Father of Newtown Victim Heckled

[Bfgrn]

No they have background checks in ALL STATES.... there is no need to make it more easy for the government to know what I own.....Keep your fascism you liar I dont want it.

SO, We, the People should continue to allow a loophole in the law that allows criminals to buy weapons at guns shows without a background check. Why? Because we don't want to hurt your wittle feelings because you are a delusional, sniveling fear filled coward and conspiracy nut.

You do realize that the gun-control crowd is driven by nothing but fear?????

Let's see...would a fear filled person feel they need a gun or not need a gun? Take your time...

 

[JoeB131]

The "penis surrogate" argument is the Godwin's law of the gun control debate. Congratulations, you just lost.

I think you misunderstand the problem Godwin's law as a fallacy.

But that's okay, you are a weak and emotional debator...

Weak and emotional? None of your responses is longer than 2 or 3 sentences. If you had an original thought it would probably blue screen your brain.

It usually doesn't take more than two sentences to dispose of your tired, emotional responses...

Oh, do you know that the FBI has determined that the number of justified self-defense shootings are about 201 a year?

So 300 million guns, only 201 are used to kill bad guys. 30,000 are used to kill good guys.

A chance of using a gun in self defense is about the chance of getting hit by lightening or winning the lottery.

 

[JoeB131]

Well, you get all bent out of shape about them... which says a lot.

And what was your MOS? Oh, that's right, you didn't serve.

LOL...projection at its finest.

Ole Joe can be counted on for humor....tell us all how valuable your posts to any real discussion....oh Army Supply guy?

Actually, you get ignored because you never really add anything to a conversation....

That's nothing to be proud of.

Incidently MOS 76Y30...

 

[jericho777]

Bunch of damned cowardly animals. They remind me of those Westboro idiots.

No one was heckled, it's a damn lie and has been retracted..
Liberals Lie they made this up!!!!

 

[OriginalShroom]

SO, We, the People should continue to allow a loophole in the law that allows criminals to buy weapons at guns shows without a background check. Why? Because we don't want to hurt your wittle feelings because you are a delusional, sniveling fear filled coward and conspiracy nut.

What proof do you have that criminal buy guns at gun shows where there are always armed uniformed and out of uniform police?

Is that supposed to scare off criminals? In your tiny little fear infested mind, do they wear black? Do they wear hoods??

AMERICA’S GUN SHOWS: OPEN MARKETS FOR CRIMINALS

Excuse me if I don't believe a study put out by the gun grabbers.

The Cato Institute has a slightly different message. The Facts about Gun Shows | Cato Institute

 

[OriginalShroom]

I think you misunderstand the problem Godwin's law as a fallacy.

But that's okay, you are a weak and emotional debator...

Weak and emotional? None of your responses is longer than 2 or 3 sentences. If you had an original thought it would probably blue screen your brain.

It usually doesn't take more than two sentences to dispose of your tired, emotional responses...

Oh, do you know that the FBI has determined that the number of justified self-defense shootings are about 201 a year?

So 300 million guns, only 201 are used to kill bad guys. 30,000 are used to kill good guys.

A chance of using a gun in self defense is about the chance of getting hit by lightening or winning the lottery.

I notice a very large number missing from your list.

The number of people whose lives were saved because they had a gun and they didn't have to kill the bad guy.

Many times just pointing your weapon at an intruder ends the confrontation as they turn tail and run or they are held at gunpoint until the police arrive to arrest them.

 

[GuyPinestra]

SO, We, the People should continue to allow a loophole in the law that allows criminals to buy weapons at guns shows without a background check. Why? Because we don't want to hurt your wittle feelings because you are a delusional, sniveling fear filled coward and conspiracy nut.

You do realize that the gun-control crowd is driven by nothing but fear?????

Let's see...would a fear filled person feel they need a gun or not need a gun? Take your time...

A fear-filled person would want to disarm the whole populace in response to one crazy fucker shooting up a school.

 

[JoeB131]

Weak and emotional? None of your responses is longer than 2 or 3 sentences. If you had an original thought it would probably blue screen your brain.

It usually doesn't take more than two sentences to dispose of your tired, emotional responses...

Oh, do you know that the FBI has determined that the number of justified self-defense shootings are about 201 a year?

So 300 million guns, only 201 are used to kill bad guys. 30,000 are used to kill good guys.

A chance of using a gun in self defense is about the chance of getting hit by lightening or winning the lottery.

I notice a very large number missing from your list.

The number of people whose lives were saved because they had a gun and they didn't have to kill the bad guy.

Many times just pointing your weapon at an intruder ends the confrontation as they turn tail and run or they are held at gunpoint until the police arrive to arrest them.

I also didn't include the number of people saved by Magic Unicorns...

Fact is, a gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a member of the household than an intruder.

 

[JoeB131]

You do realize that the gun-control crowd is driven by nothing but fear?????

Let's see...would a fear filled person feel they need a gun or not need a gun? Take your time...

A fear-filled person would want to disarm the whole populace in response to one crazy fucker shooting up a school.

The populace doesn't need to be armed. The populace is a bigger threat to itself to weapons than the government or criminals.

 

[martybegan]

It usually doesn't take more than two sentences to dispose of your tired, emotional responses...

Oh, do you know that the FBI has determined that the number of justified self-defense shootings are about 201 a year?

So 300 million guns, only 201 are used to kill bad guys. 30,000 are used to kill good guys.

A chance of using a gun in self defense is about the chance of getting hit by lightening or winning the lottery.

I notice a very large number missing from your list.

The number of people whose lives were saved because they had a gun and they didn't have to kill the bad guy.

Many times just pointing your weapon at an intruder ends the confrontation as they turn tail and run or they are held at gunpoint until the police arrive to arrest them.

I also didn't include the number of people saved by Magic Unicorns...

Fact is, a gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a member of the household than an intruder.

Again with the same tired study that covered one county in Washington State over 10 years.....

Find some new hack material please.

 

[martybegan]

Let's see...would a fear filled person feel they need a gun or not need a gun? Take your time...

A fear-filled person would want to disarm the whole populace in response to one crazy fucker shooting up a school.

The populace doesn't need to be armed. The populace is a bigger threat to itself to weapons than the government or criminals.

Yes, we all should be meek sheep, waiting for big daddy government to rescue us in our time of need.

 

[JoeB131]

[

Again with the same tired study that covered one county in Washington State over 10 years.....

Find some new hack material please.

a study that has been validated, and the NRA got congress to stop any further studies lest they prove the same thing..

[

Yes, we all should be meek sheep, waiting for big daddy government to rescue us in our time of need.

Again, defensive uses of guns are so rare, they aren't worth the risk of offensive uses of guns.

If guns and prisons made us safe, why do we have such a high crime rate? I'm still waiting for you to answer that one.

 

[martybegan]

[

Again with the same tired study that covered one county in Washington State over 10 years.....

Find some new hack material please.

a study that has been validated, and the NRA got congress to stop any further studies lest they prove the same thing..

[

Yes, we all should be meek sheep, waiting for big daddy government to rescue us in our time of need.

Again, defensive uses of guns are so rare, they aren't worth the risk of offensive uses of guns.

If guns and prisons made us safe, why do we have such a high crime rate? I'm still waiting for you to answer that one.

Validated by who? It has been debunked numerous times as an overall indidcator of defensive use of firearms.

Your second argument is a logical fallacy, as do you really think closing all the prisions would make us safer? You are implying getting rid of guns in private ownership would make us safer, which is a gumdrop fantasy land belief.

 

[bripat9643]

Weak and emotional? None of your responses is longer than 2 or 3 sentences. If you had an original thought it would probably blue screen your brain.

It usually doesn't take more than two sentences to dispose of your tired, emotional responses...

Oh, do you know that the FBI has determined that the number of justified self-defense shootings are about 201 a year?

So 300 million guns, only 201 are used to kill bad guys. 30,000 are used to kill good guys.

A chance of using a gun in self defense is about the chance of getting hit by lightening or winning the lottery.

I notice a very large number missing from your list.

The number of people whose lives were saved because they had a gun and they didn't have to kill the bad guy.

Many times just pointing your weapon at an intruder ends the confrontation as they turn tail and run or they are held at gunpoint until the police arrive to arrest them.

The fact that his study is utterly bogus has been pointed out to Joe numerous times. He doesn't care. He knows he's posting a big fat lie. That's what liberals do. Their entire agenda is one big lie.

 

[bripat9643]

You do realize that the gun-control crowd is driven by nothing but fear?????

Let's see...would a fear filled person feel they need a gun or not need a gun? Take your time...

A fear-filled person would want to disarm the whole populace in response to one crazy fucker shooting up a school.

No, the people who want that are servile totalitarian toadies who want us all prostrating ourselves before the almighty government.

 

[OriginalShroom]

[

Again with the same tired study that covered one county in Washington State over 10 years.....

Find some new hack material please.

a study that has been validated, and the NRA got congress to stop any further studies lest they prove the same thing..

[

Yes, we all should be meek sheep, waiting for big daddy government to rescue us in our time of need.

Again, defensive uses of guns are so rare, they aren't worth the risk of offensive uses of guns.

If guns and prisons made us safe, why do we have such a high crime rate? I'm still waiting for you to answer that one.

Try telling that to someone who has had to use their gun defensively.

Or would you rather have a dead crime victim than a live gun owner.

 

[bripat9643]

So the answer is no, universal background checks are not required on all sales at gun shows.

Simple solution...make universal background checks required on all sales at gun shows; through licensed dealers, AND private sellers. No law abiding citizen should oppose that common sense law, UNLESS, like the NRA you are willing to aid and abet murderers so gun manufacturers send you millions of dollars.

Typical Liberal, Gungrabber BS..

Tell everyone your position is the reasonable one and that everyone who disagrees with you is wrong. No room for compromise there.

I have yet to hear any common sense proposals from you gun lickers, except MORE guns.

Your belief that your proposals are "common sense" couldn't be more hilarious.

 

[bripat9643]

I think you misunderstand the problem Godwin's law as a fallacy.

But that's okay, you are a weak and emotional debator...

Weak and emotional? None of your responses is longer than 2 or 3 sentences. If you had an original thought it would probably blue screen your brain.

It usually doesn't take more than two sentences to dispose of your tired, emotional responses...

Oh, do you know that the FBI has determined that the number of justified self-defense shootings are about 201 a year?

So 300 million guns, only 201 are used to kill bad guys. 30,000 are used to kill good guys.

A chance of using a gun in self defense is about the chance of getting hit by lightening or winning the lottery.

Again, shootings do not equate to the number of times guns are used for self defense. Once again, you deliberately misconstrue statistics. You're a bald faced liar.

 

[Oldstyle]

We have a cancer in this country, and they are armed.

Neil Heslin, father of 6-year-old Newtown shooting victim Jesse Lewis, was heckled at the Connecticut State Legislature as he testified Tuesday in hearings on the aftermath of the Newtown massacre. Gun enthusiasts shouted “the Second Amendment!” several times while Heslin, holding a picture of his son, wondered why Bushmaster assault-style weapons such as the one shooter Adam Lanza used should be sold in the state. “There are a lot of things that should be changed to prevent what happened,” Heslin said. Around 1,500 people—both pro-gun and anti, who all had to pass through metal detectors—attended the hearings at the Connecticut capitol under heightened security. Hundreds testified, with one lawyer insisting “the local and national debate has been co-opted by the anti-gun agenda.”

Read it at Connecticut Post

January 29, 2013 7:05 AM

You know what bothers me most about this post? The main stream media edited tape of that confrontation...taking out the part where Neil Heslin first asks a question to which nobody responds to at all...then repeats the question...in effect demanding an answer...which members of the audience provided. That isn't "heckling"...that's an exchange of viewpoints.

What's going on here isn't an attempt to make sure what happened in Connecticut doesn't happen again because banning assault weapons won't cure mental illness or keep criminals from using weapons illegally. The murder rate in Chicago...a place with some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation should illustrate that...but this was never about stopping crazy people or criminals from getting weapons...this is about taking legally owned weapons out of the hands of law abiding Americans using the shootings at that school as an excuse. The truth is we have plenty of laws already on the books. Adding more will not make the nuts sane again nor make criminals who murder (which in case you hadn't heard is against the law!) obey gun laws.

 

[Bfgrn]

We have a cancer in this country, and they are armed.

Neil Heslin, father of 6-year-old Newtown shooting victim Jesse Lewis, was heckled at the Connecticut State Legislature as he testified Tuesday in hearings on the aftermath of the Newtown massacre. Gun enthusiasts shouted “the Second Amendment!” several times while Heslin, holding a picture of his son, wondered why Bushmaster assault-style weapons such as the one shooter Adam Lanza used should be sold in the state. “There are a lot of things that should be changed to prevent what happened,” Heslin said. Around 1,500 people—both pro-gun and anti, who all had to pass through metal detectors—attended the hearings at the Connecticut capitol under heightened security. Hundreds testified, with one lawyer insisting “the local and national debate has been co-opted by the anti-gun agenda.”

Read it at Connecticut Post

January 29, 2013 7:05 AM

You know what bothers me most about this post? The main stream media edited tape of that confrontation...taking out the part where Neil Heslin first asks a question to which nobody responds to at all...then repeats the question...in effect demanding an answer...which members of the audience provided. That isn't "heckling"...that's an exchange of viewpoints.

What's going on here isn't an attempt to make sure what happened in Connecticut doesn't happen again because banning assault weapons won't cure mental illness or keep criminals from using weapons illegally. The murder rate in Chicago...a place with some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation should illustrate that...but this was never about stopping crazy people or criminals from getting weapons...this is about taking legally owned weapons out of the hands of law abiding Americans using the shootings at that school as an excuse. The truth is we have plenty of laws already on the books. Adding more will not make the nuts sane again nor make criminals who murder (which in case you hadn't heard is against the law!) obey gun laws.

AGAIN, I need to correct a Fox News, Breitbart parrot.

The OP HAS NOTHING to do with any video...it is a local Connecticut reporter who attended the hearing IN PERSON, and concluded Father of Newtown victim heckled at hearing as did the Chairman of the hearing who threatened to clear the room.