A "thinker" is someone that does not march lock step with the sheep and formulates their conclusions based on fact, not emotion and opinion. You offer opinion based on your ideology and emotion which does not take any thinking. You have such a difficult time articulating what you believe you polish off your crystal ball, rub it, chant and feebly tell us what you believe others believe. Anyone that is proficient at reading and has a little bit of patience at researching can easily locate numerous precedent cases of the constitutionality of public accommodation laws Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Common law for centuries, which public accommodation laws are based on, is that any person in commerce that holds himself out as a provider of goods for everyone as a business is a common carrier and thus any member of the public has a right to contract with that business provider. Nothing anywhere about any "religious" rights or "freedoms" for a business to opt out of that anywhere. That warped distortion of THE LAW is an American thing only as many Americans need to have some group of folk to look down on as beneath them. Religion is their excuse.
Got it now or do you need a list of the hundreds and hundreds of court cases that support the fact that United States Federal District Courts have upheld the CONSTITUTIONALITY of public accommodation laws?
