FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[Rat in the Hat]

I found a date for Chri$$y.

Perhaps this is the next Mrs. Brown!!!
​

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vx9jV8Lb_is&feature=related[/ame]

 

[Christophera]

FEMA misrepresented the core structure of the Twin towers to NIST so accordingly the cause of death cannot be accurate.
The steel in the core area seen in construction is misrepresented as "core columns" when it is actually elevator guide rail support steel as can be ascertained by the butt plates on the tops of some of them. Also no diagonal braces are seen. That weak vertical steel cannot be found in the core on 9-11.

The core was a concrete tube.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

FEMA misrepresented the core structure of the Twin towers to NIST so accordingly the cause of death cannot be accurate.
The steel in the core area seen in construction is misrepresented as "core columns" when it is actually elevator guide rail support steel as can be ascertained by the butt plates on the tops of some of them. Also no diagonal braces are seen. That weak vertical steel cannot be found in the core on 9-11.

The core was a concrete tube.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

 

[Rat in the Hat]

 

[Rat in the Hat]

 

[Christophera]

FEMA misrepresented the core structure. This remnant of the WTC 1 concrete is proof that the core was concrete and that the plans used by the truth movement are grossly inaccurate.

Notice the 3x7 hallway running the length of the north WTC 1 concrete core basewall with daylight shining through.

Here is a zoom of the bogus plans. Where we see concrete above, the plans show there should be elevators and a steam shaft.

Here is the original of the 3rd floor core plan on the wtc7.net server to check it.

The plans the truth movement are using have been digitally faked to appear as final drawings by the addition of revision tables. Someone blundered and made things NOT CHARACTERS OF THE ALPHABET and sized them, then positioned them in the cells of the revision table. About 20% of the 200 + sheets have something like this.

Can anyone imagine final drawings of the tallest buildings in the world having a free handed title block?

 

[Liability]

The al qaeda blow-job providing disinformation bot known as CriscoFEARa is now on recycle mode.

The same utterly unpersuasive bullshit it has posted innumerable times, it is busy recycling again, now.

But it's that fucking CriscoFEARa bot that really needs to be recycled.

 

[DiveCon]

FEMA misrepresented the core structure. This remnant of the WTC 1 concrete is proof that the core was concrete and that the plans used by the truth movement are grossly inaccurate.

Notice the 3x7 hallway running the length of the north WTC 1 concrete core basewall with daylight shining through.



Here is a zoom of the bogus plans. Where we see concrete above, the plans show there should be elevators and a steam shaft.



Here is the original of the 3rd floor core plan on the wtc7.net server to check it.

The plans the truth movement are using have been digitally faked to appear as final drawings by the addition of revision tables. Someone blundered and made things NOT CHARACTERS OF THE ALPHABET and sized them, then positioned them in the cells of the revision table. About 20% of the 200 + sheets have something like this.



Can anyone imagine final drawings of the tallest buildings in the world having a free handed title block?

no FEMA deception, no concrete in the core, nothing in that image shows any concrete
your analysis of all things is flawed

 

[Liability]

* * * *

Can anyone imagine final drawings of the tallest buildings in the world having a free handed title block?
* * * *

The al qaeda blow-job providing bot known as CriscoFEARa has asked another stupid "question."

Every one of us can "imagine" what DID happen.

Considering when the plans were rendered, it's not at all surprising.

 

[DiveCon]

* * * *

Can anyone imagine final drawings of the tallest buildings in the world having a free handed title block?
* * * *

The al qaeda blow-job providing bot known as CriscoFEARa has asked another stupid "question."

Every one of us can "imagine" what DID happen.

Considering when the plans were rendered, it's not at all surprising.

considering CAD didnt come into wide spread use till the 1980's, i'm pretty sure that most plans were free-hand up till then

 

[Christophera]

* * * *

Can anyone imagine final drawings of the tallest buildings in the world having a free handed title block?
* * * *

The al qaeda blow-job providing bot known as CriscoFEARa has asked another stupid "question."

Every one of us can "imagine" what DID happen.

Considering when the plans were rendered, it's not at all surprising.

considering CAD didnt come into wide spread use till the 1980's, i'm pretty sure that most plans were free-hand up till then

I'm pretty sure your acting skills are dismal. You are a moron.

You imply that using a lettering guide, straight edge or square and drafting arm are "free hand".

Lettering guides were used on ALL final drawings title blocks professionally made up until CAD became common, somewhat later than 1980.

 

[DiveCon]

The al qaeda blow-job providing bot known as CriscoFEARa has asked another stupid "question."

Every one of us can "imagine" what DID happen.

Considering when the plans were rendered, it's not at all surprising.

considering CAD didnt come into wide spread use till the 1980's, i'm pretty sure that most plans were free-hand up till then

You imply that using a lettering guide, straight edge or square and drafting arm are "free hand".

yes, because they ARE
dipshit

 

[Christophera]

No, they are "manual drafting". "Manual drafting" in cludes drafting tools to make more uniform drawings. Thinking you can recover by lying shows what a poor actor you are and how stupid you are.

On this page is an example of "free hand" where diagonal braces are conceptually drawn in.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/plans/doc/tvmast/CD_ARCH/A-A-177_0.png

 

[Rat in the Hat]

No, they are "manual drafting". "Manual drafting" in cludes drafting tools to make more uniform drawings. Thinking you can recover by lying shows what a poor actor you are and how stupid you are.

On this page is an example of "free hand" where diagonal braces are conceptually drawn in.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/plans/doc/tvmast/CD_ARCH/A-A-177_0.png

 

[DiveCon]

No, they are "manual drafting". "Manual drafting" in cludes drafting tools to make more uniform drawings. Thinking you can recover by lying shows what a poor actor you are and how stupid you are.

On this page is an example of "free hand" where diagonal braces are conceptually drawn in.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/plans/doc/tvmast/CD_ARCH/A-A-177_0.png

dipshit, did you miss that every bit of lettering on that page is FREEHAND

 

[Rat in the Hat]

No, they are "manual drafting". "Manual drafting" in cludes drafting tools to make more uniform drawings. Thinking you can recover by lying shows what a poor actor you are and how stupid you are.

On this page is an example of "free hand" where diagonal braces are conceptually drawn in.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/plans/doc/tvmast/CD_ARCH/A-A-177_0.png

dipshit, did you miss that every bit of lettering on that page is FREEHAND

That's why I'm laughing at him. He p'wned himself AGAIN!

 

[DiveCon]

No, they are "manual drafting". "Manual drafting" in cludes drafting tools to make more uniform drawings. Thinking you can recover by lying shows what a poor actor you are and how stupid you are.

On this page is an example of "free hand" where diagonal braces are conceptually drawn in.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/plans/doc/tvmast/CD_ARCH/A-A-177_0.png

dipshit, did you miss that every bit of lettering on that page is FREEHAND

That's why I'm laughing at him. He p'wned himself AGAIN!

i guess he got confused by the freehand vs computer generated comparison

 

[Rat in the Hat]

dipshit, did you miss that every bit of lettering on that page is FREEHAND

That's why I'm laughing at him. He p'wned himself AGAIN!

i guess he got confused by the freehand vs computer generated comparison

There's a lot that confuses him. Facts and reality are two good examples.

 

[Christophera]

The agent is such a buffoon it must post spam to push its idiotic, erroneous treason off the last page with spam.

agent makes stupid error.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/3050823-post8651.html

I answer and correct the agent.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/3051234-post8652.html

I further correct lying, erroneous agent with the rest of the thread.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...ceives-nation-about-twin-towers-core-577.html