Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We do have a cancer in our society. The cancer is you.
Why? Because I would respect the rights of a father whose 6 year old son was brutally murdered by letting him speak his peace without heckling him?
It would take me about 60 seconds with a decent rasp to make an AR-15 full auto.
And you would be breaking the law in doing so.
Just because you would break the law does not mean others should have to pay the price for your crime.
So the fact that modifying an AR-15 is illegal means criminals won't do it?
Got it.
so why are you here trying to convice peopel to join your ideas?
And you would be breaking the law in doing so.
Just because you would break the law does not mean others should have to pay the price for your crime.
So the fact that modifying an AR-15 is illegal means criminals won't do it?
Got it.
No the point other than the one on your head is that you don't deny rights to people who do nothing wrong in order to possibly stop one person from doing wrong.
Just like you haven't been thrown in jail if some other guy runs down an old lady in a car that is the same make and model as yours.
so why are you here trying to convice peopel to join your ideas?
I'm not.
I am merely pointing out the idiocy of denying law abiding citizens their rights in order to possibly prevent a criminal from doing harm.
Tell me if you drove a ford fiesta would you want it taken away because some guy drove the same model car into a bunch of kids on the playground?
So the fact that modifying an AR-15 is illegal means criminals won't do it?
Got it.
No the point other than the one on your head is that you don't deny rights to people who do nothing wrong in order to possibly stop one person from doing wrong.
Just like you haven't been thrown in jail if some other guy runs down an old lady in a car that is the same make and model as yours.
The point is that some question the wisdom of selling weapons that can so easily be turned into fully automatic.
I have no problem with gun rights, however the line has to be drawn somewhere, unless the individual believs it wise for citizens to be able to own fully atomatic weapons, artillery, etc.
We do have a cancer in our society. The cancer is you.
Why? Because I would respect the rights of a father whose 6 year old son was brutally murdered by letting him speak his peace without heckling him?
Assuming this was a gun control hearing his "rights" to express himself is not anymore important than anyone elses. This wasn't a memorial for his son. In fact I bet he was demanding that the hecklers rights to own guns be infringed on. All based on raw emotion.
So the fact that modifying an AR-15 is illegal means criminals won't do it?
Got it.
No the point other than the one on your head is that you don't deny rights to people who do nothing wrong in order to possibly stop one person from doing wrong.
Just like you haven't been thrown in jail if some other guy runs down an old lady in a car that is the same make and model as yours.
The point is that some question the wisdom of selling weapons that can so easily be turned into fully automatic.
I have no problem with gun rights, however the line has to be drawn somewhere, unless the individual believs it wise for citizens to be able to own fully atomatic weapons, artillery, etc.
bullshit, you dont like democracy either
so why are you trying to pretend what the people say matters?
Then you tell me how an AR 15 semiautomatic that shoots a .223 round is any different than my Ruger Mini 14 semiautomatic that shoots a .223 round other than cosmetics.
And again we live in a constitutional republic not a democracy.
nope we live in a democratic republic which is a democracy.
and you should NOT be trying to convince anyone to join you in your thoughts because you should NOT want the majority of people to agree with you because according to YOU the majority is NEVER NEVER correct
so why are you here trying to convice peopel to join your ideas?
I'm not.
I am merely pointing out the idiocy of denying law abiding citizens their rights in order to possibly prevent a criminal from doing harm.
Tell me if you drove a ford fiesta would you want it taken away because some guy drove the same model car into a bunch of kids on the playground?
Weapons have one purpose; to fire a projectile meant to kill or main.
Automobiles have a purpose other than to kill.
I am the father of two grown children. I can't imagine the pain that man is going through. If you can't at least defend his right to speak his mind without being heckled, then don't try to lecture anyone about rights.
Someone with a different point of view has an equal right to state their views. But heckling someone tells me that person has no respect for anyone else's rights.
I'm not.
I am merely pointing out the idiocy of denying law abiding citizens their rights in order to possibly prevent a criminal from doing harm.
Tell me if you drove a ford fiesta would you want it taken away because some guy drove the same model car into a bunch of kids on the playground?
Weapons have one purpose; to fire a projectile meant to kill or main.
Automobiles have a purpose other than to kill.
That was not my question.
so why are you here trying to convice peopel to join your ideas?
I'm not.
I am merely pointing out the idiocy of denying law abiding citizens their rights in order to possibly prevent a criminal from doing harm.
Tell me if you drove a ford fiesta would you want it taken away because some guy drove the same model car into a bunch of kids on the playground?
Weapons have one purpose; to fire a projectile meant to kill or main.
Automobiles have a purpose other than to kill.
Weapons have one purpose; to fire a projectile meant to kill or main.
Automobiles have a purpose other than to kill.
That was not my question.
Your question was based on a logical fallacy.
Rights for what? Please show me exactly where the Constitution gives us the "Right" to own military assualt weapons.
I do support the idea that the 2nd gives us the right to conceal carry. But if you concede that it does not give us the "Right" to own say....Rocket Propelled Grenades then you agree that a line must be drawn somewhere, right?
And BTW.....if that was MY child or grandchild pictured in that casket I would stick that picture in your face.
#1 An AR is not military grade.. if this were about M-16s or M-60s or AT-4s, I would partially concede your point
#2 I think where the line needs to be drawn is on the person, not the weapon
#3 There is nothing I am hearing on this in truthful detail except what we hear from wingers.. which makes it very suspect
An M-16 is actually an AR-15, so they are military grade.
I'm not.
I am merely pointing out the idiocy of denying law abiding citizens their rights in order to possibly prevent a criminal from doing harm.
Tell me if you drove a ford fiesta would you want it taken away because some guy drove the same model car into a bunch of kids on the playground?
Weapons have one purpose; to fire a projectile meant to kill or main.
Automobiles have a purpose other than to kill.
No. Guns do not have just one purpose.
Have you never heard of, or been to a Gun Sporting show?
They shoot at targets and have competitions. They get money and awards.
#1 An AR is not military grade.. if this were about M-16s or M-60s or AT-4s, I would partially concede your point
#2 I think where the line needs to be drawn is on the person, not the weapon
#3 There is nothing I am hearing on this in truthful detail except what we hear from wingers.. which makes it very suspect
An M-16 is actually an AR-15, so they are military grade.
An M16 is not an AR15. Some of the parts are interchangeable but an AR15 to be legal has no M16 parts and cannot fire in full auto.
Both are weak weapons with very little stopping power. If you want to do some damage I'd perfer an AK47 or a shotgun.
Our right to snuggle our living children outweights your right to snuggle a mankiller of a gun.
fist meet face
