Gov Palin on Syria: 'Let Allah Sort it Out'

Stop calling her Governor -- she didn't finish her term, she quit. She doesn't get the title.

As far as the complexities of foreign policy.... Well, Alaska is right next to Russia, so she knows what she's talking about.:eusa_whistle::eusa_whistle::eusa_whistle:

how about you quit? and maybe this will drive more insane, she will be known as Governer for the rest of her life but here's this for you:eusa_boohoo:..
.and you will be called? hazzienuts the women hater and just all around loser:lol:
 
Staph, when Palin's response to mass murder is to insult other people's religion, it kind of goes beyond retarded.

I forget, people can only insult Christians and their religion...let alla take care of it is now an insult....isn't that who they pray too?

I'm surprised you didn't say it was racist too..

thankfully you liberals don't get to be the judge on what is an insult or not, and what is racist or not..though you would like to control what people say...that's that scratch a liberal find a fascist

I can't believe Joe would say this, he is constantly bashing religions. Surely his is smarter than this.

Sarah Palin paints herself as a national figure. I don't.

Nor would I make a joke about mass murder or treat it lightly as she has.
 

Stop calling her Governor -- she didn't finish her term, she quit. She doesn't get the title.

As far as the complexities of foreign policy.... Well, Alaska is right next to Russia, so she knows what she's talking about.:eusa_whistle::eusa_whistle::eusa_whistle:

yep, Bible Spice (R) never finished her one & only term :rofl:

slideshow1427812palinmi.jpg
 
Last edited:
and yet sarah palin supported the iraq war, which ultimately enabled the iraqis (what was left of them)

to establish an islamic theocracy.


attention nutsack - isle 3

yeas to attack iraq — 77

bayh (d-in)
biden (d-de)
breaux (d-la)
cantwell (d-wa)
carnahan (d-mo)
carper (d-de)
cleland (d-ga)
clinton (d-ny)
daschle (d-sd)
dodd (d-ct)
dorgan (d-nd)
edwards (d-nc)
feinstein (d-ca)
harkin (d-ia) hollings (d-sc)
johnson (d-sd)
kerry (d-ma)
kohl (d-wi)
landrieu (d-la)
lieberman (d-ct)
lincoln (d-ar)
miller (d-ga)
nelson (d-fl)
nelson (d-ne)
reid (d-nv)
rockefeller (d-wv)
schumer (d-ny)
torricelli (d-nj)

who was president?
 
I have a T shirt that says "Kill them all and let Allah sort them out" given to me by an Army sniper with 1 tour in Iraq and 2 in Afghanistan. He does not talk about his work and is one of my son's best friends.
That is where Palin got that from.
I have no problem with anything she says. She is accountable to no one, is not electable, will never run for anything again, is not wanted to run for anything again nationally and can say what she wants to.
Does not make her any smarter than before. She is a pretty ideologue ONLY.
 
I have a T shirt that says "Kill them all and let Allah sort them out" given to me by an Army sniper with 1 tour in Iraq and 2 in Afghanistan. He does not talk about his work and is one of my son's best friends.
That is where Palin got that from.
I have no problem with anything she says. She is accountable to no one, is not electable, will never run for anything again, is not wanted to run for anything again nationally and can say what she wants to.
Does not make her any smarter than before. She is a pretty ideologue ONLY.

How presumptuous of you to assume righties or teavangelists don't want her to run?
 
As refreshing as it must have been to pause for a good ole-fashioned Palin Bashing, the OP addressed her opinion on the crack the Community Organizer has gotten himself into regarding Syria.

You pinheaded liberals need to abandon for a moment your customary attack on the messenger, which you use with metronomic regularity on this board, and say whether you agree with her or not...or whether you want your Nobel Peace Price winner to jump into another Mid-East-War Adventure.

I attacked her for doing a 180 from her Iraq war position, despite the fact that effectively all of the conditions used to justify the Iraq war are in place in Syria.

Pointing out hypocrisy is a good thing, however, 48 countries, including many of the Arab states supported and participated in the invasion of Iraq. How many countries are backing President red line?
 
I attacked her for doing a 180 from her Iraq war position, despite the fact that effectively all of the conditions used to justify the Iraq war are in place in Syria.

Isn't Obama doing a 180 on his anti war position?

No. He's not proposing anything close to what Bush did in Iraq.

Launching several hundred cruise missiles to blow up people in another country is an act of war. A person killed by poison gas is just as dead as one killed by a cruise missile. I suggest that Obama has killed more innocent bystanders with his cruise missile attacks than were killed in the Syrian poison gas attack.
 
The GObP is falling apart. Rand Paul praising the scum who gassed all those children is disgusting but the R doesn't even bother to pretend they care about children once they're born. They don't give a shit about fetuses either - its just a way for them to pass more and more laws to control more and more Americans.

And, it utterly pitiful that the best woman they could find to nominate for veed was $illy Simpleton Sarah.

Many more children have died from far more deadly conventional weapons. Explain why Chemical Weapons is suppose to make any difference...

One could argue that the international conventions condemning the use of chemical weapons, with most of the world's nations as signatories to them,

might be a difference.

That is an excellent argument. When are any of the signatories of the international convention to step up and join the US in punishing Syria?
 
Who cares what Palin says, she is not an elected official and nothing other than a well paid talking head entertainer?
More power to her but she will never run for any office again so who cares?

People listen to Bill Clinton who was convicted of lying under oath. He can't run for President again.

Your point?
 
Who cares what Palin says, she is not an elected official and nothing other than a well paid talking head entertainer?
More power to her but she will never run for any office again so who cares?

People listen to Bill Clinton who was convicted of lying under oath. He can't run for President again.

Your point?

And those same people elected Clinton President how many times?
How many times did Palin win a national election?
You make my point for me.
 
And yet Sarah Palin supported the Iraq War, which ultimately enabled the Iraqis (what was left of them)

to establish an Islamic theocracy.


Attention nutsack - isle 3

YEAs to attack Iraq — 77

Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE)
Breaux (D-LA)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carnahan (D-MO)
Carper (D-DE)
Cleland (D-GA)
Clinton (D-NY)
Daschle (D-SD)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Edwards (D-NC)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Harkin (D-IA) Hollings (D-SC)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Miller (D-GA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Schumer (D-NY)
Torricelli (D-NJ)

Er, did you mention that Bush lied about the WMDs to Congress? No, of course, you didn't.

No one in Congress was aware of the secret intelligence that Saddam had no WMD as the House of Representatives and the Senate voted, a week after the submission of the NIE, on the Authorization for Use of Military Force in Iraq. The information, moreover, was not circulated within the CIA among those agents involved in operations to prove whether Saddam had WMD.
CIA confirms Bush lied about WMDs
 
you mean plausible deniability? :eusa_eh: He "wanted" to believe there were weapons there, that why they :up: changed their reasons for invading numerous times after the people were underwhelmed w/ their initial 3-4 reasons
 
I didn't 'rationalize' anything. I merely pointed out the indisputable fact that the president's proposed action towards Syria does not bear any resemblance to the all-out invasion/war that Bush perpetrated on Iraq,

and Sarah Palin supported...

...for all the same reasons that a consistent person would now support an all-out war against Syria:

1. State sponsor of terrorism
2. Oppressive regime
3. using WMD's against his own people

Remember, you people thought war was necessary against Iraq. Maybe it's time you remind us why under extremely similar conditions,

you not only think that any action against Syria is not only unnecessary, but absolutely out of the question.

Are you tacitly admitting that you never really believed war in Iraq was necessary?

I didn't care for either war. The one in Afghanistan is the only one I supported up until we killed OBL. Nonetheless, Obama is wanting to take military action against Syria, which is Bush-esque wouldn't you agree? You would never expect him to have such an itchy trigger finger now would you? I don't care for you referring to us as "you people" either. You find ways to denigrate people in the slightest ways possible.

But let me just point one thing out.

Obama promised to end the Iraq War, which he did. He promised he would end the war in Afghanistan circa 2014. But since then he has invaded Pakistan, bombed Yemen, attacked Libya, sent Marines to Sudan and Uganda, and is planning to attack Syria.

Liberals such as yourself were lamenting the fact that Bush drew America into two "useless" wars and most of you agreed it was so. When Obama himself wants to take military action, you folks fell silent. Why is that?

I don't want any action taken against Syria, our men and women signed up to kill terrorists, not help them in a war between evil vs. evil. Indeed it is out of the question, Carbine. Both Iraq and Syria are similar, but one turned out to be bad intel, the other is turning out to be the same. Both men are falling for the same trick.

I feel sorry for Liberals like you. Here you are ready to defend him should he choose to strike.

Let me remind you:

You also falsely accused me of supporting Obama's actions in Libya.

When I produced verbatim quotes from my past posts proving beyond all doubt that I did not,

you STILL refused to accept that fact.

You were an idiot. You remain an idiot.

You act liberal, you defend liberal policies, you run around with the liberals on this board. You really think that some quotes saying something to the contrary is going to pull wool over my eyes? Dude, you are the idiot not me. I can't stand liars, most of all your evasiveness on the topic. Your neg and your subsequent "negged for telling me what I believe" was all the proof I needed. I am not as easily gullible as the sheep being led to the slaughterhouse.

Now, do you care to try more bullshit with me, mister?
 

Forum List

Back
Top