Face it, libs, Hillary is done. Stick a fork in her.

now explain this Bripat ....
The Federal Bureau of Investigations has opened an inquiry into Donald Trump’s presidential campaign over the connections between top leadership of the Republican ticket and foreign governments, particularly those governments with ties to Russia’s Vladimir Putin.

The target of the examination is Republican fixer Paul Manafort, who up until recently was Trump’s campaign manager, who orchestrated many of the events in front of an international audience and behind the scenes within the Republican Party for the nominee.

whats worse emails ???? or taking money from the russians to do their biding
View attachment 96193
in other words fascist, its ok for trump to take money from the rooskies... got it ... comrade owebo
Trump sold them his things.....

Hitlery sold them our things....

See the difference Adolf?
 
The "stick a fork in her, she's done "comment is way premature...it's a knee jerk, sports fan style reaction. Just like cheer leaders react, with pom-poms in the air, when there's favorable event. My guess is unless Comey comes forth with criminal charges Hillary will pull through but Trump will gain lots of ground, just not enough. This race is truely up in the air now...to cheer a winner at this point with this current ucertanty is just foolish.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G530AZ using USMessageBoard.com mobile app
HIllary is circling the drain. The panic among her douche bag supporters couldn't be more obvious.
Okay since you're so righteous and all knowing, then you must be an un-used douche bag...that's fine, I'll tell you what, as we all know, the election is just around the corner...let's see who gets flushed down the toilet, and if the big turd swirling down the bowl is orange in color with a blond tip then I'll be waiting for your all knowing answers to what happend ...since you are the all knowing clean douche bag.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G530AZ using USMessageBoard.com mobile app
. I'll tell you what will have happened... If corruption wins, then America loses if Hillary gets elected... Simple enough for you ??
 
I am not alone - many are stating so today.

In simplicity, Watergate was about a President who got his hands on illegal tape recordings of political strategy by the opposition.

Hillary's scandals involve violations of classified information rules/regs/laws, an attempt to circumnavigate the laws requiring govt transparency, a violation of the FOIA and Fed Records Act, Perjury, cover-up at the HIGHEST govt level, fraud, corruption,etc..it also is dealing with Hillary Foundation crimes of bribery, pay-to-play, etc...

This is SO MUCH MORE than Watergate
no, its only water gate in your demented little mind cause trump told you to think it ... she hasn't, to date, ever violated classified information rules/regs/laws, that to is trump telling you what to think ... you're a mindless dweeb ... you don't even know what the rules/regs/laws are .... becasue if you did then you wouldn't have said something so ignorant .. we get it you and stupid are best friends

Wrong, douche bag. Comey said she violated the classified information rules/regs/laws.


no he didn't dick smoker ... you better go and look again dick smoker ... he said that there maybe some classified material on it ... we don't know because we haven't look at it yet ...he also said dick smoker, it maybe stuff we have already look at ... he never said she violated the classified information rules/regs/laws.... only morons like you did

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/07/rep-trey-gowdy-rips-into-fbi-director-james-comey-on-hillary-clintons-intent.html

Gowdy: Good morning, Director Comey. Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received any classified information over her private e-mail, was that true?

Comey: Our investigation found that there was classified information sent.
Gowdy: It was not true?

Comey: That's what I said.

Gowdy: OK. Well, I'm looking for a shorter answer so you and I are not here quite as long. Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her e-mails sent or received. Was that true?

Comey: That's not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents.

Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said "I did not e-mail any classified information to anyone on my e-mail there was no classified material." That is true?

Comey: There was classified information emailed.
cleardot.gif

State Dept confirms FBI got it wrong, none of Hillary Clinton’s emails were classified at the time

Hillary Clinton insisted all along that none of the emails she sent or received on her private email server during her tenure as Secretary of State was marked classified at the time. That was contradicted by the Director of the FBI yesterday when he claimed that a “very small number” of her emails were in fact classified at the time. The New York Times then determined that that number was just two. And now the State Department has confirmed that the two emails in question weren’t actually classified at the time, and had merely been marked incorrectly during the course of the investigation.


In yet another development which helps make clear that Clinton did nothing demonstrably wrong with her email, the two emails sent to her by her aides in 2012 were harmless in nature. Both were merely used to schedule phone calls with foreign leaders, and on their face, clearly could not have possibly been classified at the time. Sure enough, a spokesman for the State Department has confirmed that they were not classified.

This comes just hours after CBS News reported that Hillary Clinton had asked the NSA for a secure smartphone for her email immediately upon taking office as Secretary of State, and had been turned down. One by one, the details coming out are making clear that despite having spent so many months running an investigation and despite having been given full cooperation by Clinton and her team, the conclusions made by the FBI Director yesterday were far removed from the actual facts involved.


With Hillary Clinton now having been fully cleared of any potential charges, this may be a moot point in terms of the outcome; she’s off the hook and she remains the clear frontrunner in the 2016 presidential race. But these new details surfacing today make clear that the FBI Director didn’t come close to getting his facts right when he personally criticized her email usage yesterday. Here’s
. You can't answer a few very important things here, and that is Why did she use bleach bit, and also destroy her devices along with 33,000 e-mails when they were subpoenaed by the FBI or congress to have a look at in the investigation ????
 
You want CRIMINAL INTENT?

Using Bleach Bit, destroying Subpoenaed records - THERE IT IS!
 
oh yes dick smoker you didn't say what classified information rules/regs/laws. did she violate ... cat got your tongue

Laws that Hillary broke:

Unauthorized Removal And Retention Of Classified Documents Or Material

18 U.S.C. § 1924

Class: A Misdemeanor

Possible Penalty: Imprisonment for 1 year and/or $100,000 fine

Text: “Knowingly removing materials containing classified information of the United States with the intent to retain said info at an unauthorized location without the authority to do so”

Gathering, Transmitting Or Losing Defense Information

18 U.S.C. § 793

Class: Felony

Possible Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years and/or $250,000 fine

Text: “Allowing [by means of gross negligence] any document relating to the national defense to be removed from its proper place of custody or destroyed –or- willfully retaining unauthorized documents relating to national defense and failing to deliver them to the United States employee entitled to receive them –or- failure to report that unauthorized documents relating to national defense were removed from their proper place of custody or destroyed”

Concealment, Removal, Or Mutilation Generally

18 U.S.C. § 2071

Class: Felony

Possible Penalty: Imprisonment of no more than 3 years, a fine, or both

Text: “Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same”

Destruction, Alteration, Or Falsification Of Records In Federal Investigations And Bankruptcy

18 U.S.C. § 1519

Class: Felony

Possible Penalty: Imprisonment of no more than 20 years, a fine, or both

Text: “Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States”
so dick smoker tell us what Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States ... so dick smoker what part of the law did she violate ??? I'll wait

She used bleachbit on 33,000 emails, dumbass.
 
oh yes dick smoker you didn't say what classified information rules/regs/laws. did she violate ... cat got your tongue

Laws that Hillary broke:

Unauthorized Removal And Retention Of Classified Documents Or Material

18 U.S.C. § 1924

Class: A Misdemeanor

Possible Penalty: Imprisonment for 1 year and/or $100,000 fine

Text: “Knowingly removing materials containing classified information of the United States with the intent to retain said info at an unauthorized location without the authority to do so”

Gathering, Transmitting Or Losing Defense Information

18 U.S.C. § 793

Class: Felony

Possible Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years and/or $250,000 fine

Text: “Allowing [by means of gross negligence] any document relating to the national defense to be removed from its proper place of custody or destroyed –or- willfully retaining unauthorized documents relating to national defense and failing to deliver them to the United States employee entitled to receive them –or- failure to report that unauthorized documents relating to national defense were removed from their proper place of custody or destroyed”

Concealment, Removal, Or Mutilation Generally

18 U.S.C. § 2071

Class: Felony

Possible Penalty: Imprisonment of no more than 3 years, a fine, or both

Text: “Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same”

Destruction, Alteration, Or Falsification Of Records In Federal Investigations And Bankruptcy

18 U.S.C. § 1519

Class: Felony

Possible Penalty: Imprisonment of no more than 20 years, a fine, or both

Text: “Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States”
so dick smoker tell us what Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States ... so dick smoker what part of the law did she violate ??? I'll wait

She used bleachbit on 33,000 emails, dumbass.
On a private server with personal emails. Prove any of those deleted 33,000 emails contained classified information...
 
You want CRIMINAL INTENT?

Using Bleach Bit, destroying Subpoenaed records - THERE IT IS!
That would put her in contempt of Congress. Republicans charge her?
Have you always been an ignorant dumbass or is this new due to panic from recent days' revelations?!

The FBI is currently engaged in MULTIPLE investigations of Hillary Clinton, and the GOP is not going to touch this with a 10-foot poll, giving Libs no reason to point fingers at them for anything. This is Comey's show. You want charges - be patient. They may still come yet.
 
oh yes dick smoker you didn't say what classified information rules/regs/laws. did she violate ... cat got your tongue

Laws that Hillary broke:

Unauthorized Removal And Retention Of Classified Documents Or Material

18 U.S.C. § 1924

Class: A Misdemeanor

Possible Penalty: Imprisonment for 1 year and/or $100,000 fine

Text: “Knowingly removing materials containing classified information of the United States with the intent to retain said info at an unauthorized location without the authority to do so”

Gathering, Transmitting Or Losing Defense Information

18 U.S.C. § 793

Class: Felony

Possible Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years and/or $250,000 fine

Text: “Allowing [by means of gross negligence] any document relating to the national defense to be removed from its proper place of custody or destroyed –or- willfully retaining unauthorized documents relating to national defense and failing to deliver them to the United States employee entitled to receive them –or- failure to report that unauthorized documents relating to national defense were removed from their proper place of custody or destroyed”

Concealment, Removal, Or Mutilation Generally

18 U.S.C. § 2071

Class: Felony

Possible Penalty: Imprisonment of no more than 3 years, a fine, or both

Text: “Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same”

Destruction, Alteration, Or Falsification Of Records In Federal Investigations And Bankruptcy

18 U.S.C. § 1519

Class: Felony

Possible Penalty: Imprisonment of no more than 20 years, a fine, or both

Text: “Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States”
so dick smoker tell us what Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States ... so dick smoker what part of the law did she violate ??? I'll wait

She used bleachbit on 33,000 emails, dumbass.
On a private server with personal emails. Prove any of those deleted 33,000 emails contained classified information...

She claims they were "private." Since when is a suspect in a criminal investigation allowed to determine what evidence the prosecution is allowed to have?
 
She claims they were "private." Since when is a suspect in a criminal investigation allowed to determine what evidence the prosecution is allowed to have?
When did it become acceptable for a suspect in a criminal investigation to tell the investigator that they - the person being investigated - will go through their own files, determine what is evidence that they will hand over and what is not, then destroy the rest (THOUSANDS) - all of which was Subpoenaed?
 
[That would put her in contempt of Congress. Republicans charge her?

If you ever told the truth, would you burst into flames or something?

WIKILEAKS: Hillary Staff Discussed Hiding Obama-Hillary Emails from Investigators - Then Deleted Them (VIDEO)

There is your intent, sploogy.

The Clinton mob deliberately, with malice aforethough, destroyed evidence under a legal subpoena. Based on his own statement offered last month, Comey has NO excuse to not arrest Hillary Clinton.

In terms a democrat can understand, I gots your intent hanging, bitch,,.
 
She claims they were "private." Since when is a suspect in a criminal investigation allowed to determine what evidence the prosecution is allowed to have?

Since the law became meaningless.

The law is a farce, a club used to beat the commoners into submission. The law obviously has no power over our ruling elite. Hillary flaunts her criminality and mocks those who call for the same laws to be applied to her as would be applied to the serfs.

We are not a nation of law, we are not a nation of justice. We are a banana republic where status in the ruling Junta creates immunity from the laws imposed on the lower caste.
 
no, its only water gate in your demented little mind cause trump told you to think it ... she hasn't, to date, ever violated classified information rules/regs/laws, that to is trump telling you what to think ... you're a mindless dweeb ... you don't even know what the rules/regs/laws are .... becasue if you did then you wouldn't have said something so ignorant .. we get it you and stupid are best friends

The first thing a democrat hack must do is jettison integrity.

The second thing you do is clearly to rid yourselves of intellect as well.

{
1. Mishandling Classified Information
Executive Order 13526 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f) of the federal code make it unlawful to send of store classified information on personal email. Casey Harper at The Daily Caller delved into this angle:

"'By using a private email system, Secretary Clinton violated the Federal Records Act and the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual regarding records management, and worse, could have left classified and top secret documents vulnerable to cyber attack,' Cause of Action Executive Director Dan Epstein said in an email to reporters.

'This is an egregious violation of the law, and if it were anyone else, they could be facing fines and criminal prosecution.'”

Harper goes on to point out that multiple violations of this law have been enforced recently, including in 1999, when former CIA Director John M. Deutch's security clearance was suspended for using his personal email to send classified information.

Additionally, this past week, Gen. David Patraeus pleaded guilty for mishandling classified information by using a Gmail account instead of his official government email.

2. Violation of The 2009 Federal Records Act
Section 1236.22 of the 2009 National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) requirements states that:

“Agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency record keeping system.”

According to the original story on Clinton's emails published in The New York Times:

"Federal regulations, since 2009, have required that all emails be preserved as part of an agency’s record-keeping system. In Mrs. Clinton’s case, her emails were kept on her personal account and her staff took no steps to have them preserved as part of State Department record.

In response to a State Department request, Mrs. Clinton’s advisers, late last year, reviewed her account and decided which emails to turn over to the State Department."

The fact that the State Department combs through the 55,000 pages of emails sent on Clinton's private email account seems to verify that at least some of the emails Clinton sent contained classified information.

3. Violation of the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA)
Veterans for a Strong America has filed a lawsuit against the State Department over potential violations of FOIA. Joel Arends, chairman of the non-profit group, explained to the Washington Examiner that their FOIA request over the Benghazi affair specifically asked for any personal email accounts Secretary Clinton may have used:

“'At this point in time, I think we're the only ones that specifically asked for both her personal and government email and phone logs,' Arends said of his group's Benghazi-related request.”

MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell believes that the use of a personal emails server appears to be a preemptive move, specifically designed to circumvent FOIA:

“'Hillary Clinton’s system was designed to defy Freedom of Information Act requests, which is designed to defy the law.'”
}
3 Federal Laws Hillary May Have Violated By Using Personal Email Accounts for State Business
 
Even the ridiculously over-sampled polls are showing Clinton +1...

She is done. Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.
 
You want CRIMINAL INTENT?

Using Bleach Bit, destroying Subpoenaed records - THERE IT IS!
That would put her in contempt of Congress. Republicans charge her?
Have you always been an ignorant dumbass or is this new due to panic from recent days' revelations?!

The FBI is currently engaged in MULTIPLE investigations of Hillary Clinton, and the GOP is not going to touch this with a 10-foot poll, giving Libs no reason to point fingers at them for anything. This is Comey's show. You want charges - be patient. They may still come yet.
You're fucking deranged. :cuckoo:

If Hillary failed to provide subpoenaed emails because she wiped them clean, the GOP-led Congress would have held her in contempt, if for no other reason than to bring her poll numbers down, just as they did with Benghazi hearing #8. Your mind-boggling excuse that they wouldn't because of the current FBI investigation is beyond your usual rightarded idiocy because they would have charged her with contempt many months ago when she purportedly BleachBit her server. You're such an imbecile, you actually thought I meant they would charge her today for something she did over a year ago.
 
oh yes dick smoker you didn't say what classified information rules/regs/laws. did she violate ... cat got your tongue

Laws that Hillary broke:

Unauthorized Removal And Retention Of Classified Documents Or Material

18 U.S.C. § 1924

Class: A Misdemeanor

Possible Penalty: Imprisonment for 1 year and/or $100,000 fine

Text: “Knowingly removing materials containing classified information of the United States with the intent to retain said info at an unauthorized location without the authority to do so”

Gathering, Transmitting Or Losing Defense Information

18 U.S.C. § 793

Class: Felony

Possible Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years and/or $250,000 fine

Text: “Allowing [by means of gross negligence] any document relating to the national defense to be removed from its proper place of custody or destroyed –or- willfully retaining unauthorized documents relating to national defense and failing to deliver them to the United States employee entitled to receive them –or- failure to report that unauthorized documents relating to national defense were removed from their proper place of custody or destroyed”

Concealment, Removal, Or Mutilation Generally

18 U.S.C. § 2071

Class: Felony

Possible Penalty: Imprisonment of no more than 3 years, a fine, or both

Text: “Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same”

Destruction, Alteration, Or Falsification Of Records In Federal Investigations And Bankruptcy

18 U.S.C. § 1519

Class: Felony

Possible Penalty: Imprisonment of no more than 20 years, a fine, or both

Text: “Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States”
so dick smoker tell us what Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States ... so dick smoker what part of the law did she violate ??? I'll wait

She used bleachbit on 33,000 emails, dumbass.
On a private server with personal emails. Prove any of those deleted 33,000 emails contained classified information...

She claims they were "private." Since when is a suspect in a criminal investigation allowed to determine what evidence the prosecution is allowed to have?
If deleting them was illegal, she would have been charged. So I take this as a "no," you can't prove any of those emails contained classified information.
 
You want CRIMINAL INTENT?

Using Bleach Bit, destroying Subpoenaed records - THERE IT IS!
That would put her in contempt of Congress. Republicans charge her?
Have you always been an ignorant dumbass or is this new due to panic from recent days' revelations?!

The FBI is currently engaged in MULTIPLE investigations of Hillary Clinton, and the GOP is not going to touch this with a 10-foot poll, giving Libs no reason to point fingers at them for anything. This is Comey's show. You want charges - be patient. They may still come yet.
You're fucking deranged. :cuckoo:

If Hillary failed to provide subpoenaed emails because she wiped them clean, the GOP-led Congress would have held her in contempt, if for no other reason than to bring her poll numbers down, just as they did with Benghazi hearing #8. Your mind-boggling excuse that they wouldn't because of the current FBI investigation is beyond your usual rightarded idiocy because they would have charged her with contempt many months ago when she purportedly BleachBit her server. You're such an imbecile, you actually thought I meant they would charge her today for something she did over a year ago.
. Investigations against high profiled people's take time, and soon they will all be reeled in to the net. Hillary is fixing to be fried like the bottom feeder that she is.
 
[That would put her in contempt of Congress. Republicans charge her?

If you ever told the truth, would you burst into flames or something?

WIKILEAKS: Hillary Staff Discussed Hiding Obama-Hillary Emails from Investigators - Then Deleted Them (VIDEO)

There is your intent, sploogy.

The Clinton mob deliberately, with malice aforethough, destroyed evidence under a legal subpoena. Based on his own statement offered last month, Comey has NO excuse to not arrest Hillary Clinton.

In terms a democrat can understand, I gots your intent hanging, bitch,,.
LOLOL

Now you're assuming any such emails Podesta was referencing were not turned over. :eusa_doh:

Seems all that's hanging is your dysfunctional brain.
 
Faun, you keep repeating the same propaganda that has been debunked over and over.

Barry and Lynch have constantly, and continue to, protect Hillary from indictment and prosecution, just as they have done with Holder, Castro, Reid, etc.
 

Forum List

Back
Top