Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OK. Do you think this black box was photographed where it landed, or where someone put it on the ground?the question wasn't "how hard is it to plant evidence" and your statement regarding that is completely irrelevant unless you have some evidence it was planted.
No that's not just it. I'm just getting started. Just shows your impatients.
Since you responded, do you think this black box was photographed where it landed, or did someone put it there on the ground?
There is no proof that can show that the flight recorder was not recovered at the scene of the crash of flight 93.
No that's not just it. I'm just getting started. Just shows your impatients.THATS IT?!!!
thats your evidence? you dont like the PICTURE?!!!!
Since you responded, do you think this black box was photographed where it landed, or did someone put it there on the ground?
it shows my WHAT?!!
i dont care if it was photographed were it landed, whether it was uncovered, whether the person that found it walked it over to the nearest person with a camera or anything else.
where is it claimed the photo was taken where it landed?
it doesnt really fucking matter, jackass. it shows shows the minutia you fucking idiots go through to try to justify your preconceived conclusions.
again i ask you.... WHERE IS YOUR PROOF IT WAS PLANTED?!!
how could they recover 95% of something that "vaporized"?No that's not just it. I'm just getting started. Just shows your impatients.
Since you responded, do you think this black box was photographed where it landed, or did someone put it there on the ground?
it shows my WHAT?!!
i dont care if it was photographed were it landed, whether it was uncovered, whether the person that found it walked it over to the nearest person with a camera or anything else.
where is it claimed the photo was taken where it landed?
it doesnt really fucking matter, jackass. it shows shows the minutia you fucking idiots go through to try to justify your preconceived conclusions.
again i ask you.... WHERE IS YOUR PROOF IT WAS PLANTED?!!
Where is the evidence it was in a fire that vaporized a 757?
how could they recover 95% of something that "vaporized"?it shows my WHAT?!!
i dont care if it was photographed were it landed, whether it was uncovered, whether the person that found it walked it over to the nearest person with a camera or anything else.
where is it claimed the photo was taken where it landed?
it doesnt really fucking matter, jackass. it shows shows the minutia you fucking idiots go through to try to justify your preconceived conclusions.
again i ask you.... WHERE IS YOUR PROOF IT WAS PLANTED?!!
Where is the evidence it was in a fire that vaporized a 757?
everything you said there is the opposite of the truthhow could they recover 95% of something that "vaporized"?Where is the evidence it was in a fire that vaporized a 757?
How could they recover a flight recorder in a horrible firey crash with absolutely zero evidence of any heat damage?
The only way THAT recorder was in THAT crash is if there was no fuel burning thruout the wreckage. It's painted moron. I could char a spot on it with a cigarette lighter.
I have no idea what really happened there but I know a lot about what heat does to metal and painted metal and you can scoff till you are blue in the face. That recorder was not in a fire. Denying THAT fact makes YOU the crazy one not me.
everything you said there is the opposite of the truthhow could they recover 95% of something that "vaporized"?
How could they recover a flight recorder in a horrible firey crash with absolutely zero evidence of any heat damage?
The only way THAT recorder was in THAT crash is if there was no fuel burning thruout the wreckage. It's painted moron. I could char a spot on it with a cigarette lighter.
I have no idea what really happened there but I know a lot about what heat does to metal and painted metal and you can scoff till you are blue in the face. That recorder was not in a fire. Denying THAT fact makes YOU the crazy one not me.
thus you didnt say a single fact
you were wrongeverything you said there is the opposite of the truthHow could they recover a flight recorder in a horrible firey crash with absolutely zero evidence of any heat damage?
The only way THAT recorder was in THAT crash is if there was no fuel burning thruout the wreckage. It's painted moron. I could char a spot on it with a cigarette lighter.
I have no idea what really happened there but I know a lot about what heat does to metal and painted metal and you can scoff till you are blue in the face. That recorder was not in a fire. Denying THAT fact makes YOU the crazy one not me.
thus you didnt say a single fact
I don't really care what you think. You have shown time and time again to be a fool that is more interested in trying to win debates with repeticious multiple posts that add nothing but your stark immaturity to this and most other topics don't agree with. You notice that I have not particpated in this thread. I just happened to see the picture of the supposed flight recorder and decided that some reason and physical rationality needed injected into this discussion as to it's likelyhood that it was in a fiery crash and that possibility is zero.
Carry on fool. There is nothing to debate on the point I made.
you were wrongeverything you said there is the opposite of the truth
thus you didnt say a single fact
I don't really care what you think. You have shown time and time again to be a fool that is more interested in trying to win debates with repeticious multiple posts that add nothing but your stark immaturity to this and most other topics don't agree with. You notice that I have not particpated in this thread. I just happened to see the picture of the supposed flight recorder and decided that some reason and physical rationality needed injected into this discussion as to it's likelyhood that it was in a fiery crash and that possibility is zero.
Carry on fool. There is nothing to debate on the point I made.
you are the most immature person of this message board
Pretty funny. You demand proof, then in the next breath say you don't care about the evidence and it doesn't really f'n matter. Talk aboutNo that's not just it. I'm just getting started. Just shows your impatients.THATS IT?!!!
thats your evidence? you dont like the PICTURE?!!!!
Since you responded, do you think this black box was photographed where it landed, or did someone put it there on the ground?
it shows my WHAT?!!
i dont care if it was photographed were it landed, whether it was uncovered, whether the person that found it walked it over to the nearest person with a camera or anything else.
where is it claimed the photo was taken where it landed?
it doesnt really fucking matter, jackass. it shows shows the minutia you fucking idiots go through to try to justify your preconceived conclusions.
again i ask you.... WHERE IS YOUR PROOF IT WAS PLANTED?!!
If you'd just have patients and answer my questions, you might see the evidence.There is no proof that can show that the flight recorder was not recovered at the scene of the crash of flight 93.
Right, how could they recover that much of something when photographs of the scene after the alleged crash, but before the cleanup began shows nothing even close to that amount. Talk abouthow could they recover 95% of something that "vaporized"? Edited By Intense
You should talk!you are the most immature person of this message board
you PoS., you edited what i said to make it seem differentRight, how could they recover that much of something when photographs of the scene after the alleged crash, but before the cleanup began shows nothing even close to that amount. Talk abouthow could they recover 95% of something
i do, and it fits you as wellYou should talk!you are the most immature person of this message board
The king of adhom attacks is bitching about a little snarkiness?!you PoS., you edited what i said to make it seem differentRight, how could they recover that much of something when photographs of the scene after the alleged crash, but before the cleanup began shows nothing even close to that amount. Talk abouthow could they recover 95% of something
Someone has a little anger-management problem!all fucking troofers are idiots
