GOP revives rule allowing $1 salaries for government employees

[owebo]

The unions sucked the life out of those companies paying the benefits. Auto companies were paying more in pensions than they were on steel. The unions were vampires sucking the life out of the companies that employed them. As with all parasites, when the host dies, so does the union parasite.

Just a few years ago we saw it happen with Hostess. The company begged the union to let the company survive. The union said no. Where did they think the money was going to come from?

Hostess closed. Sold off the recipes and the owners pocketed a few million. No comfort for the deservedly unemployed union members.

not this right wing fantasy, again.

Hostess merely had, lousy capital management that was overpriced under Any form of True capitalism. Management compensation should have been cut to cover the short fall, not Labor compensation. It was not a labor issue, it was a management issue and they should have taken responsibility instead of simply blamed Labor.

Or go bankrupt renig on pensions and open back up later as mostess and pay new employees less.

Then blame Obama because workers aren't doing as well now. No shit! Hostess didn't want to pay.

Management was too busy getting richer while Labor got poorer.

Except management was getting richer, and labor wasn't getting poorer...so....

Yes, they were. You are remembering, right wing fantasy.

No,money weren't...you're remembering you fake news fascist fantasy...

 

[danielpalos]

not this right wing fantasy, again.

Hostess merely had, lousy capital management that was overpriced under Any form of True capitalism. Management compensation should have been cut to cover the short fall, not Labor compensation. It was not a labor issue, it was a management issue and they should have taken responsibility instead of simply blamed Labor.

Not this fascist left wing fantasy again....

Unions celebrated killing their jobs,...fuck them...only true capitalism will stop you fascists....

management asked for and got higher compensation, for being lousy.

No, management was retained to protect as much value ifmthenassetsmwhilemthey closed the company.....so

only lousy managers could not make like Henry Ford and double Labor wages while realizing gains from efficiency.

That makes no sense...

You make no sense, under any form of Capitalism.

 

[danielpalos]

Or go bankrupt renig on pensions and open back up later as mostess and pay new employees less.

Then blame Obama because workers aren't doing as well now. No shit! Hostess didn't want to pay.

Owners sold the brand child, it was their property....hostess stood their ground against Obama and paid the price for taking the high road....

what high road. management was overpriced and didn't want to take responsibility.

Management was not over priced, and they made excellent choices based on the reality of the situation.....

No, they didn't. Management was simply overpriced, and Hostess would have been better off hiring illegal managers, to save on cost.

No, labor was overpriced,many the company was crushed by it despite managements best efforts...

How could labor be overpriced, if production was not the problem?

 

[sealybobo]

The unions sucked the life out of those companies paying the benefits. Auto companies were paying more in pensions than they were on steel. The unions were vampires sucking the life out of the companies that employed them. As with all parasites, when the host dies, so does the union parasite.

Just a few years ago we saw it happen with Hostess. The company begged the union to let the company survive. The union said no. Where did they think the money was going to come from?

Hostess closed. Sold off the recipes and the owners pocketed a few million. No comfort for the deservedly unemployed union members.

not this right wing fantasy, again.

Hostess merely had, lousy capital management that was overpriced under Any form of True capitalism. Management compensation should have been cut to cover the short fall, not Labor compensation. It was not a labor issue, it was a management issue and they should have taken responsibility instead of simply blamed Labor.

Not this fascist left wing fantasy again....

Unions celebrated killing their jobs,...fuck them...only true capitalism will stop you fascists....

management asked for and got higher compensation, for being lousy.

No, management was retained to protect as much value ifmthenassetsmwhilemthey closed the company.....so

only lousy managers could not make like Henry Ford and double Labor wages while realizing gains from efficiency.

There once was a time when labor, management and shareholders got their fair share. Back when unions represented 35% of the workforce. But the shareholders and management stopped giving labor their fair share. This started in the 70s and Reagan played a UGE part but Republicans worship him

 

[danielpalos]

not this right wing fantasy, again.

Hostess merely had, lousy capital management that was overpriced under Any form of True capitalism. Management compensation should have been cut to cover the short fall, not Labor compensation. It was not a labor issue, it was a management issue and they should have taken responsibility instead of simply blamed Labor.

Or go bankrupt renig on pensions and open back up later as mostess and pay new employees less.

Then blame Obama because workers aren't doing as well now. No shit! Hostess didn't want to pay.

Management was too busy getting richer while Labor got poorer.

Except management was getting richer, and labor wasn't getting poorer...so....

Yes, they were. You are remembering, right wing fantasy.

No,money weren't...you're remembering you fake news fascist fantasy...

Hostess failed. Management was getting paid management bucks to make a profit.

Hostess merely had, lousy capital management that was overpriced under Any form of True capitalism. Management compensation should have been cut to cover the short fall, not Labor compensation. It was not a labor issue, it was a management issue and they should have taken responsibility instead of simply blaming Labor.

 

[Meathead]

Good.... most of them aren't worth $.01 let alone $1.

And about the only one who is worth more than a dollar is actually making a dollar (see avatar if you're confused).

 

[danielpalos]

not this right wing fantasy, again.

Hostess merely had, lousy capital management that was overpriced under Any form of True capitalism. Management compensation should have been cut to cover the short fall, not Labor compensation. It was not a labor issue, it was a management issue and they should have taken responsibility instead of simply blamed Labor.

Not this fascist left wing fantasy again....

Unions celebrated killing their jobs,...fuck them...only true capitalism will stop you fascists....

management asked for and got higher compensation, for being lousy.

No, management was retained to protect as much value ifmthenassetsmwhilemthey closed the company.....so

only lousy managers could not make like Henry Ford and double Labor wages while realizing gains from efficiency.

There once was a time when labor, management and shareholders got their fair share. Back when unions represented 35% of the workforce. But the shareholders and management stopped giving labor their fair share. This started in the 70s and Reagan played a UGE part but Republicans worship him

just right wing fantasy; establish public policies that help the rich get richer at the expense of the poor, and blame the poor for not working hard enough, like "Hostess Management".

 

[sealybobo]

Or go bankrupt renig on pensions and open back up later as mostess and pay new employees less.

Then blame Obama because workers aren't doing as well now. No shit! Hostess didn't want to pay.

Owners sold the brand child, it was their property....hostess stood their ground against Obama and paid the price for taking the high road....

what high road. management was overpriced and didn't want to take responsibility.

Management was not over priced, and they made excellent choices based on the reality of the situation.....

No, they didn't. Management was simply overpriced, and Hostess would have been better off hiring illegal managers, to save on cost.

No, labor was overpriced,many the company was crushed by it despite managements best efforts...

Forget the $1 rule for politicians. How about every other year instead of the CEO getting the bonus the workers get it. Or split the profits 50% to executives 50% to workers. another $20 million they give employees the bonus?

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Unemployment about to go up to 20%.....You think your pay isn't going to go down? PFT!

GOP revives rule allowing $1 salaries for government employees

the reported unemployment numbers might go to 20%, but the number of unemployed wont be going up.
Whats going to happen is now that king barry is out of office, those that do the reporting will use the real numbers on unemployment instead of the cover up numbers they have been using. The reason for this is that so history will show that barry kept people working but as soon as republicans came in, people lost their jobs the next day.

 

[sealybobo]

Unemployment about to go up to 20%.....You think your pay isn't going to go down? PFT!

GOP revives rule allowing $1 salaries for government employees

the reported unemployment numbers might go to 20%, but the number of unemployed wont be going up.
Whats going to happen is now that king barry is out of office, those that do the reporting will use the real numbers on unemployment instead of the cover up numbers they have been using. The reason for this is that so history will show that barry kept people working but as soon as republicans came in, people lost their jobs the next day.

Who's about to lose their jobs? Government workers I suspect?

 

[danielpalos]

Owners sold the brand child, it was their property....hostess stood their ground against Obama and paid the price for taking the high road....

what high road. management was overpriced and didn't want to take responsibility.

Management was not over priced, and they made excellent choices based on the reality of the situation.....

No, they didn't. Management was simply overpriced, and Hostess would have been better off hiring illegal managers, to save on cost.

No, labor was overpriced,many the company was crushed by it despite managements best efforts...

Forget the $1 rule for politicians. How about every other year instead of the CEO getting the bonus the workers get it. Or split the profits 50% to executives 50% to workers. another $20 million they give employees the bonus?

or, management should forfeit their "golden parachutes" and then try to manage, regular labor.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Good.... most of them aren't worth $.01 let alone $1.

/--- I laugh when Libtards cry Gubmint Shutdown when only non essential workers are sent home. If they are non essential why have them in the first place?

 

[Cellblock2429]

Unemployment about to go up to 20%.....You think your pay isn't going to go down? PFT!

GOP revives rule allowing $1 salaries for government employees

the reported unemployment numbers might go to 20%, but the number of unemployed wont be going up.
Whats going to happen is now that king barry is out of office, those that do the reporting will use the real numbers on unemployment instead of the cover up numbers they have been using. The reason for this is that so history will show that barry kept people working but as soon as republicans came in, people lost their jobs the next day.

/--- True unless Trump has the numbers retroactive to 2008.

 

[sealybobo]

Unemployment about to go up to 20%.....You think your pay isn't going to go down? PFT!

GOP revives rule allowing $1 salaries for government employees

the reported unemployment numbers might go to 20%, but the number of unemployed wont be going up.
Whats going to happen is now that king barry is out of office, those that do the reporting will use the real numbers on unemployment instead of the cover up numbers they have been using. The reason for this is that so history will show that barry kept people working but as soon as republicans came in, people lost their jobs the next day.

You may not remember but we used to accuse bush of using a bullshit formula to come up with a bogus unemployment number. You simply forget and now you're using the argument on us. But best argument you have is Clinton signed NAFTA. You're intellectually dishonest.

I want to see how exactly you're going to help the people who gave up looking.

Oh and the economy is already better because those people are looking again. Obama can't help it corporations won't hire the unemployed.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Owners sold the brand child, it was their property....hostess stood their ground against Obama and paid the price for taking the high road....

what high road. management was overpriced and didn't want to take responsibility.

Management was not over priced, and they made excellent choices based on the reality of the situation.....

No, they didn't. Management was simply overpriced, and Hostess would have been better off hiring illegal managers, to save on cost.

No, labor was overpriced,many the company was crushed by it despite managements best efforts...

Forget the $1 rule for politicians. How about every other year instead of the CEO getting the bonus the workers get it. Or split the profits 50% to executives 50% to workers. another $20 million they give employees the bonus?

/---- It's none of your business what companies pay their CEOs. It's not taxpayer money, Fidel.

 

[sealybobo]

Good.... most of them aren't worth $.01 let alone $1.

/--- I laugh when Libtards cry Gubmint Shutdown when only non essential workers are sent home. If they are non essential why have them in the first place?

I agree but you do realize you will be adding to unemployment when you cut the government in half. Right? Then after their unemployment insurance runs out, we can say those people still count. They just fell off the books. And you'll have no way of verifying my fake news

 

[Cellblock2429]

Not this fascist left wing fantasy again....

Unions celebrated killing their jobs,...fuck them...only true capitalism will stop you fascists....

management asked for and got higher compensation, for being lousy.

No, management was retained to protect as much value ifmthenassetsmwhilemthey closed the company.....so

only lousy managers could not make like Henry Ford and double Labor wages while realizing gains from efficiency.

There once was a time when labor, management and shareholders got their fair share. Back when unions represented 35% of the workforce. But the shareholders and management stopped giving labor their fair share. This started in the 70s and Reagan played a UGE part but Republicans worship him

just right wing fantasy; establish public policies that help the rich get richer at the expense of the poor, and blame the poor for not working hard enough, like "Hostess Management".

/---- Libs have been playing that broken record for decades. So where do the poor get all of the money the rich are stealing from them? Lottery winnings?

 

[owebo]

Good.... most of them aren't worth $.01 let alone $1.

/--- I laugh when Libtards cry Gubmint Shutdown when only non essential workers are sent home. If they are non essential why have them in the first place?

I agree but you do realize you will be adding to unemployment when you cut the government in half. Right? Then after their unemployment insurance runs out, we can say those people still count. They just fell off the books. And you'll have no way of verifying my fake news

Actually, we will be exploding employment by cutting the .gov in half....so.....

 

[owebo]

Owners sold the brand child, it was their property....hostess stood their ground against Obama and paid the price for taking the high road....

what high road. management was overpriced and didn't want to take responsibility.

Management was not over priced, and they made excellent choices based on the reality of the situation.....

No, they didn't. Management was simply overpriced, and Hostess would have been better off hiring illegal managers, to save on cost.

No, labor was overpriced,many the company was crushed by it despite managements best efforts...

Forget the $1 rule for politicians. How about every other year instead of the CEO getting the bonus the workers get it. Or split the profits 50% to executives 50% to workers. another $20 million they give employees the bonus?

why? What are you saying the workers have done to deserve that?

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Unemployment about to go up to 20%.....You think your pay isn't going to go down? PFT!

GOP revives rule allowing $1 salaries for government employees

the reported unemployment numbers might go to 20%, but the number of unemployed wont be going up.
Whats going to happen is now that king barry is out of office, those that do the reporting will use the real numbers on unemployment instead of the cover up numbers they have been using. The reason for this is that so history will show that barry kept people working but as soon as republicans came in, people lost their jobs the next day.

You may not remember but we used to accuse bush of using a bullshit formula to come up with a bogus unemployment number. You simply forget and now you're using the argument on us. But best argument you have is Clinton signed NAFTA. You're intellectually dishonest.

I want to see how exactly you're going to help the people who gave up looking.

Oh and the economy is already better because those people are looking again. Obama can't help it corporations won't hire the unemployed.

question,
do you ever feel stupid when you assume what I thought 30 years ago when you have only known of my posting for the last year?