Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes you are denying science.A this point all you are doing is denying science. If you arent going to be rational I'm just going to ignore your comments on the subject.. The link I posted clearly shows the gene for white/light skin is roughly 7K years old. Has nothing to do with any Black power movement as you keep alluding to. Its from white scientists. Sorry if that bothers you but it is what it is.Science and historians told me.who told you? Elijah Muhummad or Eldridge Cleaver?
nope------you are confused. You claim that some
scientist "told you" that a "white gene" appeared
7000 years ago. Nope-----skin color is POLYGENIC.
Just the idea of a single "white gene" is ludicrous----
Historians told you that there is written history describing
brilliant black societies that existed tens of thousands
of years ago?
some anti biotics are simply byproducts of MOLDS---penicillin is one and so is tetracycline.
There was a tetracycline
producing mold in Nubia-----and THEREFORE----
some high concentrations of tetracycline in ---the bones of
long dead Nubians------even infants which----is really
unfortunate-----Tetracycline is not used in children----
it creates problems for bones and teeth. try not to be so dim. The stuff you cite is just a matter of really desperate
sophistry. Long long ago----during the cold war----the USSR
expressed its nationalism by claiming to be the "FIRST"
to have come up with this or that discovery. -----your attempt
is even sillier
I am denying science?------you cited a newspaper article
written by a person who knows about as much as
you do about the study of genetics. ---a human interest
story ----poorly done. The science I learn is from
real scientists---------not dim cub reporters. Skin color is
POLYGENIC-------there are some traits that do depend
on a mutation of a single base in a base pair----but skin
color is NOT one of them
Isn't it obvious? You post like a jealous snubbed bitchCould be but I still would have to ask the same question.I assumed you were female. Guess homosexual is the next assumtionSo you do know how to use question marks? You must have been lying when you claimed you were asking me a question then. What makes you think I have a man? I dont recall saying I was gay.Shouldn't you be more worried about your man leaving you for a white woman then trying to derail this thread?A this point all you are doing is denying science. If you arent going to be rational I'm just going to ignore your comments on the subject.. The link I posted clearly shows the gene for white/light skin is roughly 7K years old. Has nothing to do with any Black power movement as you keep alluding to. Its from white scientists. Sorry if that bothers you but it is what it is.nope------you are confused. You claim that some
scientist "told you" that a "white gene" appeared
7000 years ago. Nope-----skin color is POLYGENIC.
Just the idea of a single "white gene" is ludicrous----
Historians told you that there is written history describing
brilliant black societies that existed tens of thousands
of years ago?
some anti biotics are simply byproducts of MOLDS---penicillin is one and so is tetracycline.
There was a tetracycline
producing mold in Nubia-----and THEREFORE----
some high concentrations of tetracycline in ---the bones of
long dead Nubians------even infants which----is really
unfortunate-----Tetracycline is not used in children----
it creates problems for bones and teeth. try not to be so dim. The stuff you cite is just a matter of really desperate
sophistry. Long long ago----during the cold war----the USSR
expressed its nationalism by claiming to be the "FIRST"
to have come up with this or that discovery. -----your attempt
is even sillier
Go back and reread my post. I just found another link that blows me away. I thought this one guy was a black power nut case that claimed white people are really albino east Indians. Turns out he was closer to the truth than anyone imagined.Yes you are denying science.A this point all you are doing is denying science. If you arent going to be rational I'm just going to ignore your comments on the subject.. The link I posted clearly shows the gene for white/light skin is roughly 7K years old. Has nothing to do with any Black power movement as you keep alluding to. Its from white scientists. Sorry if that bothers you but it is what it is.Science and historians told me.
nope------you are confused. You claim that some
scientist "told you" that a "white gene" appeared
7000 years ago. Nope-----skin color is POLYGENIC.
Just the idea of a single "white gene" is ludicrous----
Historians told you that there is written history describing
brilliant black societies that existed tens of thousands
of years ago?
some anti biotics are simply byproducts of MOLDS---penicillin is one and so is tetracycline.
There was a tetracycline
producing mold in Nubia-----and THEREFORE----
some high concentrations of tetracycline in ---the bones of
long dead Nubians------even infants which----is really
unfortunate-----Tetracycline is not used in children----
it creates problems for bones and teeth. try not to be so dim. The stuff you cite is just a matter of really desperate
sophistry. Long long ago----during the cold war----the USSR
expressed its nationalism by claiming to be the "FIRST"
to have come up with this or that discovery. -----your attempt
is even sillier
I am denying science?------you cited a newspaper article
written by a person who knows about as much as
you do about the study of genetics. ---a human interest
story ----poorly done. The science I learn is from
real scientists---------not dim cub reporters. Skin color is
POLYGENIC-------there are some traits that do depend
on a mutation of a single base in a base pair----but skin
color is NOT one of them
what "science" did I deny------YOUR interpretation of
a report printed in the WASHINGTON POST?-----that
single base mutation that created white people out of
black people 7000 years ago? did you pass high school biology? BTW----have you found that
20,000 year old black library yet?
I guess thats fair. You post like a white cave chimp.Isn't it obvious? You post like a jealous snubbed bitchCould be but I still would have to ask the same question.I assumed you were female. Guess homosexual is the next assumtionSo you do know how to use question marks? You must have been lying when you claimed you were asking me a question then. What makes you think I have a man? I dont recall saying I was gay.Shouldn't you be more worried about your man leaving you for a white woman then trying to derail this thread?A this point all you are doing is denying science. If you arent going to be rational I'm just going to ignore your comments on the subject.. The link I posted clearly shows the gene for white/light skin is roughly 7K years old. Has nothing to do with any Black power movement as you keep alluding to. Its from white scientists. Sorry if that bothers you but it is what it is.
Yes you are denying science.A this point all you are doing is denying science. If you arent going to be rational I'm just going to ignore your comments on the subject.. The link I posted clearly shows the gene for white/light skin is roughly 7K years old. Has nothing to do with any Black power movement as you keep alluding to. Its from white scientists. Sorry if that bothers you but it is what it is.Science and historians told me.who told you? Elijah Muhummad or Eldridge Cleaver?
nope------you are confused. You claim that some
scientist "told you" that a "white gene" appeared
7000 years ago. Nope-----skin color is POLYGENIC.
Just the idea of a single "white gene" is ludicrous----
Historians told you that there is written history describing
brilliant black societies that existed tens of thousands
of years ago?
some anti biotics are simply byproducts of MOLDS---penicillin is one and so is tetracycline.
There was a tetracycline
producing mold in Nubia-----and THEREFORE----
some high concentrations of tetracycline in ---the bones of
long dead Nubians------even infants which----is really
unfortunate-----Tetracycline is not used in children----
it creates problems for bones and teeth. try not to be so dim. The stuff you cite is just a matter of really desperate
sophistry. Long long ago----during the cold war----the USSR
expressed its nationalism by claiming to be the "FIRST"
to have come up with this or that discovery. -----your attempt
is even sillier
I am denying science?------you cited a newspaper article
written by a person who knows about as much as
you do about the study of genetics. ---a human interest
story ----poorly done. The science I learn is from
real scientists---------not dim cub reporters. Skin color is
POLYGENIC-------there are some traits that do depend
on a mutation of a single base in a base pair----but skin
color is NOT one of them
In earlier research, Keith Cheng from Penn State College of Medicine reported that one amino acid difference in the gene SLC24A5 is a key contributor to the skin colour difference between Europeans and West Africans.
‘The mutation in SLC24A5 changes just one building block in the protein, and contributes about a third of the visually striking differences in skin tone between peoples of African and European ancestry,’ he said.
"
The a mutation, called A111T, is found in virtually every one of European ancestry.
A111T is also found in populations in the Middle East and Indian subcontinent, but not in high numbers in Africans.
Read more: Light skin in Europeans stems from ONE 10 000-year-old ancestor who lived between India and the Middle East claims study Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook"
Awe look at you using a racist insult. Don't much matter because you are beneath me. Now go away child so the adults can have a discussion.I guess thats fair. You post like a white cave chimp.Isn't it obvious? You post like a jealous snubbed bitchCould be but I still would have to ask the same question.I assumed you were female. Guess homosexual is the next assumtionSo you do know how to use question marks? You must have been lying when you claimed you were asking me a question then. What makes you think I have a man? I dont recall saying I was gay.Shouldn't you be more worried about your man leaving you for a white woman then trying to derail this thread?
Go back and reread my post. I just found another link that blows me away. I thought this one guy was a black power nut case that claimed white people are really albino east Indians. Turns out he was closer to the truth than anyone imagined.Yes you are denying science.A this point all you are doing is denying science. If you arent going to be rational I'm just going to ignore your comments on the subject.. The link I posted clearly shows the gene for white/light skin is roughly 7K years old. Has nothing to do with any Black power movement as you keep alluding to. Its from white scientists. Sorry if that bothers you but it is what it is.nope------you are confused. You claim that some
scientist "told you" that a "white gene" appeared
7000 years ago. Nope-----skin color is POLYGENIC.
Just the idea of a single "white gene" is ludicrous----
Historians told you that there is written history describing
brilliant black societies that existed tens of thousands
of years ago?
some anti biotics are simply byproducts of MOLDS---penicillin is one and so is tetracycline.
There was a tetracycline
producing mold in Nubia-----and THEREFORE----
some high concentrations of tetracycline in ---the bones of
long dead Nubians------even infants which----is really
unfortunate-----Tetracycline is not used in children----
it creates problems for bones and teeth. try not to be so dim. The stuff you cite is just a matter of really desperate
sophistry. Long long ago----during the cold war----the USSR
expressed its nationalism by claiming to be the "FIRST"
to have come up with this or that discovery. -----your attempt
is even sillier
I am denying science?------you cited a newspaper article
written by a person who knows about as much as
you do about the study of genetics. ---a human interest
story ----poorly done. The science I learn is from
real scientists---------not dim cub reporters. Skin color is
POLYGENIC-------there are some traits that do depend
on a mutation of a single base in a base pair----but skin
color is NOT one of them
what "science" did I deny------YOUR interpretation of
a report printed in the WASHINGTON POST?-----that
single base mutation that created white people out of
black people 7000 years ago? did you pass high school biology? BTW----have you found that
20,000 year old black library yet?
Who said genes contain protein? Did you flunk english reading? Please read the article again. You cant be this much of an idiot.Yes you are denying science.A this point all you are doing is denying science. If you arent going to be rational I'm just going to ignore your comments on the subject.. The link I posted clearly shows the gene for white/light skin is roughly 7K years old. Has nothing to do with any Black power movement as you keep alluding to. Its from white scientists. Sorry if that bothers you but it is what it is.Science and historians told me.
nope------you are confused. You claim that some
scientist "told you" that a "white gene" appeared
7000 years ago. Nope-----skin color is POLYGENIC.
Just the idea of a single "white gene" is ludicrous----
Historians told you that there is written history describing
brilliant black societies that existed tens of thousands
of years ago?
some anti biotics are simply byproducts of MOLDS---penicillin is one and so is tetracycline.
There was a tetracycline
producing mold in Nubia-----and THEREFORE----
some high concentrations of tetracycline in ---the bones of
long dead Nubians------even infants which----is really
unfortunate-----Tetracycline is not used in children----
it creates problems for bones and teeth. try not to be so dim. The stuff you cite is just a matter of really desperate
sophistry. Long long ago----during the cold war----the USSR
expressed its nationalism by claiming to be the "FIRST"
to have come up with this or that discovery. -----your attempt
is even sillier
I am denying science?------you cited a newspaper article
written by a person who knows about as much as
you do about the study of genetics. ---a human interest
story ----poorly done. The science I learn is from
real scientists---------not dim cub reporters. Skin color is
POLYGENIC-------there are some traits that do depend
on a mutation of a single base in a base pair----but skin
color is NOT one of them
In earlier research, Keith Cheng from Penn State College of Medicine reported that one amino acid difference in the gene SLC24A5 is a key contributor to the skin colour difference between Europeans and West Africans.
‘The mutation in SLC24A5 changes just one building block in the protein, and contributes about a third of the visually striking differences in skin tone between peoples of African and European ancestry,’ he said.
"
The a mutation, called A111T, is found in virtually every one of European ancestry.
A111T is also found in populations in the Middle East and Indian subcontinent, but not in high numbers in Africans.
Read more: Light skin in Europeans stems from ONE 10 000-year-old ancestor who lived between India and the Middle East claims study Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook"
genes do not contain PROTEIN------did you pass high school biology? now its 10,000 years ago that black people turned white? and there were GREAT EMPIRES of literate black people BEFORE THAT ???-------who invented
antibiotics and -----calculus? you got a citation from
a peer reviewed journal? it the stuff is of any significance
It showed up in the journal "NATURE"
Dont get mad at me go talk to this guy and tell him he doesnt know what he is talking about.Go back and reread my post. I just found another link that blows me away. I thought this one guy was a black power nut case that claimed white people are really albino east Indians. Turns out he was closer to the truth than anyone imagined.Yes you are denying science.A this point all you are doing is denying science. If you arent going to be rational I'm just going to ignore your comments on the subject.. The link I posted clearly shows the gene for white/light skin is roughly 7K years old. Has nothing to do with any Black power movement as you keep alluding to. Its from white scientists. Sorry if that bothers you but it is what it is.
I am denying science?------you cited a newspaper article
written by a person who knows about as much as
you do about the study of genetics. ---a human interest
story ----poorly done. The science I learn is from
real scientists---------not dim cub reporters. Skin color is
POLYGENIC-------there are some traits that do depend
on a mutation of a single base in a base pair----but skin
color is NOT one of them
what "science" did I deny------YOUR interpretation of
a report printed in the WASHINGTON POST?-----that
single base mutation that created white people out of
black people 7000 years ago? did you pass high school biology? BTW----have you found that
20,000 year old black library yet?
does not take much to BLOW YOU AWAY-----you can find even better stuff in MAD MAGAZINE
Aww. Look at you being a butthurt misogynist and thinking once again you can direct me to do anything.Awe look at you using a racist insult. Don't much matter because you are beneath me. Now go away child so the adults can have a discussion.I guess thats fair. You post like a white cave chimp.Isn't it obvious? You post like a jealous snubbed bitchCould be but I still would have to ask the same question.I assumed you were female. Guess homosexual is the next assumtionSo you do know how to use question marks? You must have been lying when you claimed you were asking me a question then. What makes you think I have a man? I dont recall saying I was gay.
Who said genes contain protein? Did you flunk english reading? Please read the article again. You cant be this much of an idiot.Yes you are denying science.A this point all you are doing is denying science. If you arent going to be rational I'm just going to ignore your comments on the subject.. The link I posted clearly shows the gene for white/light skin is roughly 7K years old. Has nothing to do with any Black power movement as you keep alluding to. Its from white scientists. Sorry if that bothers you but it is what it is.nope------you are confused. You claim that some
scientist "told you" that a "white gene" appeared
7000 years ago. Nope-----skin color is POLYGENIC.
Just the idea of a single "white gene" is ludicrous----
Historians told you that there is written history describing
brilliant black societies that existed tens of thousands
of years ago?
some anti biotics are simply byproducts of MOLDS---penicillin is one and so is tetracycline.
There was a tetracycline
producing mold in Nubia-----and THEREFORE----
some high concentrations of tetracycline in ---the bones of
long dead Nubians------even infants which----is really
unfortunate-----Tetracycline is not used in children----
it creates problems for bones and teeth. try not to be so dim. The stuff you cite is just a matter of really desperate
sophistry. Long long ago----during the cold war----the USSR
expressed its nationalism by claiming to be the "FIRST"
to have come up with this or that discovery. -----your attempt
is even sillier
I am denying science?------you cited a newspaper article
written by a person who knows about as much as
you do about the study of genetics. ---a human interest
story ----poorly done. The science I learn is from
real scientists---------not dim cub reporters. Skin color is
POLYGENIC-------there are some traits that do depend
on a mutation of a single base in a base pair----but skin
color is NOT one of them
In earlier research, Keith Cheng from Penn State College of Medicine reported that one amino acid difference in the gene SLC24A5 is a key contributor to the skin colour difference between Europeans and West Africans.
‘The mutation in SLC24A5 changes just one building block in the protein, and contributes about a third of the visually striking differences in skin tone between peoples of African and European ancestry,’ he said.
"
The a mutation, called A111T, is found in virtually every one of European ancestry.
A111T is also found in populations in the Middle East and Indian subcontinent, but not in high numbers in Africans.
Read more: Light skin in Europeans stems from ONE 10 000-year-old ancestor who lived between India and the Middle East claims study Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook"
genes do not contain PROTEIN------did you pass high school biology? now its 10,000 years ago that black people turned white? and there were GREAT EMPIRES of literate black people BEFORE THAT ???-------who invented
antibiotics and -----calculus? you got a citation from
a peer reviewed journal? it the stuff is of any significance
It showed up in the journal "NATURE"
I guess thats why you are posting on here instead of researching for your doctorate. You do realize proteins and amino acids are not the same thing right?Who said genes contain protein? Did you flunk english reading? Please read the article again. You cant be this much of an idiot.Yes you are denying science.A this point all you are doing is denying science. If you arent going to be rational I'm just going to ignore your comments on the subject.. The link I posted clearly shows the gene for white/light skin is roughly 7K years old. Has nothing to do with any Black power movement as you keep alluding to. Its from white scientists. Sorry if that bothers you but it is what it is.
I am denying science?------you cited a newspaper article
written by a person who knows about as much as
you do about the study of genetics. ---a human interest
story ----poorly done. The science I learn is from
real scientists---------not dim cub reporters. Skin color is
POLYGENIC-------there are some traits that do depend
on a mutation of a single base in a base pair----but skin
color is NOT one of them
In earlier research, Keith Cheng from Penn State College of Medicine reported that one amino acid difference in the gene SLC24A5 is a key contributor to the skin colour difference between Europeans and West Africans.
‘The mutation in SLC24A5 changes just one building block in the protein, and contributes about a third of the visually striking differences in skin tone between peoples of African and European ancestry,’ he said.
"
The a mutation, called A111T, is found in virtually every one of European ancestry.
A111T is also found in populations in the Middle East and Indian subcontinent, but not in high numbers in Africans.
Read more: Light skin in Europeans stems from ONE 10 000-year-old ancestor who lived between India and the Middle East claims study Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook"
genes do not contain PROTEIN------did you pass high school biology? now its 10,000 years ago that black people turned white? and there were GREAT EMPIRES of literate black people BEFORE THAT ???-------who invented
antibiotics and -----calculus? you got a citation from
a peer reviewed journal? it the stuff is of any significance
It showed up in the journal "NATURE"
from your idiot article
In earlier research, Keith Cheng from Penn State College of Medicine reported that one amino acid difference in the gene SLC24A5.
Idiot---do you know the word "amino acid" ?? good---you
don't------there are no AMINO ACIDS in genes ----amino acid is the smallest unit of protein-----proteins are made
from a whole bunch of AMINO ACIDS-------ain't none in genes
Dont get mad at me go talk to this guy and tell him he doesnt know what he is talking about.Go back and reread my post. I just found another link that blows me away. I thought this one guy was a black power nut case that claimed white people are really albino east Indians. Turns out he was closer to the truth than anyone imagined.Yes you are denying science.I am denying science?------you cited a newspaper article
written by a person who knows about as much as
you do about the study of genetics. ---a human interest
story ----poorly done. The science I learn is from
real scientists---------not dim cub reporters. Skin color is
POLYGENIC-------there are some traits that do depend
on a mutation of a single base in a base pair----but skin
color is NOT one of them
what "science" did I deny------YOUR interpretation of
a report printed in the WASHINGTON POST?-----that
single base mutation that created white people out of
black people 7000 years ago? did you pass high school biology? BTW----have you found that
20,000 year old black library yet?
does not take much to BLOW YOU AWAY-----you can find even better stuff in MAD MAGAZINE
Keith C. Cheng M.D. Ph.D. - Professor and Chief Division of Experimental Pathology - Penn State Hershey
Keith C. Cheng, M.D., Ph.D.
Chief, Division of Experimental Pathology
Distinguished Professor of Pathology, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, and Pharmacology
Co-Founding Co-Director of the Penn State IBIOS Bioinformatics and Genomics graduate program (with Cooduvalli Shashikant)
I already provided the link to the 7K year genetic occurrence. Obviously the people that had the original mutation migrated to europe and thats how it appeared there. Since the guy is not a historian why would you expect him to tell you about the Black empires that existed prior to that?Dont get mad at me go talk to this guy and tell him he doesnt know what he is talking about.Go back and reread my post. I just found another link that blows me away. I thought this one guy was a black power nut case that claimed white people are really albino east Indians. Turns out he was closer to the truth than anyone imagined.Yes you are denying science.
what "science" did I deny------YOUR interpretation of
a report printed in the WASHINGTON POST?-----that
single base mutation that created white people out of
black people 7000 years ago? did you pass high school biology? BTW----have you found that
20,000 year old black library yet?
does not take much to BLOW YOU AWAY-----you can find even better stuff in MAD MAGAZINE
Keith C. Cheng M.D. Ph.D. - Professor and Chief Division of Experimental Pathology - Penn State Hershey
Keith C. Cheng, M.D., Ph.D.
Chief, Division of Experimental Pathology
Distinguished Professor of Pathology, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, and Pharmacology
Co-Founding Co-Director of the Penn State IBIOS Bioinformatics and Genomics graduate program (with Cooduvalli Shashikant)
good citation-----it does not mention anything about the
PROTEIN MUTATION in some gene ----7000
years ago that turned black people white or those huge literate empires that were created more than 10,000
years go-----with libraries
I guess thats why you are posting on here instead of researching for your doctorate. You do realize proteins and amino acids are not the same thing right?Who said genes contain protein? Did you flunk english reading? Please read the article again. You cant be this much of an idiot.Yes you are denying science.I am denying science?------you cited a newspaper article
written by a person who knows about as much as
you do about the study of genetics. ---a human interest
story ----poorly done. The science I learn is from
real scientists---------not dim cub reporters. Skin color is
POLYGENIC-------there are some traits that do depend
on a mutation of a single base in a base pair----but skin
color is NOT one of them
In earlier research, Keith Cheng from Penn State College of Medicine reported that one amino acid difference in the gene SLC24A5 is a key contributor to the skin colour difference between Europeans and West Africans.
‘The mutation in SLC24A5 changes just one building block in the protein, and contributes about a third of the visually striking differences in skin tone between peoples of African and European ancestry,’ he said.
"
The a mutation, called A111T, is found in virtually every one of European ancestry.
A111T is also found in populations in the Middle East and Indian subcontinent, but not in high numbers in Africans.
Read more: Light skin in Europeans stems from ONE 10 000-year-old ancestor who lived between India and the Middle East claims study Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook"
genes do not contain PROTEIN------did you pass high school biology? now its 10,000 years ago that black people turned white? and there were GREAT EMPIRES of literate black people BEFORE THAT ???-------who invented
antibiotics and -----calculus? you got a citation from
a peer reviewed journal? it the stuff is of any significance
It showed up in the journal "NATURE"
from your idiot article
In earlier research, Keith Cheng from Penn State College of Medicine reported that one amino acid difference in the gene SLC24A5.
Idiot---do you know the word "amino acid" ?? good---you
don't------there are no AMINO ACIDS in genes ----amino acid is the smallest unit of protein-----proteins are made
from a whole bunch of AMINO ACIDS-------ain't none in genes
How Do Genes Work Understanding Genetics
You need a brush up on your doctorate then. You claimed that amino acids and proteins are the same. You were wrong. I think I'm going to go with the person that is actually in the field over you. Especially if you are white. I just caught you in a lie.I guess thats why you are posting on here instead of researching for your doctorate. You do realize proteins and amino acids are not the same thing right?Who said genes contain protein? Did you flunk english reading? Please read the article again. You cant be this much of an idiot.Yes you are denying science.
In earlier research, Keith Cheng from Penn State College of Medicine reported that one amino acid difference in the gene SLC24A5 is a key contributor to the skin colour difference between Europeans and West Africans.
‘The mutation in SLC24A5 changes just one building block in the protein, and contributes about a third of the visually striking differences in skin tone between peoples of African and European ancestry,’ he said.
"
The a mutation, called A111T, is found in virtually every one of European ancestry.
A111T is also found in populations in the Middle East and Indian subcontinent, but not in high numbers in Africans.
Read more: Light skin in Europeans stems from ONE 10 000-year-old ancestor who lived between India and the Middle East claims study Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook"
genes do not contain PROTEIN------did you pass high school biology? now its 10,000 years ago that black people turned white? and there were GREAT EMPIRES of literate black people BEFORE THAT ???-------who invented
antibiotics and -----calculus? you got a citation from
a peer reviewed journal? it the stuff is of any significance
It showed up in the journal "NATURE"
from your idiot article
In earlier research, Keith Cheng from Penn State College of Medicine reported that one amino acid difference in the gene SLC24A5.
Idiot---do you know the word "amino acid" ?? good---you
don't------there are no AMINO ACIDS in genes ----amino acid is the smallest unit of protein-----proteins are made
from a whole bunch of AMINO ACIDS-------ain't none in genes
How Do Genes Work Understanding Genetics
I did my doctorate long ago-----I am retired-----an amino acid--
is the bit of which proteins are made--------you do realize that you are an idiot-----RIGHT? The article you cited is very good------feel free to ask questions------you have no idea as to how to interpret it
I already provided the link to the 7K year genetic occurrence. Obviously the people that had the original mutation migrated to europe and thats how it appeared there. Since the guy is not a historian why would you expect him to tell you about the Black empires that existed prior to that?Dont get mad at me go talk to this guy and tell him he doesnt know what he is talking about.Go back and reread my post. I just found another link that blows me away. I thought this one guy was a black power nut case that claimed white people are really albino east Indians. Turns out he was closer to the truth than anyone imagined.what "science" did I deny------YOUR interpretation of
a report printed in the WASHINGTON POST?-----that
single base mutation that created white people out of
black people 7000 years ago? did you pass high school biology? BTW----have you found that
20,000 year old black library yet?
does not take much to BLOW YOU AWAY-----you can find even better stuff in MAD MAGAZINE
Keith C. Cheng M.D. Ph.D. - Professor and Chief Division of Experimental Pathology - Penn State Hershey
Keith C. Cheng, M.D., Ph.D.
Chief, Division of Experimental Pathology
Distinguished Professor of Pathology, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, and Pharmacology
Co-Founding Co-Director of the Penn State IBIOS Bioinformatics and Genomics graduate program (with Cooduvalli Shashikant)
good citation-----it does not mention anything about the
PROTEIN MUTATION in some gene ----7000
years ago that turned black people white or those huge literate empires that were created more than 10,000
years go-----with libraries
I already provided the link to the 7K year genetic occurrence. Obviously the people that had the original mutation migrated to europe and thats how it appeared there. Since the guy is not a historian why would you expect him to tell you about the Black empires that existed prior to that?Dont get mad at me go talk to this guy and tell him he doesnt know what he is talking about.Go back and reread my post. I just found another link that blows me away. I thought this one guy was a black power nut case that claimed white people are really albino east Indians. Turns out he was closer to the truth than anyone imagined.what "science" did I deny------YOUR interpretation of
a report printed in the WASHINGTON POST?-----that
single base mutation that created white people out of
black people 7000 years ago? did you pass high school biology? BTW----have you found that
20,000 year old black library yet?
does not take much to BLOW YOU AWAY-----you can find even better stuff in MAD MAGAZINE
Keith C. Cheng M.D. Ph.D. - Professor and Chief Division of Experimental Pathology - Penn State Hershey
Keith C. Cheng, M.D., Ph.D.
Chief, Division of Experimental Pathology
Distinguished Professor of Pathology, Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, and Pharmacology
Co-Founding Co-Director of the Penn State IBIOS Bioinformatics and Genomics graduate program (with Cooduvalli Shashikant)
good citation-----it does not mention anything about the
PROTEIN MUTATION in some gene ----7000
years ago that turned black people white or those huge literate empires that were created more than 10,000
years go-----with libraries
Moses was Hebrew.Moses was black, so was his Ethiopian wife. Just saying.
You need a brush up on your doctorate then. You claimed that amino acids and proteins are the same. You were wrong. I think I'm going to go with the person that is actually in the field over you. Especially if you are white. I just caught you in a lie.I guess thats why you are posting on here instead of researching for your doctorate. You do realize proteins and amino acids are not the same thing right?Who said genes contain protein? Did you flunk english reading? Please read the article again. You cant be this much of an idiot.genes do not contain PROTEIN------did you pass high school biology? now its 10,000 years ago that black people turned white? and there were GREAT EMPIRES of literate black people BEFORE THAT ???-------who invented
antibiotics and -----calculus? you got a citation from
a peer reviewed journal? it the stuff is of any significance
It showed up in the journal "NATURE"
from your idiot article
In earlier research, Keith Cheng from Penn State College of Medicine reported that one amino acid difference in the gene SLC24A5.
Idiot---do you know the word "amino acid" ?? good---you
don't------there are no AMINO ACIDS in genes ----amino acid is the smallest unit of protein-----proteins are made
from a whole bunch of AMINO ACIDS-------ain't none in genes
How Do Genes Work Understanding Genetics
I did my doctorate long ago-----I am retired-----an amino acid--
is the bit of which proteins are made--------you do realize that you are an idiot-----RIGHT? The article you cited is very good------feel free to ask questions------you have no idea as to how to interpret it
They are not the same. They why they are called 2 different things. An amino acid is not a protein. Thats like saying a cell is an organ. You better go back to school.You need a brush up on your doctorate then. You claimed that amino acids and proteins are the same. You were wrong. I think I'm going to go with the person that is actually in the field over you. Especially if you are white. I just caught you in a lie.I guess thats why you are posting on here instead of researching for your doctorate. You do realize proteins and amino acids are not the same thing right?Who said genes contain protein? Did you flunk english reading? Please read the article again. You cant be this much of an idiot.
from your idiot article
In earlier research, Keith Cheng from Penn State College of Medicine reported that one amino acid difference in the gene SLC24A5.
Idiot---do you know the word "amino acid" ?? good---you
don't------there are no AMINO ACIDS in genes ----amino acid is the smallest unit of protein-----proteins are made
from a whole bunch of AMINO ACIDS-------ain't none in genes
How Do Genes Work Understanding Genetics
I did my doctorate long ago-----I am retired-----an amino acid--
is the bit of which proteins are made--------you do realize that you are an idiot-----RIGHT? The article you cited is very good------feel free to ask questions------you have no idea as to how to interpret it
I have no problem with amino acids and proteins---a protein is
a big bunch of amino acids---------they are both of the same stuff. ----- you are not only stupid----you are disgusting and vulgar. Who you "going with"???
