Global Warming Is Becoming Global Cooling

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Where is the increase coming from?

NOAA says not Major Tornadoes.

View attachment 592380
===

No increase in Landfalling Hurricanes,

View attachment 592383
LINK

===

No increase in Hurricane strength or Frequency,

View attachment 592385
===

No increase in Typhoons either since 1951,

View attachment 592386

===

Droughts are DECREASING in the 48 states,

View attachment 592387

===

Decreasing Wildfires NASA

View attachment 592388
LINK

NASA very similar chart

===

View attachment 592391
===

View attachment 592394

===

View attachment 592396

===

quote from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC):



===

No increase in HOT days,

View attachment 592398
===

Plummeting death rate since 1920,

View attachment 592399
LINK

===

and the best for last:

Next, here is the radical change in downwelling radiation at the surface from the increase in CO2 that is supposed to be driving the “CLIMATE EMERGENCY!!!” What I’ve shown is the change that in theory would have occurred from the changes in CO2 from 1750 to the present, and the change that in theory will occur in the future when CO2 increases from its present value to twice the 1750 value. This is using the generally accepted (although not rigorously derived) claim that the downwelling radiation change from a doubling of CO2 is 3.5 watts per square metre (W/m2). The purpose is to show how small these CO2-caused changes are compared to total downwelling radiation.

The changes in downwelling radiation from the increase in CO2 are trivially small, lost in the noise …

LINK

Maybe try getting your info NOT from paid liars at the Federalist society.

I only fact checked one of your charts. Naturally, it is misleading and created by paid deniers to fool the denier rubes

Here is the ACTUAL chart of tornado energy over the past decades. See a trend?:

 

[ding]

So, you're saying that playing golf is more important than saving our planet?

Fuck yeah.

 

[ding]

Wait until Old Rocks sees this!
His head is going to explode

So....the over/under on "you dumb fuck denier" is two on the response. I'm taking the over.

Ding....what are you taking dude?

over for sure.

 

[ding]

Another example of Dunning-Kruger. No, that is simply not true. You absolutely know nothing about this subject, are speaking from abject ignorance, and are too stupid to realize it.

No. It's not an example of dunning-kruger, dummy. You don't know what you are talking about as usual.

 

[ding]

We are #2 polluter after China. And when it comes to total amount of GHGs put into the atmosphere, we are #1 by a huge margin.

Analysis: Which countries are historically responsible for climate change? - Carbon Brief

Carbon Brief looks at national responsibility for historical emissions of CO2 from 1850-2021, updating analysis published in 2019.

www.carbonbrief.org

CO2 isn't pollution, dummy. CO2 is a vital component of the carbon cycle which all life on this planet depends upon for its survival. Leave it to you to believe CO2 is pollution.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Maybe try getting your info NOT from paid liars at the Federalist society.

I only fact checked one of your charts. Naturally, it is misleading and created by paid deniers to fool the denier rubes

Here is the ACTUAL chart of tornado energy over the past decades. See a trend?:

View attachment 594489

No link means you have nothing, and you ignored my link to what the NOAA says about declining Major Tornado counts this straight off their website:

Historical Records and Trends​

=====

Here you will learn how Dr. Mann lied about the chart you attacked in my post and what the NOAA tornado database says about Tornadoes.

Dr. Curry

TORNADO​

LINK

 

[Sunsettommy]

Maybe try getting your info NOT from paid liars at the Federalist society.

I only fact checked one of your charts. Naturally, it is misleading and created by paid deniers to fool the denier rubes

Here is the ACTUAL chart of tornado energy over the past decades. See a trend?:

View attachment 594489

It has been 5 weeks and still no link for your chart maybe you made it up out of your ass?



Not only that you IGNORED the NOAA data on Tornadoes which means you rather remain ignorant and stupid like the climate creep gook you are.

From Currys blog climate gooks will ignore because they ARE full of shit:

=====

Chris Martz, an undergraduate meteorology student at Millersville University, provides the following plots of NOAA’s tornado record

 

[Billy_Bob]

It has been 5 weeks and still no link for your chart maybe you made it up out of your ass?



Not only that you IGNORED the NOAA data on Tornadoes which means you rather remain ignorant and stupid like the climate creep gook you are.

From Currys blog climate gooks will ignore because they ARE full of shit:

=====

Chris Martz, an undergraduate meteorology student at Millersville University, provides the following plots of NOAA’s tornado record

View attachment 613895

ACE (Accumulated Cyclonic Energy) is very low and has been for about 9 years. Your charts are accurate to the empirically observed data.

 

[Weatherman2020]

LOL. So, you are a science denier?

Hilarious. Tell us what a woman is, Mr Science.