blacks - who were Republicans - from voting?

Can you tell me why you give a hall pass the atheistic regimes of the 20th century which committed the greatest atrocities in the history of mankind? Could it be that you are a communist per chance?

And lastly, your main problem with me is that I am a Christian. Yes, I do believe that God loved man so much that he was born into this world to testify to the truth and suffer death for our sins to reconcile justice with mercy. Yes, I do believe that if I have enough faith God will manifest his spirit into the host so that I may devour God for no other reason than I asked him to.

What's it to you?

So you go right ahead and tell me that my religion is wrong and that I'm going to hell, just like any other good religious fanatic would do.
.
being a liar, unfortunately for you, does not afford your type the opportunity to rewrite recorded history ... that you let it be recorded in the first place was your error.

View attachment 279488

the bible belt, christianity is the synonym the kkk is used for to represent their world view through the christian bible to this very day.


Can you tell me why you give a hall pass the atheistic regimes of the 20th century

for the most part it was a reaction for self defense and the well being of their respective societies, your religious angle was never a primary role in any of those upheavals as the religious participated on both sides of those conflicts.

there is a lack of remorse if any by the participants on whichever view is chosen. it's far from over the deceitful are who presently continue to have the upperhand.
Ok, you asked for it.

Very few people today know that in 1808 Congress abolished the slave trade. That's because by the 1820's, most of the Founding Fathers were dead and Thomas Jefferson's party, the Democratic Party, which was founded in 1792, had become the majority party in Congress. With this new party a change in congressional policy on slavery emerged. The 1789 law that prohibited slavery in federal territory was reversed when the Democratic Congress passed the Missouri Compromise in 1820. Several States were subsequently admitted as slave States. Slavery was being officially promoted by congressional policy by a Democratically controlled Congress.

Missouri Compromise - Wikipedia

16th United States Congress - Wikipedia


The Democratic party policy of promoting slavery ignored the principles in the founding document.

"The first step of the slaveholder to justify by argument the peculiar institutions [of slavery] is to deny the self-evident truths of the Declaration of Independence. He denies that all men are created equal. He denies that they have inalienable rights." President John Quincy Adams, The Hingham Patriot, June 29, 1839

In 1850 the Democrats passed the Fugitive Slave Law. That law required Northerners to return escaped slaves back into slavery or pay huge fines. The Fugitive Slave Law made anti-slavery citizens in the North and their institutions responsible for enforcing slavery. The Fugitive Slave Law was sanctioned kidnapping. The Fugitive Slave Law was disastrous for blacks in the North. The Law allowed Free Blacks to be carried into slavery. 20,000 blacks from the North left the United States and fled to Canada. The Underground Railroad reached its peak of activity as a result of the Fugitive Slave Law.

Fugitive Slave Act - 1850

Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 - Wikipedia

Fugitive Slave Act

31st United States Congress - Wikipedia In 1854, the Democratically controlled Congress passed another law strengthening slavery, the Kansas-Nebraska act. Even though slavery was expanded into federal territories in 1820 by the Democratically controlled Congress, a ban on slavery was retained in the Kansas Nebraska territory. But through the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Democrats vastly expanded the national area where slavery was permitted as the Kansas and Nebraska territories comprised parts of Colorado, Wyoming, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana, and Idaho. The Democrats were pushing slavery westward across the nation.

The History Place - Abraham Lincoln: Kansas-Nebraska Act

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas–Nebraska_Act

Frederick Douglas believed that the 3/5th clause is an anti-slavery clause. Not a pro-slavery clause. Frederick Douglas believed that the Constitution was an anti-slavery document.

(1860) Frederick Douglass, “the Constitution of the United States: Is It Pro-Slavery or Anti-slavery?” | The Black Past: Remembered and Reclaimed

What Did Frederick Douglass Believe About the U.S. Constitution? | The Classroom | Synonym

http://townhall.com/columnists/kenb...onstitution_did_not_condone_slavery/page/full

And so did others.

In May of 1854, following the passage of these pro-slavery laws in Congress, a number of anti-slavery Democrats along with some anti-slavery members from other parties, including the Whigs, Free-Soilers, and Emancipationists formed a new party to fight slavery and secure equal civil rights. The name of the new party? The Republican Party. It was named the Republican Party because they wanted to return to the principles of freedom set forth in the governing documents of the Republic before pro-slavery members of Congress had perverted those original principles.

History of the United States Republican Party - Wikipedia

Republican Party founded - Mar 20, 1854 - HISTORY.com

Republican Party - The Republican Party In The New Millennium

The Rise and Fall of Jim Crow. Jim Crow Stories . Republican Party | PBS

"The Democratic Party had become the dominant political party in America in the 1820s, [30] and in May 1854, in response to the strong pro-slavery positions of the Democrats, several anti-slavery Members of Congress formed an anti-slavery party – the Republican Party. [31] It was founded upon the principles of equality originally set forth in the governing documents of the Republic. In an 1865 publication documenting the history of black voting rights, Philadelphia attorney John Hancock confirmed that the Declaration of Independence set forth “equal rights to all. It contains not a word nor a clause regarding color. Nor is there any provision of the kind to be found in the Constitution of the United States.”

The History of Black Voting Rights [Great read!]

In 1856, the Democratic platform strongly defended slavery. According to the Democrats of 1856, ending slavery would be dangerous and would ruin the happiness of the people.

“All efforts of the abolitionists... are calculated to lead to the most alarming and dangerous consequences and all such efforts have an inevitable tendency to diminish the happiness of the people.” McKee, The National...Platforms, Democratic Platform of 1856, p.91

In 1857, a Democratically controlled Supreme Court delivered the Dred Scott decision, declaring that blacks were not persons or citizens but instead were property and therefore had no rights. In effect, Democrats believed slaves were property that could be disposed of at the will of its owner.

Democrats on the Court announced that "blacks had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the Negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and sold, and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic, whenever a profit could be made by it." Dred Scott at 407 (1856)

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

The History Place - Abraham Lincoln: Dred Scott Decision

Dred Scott

Dred Scott: Democratic Reaction

The Democratic Platform for 1860 supported both the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 and the Dred Scott decision of 1857. The Democrats even handed out copies of the Dred Scott decision with their platform to affirm that it was proper to hold African Americans in bondage.

2. Inasmuch as difference of opinion exists in the Democratic party as to the nature and extent of the powers of a Territorial Legislature, and as to the powers and duties of Congress, under the Constitution of the United States, over the institution of slavery within the Territories, Resolved, That the Democratic party will abide by the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States upon these questions of Constitutional Law.

6. Resolved, That the enactments of the State Legislatures to defeat the faithful execution of the Fugitive Slave Law, are hostile in character, subversive of the Constitution, and revolutionary in their effect.

Avalon Project - Democratic Party Platform; June 18, 1860

The Republican platform of 1860, on the other hand, blasted both the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 and the Dred Scott decision of 1857 and announced its continued intent to end slavery and secure equal civil rights for black Americans.

2. That the maintenance of the principles promulgated in the Declaration of Independence and embodied in the Federal Constitution, "That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed," is essential to the preservation of our Republican institutions; and that the Federal Constitution, the rights of the states, and the Union of the states, must and shall be preserved.

5. That the present Democratic Administration has far exceeded our worst apprehension in its measureless subserviency to the exactions of a sectional interest, as is especially evident in its desperate exertions to force the infamous Lecompton constitution upon the protesting people of Kansas - in construing the personal relation between master and servant to involve an unqualified property in persons - in its attempted enforcement everywhere, on land and sea, through the intervention of congress and of the federal courts, of the extreme pretensions of a purely local interest, and in its general and unvarying abuse of the power entrusted to it by a confiding people.

7. That the new dogma that the Constitution of its own force carries slavery into any or all of the territories of the United States, is a dangerous political heresy, at variance with the explicit provisions of that instrument itself, with cotemporaneous exposition, and with legislative and judicial precedent, is revolutionary in its tendency and subversive of the peace and harmony of the country.

8. That the normal condition of all the territory of the United States is that of freedom; that as our republican fathers, when they had abolished slavery in all our national territory, ordained that no "person should be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law," it becomes our duty, by legislation, whenever such legislation is necessary, to maintain this provision of the constitution against all attempts to violate it; and we deny the authority of congress, of a territorial legislature, or of any individuals, to give legal existence to slavery in any territory of the United States.

9. That we brand the recent re-opening of the African Slave Trade, under the cover of our national flag, aided by perversions of judicial power, as a crime against humanity, and a burning shame to our country and age, and we call upon congress to take prompt and efficient measures for the total and final suppression of that execrable traffic.

10. That in the recent vetoes by the federal governors of the acts of the Legislatures of Kansas and Nebraska, prohibiting slavery in those territories, we find a practical illustration of the boasted democratic principle of non- intervention and popular sovereignty, embodied in the Kansas-Nebraska bill, and a demonstration of the deception and fraud involved therein.
Republican Party National Platform, 1860


Republicans freed the slaves, Democrats in the North and the South fought against it.

January 31, 1865
13th Amendment banning slavery was passed by U.S. House of Representatives with unanimous Republican support and intense Democrat opposition.

April 8, 1865
13th Amendment banning slavery passed by U.S. Senate with 100% Republican support and 63% Democrat opposition.

November 22, 1865
Republicans denounce Democrat legislature of Mississippi for enacting “Black Codes,” which institutionalized racial discrimination.

February 5, 1866
U.S. Rep. Thaddeus Stevens (R-PA) introduces legislation, successfully opposed by Democrat President Andrew Johnson, to implement “40 acres and a mule” relief by distributing land to former slaves.

April 9, 1866
Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Johnson’s veto, and the Civil Rights Act of 1866, conferring rights of citizenship on African-Americans, becomes law.

May 10, 1866
U.S. House passes the Republicans’ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process and equal protection of the laws to all citizens, with 100% of Democrats voting no.

June 8, 1866
U.S. Senate passes the Republicans’ 14th Amendment guaranteeing due process and equal protection of the law to all citizens, where 94% of Republicans vote yes and 100% of Democrats vote no.

January 8, 1867
Republicans override Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto of law granting voting rights to African-Americans in D.C.

July 19, 1867
Republican Congress overrides Democrat President Andrew Johnson’s veto of legislation protecting voting rights of African-Americans.

March 30, 1868
Republicans begin impeachment trial of Democrat President Andrew Johnson, who declared: “This is a country for white men, and by God, as long as I am President, it shall be a government of white men”.
OMG, I was right, you're a racist. Can I see you KKK card?
Because I posted the truth about the racist heritage of the Democratic Party?

You know they never did apologize for it.
 
A religious zealot is someone who attacks others for their religious beliefs. The only fool doing that is you.

How many times must I bring up the sins your religion committed in the crusades and inquisitions. The most horrific crimes and torture ever. Even beats Hitler...

But it's ok with you peeps.
You can’t be serious.

The most horrific crimes ever committed were by militant atheists such as yourself, Roy.

And that was less than 100 years ago. Or have you forgotten the 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by militant atheist regimes?

Besides, the crusades halted the Muslim advance into Europe and the inquisition was a response to Cathar aggression who just happened to be socialists like yourself.

C’mon, Reverend Roy. Wake the fuck up.
.
And that was less than 100 years ago. Or have you forgotten the 200 million people murdered in the 20th century by militant atheist regimes?

your a stooge. bing

View attachment 279367

your cohorts just have pretty faces, down deep they are as evil as you.
How many times do I have to tell you that the KKK was formed as the terrorist wing of the Democratic Party for the express purpose of taking back their statehouses using terror and violence to dissuade blacks - who were Republicans - from voting?

Can you tell me why you give a hall pass the atheistic regimes of the 20th century which committed the greatest atrocities in the history of mankind? Could it be that you are a communist per chance?

And lastly, your main problem with me is that I am a Christian. Yes, I do believe that God loved man so much that he was born into this world to testify to the truth and suffer death for our sins to reconcile justice with mercy. Yes, I do believe that if I have enough faith God will manifest his spirit into the host so that I may devour God for no other reason than I asked him to.

What's it to you?

So you go right ahead and tell me that my religion is wrong and that I'm going to hell, just like any other good religious fanatic would do.
Omg, you are so brainwashed into you religion....

First, there is no atheistic regime in the 20th century. You're a friggin idiot for even trying that shit...

And you think the KKK is a democratic thing.... I don't believe in political parties. They're all evil. But if I did, it would be the other party...

I think you're a flat out repub, and believe in end-of-world shit. And you want to make as much money as you can in the meantime. You're a snake-oil salseman.

You are not following the values of christ.
Learn some history.
 

Forum List

Back
Top