1776
Anti-Liberal
Liberal scumbags confuse hicks here hating the Jews as part of the KKK with Hitler hating the Jews as a National "socialist."
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Any "historian" that claims the national socialists weren't socialist is a propagandist. Which is why the left would grovel at their feet. Just like the Nazis.
Already did. You're a popcorn fart, nothing more. You offer nothing but insults so that's all you deserve.Yet you can't cite any real historians who would in any way validate your hair brain theories.But you made that up, so....Unfortunate that actual historians don't concur with your superficial pop culture historical revisionist view.
Liberal scumbags confuse hicks here hating the Jews as part of the KKK with Hitler hating the Jews as a National "socialist."
Neither was socialist, which has to be democratic. One totalitarianism was communist, collective economy, the other fascist, capitalist economy. Duh.You dummies really are just about as stupid as you can possibly be.
Right wing Define Right wing at Dictionary.com
Wow, you finally didn't just call us stupid, you provided a link this time. LOL. You're not just discombobulated, you're dismanhooded.
At least I'm smart enough to know better than to make up my own definitions.
No, you link to someone not smart enough to make up their own definitions but does it anyway.
So what about answering the question, Skippy. How was fascist Germany materially different from Communist Russia?
Soviet Communist were left wing and Nazi Germany was right wing......as everyone obviously already knows. Well.....almost everyone.
Repeating your assertion as truth is a logical fallacy called "begging the question."
The question is how are they materially different? If "everyone already knows" then why can't you simply answer the question instead of ducking and dodging? How were they different that makes Germany "right" and Russia "left?" They were two peas in a pod, both socialist.
Already did. You're a popcorn fart, nothing more. You offer nothing but insults so that's all you deserve.Yet you can't cite any real historians who would in any way validate your hair brain theories.But you made that up, so....Unfortunate that actual historians don't concur with your superficial pop culture historical revisionist view.
So to summarize this thread: Fascist and Nazis have never been characterized as anything but right wing reactionaries by actual scholars of history. All the dummies who attempted to make arguments to the contrary have failed completely to substantiate any part of their alleged arguments.
Begs the question: How stupid do you have to be to argue points of history without being able to cite any historians who concur with your view?
Any "historian" that claims the national socialists weren't socialist is a propagandist. Which is why the left would grovel at their feet. Just like the Nazis.
Repeating your assertion as truth is a logical fallacy called "begging the question."
The question is how are they materially different? If "everyone already knows" then why can't you simply answer the question instead of ducking and dodging? How were they different that makes Germany "right" and Russia "left?" They were two peas in a pod, both socialist.
Or a search online would have revealed the truth that fascism is in no way 'left wing':Already did. You're a popcorn fart, nothing more. You offer nothing but insults so that's all you deserve.Yet you can't cite any real historians who would in any way validate your hair brain theories.But you made that up, so....Unfortunate that actual historians don't concur with your superficial pop culture historical revisionist view.
Weasel -
Have you considered that in the time you have spent posting nonsense on this thread, you could have gone and read a book and brought yourself up to speed on this topic?
Yes, you'd have found that you were wrong - but you would also have learned the topic.
What would it cost you to read a book and learn?
#732-Aren't any left, or scared of the loudmouth dingbats...
HITLER WAS A SOCIALIST
Hitler's Socialist Deeds
Yes, now flesh out his nationalist deeds just as thoroughly, will you?
You know...that whole Jew thing. That whole hatred of multiculturalism thing. All that usual liberal stuff.
But you made that up, so....Unfortunate that actual historians don't concur with your superficial pop culture historical revisionist view.
Yet you can't cite any real historians who would in any way validate your hair brain theories.
What does that mean? Socialists are big on authority, working for the party doesn't demonstrate anything.And you are aware that Arendt's boyfriend worked for the Nazi Party at the time, right?
So how left wing is she, would you say?
I have a college degree and you pooped your pants again.When do you stop gazing into the mirror?
How many of the half dozen authors cited have you read, Weasel?
Because the ones listed are about the most reknowned people working in this field, and any history course on Fascist Politics will include 2 or 3 of them.
Do you really think you can come to understand something as complex as Fascist theory by spending 5 minutes on Wikipedia?
He obviously never read a book in his life. Just goes to show that people can't learn as much from websites as they thought.
From John Dean's book, Conservatives Without Conscience.
"Authoritarianism is not well understood and seldom discussed in the context of American government and politics, yet it now constitutes the prevailing thinking and behavior among conservatives."
excerpts from the book Conservatives Without Conscience by John Dean
Exactly, they want to cut taxes, shrink the govt, and end Obamacare because they want authoritarian govt!!
See why we have to be 100% certain that liberalism will be based in pure ignorance? Is any other reasonable conclusion possible?
#732-Aren't any left, or scared of the loudmouth dingbats...
I think there are a fair few real conservatives on this board, but whether they are on this thread is another question.
Certainly most conservatives understand that Hitler was right wing, although whether they have the patience to deal with the gaggle of extremists we have here is another question.
So to summarize this thread: Fascist and Nazis have never been characterized as anything but right wing reactionaries by actual scholars of history. All the dummies who attempted to make arguments to the contrary have failed completely to substantiate any part of their alleged arguments.
Begs the question: How stupid do you have to be to argue points of history without being able to cite any historians who concur with your view?