Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
In 1776 liberals were conservatives compared to today's liberal. You have no idea how far left liberals have become.I understand completely.You don't want to understand therefore, you don't.So you're saying that your problem is nobody understands you fuckers?
Liberals have their own world and the rest of us live in this one.
Our country, the one we live in, was founded by liberals. It was the liberals--the ones who believed that we were all created equal--who fought the union side of the civil war and emanicipated the slaves. It was the liberals who fought for civil rights. It was the liberals who fought for legislation to protect children (e.g., child labor laws), and the environment, and the economy so that we could all prosper. If you're a citizen of the United States, you live in a country created and perpetuated by liberals.
I know for a fact that the 1776 liberals and the ones who wrote the Constitution were smart enough to reserve the entire universe of individual rights ... none were surrendered. The same principles they applied then, we apply now ... and we're fortunate that our body of knowledge has expanded since then and our understanding is greater.
Nope, never had that but I keep my politics mostly to myself. My clients think I'm a conservative, since nearly everyone here is and I have the same work ethic, even better in most cases.
And most liberals are hardly going to pat you on the back for listening to a program that people who like it are perfectly willing to call themselves Dittoheads. Liberals think for themselves, it's part of being a liberal.
Liberals think for themselves? I guess that's why when one of their own uses certain phrases, it doesn't take long for the butt lickers on here to start repeating those Liberal phrases.
I believe people who lean toward the left are the ones who have repeatedly demonstrated that they read relevant statutory law and supreme court decisions and apply the language and legal concepts to similar cases and controversies. From my observations, they are less likely to fall victim to logical fallacies and disingenuous arguments and employ critical thinking skills.
When "liberals" derive their "common language" from authoritative sources but their political adversaries derive their "common language" from partisan pundits and talking heads like Rush Limbaugh, then it is fair to say that liberals are more likely than conservatives to think for themselves.
Recently, in the past 8 years, and now, lefties pucker up to either a black ass, a socialist, or a twat. They could care less about anything other than seeing how much they can kiss.
Conservative65: Your response did not address anything in my post. You referred to our president as a "black ass" and to Hillary Clinton as a "twat", which says more about you than it does about them. You referred to Bernie Sanders as a socialist and did so without recognizing that all politicians are socialists. For example, whenever a politician votes for a budget that allocates taxpayer dollars for the benefit of the common welfare, he is voting for socialism.
If the only thing the people of this nation care about is kissing asses as you allege, then what makes the asses you kiss so special? Identify the person you're puckering for and the rest of us can call that person objectionable names. It certainly doesn't appear as if you're interested in any other kind of conversation. In other words, you're just throwing unnecessary animosity into the wind.
It says that Democrats pick candidates based on skin color and reproductive organ.
Bernie is the self proclaimed socialist. When a politician votes to budget allocating taxes that everyone pays, that's not socialism. Socialism involves what Bernie proposes with free college. Those of us who aren't a kid's parent are expected to do for that kid with higher taxes what the kid's own parent won't do voluntarily. That's socialism.
What makes you think I kiss ass? What do I expect the government to do for me? Provide a list.
I don't care what you call me. In the end, you don't mean shit in a n*gger's back yard to me.
Well I know some of them are idiots. They believe some incredibly lame excuses. They can be so gullible simply because of their own bias. Many are part of a protected class that enjoys double standards and special consideration for their race, their sexual orientation, or their wealth. They don't feel shame for their transgressions.Nope. You have no interest in learning about what a liberal is. You've been told they are evil bad people. For you that's all you need to hear.I understand completely.You don't want to understand therefore, you don't.So you're saying that your problem is nobody understands you fuckers?Face it, you're an idiot who has no idea what a liberal is, let alone what they believe. You were told they are bad people, and you believe it.
Liberals have their own world and the rest of us live in this one.
Modesty and humility is foreign to many of them. They feel everyone should think the same way. Everyone else should just leave.
We are allowed to have an opinion as long as it matches their opinion.
Claiming that modern liberals, in the context of america, are "stalinists" is absolute absurdity. In fact, it's so far out there, I question if you understand what american liberals believe in.In 1776 liberals were conservatives compared to today's liberal. You have no idea how far left liberals have become.I understand completely.You don't want to understand therefore, you don't.
Liberals have their own world and the rest of us live in this one.
Our country, the one we live in, was founded by liberals. It was the liberals--the ones who believed that we were all created equal--who fought the union side of the civil war and emanicipated the slaves. It was the liberals who fought for civil rights. It was the liberals who fought for legislation to protect children (e.g., child labor laws), and the environment, and the economy so that we could all prosper. If you're a citizen of the United States, you live in a country created and perpetuated by liberals.
I know for a fact that the 1776 liberals and the ones who wrote the Constitution were smart enough to reserve the entire universe of individual rights ... none were surrendered. The same principles they applied then, we apply now ... and we're fortunate that our body of knowledge has expanded since then and our understanding is greater.
The so-called "principles" of modern liberals have nothing in common with the principles of the Founding Fathers. The believed in private property and the free market. Modern liberals, on the other hand, are Stalinists who believe in neither.
Stalinism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaIn 1776 liberals were conservatives compared to today's liberal. You have no idea how far left liberals have become.I understand completely.You don't want to understand therefore, you don't.
Liberals have their own world and the rest of us live in this one.
Our country, the one we live in, was founded by liberals. It was the liberals--the ones who believed that we were all created equal--who fought the union side of the civil war and emanicipated the slaves. It was the liberals who fought for civil rights. It was the liberals who fought for legislation to protect children (e.g., child labor laws), and the environment, and the economy so that we could all prosper. If you're a citizen of the United States, you live in a country created and perpetuated by liberals.
I know for a fact that the 1776 liberals and the ones who wrote the Constitution were smart enough to reserve the entire universe of individual rights ... none were surrendered. The same principles they applied then, we apply now ... and we're fortunate that our body of knowledge has expanded since then and our understanding is greater.
The so-called "principles" of modern liberals have nothing in common with the principles of the Founding Fathers. The believed in private property and the free market. Modern liberals, on the other hand, are Stalinists who believe in neither.
And then someNope, never had that but I keep my politics mostly to myself. My clients think I'm a conservative, since nearly everyone here is and I have the same work ethic, even better in most cases.
And most liberals are hardly going to pat you on the back for listening to a program that people who like it are perfectly willing to call themselves Dittoheads. Liberals think for themselves, it's part of being a liberal.
Liberals think for themselves? That's rich... especially considering they lap up their choices handed to them courtesy of the DNC... Clinton and Sanders.
Palease. The modern liberals are the biggest brain-dead losers going.
In 1776 liberals were conservatives compared to today's liberal. You have no idea how far left liberals have become.I understand completely.You don't want to understand therefore, you don't.
Liberals have their own world and the rest of us live in this one.
Our country, the one we live in, was founded by liberals. It was the liberals--the ones who believed that we were all created equal--who fought the union side of the civil war and emanicipated the slaves. It was the liberals who fought for civil rights. It was the liberals who fought for legislation to protect children (e.g., child labor laws), and the environment, and the economy so that we could all prosper. If you're a citizen of the United States, you live in a country created and perpetuated by liberals.
I know for a fact that the 1776 liberals and the ones who wrote the Constitution were smart enough to reserve the entire universe of individual rights ... none were surrendered. The same principles they applied then, we apply now ... and we're fortunate that our body of knowledge has expanded since then and our understanding is greater.
The so-called "principles" of modern liberals have nothing in common with the principles of the Founding Fathers. The believed in private property and the free market. Modern liberals, on the other hand, are Stalinists who believe in neither.
History will vindicate liberalism but monsters like you will watch the world burn, by your own doing...In 1776 liberals were conservatives compared to today's liberal. You have no idea how far left liberals have become.I understand completely.
Liberals have their own world and the rest of us live in this one.
Our country, the one we live in, was founded by liberals. It was the liberals--the ones who believed that we were all created equal--who fought the union side of the civil war and emanicipated the slaves. It was the liberals who fought for civil rights. It was the liberals who fought for legislation to protect children (e.g., child labor laws), and the environment, and the economy so that we could all prosper. If you're a citizen of the United States, you live in a country created and perpetuated by liberals.
I know for a fact that the 1776 liberals and the ones who wrote the Constitution were smart enough to reserve the entire universe of individual rights ... none were surrendered. The same principles they applied then, we apply now ... and we're fortunate that our body of knowledge has expanded since then and our understanding is greater.
The so-called "principles" of modern liberals have nothing in common with the principles of the Founding Fathers. The believed in private property and the free market. Modern liberals, on the other hand, are Stalinists who believe in neither.
Liberals are a dying breed, they will end up at best a footnote in history.
Liberals think for themselves? I guess that's why when one of their own uses certain phrases, it doesn't take long for the butt lickers on here to start repeating those Liberal phrases.
I believe people who lean toward the left are the ones who have repeatedly demonstrated that they read relevant statutory law and supreme court decisions and apply the language and legal concepts to similar cases and controversies. From my observations, they are less likely to fall victim to logical fallacies and disingenuous arguments and employ critical thinking skills.
When "liberals" derive their "common language" from authoritative sources but their political adversaries derive their "common language" from partisan pundits and talking heads like Rush Limbaugh, then it is fair to say that liberals are more likely than conservatives to think for themselves.
Recently, in the past 8 years, and now, lefties pucker up to either a black ass, a socialist, or a twat. They could care less about anything other than seeing how much they can kiss.
Conservative65: Your response did not address anything in my post. You referred to our president as a "black ass" and to Hillary Clinton as a "twat", which says more about you than it does about them. You referred to Bernie Sanders as a socialist and did so without recognizing that all politicians are socialists. For example, whenever a politician votes for a budget that allocates taxpayer dollars for the benefit of the common welfare, he is voting for socialism.
If the only thing the people of this nation care about is kissing asses as you allege, then what makes the asses you kiss so special? Identify the person you're puckering for and the rest of us can call that person objectionable names. It certainly doesn't appear as if you're interested in any other kind of conversation. In other words, you're just throwing unnecessary animosity into the wind.
It says that Democrats pick candidates based on skin color and reproductive organ.
Bernie is the self proclaimed socialist. When a politician votes to budget allocating taxes that everyone pays, that's not socialism. Socialism involves what Bernie proposes with free college. Those of us who aren't a kid's parent are expected to do for that kid with higher taxes what the kid's own parent won't do voluntarily. That's socialism.
What makes you think I kiss ass? What do I expect the government to do for me? Provide a list.
I don't care what you call me. In the end, you don't mean shit in a n*gger's back yard to me.
Are you a short-fingered vulgarian?
History will vindicate liberalism but monsters like you will watch the world burn, by your own doing...In 1776 liberals were conservatives compared to today's liberal. You have no idea how far left liberals have become.Our country, the one we live in, was founded by liberals. It was the liberals--the ones who believed that we were all created equal--who fought the union side of the civil war and emanicipated the slaves. It was the liberals who fought for civil rights. It was the liberals who fought for legislation to protect children (e.g., child labor laws), and the environment, and the economy so that we could all prosper. If you're a citizen of the United States, you live in a country created and perpetuated by liberals.
I know for a fact that the 1776 liberals and the ones who wrote the Constitution were smart enough to reserve the entire universe of individual rights ... none were surrendered. The same principles they applied then, we apply now ... and we're fortunate that our body of knowledge has expanded since then and our understanding is greater.
The so-called "principles" of modern liberals have nothing in common with the principles of the Founding Fathers. The believed in private property and the free market. Modern liberals, on the other hand, are Stalinists who believe in neither.
Liberals are a dying breed, they will end up at best a footnote in history.
History has done no such thing. The lack of liberalism is why humanity will dig its own grave, and be proud of it.History will vindicate liberalism but monsters like you will watch the world burn, by your own doing...In 1776 liberals were conservatives compared to today's liberal. You have no idea how far left liberals have become.
I know for a fact that the 1776 liberals and the ones who wrote the Constitution were smart enough to reserve the entire universe of individual rights ... none were surrendered. The same principles they applied then, we apply now ... and we're fortunate that our body of knowledge has expanded since then and our understanding is greater.
The so-called "principles" of modern liberals have nothing in common with the principles of the Founding Fathers. The believed in private property and the free market. Modern liberals, on the other hand, are Stalinists who believe in neither.
Liberals are a dying breed, they will end up at best a footnote in history.
History has already condemned liberalism. It's the ultimate irony for you to be calling anyone a monster.
History has done no such thing. The lack of liberalism is why humanity will dig its own grave, and be proud of it.History will vindicate liberalism but monsters like you will watch the world burn, by your own doing...I know for a fact that the 1776 liberals and the ones who wrote the Constitution were smart enough to reserve the entire universe of individual rights ... none were surrendered. The same principles they applied then, we apply now ... and we're fortunate that our body of knowledge has expanded since then and our understanding is greater.
The so-called "principles" of modern liberals have nothing in common with the principles of the Founding Fathers. The believed in private property and the free market. Modern liberals, on the other hand, are Stalinists who believe in neither.
Liberals are a dying breed, they will end up at best a footnote in history.
History has already condemned liberalism. It's the ultimate irony for you to be calling anyone a monster.
Yeah....but Al Sharpton needs to make a living somehow.Show me where I've used such a phrase. I can show you where plenty have repeated phrases like "you didn't build that", "code words for racism", and the like. If you don't want to be considered a Liberal puppet, quit letting your handlers yank your strings.
The above is very disingenuous, the same as conservatives who cling to the "state rights" mantra is disingenuous because they use it to justify the passage of state laws that oppress others.
When the mantra "segregation today, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever," lost its efficacy after Brown v. Board of Education, then the proponents of segregation began hanging their hats on "state rights". Historical evidence of conservative use of state powers to oppress women, minorities, and disfavored groups discloses animus. Racism, for instance, is animus directed toward minorities.
States' rights is used to explain how the Constitution was written and something you hate.
Racism is used by minorities with program like affirmative action. They complain about race being used to deny yet don't have a problem with race being used when they benefit from it.
I love the Constitution. It's my best friend when debating or writing about rights and the protection of rights. You fail to understand that the post-civil war amendments to the Constitution gutted a state's power to oppress people. But, states are crafty. They still enact legislation and policies that effectively disadvantage disfavored groups of people, which results in court challenges. Perhaps you don't like that race might be a factor involved in our politics, but I doubt you've had to walk miles in the shoes of people who have been historically oppressed and still experience the ill-effects today.
Oh, the slavery still effects them today excuse? When you use that, you lose. My family didn't come to the country until 1905. We never owned slaves. In fact, no one that was a slave is alive today. Schools where I live have been integrated since before I started going and I started first grade in 1969.
What does that have to do with liberalism? Oh right, nothing. And I support capitalism (so did Marx), I'm a capitalist, it builds what you need for socialism.History has done no such thing. The lack of liberalism is why humanity will dig its own grave, and be proud of it.History will vindicate liberalism but monsters like you will watch the world burn, by your own doing...The so-called "principles" of modern liberals have nothing in common with the principles of the Founding Fathers. The believed in private property and the free market. Modern liberals, on the other hand, are Stalinists who believe in neither.
Liberals are a dying breed, they will end up at best a footnote in history.
History has already condemned liberalism. It's the ultimate irony for you to be calling anyone a monster.
Nope, the lack of capitalism is the reason you see starvation and poverty in the world.
Religion can pay well, unfortunately...Yeah....but Al Sharpton needs to make a living somehow.The above is very disingenuous, the same as conservatives who cling to the "state rights" mantra is disingenuous because they use it to justify the passage of state laws that oppress others.
When the mantra "segregation today, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever," lost its efficacy after Brown v. Board of Education, then the proponents of segregation began hanging their hats on "state rights". Historical evidence of conservative use of state powers to oppress women, minorities, and disfavored groups discloses animus. Racism, for instance, is animus directed toward minorities.
States' rights is used to explain how the Constitution was written and something you hate.
Racism is used by minorities with program like affirmative action. They complain about race being used to deny yet don't have a problem with race being used when they benefit from it.
I love the Constitution. It's my best friend when debating or writing about rights and the protection of rights. You fail to understand that the post-civil war amendments to the Constitution gutted a state's power to oppress people. But, states are crafty. They still enact legislation and policies that effectively disadvantage disfavored groups of people, which results in court challenges. Perhaps you don't like that race might be a factor involved in our politics, but I doubt you've had to walk miles in the shoes of people who have been historically oppressed and still experience the ill-effects today.
Oh, the slavery still effects them today excuse? When you use that, you lose. My family didn't come to the country until 1905. We never owned slaves. In fact, no one that was a slave is alive today. Schools where I live have been integrated since before I started going and I started first grade in 1969.
Despite all his rhetoric about how much he wants things to be, he would actually have to work a real job instead of being a race pimp.
You're a Nazi, not a capitalist. All the countries that are wallowing in poverty have adopted liberalism rather than capitalism.What does that have to do with liberalism? Oh right, nothing. And I support capitalism (so did Marx), I'm a capitalist, it builds what you need for socialism.History has done no such thing. The lack of liberalism is why humanity will dig its own grave, and be proud of it.History will vindicate liberalism but monsters like you will watch the world burn, by your own doing...Liberals are a dying breed, they will end up at best a footnote in history.
History has already condemned liberalism. It's the ultimate irony for you to be calling anyone a monster.
Nope, the lack of capitalism is the reason you see starvation and poverty in the world.
You're an idiot, and the country was founded based on liberalism. Capitalism came later and we still have lots of both, even in our mixed economy, but you don't know what the fuck that is either now do you my little infant...You're a Nazi, not a capitalist. All the countries that are wallowing in poverty have adopted liberalism rather than capitalism.What does that have to do with liberalism? Oh right, nothing. And I support capitalism (so did Marx), I'm a capitalist, it builds what you need for socialism.History has done no such thing. The lack of liberalism is why humanity will dig its own grave, and be proud of it.History will vindicate liberalism but monsters like you will watch the world burn, by your own doing...
History has already condemned liberalism. It's the ultimate irony for you to be calling anyone a monster.
Nope, the lack of capitalism is the reason you see starvation and poverty in the world.
Religion can pay well, unfortunately...Yeah....but Al Sharpton needs to make a living somehow.States' rights is used to explain how the Constitution was written and something you hate.
Racism is used by minorities with program like affirmative action. They complain about race being used to deny yet don't have a problem with race being used when they benefit from it.
I love the Constitution. It's my best friend when debating or writing about rights and the protection of rights. You fail to understand that the post-civil war amendments to the Constitution gutted a state's power to oppress people. But, states are crafty. They still enact legislation and policies that effectively disadvantage disfavored groups of people, which results in court challenges. Perhaps you don't like that race might be a factor involved in our politics, but I doubt you've had to walk miles in the shoes of people who have been historically oppressed and still experience the ill-effects today.
Oh, the slavery still effects them today excuse? When you use that, you lose. My family didn't come to the country until 1905. We never owned slaves. In fact, no one that was a slave is alive today. Schools where I live have been integrated since before I started going and I started first grade in 1969.
Despite all his rhetoric about how much he wants things to be, he would actually have to work a real job instead of being a race pimp.
You're an idiot, and the country was founded based on liberalism. Capitalism came later and we still have lots of both, even in our mixed economy, but you don't know what the fuck that is either now do you my little infant...You're a Nazi, not a capitalist. All the countries that are wallowing in poverty have adopted liberalism rather than capitalism.What does that have to do with liberalism? Oh right, nothing. And I support capitalism (so did Marx), I'm a capitalist, it builds what you need for socialism.History has done no such thing. The lack of liberalism is why humanity will dig its own grave, and be proud of it.History has already condemned liberalism. It's the ultimate irony for you to be calling anyone a monster.
Nope, the lack of capitalism is the reason you see starvation and poverty in the world.
Things I read in? Like, equality and no state promotion of religion? That shit you mean?You're an idiot, and the country was founded based on liberalism. Capitalism came later and we still have lots of both, even in our mixed economy, but you don't know what the fuck that is either now do you my little infant...You're a Nazi, not a capitalist. All the countries that are wallowing in poverty have adopted liberalism rather than capitalism.What does that have to do with liberalism? Oh right, nothing. And I support capitalism (so did Marx), I'm a capitalist, it builds what you need for socialism.History has done no such thing. The lack of liberalism is why humanity will dig its own grave, and be proud of it.
Nope, the lack of capitalism is the reason you see starvation and poverty in the world.
It wasn't founded on the type of Liberalism you espouse. If it were, things people like you read INTO the Constitution would have been put in there. Since you have to get 5 foolish justices in a majority to say so, so much for your claim.
