🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Federal judge voids mask mandate on planes, public transit

LOOK at these faggots, both arguing FOR wearing masks as well as saying that even if not required, they will still wear them anyway! The Left have created a new generation of mental defectives, this time: germophobes, who will now go through the rest of their lives in fear of . . . .

. . . . something.

And the rationale? Well, it was a Trump-appointed judge so obviously, he doesn't count, he doesn't follow the science. All them other judges who keep saying to wear them, THEY are following the science!! :cuckoo:
The judge in question was deemed unfit to serve as a federal judge by the Bar Association, partly because she had never spent one day in any court as a judge or representing a case as lawyer. Her support for trump is the only qualification that was considered or that she had for being appointed.
 
Darkwind
It's sad, but unexpected to see crazies, such as yourself pleased with federal judges who have no more qualifications than partisan loyalty.
The Democrats hate her because she was appointed by Trump.
Her ruling is correct.
The Democrats are using Bureaucrats to make laws.
This is how banana republic dictators do stuff.
This is how we lose our freedoms and our democracy.
 
Brandon lost a bit of his control yesterday. Finally, common sense is on the rebound.

The obvious part is two fold for anyone with common sense.
#1 There are several types of face coverings and yet only 1-2 actually work.
Brandon didn't care what type you used as long as your face was covered.
That's control, and nothing else.
#2 Brandon is ending Title 42, why? Why end 42 if we are still in the middle of the pandemic?
That's control, and nothing else.
 
Two thirds around here still wearing the diaper. My bet is one year from now 25-33% of Americans will still be frightened sheep. Anyway as this hoax crap dwindles the main thing now is to win in November. I fully expect a Fauci reemergence in September with all kinds of new noise about lockdowns and mail ins and hopefully there are enough thinking Americans this time to refuse the cattle loading.
 
and people not doctors were never, ever allowed to take theirs off?

Plus, people in Asian countries have been wearing them for decades when out in public and not feeling well, saw it for the first time in 1990 and I am sure it was not new then. They never suffered any harm that I heard about, why it is not dangerous for them?
Many people have worn them for years in casino's. I have seen quite a few wear them mowing the theirs lawns. A lot of cancer patients wear. Kids with severe allergies.

I guess some have never gotten outside their little safe space for years.
 
Many people have worn them for years in casino's. I have seen quite a few wear them mowing the theirs lawns. A lot of cancer patients wear. Kids with severe allergies.

I guess some have never gotten outside their little safe space for years.
Many…quite a few…A lot of…are not representative of actual reality
 
Many people have worn them for years in casino's. I have seen quite a few wear them mowing the theirs lawns. A lot of cancer patients wear. Kids with severe allergies.

I guess some have never gotten outside their little safe space for years.

doubtful some of these people have ever been more than 100 miles from their home
 
Two thirds around here still wearing the diaper. My bet is one year from now 25-33% of Americans will still be frightened sheep. Anyway as this hoax crap dwindles the main thing now is to win in November. I fully expect a Fauci reemergence in September with all kinds of new noise about lockdowns and mail ins and hopefully there are enough thinking Americans this time to refuse the cattle loading.
Right at a million Americans dead, and you're still calling it a hoax. Your stupidity is truly astounding.
 
The judge in question was deemed unfit to serve as a federal judge by the Bar Association, partly because she had never spent one day in any court as a judge or representing a case as lawyer.
HMMM why the use of the midleading term unfit? at worst she would be unqualified not unfit. I smell a political rat in the equation

Her support for trump is the only qualification that was considered or that she had for being appointed.
and there it is, the trump trigger
 
Good. First, I question where the CDC ever got the authority to do this in the first place. Furthermore, they can't just keep extending this over and over indefinitely without some check or balance in place. People have moved on from COVID. It's time for this administration to move on as well.

The Libs are Livid over it. They have been running smear pieces against the judge now. Remember the dems were planning another covid lock down for the election. This judge just royally screwed them over.
 
HMMM why the use of the midleading term unfit? at worst she would be unqualified not unfit. I smell a political rat in the equation


and there it is, the trump trigger
You'll have to ask the American Bar Association why they chose that term. I'm assuming the term unqualified didn't adequately express their opposition to her appointment.
 
You'll have to ask the American Bar Association why they chose that term.
I don't really have to since I was merely pointing out there was no basis in your post for using the word "unfit" and the fact that you would need it explained to you by the Bar is proof that the claim itself cannot justify using the term.

I'm assuming the term unqualified didn't adequately express their opposition to her appointment.
But it should have if she was really unqualified which is how we know it was a political decision, and of course there is this admission:

Her support for trump is the only qualification that was considered or that she had for being appointed.
as well as for being dismissed...If ya don't smell the political rat in her rejection [she probably is not qualified] then you may be "unfit" to comment on it.
 
I don't really have to since I was merely pointing out there was no basis in your post for using the word "unfit" and the fact that you would need it explained to you by the Bar is proof that the claim itself cannot justify using the term.


But it should have if she was really unqualified which is how we know it was a political decision, and of course there is this admission:


as well as for being dismissed...If ya don't smell the political rat in her rejection [she probably is not qualified] then you may be "unfit" to comment on it.
My basis for using that word was to accurately repeat what the ABA had said.
 
My basis for using that word was to accurately repeat what the ABA had said.
I know, I was trying to convey that the quote you used had it wrong [evidently I should have tried harder]
There is/was no evidence in the quote itself that showed or justified the use of "unfit", not a mistake competent and qualified professionals make, which is how we know it is/was politically motivated
Unless of course we are not dealing with competence and professionalism.
 
I know, I was trying to convey that the quote you used had it wrong [evidently I should have tried harder]
There is/was no evidence in the quote itself that showed or justified the use of "unfit", not a mistake competent and qualified professionals make, which is how we know it is/was politically motivated
Unless of course we are not dealing with competence and professionalism.
Keep grabbing. There's still a chance you might reach those straws.
 

Forum List

Back
Top