Procrustes Stretched
Dante's Manifesto
People keep denying this.And foolish people on the right keep insisting Mr. Trump would have absolute immunity if he went out onto 5th Avenue an shot 45 people.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
People keep denying this.And foolish people on the right keep insisting Mr. Trump would have absolute immunity if he went out onto 5th Avenue an shot 45 people.
What's stupid is reading incomprehension so bad that a person couldn't say what the other person is arguing if his life depended on it.Well, since Donnie and his supporters are arguing for absolute immunity, that would include such a scenario.
So blame yourselves for arguing something so incredibly stupid.
I'm not sure what this irrelevant outburst is, but Team Trump is definitely arguing for absolute immunity. Go check. And stop whining, ffs!What's stupid is reading incomprehension so bad that a person couldn't say what the other person is arguing if his life depended on it.
Barrack Hussain Obama, back when he was president , assassinated a US citizen without due process, breaking the law of the Constitution. What you are implying is that he, the brown turd Obammy can be brought to trial and would be convicted of crimes.Not just official acts necessarily though but immunity from criminal charges for pretty much anything. Using Dante's really REALLY dumb analogy that Trump supporters would give him immunity for going out and shooting 45 people. In that essentially non existent circumstance, we would expect our elected leaders to impeach and remove him from the Presidency immediately and then certainly state or local law would apply to prosecute him for murder. But if Congress is not the constitutional authority to prosecute and convict a President of crimes, any Tom, Dick, Harry or Harriet could accuse him of anything and keep him in court throughout his term of office. There would be constant investigations to see if something was within his jurisdictional duties or not. And for the rest of his life, his enemies could be making something he did as President a 'crime.
And if Congress did not impeach him and try him for the murder charge, we no longer have a government of, by and for the people anyway.
And foolish people on the right keep insisting Mr. Trump would have absolute immunity if he went out onto 5th Avenue an shot 45 people.
Well, since Donnie and his supporters are arguing for absolute immunity, that would include such a scenario.
So blame yourselves for arguing something so incredibly stupid.
Nah, but it is on the right."Foolish people on the left"?
Isn't that a redundancy?
It began this past January when judge Pan asked her now infamous question about Seal Team 6. It continued today in the arguments in front of SCOTUS. How embarrassing.
What they fail to mention is that the Biden team, with Reichsleiter Garland as his wingman, attempting a political assassination with all the coordinated lawfare against Biden's #1 opponent.
The left needs to take a long, hard look at themselves in a mirror. They may not like what they see, if the mirror doesn't shatter first that is.
Justices Neil M. Gorsuch and Brett M. Kavanaugh frequently told the government that the Supreme Court’s ruling would apply to all future presidents — not just Donald Trump.
“I’m not concerned about this case,” Gorsuch said. “But I am concerned about future uses of the criminal law to target political opponents based on accusations about their motives.”
“We’re writing a rule for the ages,” he continued.
Loading…
www.washingtonpost.com
I’m not concerned about this case,” Gorsuch said. “But I am concerned about future uses of the criminal law to target political opponents based on accusations about their motives.”
Well there is some incoherent babble.It's absolute immunity, once invoking the limited scope.
It will be 7-2 against immunity.
Well there is some incoherent babble.
That sure is not what Team Trump is arguing, before the SCOTUS, either. So it's made up, incoherent babble.
He's not our babysitter.So when a President Fails to protect US citizens, then when he is out of office, he can them be brought up on "Crimes against Humanity" right?
Absolute immunity, but just sometimes.It is what the ruling will be.
Absolute immunity, but just sometimes.
Thanks. Now my brain needs a shower.