Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What would you say the trend was over the last 20 years? Wouldn't any good engineer take the current trend and extrapolate from that?Oh, you missed it. It was even more linear between 2000 and 2001. And where it was REALLY linear was between June 1st and June 2nd of 2000. And between 12:00:00 and 12:00:01 it was more linear than anything has ever been before.
You've got some fucking nerve to suggest I don't understand logarithmic relationships.
Where do I sign up!!!!
There is a reason it is called the "Keeling CURVE". I can't say I appreciate the dishonesty explicit in such blatant cherry picking.
View attachment 533645
Dummy, do you think the Keeling curve exists in a vacuum? The Keeling curve is a function of emissions. The relationship between emissions and atmospheric is directly proportional. If emissions are linear, the Keeling curve will be linear. If emissions are exponential, the Keeling curve will be exponential. My question to you is why would you expect exponential emissions when emissions have been linear for 20 years?The Keeling CURVE shows a clearly nonlinear, logarithmic relationship.
The verdict is in. You are slightly more intelligent than oldrocks but not by much.Jesus are you dense. Linear data trends are LINEAR. They have constant relationships between the independent and dependent variables. Logarithmic relationships change, they accelerate or decelerate and produce nonlinear trends. A curving data trend is NOT linear. The Keeling CURVE shows a clearly nonlinear, logarithmic relationship. ANY logarithmic relationship will look linear if you look at it closely enough. The true test is not to look closer, but to back up. If the relationship is linear, it will continue to look linear. If it is not, pulling back will show.
So socialism and communism will solve the problem?Capitalism.
I guess you are admitting that you should not be posting here?I don't know how to do links. That aside, what particular point exactly are you having trouble believing.
A retreating glacier still produces water, dumbass!It does no good pointing at extremes. And retreating glaciers aren't good either. There are a lot of people who depend on them for water.
Any action in the right direction helps. There will always be the argument as to whether it is enough or too much, though history on this topic has clearly shown that in almost every instance, mitigation efforts have been abysmally inadequate. We should have started work to eliminate fossil fuel power and ICE transportation right after World War II. But the only point in reviewing the errors of the past is to see what needs doing now.
Do not make the mistake of some posters here to think that because overpopulation is a root cause to global warming, that we should work on it and NOT work on global warming. That is a false dichotomy: an unwarranted elimination of alternatives. We can and should work on both - and other problems as well. Their is no need for exclusivity. The two efforts do not share any limited resource. There is no conflict.
Comrade Stalin once said: "What is the power of soviet socialism?... If there is a problem that does not contradict the laws of physics, mechanics and chemistry, and its solution is necessary for the motherland, then it will be solved - that's what the Soviet power is."So socialism and communism will solve the problem?
Really? Well we have not even come close to the warmest month ever recorded. In fact, we had days in June and tomorrow's forecast in the low 60s.In my city, the hottest month ever was recorded this year. I’d say this is accurate.
Actually, China is also building coal-powered energy plants at a frantic pace. They are also building renewable sources at a frantic pace.
China learned from us that the foremost ingredient of a healthy economy is CHEAP, PLENTIFUL ELECTRICITY. We were energy independent under President Trump, in just a few months, President Harris/Biden reversed that and now gas prices are skyrocketing. Who loves you, baby?
Thank you Comrade. I really don't give a shit that you continue to make unforced errors.Comrade Stalin once said: "What is the power of soviet socialism?... If there is a problem that does not contradict the laws of physics, mechanics and chemistry, and its solution is necessary for the motherland, then it will be solved - that's what the Soviet power is."
Communism will destroy wars and create the prerequisites for a real unification of the forces of all mankind aimed at creation .
Are you really this stupid? I guess so.Dummy, do you think the Keeling curve exists in a vacuum? The Keeling curve is a function of emissions. The relationship between emissions and atmospheric is directly proportional. If emissions are linear, the Keeling curve will be linear. If emissions are exponential, the Keeling curve will be exponential. My question to you is why would you expect exponential emissions when emissions have been linear for 20 years?
View attachment 534060
View attachment 534064
