Even you leftists on here can no longer deny the truth.

[Slade3200]

I think your neighbor is ANTIFA. Have you considered burning his house down?

that sounds like the patriotic thing to do

Do you doubt that it could have happened? Are you saying that it didn't?

What are you referring to? Your ANTIFA neighbor or a team up of ANTIFA and ISIS to destroy Trump?

 

[ClosedCaption]

US Antifa and other Leftist groups met in Germany with al-Qaeda and ISIS to plot Trump’s destruction

It's a fact. They're all a bunch of violent terrorists and deserve to die.

US Antifa and other Leftist groups met in Germany with al-Qaeda and ISIS to plot Trump’s destruction

Wait, but meetings dont mean anything right? Or do meetings mean things when its not Trump and Russia?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Btw Antifa is the rights newest boogie man. Antifa also had a huge terrifying riot across the Nation too! Booga Booga

 

[jknowgood]

Its a fact? Why, because you saw it in an article? Do you really want to go down that road?

you saw that moore was accused and with no actual facts declared it true.

What has already been proven about Moore is more than enough for anyone with morals not to vote for him.

What has been proven?

 

[NYcarbineer]

I think your neighbor is ANTIFA. Have you considered burning his house down?

that sounds like the patriotic thing to do

Hopefully he knows how to do that bump

US Antifa and other Leftist groups met in Germany with al-Qaeda and ISIS to plot Trump’s destruction

It's a fact. They're all a bunch of violent terrorists and deserve to die.

US Antifa and other Leftist groups met in Germany with al-Qaeda and ISIS to plot Trump’s destruction

Obama got 30 death threats a day when he was president. How many threads did you start about that?

 

[jknowgood]

US Antifa and other Leftist groups met in Germany with al-Qaeda and ISIS to plot Trump’s destruction

It's a fact. They're all a bunch of violent terrorists and deserve to die.

US Antifa and other Leftist groups met in Germany with al-Qaeda and ISIS to plot Trump’s destruction

The same could be said about the right. Also you fuckers worked with Putin last election steal the election so you're dirty as fuck.

I don't support Antifa but hate fascism with a passion.

Awe, spouting lies with no evidence. Now move a long and let the adults talk.

 

[RWNJ]

From the Article in the OP:

‘There is clearly overwhelming evidence that there are growing ties between U.S. radicals and the Islamic State, as well as several [ISIS] offshoots and splinter groups,’ stated the FBI field report, which was delivered to Acting Director Andrew McCabe on July 11, 2017, and which is being published for the first time in my new book All Out War: The Plot to Destroy Trump.

Do I really need to explain what's going on here?

It should come as no surprise to anyone that members of the far left and radical Islam are united in their hate for the American way of life, and that they are willing to work together to accomplish their goals. Neither is it surprising that the Obama administration would provide cover for these radical groups, which in so doing, has created a serious national security threat, as he was friends with Bill Ayers, a renowned, and unrepentant domestic terrorist.

BTW, Slade. I've searched the internet, using three different search engines. I couldn't find anything where the FBI denied that this report doesn't exist, or that it is in any way inaccurate. Do you really believe that these domestic terrorist groups would not have met with their Middle East counterparts? Why are you defending them? Are you one of them?

The FBI doesn't comment on conspiracy theories like this. That is their policy. Just because you can't find a denial doesn't mean its true, it means the FBI is sticking by their policy. This dude is trying to sell a book. You are a dupe

Well, this story is all over the internet, and I couldn't find anything that says it's not true. I guess time will tell. After all, Antifa has officially been labeled a terrorist group. So I have no problem believing this.

ANTIFA has been officially labeled a terrorist group? Officially by the US government or Officially by Breitbart?

And of course this story is all over the internet. It takes one wingnut to post about it and then it spreads like wildfire. Haven't you noticed that seems to be the norm now a days. It's called fake news.... Are any credible/non partisan outlets reporting it?

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has formally classified the activities of anti-fascist groups (antifa) as “domestic terrorist violence” since early 2016, according to confidential law enforcement documents obtained by Politico and interviews.

Federal authorities have reportedly warned state and local officials the antifa has become “increasingly confrontational” in efforts to thwart white supremacist groups.


Newly disclosed documents show authorities believed “anarchist extremists” were the main cause of violence at a number of public rallies. A confidential 2016 joint intelligence assessment by DHS and the FBI blamed the antifa for attacks on a range of targets, including police, government institutions and symbols of “the capitalist system.”

And what would you consider a credible news source?

 

[Doubledareme]

Its a fact? Why, because you saw it in an article? Do you really want to go down that road?

you saw that moore was accused and with no actual facts declared it true.

What has already been proven about Moore is more than enough for anyone with morals not to vote for him.

What has been proven?

That he was an "adult" male trying to date "teenage" girls. Mall-rat Roy had a thing for young meat and robbing the cradle. He's admitted to it.

The wife being 14 years younger is also proof of said thing.

 

[jknowgood]

Its a fact? Why, because you saw it in an article? Do you really want to go down that road?

you saw that moore was accused and with no actual facts declared it true.

What has already been proven about Moore is more than enough for anyone with morals not to vote for him.

What has been proven?

That he was an "adult" male trying to date "teenage" girls. Mall-rat Roy has a thing for young meat and robbing the cradle. He's admitted to it.

No he hasn't.

 

[Doubledareme]

Its a fact? Why, because you saw it in an article? Do you really want to go down that road?

you saw that moore was accused and with no actual facts declared it true.

What has already been proven about Moore is more than enough for anyone with morals not to vote for him.

What has been proven?

That he was an "adult" male trying to date "teenage" girls. Mall-rat Roy has a thing for young meat and robbing the cradle. He's admitted to it.

No he hasn't.

Yes, he has.

"Hannity pressed Moore on whether he had dated girls in their teens when he was in 30s. “Not generally, no,” the former judge said in response."

We have a word for that, we call it "yes".

 

[RWNJ]

Its a fact? Why, because you saw it in an article? Do you really want to go down that road?

you saw that moore was accused and with no actual facts declared it true.

What has already been proven about Moore is more than enough for anyone with morals not to vote for him.

What has been proven?

That he was an "adult" male trying to date "teenage" girls. Mall-rat Roy has a thing for young meat and robbing the cradle. He's admitted to it.

Really? Where's your proof?

 

[RWNJ]

you saw that moore was accused and with no actual facts declared it true.

What has already been proven about Moore is more than enough for anyone with morals not to vote for him.

What has been proven?

That he was an "adult" male trying to date "teenage" girls. Mall-rat Roy has a thing for young meat and robbing the cradle. He's admitted to it.

No he hasn't.

Yes, he has.

"Hannity pressed Moore on whether he had dated girls in their teens when he was in 30s. “Not generally, no,” the former judge said in response."

We have a word for that, we call it "yes".

In their teens? 18 and 19 are in the teens. In some states, 16 is legal.

 

[Doubledareme]

Its a fact? Why, because you saw it in an article? Do you really want to go down that road?

you saw that moore was accused and with no actual facts declared it true.

What has already been proven about Moore is more than enough for anyone with morals not to vote for him.

What has been proven?

That he was an "adult" male trying to date "teenage" girls. Mall-rat Roy has a thing for young meat and robbing the cradle. He's admitted to it.

Really? Where's your proof?

"Hannity pressed Moore on whether he had dated girls in their teens when he was in 30s. “Not generally, no,” the former judge said in response."

 

[Doubledareme]

What has already been proven about Moore is more than enough for anyone with morals not to vote for him.

What has been proven?

That he was an "adult" male trying to date "teenage" girls. Mall-rat Roy has a thing for young meat and robbing the cradle. He's admitted to it.

No he hasn't.

Yes, he has.

"Hannity pressed Moore on whether he had dated girls in their teens when he was in 30s. “Not generally, no,” the former judge said in response."

We have a word for that, we call it "yes".

In their teens? 18 and 19 are in the teens. In some states, 16 is legal.

18 and 19 are late teenagers and far too young for a man nearly twice their age.

 

[jc456]

Its a fact? Why, because you saw it in an article? Do you really want to go down that road?

you saw that moore was accused and with no actual facts declared it true.

What has already been proven about Moore is more than enough for anyone with morals not to vote for him.

as much as that story then eh? same evidence.

 

[jknowgood]

you saw that moore was accused and with no actual facts declared it true.

What has already been proven about Moore is more than enough for anyone with morals not to vote for him.

What has been proven?

That he was an "adult" male trying to date "teenage" girls. Mall-rat Roy has a thing for young meat and robbing the cradle. He's admitted to it.

No he hasn't.

Yes, he has.

"Hannity pressed Moore on whether he had dated girls in their teens when he was in 30s. “Not generally, no,” the former judge said in response."

We have a word for that, we call it "yes".

If they were above 18 a little creepy, but not against the law. So did you hold Clinton to the same scrutiny?

 

[RWNJ]

What has been proven?

That he was an "adult" male trying to date "teenage" girls. Mall-rat Roy has a thing for young meat and robbing the cradle. He's admitted to it.

No he hasn't.

Yes, he has.

"Hannity pressed Moore on whether he had dated girls in their teens when he was in 30s. “Not generally, no,” the former judge said in response."

We have a word for that, we call it "yes".

In their teens? 18 and 19 are in the teens. In some states, 16 is legal.

18 and 19 are late teenagers and far too young for a man nearly twice their age.

18 and 19 year old girls are considered to be adults. They can date anyone they like. They could marry an eighty year old man if they want.

 

[jknowgood]

What has been proven?

That he was an "adult" male trying to date "teenage" girls. Mall-rat Roy has a thing for young meat and robbing the cradle. He's admitted to it.

No he hasn't.

Yes, he has.

"Hannity pressed Moore on whether he had dated girls in their teens when he was in 30s. “Not generally, no,” the former judge said in response."

We have a word for that, we call it "yes".

In their teens? 18 and 19 are in the teens. In some states, 16 is legal.

18 and 19 are late teenagers and far too young for a man nearly twice their age.

Wow, and I bet you stood up for clinton?

 

[Doubledareme]

What has already been proven about Moore is more than enough for anyone with morals not to vote for him.

What has been proven?

That he was an "adult" male trying to date "teenage" girls. Mall-rat Roy has a thing for young meat and robbing the cradle. He's admitted to it.

No he hasn't.

Yes, he has.

"Hannity pressed Moore on whether he had dated girls in their teens when he was in 30s. “Not generally, no,” the former judge said in response."

We have a word for that, we call it "yes".

If they were above 18 a little creepy, but not against the law. So did you hold Clinton to the same scrutiny?

Clinton didn't molest a 14-year-old (so it seems) or ask the mother of a 16-year-old (both mother and daughter say so) if he could "date" her.

And the standard is the same, go after a kid and I cut your balls off.

 

[Doubledareme]

That he was an "adult" male trying to date "teenage" girls. Mall-rat Roy has a thing for young meat and robbing the cradle. He's admitted to it.

No he hasn't.

Yes, he has.

"Hannity pressed Moore on whether he had dated girls in their teens when he was in 30s. “Not generally, no,” the former judge said in response."

We have a word for that, we call it "yes".

In their teens? 18 and 19 are in the teens. In some states, 16 is legal.

18 and 19 are late teenagers and far too young for a man nearly twice their age.

Wow, and I bet you stood up for clinton?

Clinton didn't try to ask out a 16-year-old or molest a 14-year-old.