GOP Hero and Legend George Zimmerman ‘Bragged’ About Trayvon Killing, Then Got Face Punched

[Muhammed]

You're full of shit and lying again. I heard what the eye witness said.

So post the transcript of the testimony.

Do you're own homework, you ignorant and petulant jackass.

So you say I'm lying and you won't prove it

got it

The eyewitness account is common knowledge, jackass.

Then you should have no problem posting the court testimony of that eyewitness who saw the entire thing and not just part of it.

You said I was lying so prove it

Do your own homework, jackass.

 

[Skull Pilot]

So post the transcript of the testimony.

Do you're own homework, you ignorant and petulant jackass.

So you say I'm lying and you won't prove it

got it

The eyewitness account is common knowledge, jackass.

Then you should have no problem posting the court testimony of that eyewitness who saw the entire thing and not just part of it.

You said I was lying so prove it

Do your own homework, jackass.

So you just call people liars and then never prove it?

Got it

The thing is you can't prove it so you call me names that's very childish

 

[Muhammed]

Do you're own homework, you ignorant and petulant jackass.

So you say I'm lying and you won't prove it

got it

The eyewitness account is common knowledge, jackass.

Then you should have no problem posting the court testimony of that eyewitness who saw the entire thing and not just part of it.

You said I was lying so prove it

Do your own homework, jackass.

So you just call people liars and then never prove it?

Got it

The thing is you can't prove it so you call me names that's very childish

You know damn well there is an eyewitness, jackass.

 

[Skull Pilot]

So you say I'm lying and you won't prove it

got it

The eyewitness account is common knowledge, jackass.

Then you should have no problem posting the court testimony of that eyewitness who saw the entire thing and not just part of it.

You said I was lying so prove it

Do your own homework, jackass.

So you just call people liars and then never prove it?

Got it

The thing is you can't prove it so you call me names that's very childish

You know damn well there is an eyewitness, jackass.

You are not only an emotional five year old but your reading comprehension is at the same level

I said No one saw the start of the fight. No one saw the initial contact. All the witnesses testified as to what happened at or near the end of the altercation not how it started.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

You're right. Bringing a fist to a gunfight is embarrassing enough.

Obviously, it is the coward who brings a gun to a fist fight. Martin had no idea GZ was armed so he didn't even bother to find a stick or wield a knife. He confronted GZ with his bare hands like a man.

Then he died like a little bitch after using those fists to try to kill someone.

No, whatever he was, Travon died like a man fighting his ass off. He wasn't a bitch like you hiding behind his computer talking shit.

Are we talking about me or are we really talking about you?

I didn't stutter. You are the bitch hiding safely behind your computer saying things you would never have the courage to say in mixed company.

I say GZ had the right to defend himself, the same thing I tell people IRL. You think you fucking know me? The only one who seems to be hiding his deficit in manhood is you.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

The eyewitness account is common knowledge, jackass.

Then you should have no problem posting the court testimony of that eyewitness who saw the entire thing and not just part of it.

You said I was lying so prove it

Do your own homework, jackass.

So you just call people liars and then never prove it?

Got it

The thing is you can't prove it so you call me names that's very childish

You know damn well there is an eyewitness, jackass.

You are not only an emotional five year old but your reading comprehension is at the same level

I said No one saw the start of the fight. No one saw the initial contact. All the witnesses testified as to what happened at or near the end of the altercation not how it started.

It doesn't matter who started it. Witnesses saw a ghetto thug beating a man viciously. That man had the right to defend himself.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Then you should have no problem posting the court testimony of that eyewitness who saw the entire thing and not just part of it.

You said I was lying so prove it

Do your own homework, jackass.

So you just call people liars and then never prove it?

Got it

The thing is you can't prove it so you call me names that's very childish

You know damn well there is an eyewitness, jackass.

You are not only an emotional five year old but your reading comprehension is at the same level

I said No one saw the start of the fight. No one saw the initial contact. All the witnesses testified as to what happened at or near the end of the altercation not how it started.

It doesn't matter who started it. Witnesses saw a ghetto thug beating a man viciously. That man had the right to defend himself.

GZ is responsible for the totality of the events is what I am saying.

He wanted to play cop and started following a guy for no real reason. He got out of his car and pursued on foot. The entire incident was of his own making because of his poor decisions.

And when you are carrying a concealed weapon it does matter who starts the altercation. Just ask any cop.

As a CCW permit holder carrying a weapon you have the responsibility to avoid confrontations not seek them out. Zimmerman sought out this confrontation

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Do your own homework, jackass.

So you just call people liars and then never prove it?

Got it

The thing is you can't prove it so you call me names that's very childish

You know damn well there is an eyewitness, jackass.

You are not only an emotional five year old but your reading comprehension is at the same level

I said No one saw the start of the fight. No one saw the initial contact. All the witnesses testified as to what happened at or near the end of the altercation not how it started.

It doesn't matter who started it. Witnesses saw a ghetto thug beating a man viciously. That man had the right to defend himself.

GZ is responsible for the totality of the events is what I am saying.

He wanted to play cop and started following a guy for no real reason. He got out of his car and pursued on foot. The entire incident was of his own making because of his poor decisions.

And when you are carrying a concealed weapon it does matter who starts the altercation. Just ask any cop.

As a CCW permit holder carrying a weapon you have the responsibility to avoid confrontations not seek them out. Zimmerman sought out this confrontation

And women ask to be raped. Got it.

 

[Muhammed]

Do your own homework, jackass.

So you just call people liars and then never prove it?

Got it

The thing is you can't prove it so you call me names that's very childish

You know damn well there is an eyewitness, jackass.

You are not only an emotional five year old but your reading comprehension is at the same level

I said No one saw the start of the fight. No one saw the initial contact. All the witnesses testified as to what happened at or near the end of the altercation not how it started.

It doesn't matter who started it. Witnesses saw a ghetto thug beating a man viciously. That man had the right to defend himself.

GZ is responsible for the totality of the events is what I am saying.

He wanted to play cop and started following a guy for no real reason. He got out of his car and pursued on foot. The entire incident was of his own making because of his poor decisions.

And when you are carrying a concealed weapon it does matter who starts the altercation. Just ask any cop.

not seek them out. Zimmerman sought out this confrontation

And, as usual, you are simply lying again, jackass.

You claim..

"As a CCW permit holder carrying a weapon you have the responsibility to avoid confrontations"

What Florida State law says that? It does not exist, jackass.

 

[Skull Pilot]

So you just call people liars and then never prove it?

Got it

The thing is you can't prove it so you call me names that's very childish

You know damn well there is an eyewitness, jackass.

You are not only an emotional five year old but your reading comprehension is at the same level

I said No one saw the start of the fight. No one saw the initial contact. All the witnesses testified as to what happened at or near the end of the altercation not how it started.

It doesn't matter who started it. Witnesses saw a ghetto thug beating a man viciously. That man had the right to defend himself.

GZ is responsible for the totality of the events is what I am saying.

He wanted to play cop and started following a guy for no real reason. He got out of his car and pursued on foot. The entire incident was of his own making because of his poor decisions.

And when you are carrying a concealed weapon it does matter who starts the altercation. Just ask any cop.

As a CCW permit holder carrying a weapon you have the responsibility to avoid confrontations not seek them out. Zimmerman sought out this confrontation

And women ask to be raped. Got it.

Not even analogous

Now if you say a woman armed with a gun walked up to a guy and initiated contact then shot the guy you might have a valid analogy

Zimmerman had absolutely no reason to pursue Martin. NONE. He made a string of decisions that put him int he position where he felt he had to shoot someone.

And as I said we still don't know what happened at the start of the fight for all we know GZ reached for his gun because he was afraid and then Martin fearing he might get shot took him to the ground. We just do not know.

So it matters who does what and when. And like I said any and all CCW permit holders who are carrying a weapon have the responsibility to avoid confrontations not seek them out.

SO IMO GZ wanted to play cop and made a string of irresponsible decisions that resulted in him killing someone.

 

[Skull Pilot]

So you just call people liars and then never prove it?

Got it

The thing is you can't prove it so you call me names that's very childish

You know damn well there is an eyewitness, jackass.

You are not only an emotional five year old but your reading comprehension is at the same level

I said No one saw the start of the fight. No one saw the initial contact. All the witnesses testified as to what happened at or near the end of the altercation not how it started.

It doesn't matter who started it. Witnesses saw a ghetto thug beating a man viciously. That man had the right to defend himself.

GZ is responsible for the totality of the events is what I am saying.

He wanted to play cop and started following a guy for no real reason. He got out of his car and pursued on foot. The entire incident was of his own making because of his poor decisions.

And when you are carrying a concealed weapon it does matter who starts the altercation. Just ask any cop.

not seek them out. Zimmerman sought out this confrontation

And, as usual, you are simply lying again, jackass.

You claim..

"As a CCW permit holder carrying a weapon you have the responsibility to avoid confrontations"

What Florida State law says that? It does not exist, jackass.

Avoiding confrontation is not the same as retreating. Get a dictionary.

Ask any CCW training instructor and they will tell you that you will be held to a higher standard as it should be.

GZ took the responsibility of carrying a loaded weapon too lightly IMO. You don't get to play cop just because you have a gun

 

[Correll]

Says the man that has forgotten about the 911 tape and the eyewitness and the physical evidence.

I have already debated this entire event elsewhere and have no wish to do do again. I heard the 911 call, I know about the witness who ony saw the two on the ground, and I know that GZ received lacerations to the back of his head but never lost consciousness!
He is still a coward and a psychopath who got away with murder.

There was nothing cowardly or psychotic about GZ's behavior that night.

He slightly overstepped the role of Neighbor HOod Watch.

That is not cowardly or psychotic.

That is a matter of opinion

NO, it's not.

"Cowardly" and "psychotic" are real words with real meanings.


A neighborhood watch guy following some young punk so he can vector the police in to check the guy out, does not meet either of those definitions.

THe question you need to ask yourself is why you have put yourself in a position where you are claiming that two words mean something that they OBVIOUSLY do not mean.

That, btw, is not a rhetorical comment. THe question is real, and if you could face it honestly, it could change your life.


But you can't.

Zimmerman's psychotic and cowardly behavior surfaced publicly AFTER he killed Martin. I was merely pointing to his later psychotic and cowardly episodes as having a bearing on his mentality the night he shot Martin. If you review GZ's ex-wife's experiences with the murderous bastard you might rethink the praise you heap so copiously upon your hero. GZ, in this layman's eyes, has mental problems.

Having an ex-wife make a charge is your "proof"?

LOL!!!!!

There are three types of people that have zero credibility with me. Ex-s, lawyers and mothers.


Ex-s are too likely to be blindly hateful.

Lawyers are professional liars.

Mothers are blinding loving.



Zimmerman called the cops on a stranger in a gated community.

He followed the guy a ways so he could tell the cops where the guy was.

That guy, viciously assaulted him, and GZ defended himself as is his right.

Why do you side with the vicious criminal?

Because of Race? That would make you a racist, by definition.

 

[Correll]

You know damn well there is an eyewitness, jackass.

You are not only an emotional five year old but your reading comprehension is at the same level

I said No one saw the start of the fight. No one saw the initial contact. All the witnesses testified as to what happened at or near the end of the altercation not how it started.

It doesn't matter who started it. Witnesses saw a ghetto thug beating a man viciously. That man had the right to defend himself.

GZ is responsible for the totality of the events is what I am saying.

He wanted to play cop and started following a guy for no real reason. He got out of his car and pursued on foot. The entire incident was of his own making because of his poor decisions.

And when you are carrying a concealed weapon it does matter who starts the altercation. Just ask any cop.

As a CCW permit holder carrying a weapon you have the responsibility to avoid confrontations not seek them out. Zimmerman sought out this confrontation

And women ask to be raped. Got it.

Not even analogous

Now if you say a woman armed with a gun walked up to a guy and initiated contact then shot the guy you might have a valid analogy

Zimmerman had absolutely no reason to pursue Martin. NONE. He made a string of decisions that put him int he position where he felt he had to shoot someone.

And as I said we still don't know what happened at the start of the fight for all we know GZ reached for his gun because he was afraid and then Martin fearing he might get shot took him to the ground. We just do not know.

So it matters who does what and when. And like I said any and all CCW permit holders who are carrying a weapon have the responsibility to avoid confrontations not seek them out.

SO IMO GZ wanted to play cop and made a string of irresponsible decisions that resulted in him killing someone.

Zimmerman had a completely valid reason to follow Martin.

He did not recognize Martin as someone who lived in the Gate Community, AND he matched the description of at large burglar.

Actually, I guess that is TWO good reasons.

MARTIN had no reason or right to attack Zimmerman and beat him while he screamed for help.

 

[Correll]

Zimmerman was in charge of recruiting block captains for a neighborhood watch program and, after having been asked, was also part of a group to enforce parking rules in his community.

The president of the homeowners association for the community where the shooting took place testified that he didn't think a neighborhood watch program was needed and that Zimmerman was in charge of the community's program from the very beginning.

Donald O'Brien stressed that the homeowners association had nothing to do with the neighborhood watch program but that he did attend a meeting to start it. Residents were told to "stay away" from suspicious people and call police, O'Brien said.

He said he once text messaged Zimmerman with praises for a group of workers who followed a burglar. Their actions led to the arrest of a young black man, who was charged with burglaries in the neighborhood, O'Brien said.

O'Brien added that police indicated it was acceptable to follow suspicious persons at a safe distance. He also said he signed an agreement with police to increase patrol of the area and to tow illegally parked cars.


Trial turns to Zimmerman's neighborhood-watch role

THAT'S very interesting.

Sort of shoots down the theory that was Zimmerman did was beyond the pale.

You do remember that GZ was NOT on duty as a neighborhood watchman when he killed the thug right?

You do not have to be "on duty" to call 911.

My point stands, the above link and quote shoots down the theory that what Zimmerman did was beyond the pale.

 

[Correll]

Who started the fight is irrelevant once Zimmerman was on his back pleading for his life. After that point Martin was legally obligated to let him up, but instead he kept going according to other witnesses.

Not necessarily.

If you are armed and start a fight you are responsible for putting your own life in danger therefore it's pretty tough to claim self defense.

CCW permit holders are held to a higher standard as they should be. GZ was obligated to try to avoid any situation that would require him shooting someone

And of course you are simply lying your ass off.

Try it and tell me how your trial goes.

There is no way to know who started the fight. The only evidence we have shows that Martin tried to kill GZ. Sufficient grounds for self-defense.

I don't know how many times I have to say this but whether or not GZ was justified to shoot has never been my argument

I have been saying that the totality of events were set in motion by Zimmerman's poor decisions and irresponsibility of trying to play cop. He wanted a confrontation. Well he got it and got his ass kicked for it. He put himself in the situation where he needed to pull his gun.

There is no support for your claim that Zimmerman wanted a confrontation.

We have the 911 tape because Zimmerman called the cops to come and "confront" the guy.

 

[Correll]

Just more proof that thugs like Trayvon are everywhere and can't accept what a court said.

Yup, the Trayvons and Georges and Corrells and the yous.

I am a harmless middle aged white guy who has never had any trouble with the law. You are a moron.

You mean you are a moronic white guy in his middle age who has not been caught yet. Yeah, you have a thug heart.

I said what I meant to say, asshole. Want to guess how many times I have sat on a man's chest and beat him while he screamed for help? That's a defining action of a Thug and I have never done that, nor anything like you.

Yes, you are a thug in heart, Correll. You just have not been caught. You are no different than your hero and legend, George Zimmerman.

You are too cowardly to brag about the evil you have done.

You are an asshole. Fuck you.

 

[Skull Pilot]

You are not only an emotional five year old but your reading comprehension is at the same level

I said No one saw the start of the fight. No one saw the initial contact. All the witnesses testified as to what happened at or near the end of the altercation not how it started.

It doesn't matter who started it. Witnesses saw a ghetto thug beating a man viciously. That man had the right to defend himself.

GZ is responsible for the totality of the events is what I am saying.

He wanted to play cop and started following a guy for no real reason. He got out of his car and pursued on foot. The entire incident was of his own making because of his poor decisions.

And when you are carrying a concealed weapon it does matter who starts the altercation. Just ask any cop.

As a CCW permit holder carrying a weapon you have the responsibility to avoid confrontations not seek them out. Zimmerman sought out this confrontation

And women ask to be raped. Got it.

Not even analogous

Now if you say a woman armed with a gun walked up to a guy and initiated contact then shot the guy you might have a valid analogy

Zimmerman had absolutely no reason to pursue Martin. NONE. He made a string of decisions that put him int he position where he felt he had to shoot someone.

And as I said we still don't know what happened at the start of the fight for all we know GZ reached for his gun because he was afraid and then Martin fearing he might get shot took him to the ground. We just do not know.

So it matters who does what and when. And like I said any and all CCW permit holders who are carrying a weapon have the responsibility to avoid confrontations not seek them out.

SO IMO GZ wanted to play cop and made a string of irresponsible decisions that resulted in him killing someone.

Zimmerman had a completely valid reason to follow Martin.

He did not recognize Martin as someone who lived in the Gate Community, AND he matched the description of at large burglar.

Actually, I guess that is TWO good reasons.

MARTIN had no reason or right to attack Zimmerman and beat him while he screamed for help.

We do not know how the fight started so do not presume.

For all we know Zimmerman reached for his gun because he was scared shitless and Martin took him down because he thought he was going to be shot.

He was playing cop Martin was not observed doing anything wrong and you presume Zimmerman knew absolutely every person who lived in the neighborhood and anyone who might be visiting soemone. Sorry there was no reason for him to pursue Martin. In fact by GZ's comments to the dispatcher he was convinced Martin was doing something wrong with no evidence of that whatsoever.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Not necessarily.

If you are armed and start a fight you are responsible for putting your own life in danger therefore it's pretty tough to claim self defense.

CCW permit holders are held to a higher standard as they should be. GZ was obligated to try to avoid any situation that would require him shooting someone

And of course you are simply lying your ass off.

Try it and tell me how your trial goes.

There is no way to know who started the fight. The only evidence we have shows that Martin tried to kill GZ. Sufficient grounds for self-defense.

I don't know how many times I have to say this but whether or not GZ was justified to shoot has never been my argument

I have been saying that the totality of events were set in motion by Zimmerman's poor decisions and irresponsibility of trying to play cop. He wanted a confrontation. Well he got it and got his ass kicked for it. He put himself in the situation where he needed to pull his gun.

There is no support for your claim that Zimmerman wanted a confrontation.

We have the 911 tape because Zimmerman called the cops to come and "confront" the guy.

Yeah then he confronted him. so he wanted to play cop

 

[JakeStarkey]

The best evidence adduced from testimony is that TM went into the condo, and when he came out to assault GZ, he was fair game under Florida law. GZ, however, initated first contact before TM went in, so he is morally guilty as well.

 

[Correll]

It doesn't matter who started it. Witnesses saw a ghetto thug beating a man viciously. That man had the right to defend himself.

GZ is responsible for the totality of the events is what I am saying.

He wanted to play cop and started following a guy for no real reason. He got out of his car and pursued on foot. The entire incident was of his own making because of his poor decisions.

And when you are carrying a concealed weapon it does matter who starts the altercation. Just ask any cop.

As a CCW permit holder carrying a weapon you have the responsibility to avoid confrontations not seek them out. Zimmerman sought out this confrontation

And women ask to be raped. Got it.

Not even analogous

Now if you say a woman armed with a gun walked up to a guy and initiated contact then shot the guy you might have a valid analogy

Zimmerman had absolutely no reason to pursue Martin. NONE. He made a string of decisions that put him int he position where he felt he had to shoot someone.

And as I said we still don't know what happened at the start of the fight for all we know GZ reached for his gun because he was afraid and then Martin fearing he might get shot took him to the ground. We just do not know.

So it matters who does what and when. And like I said any and all CCW permit holders who are carrying a weapon have the responsibility to avoid confrontations not seek them out.

SO IMO GZ wanted to play cop and made a string of irresponsible decisions that resulted in him killing someone.

Zimmerman had a completely valid reason to follow Martin.

He did not recognize Martin as someone who lived in the Gate Community, AND he matched the description of at large burglar.

Actually, I guess that is TWO good reasons.

MARTIN had no reason or right to attack Zimmerman and beat him while he screamed for help.

We do not know how the fight started so do not presume.

For all we know Zimmerman reached for his gun because he was scared shitless and Martin took him down because he thought he was going to be shot.

He was playing cop Martin was not observed doing anything wrong and you presume Zimmerman knew absolutely every person who lived in the neighborhood and anyone who might be visiting soemone. Sorry there was no reason for him to pursue Martin. In fact by GZ's comments to the dispatcher he was convinced Martin was doing something wrong with no evidence of that whatsoever.

1. I presume nothing. Of course Zimmerman did not know everyone. But asking the police to check a stranger who fit the description of a local burglar was completely reasonable.

2. Yes, GZ was quite suspicious of the stranger in the gated community that matched the description of the local burglar and who was looking at a lot of houses.

3. Calling the cops is not playing cops. Even following Martin to tell the cops where he went is not playing cops.

4. Considering that Martin was so vicious that he would not stop beating the man screaming for help, even when the one eyewitness yelled that he was calling the cops, I think that we DO have reason to "presume" that Martin the vicious thug was the one that started the fight.