Hitler, Fascism and the right wing

[PaintMyHouse]

, and socialism has in no way led to it, .

how completely stupid and 100% illiterate!! Socialism was conceived of as a step toward communism. Obama is a liberal who had 3 communist parents and voted to left of Bernie Sanders. The left is the left!

There are many forms and schools of socialism, some practiced even before Marx.
Marx believed it would be difficult to move from the present system to communism, so a training period was established called "Scientific Socialism." The USSR dropped the scientific socialism thing a few years after the revolution as it dropped Marxian communism. Republicans, however, have used that scientific socialism thing since, using the premise that socialism leads to communism. As of now no country has practiced Marxian communism and most industrial nations use a mixture of capitalism and socialism as its economic system.

ROFLMNAO! I guess I will NEVER tire of watching communists deny the existence of communism, though explanations from academic purity, which hold that because socialism doesn't match some horse-shit theoretical construct, 'it wasn't socialism'.

Socialism kills... and that is simply the nature of evil.

I guess their theory is that if socialist schemes don't have the desired consequences, then it wasn't really socialism. They can go on pretending forever that socialism has never been tried because the results of trying will always be disastrous.

Socialism works all over the work dummy, which is why you fear it.

 

[bripat9643]

, and socialism has in no way led to it, .

how completely stupid and 100% illiterate!! Socialism was conceived of as a step toward communism. Obama is a liberal who had 3 communist parents and voted to left of Bernie Sanders. The left is the left!

There are many forms and schools of socialism, some practiced even before Marx.
Marx believed it would be difficult to move from the present system to communism, so a training period was established called "Scientific Socialism." The USSR dropped the scientific socialism thing a few years after the revolution as it dropped Marxian communism. Republicans, however, have used that scientific socialism thing since, using the premise that socialism leads to communism. As of now no country has practiced Marxian communism and most industrial nations use a mixture of capitalism and socialism as its economic system.

ROFLMNAO! I guess I will NEVER tire of watching communists deny the existence of communism, though explanations from academic purity, which hold that because socialism doesn't match some horse-shit theoretical construct, 'it wasn't socialism'.

Socialism kills... and that is simply the nature of evil.

I guess their theory is that if socialist schemes don't have the desired consequences, then it wasn't really socialism. They can go on pretending forever that socialism has never been tried because the results of trying will always be disastrous.

Socialism works all over the work dummy, which is why you fear it.

"All over the work?" Socialism works great if your aim is totalitarian dictatorship and poverty.

 

[francoHFW]

In the modern sense, socialism is always democratic and works great, communism is never democratic, and never works. See if you can get that, brainwashed chumps.

 

[francoHFW]

"Now we're all socialists!" Finland's PM when O-Care passed. Eat shytte and read something, a-holes.

 

[Pogo]

Bush -

Name one country in Europe that has a socialist government.

Greece, France, UK, Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, and on and on... Socialized health care, education, transportation, = socialism. Look what all the socialization got Greece? Totally broke.

"Socialism works fine until you run out of other peoples money"
- Margaret Thatcher

Oh dear.

My god man.....how can you possibly be this poorly informed?

What was that...ten guesses and you got tham ALL wrong?!?!

I guess there is no point asking how long David Cameron and the UK Conservative Party have been socialists, is there?!

I got them ALL correct. UK does not have a true conservative party. Just left, far left, and extreme left. You sir, are so far to the left that you cannot even see the center.

I have to say, Bush, it really makes me laugh that you can dismiss the politics of 20 countries as being far left without ever asking yourself whether it just might be you that is far right?

It also makes me laugh that you can make the laugh-out-loud claim that the UK Conservative Party (and a dozen other conservative parties) is not conservative without it ever occuring to you that maybe it is the GOP that is not truly conservative?

Is it any wonder you find the term 'fascism' so hard to understand, when you don't seem to entirely understand 'conservative' either?

I just love the irony that the same poster who says the UK has no conservative party just before that put up a giant poster of Margaret Thatcher

I forget, where was she from again? Alabama?

 

[Saigon]

"Now we're all socialists!" Finland's PM when O-Care passed. Eat shytte and read something, a-holes.

To be fair, Stubb was speaking tongue in cheek - and is a conservative himself!

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Socialism works all over the world dummy, which is why you fear it.

exactly!! That is why China switched to capitalism and instantly eliminated 40% of the world's poverty!

Do you see why we have to be 100% positive that liberalism is based in pure ignorance? Is any other conclusion possible?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Hitlerism was militaristic, nationalistic, capitalistic, racist, and totalitarian. Anywhere but Liberal fascism/Beck World, that's far right wing, brainwashed a-holes.

dear you cant be capitalist and totalitarian.

Welcome to your ABC's. Try college.

Masters in History, concentration in 20th century and Hitler. You, brainwashed shyttehead?

of course if true you'd know that our liberals spied for Hitler Stalin and Mao because they were big govt liberals. Why did you think our liberals spied for them?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Socialism works all over the world dummy, which is why you fear it.

exactly!! That is why China switched to capitalism and instantly eliminated 40% of the world's poverty!

Do you see why we have to be 100% positive that liberalism is based in pure ignorance? Is any other conclusion possible?

China wasn't Socialist, it was Communist, and you wouldn't like what it has, State Capitalism.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

China wasn't Socialist. it was Communist,.

too stupid and 100% liberal of course!! Like the USSR( union of soviet socialist republics) was communist and not socialist? Marx conceived of socialism as route to communism and Lenin implemented it as such. result is always the same whether liberals mess with our housing industry or all industries, they mess it up badly.

Do you understand now?

The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.


This was precisely the tactic of “infiltration” advocated by Lenin and Stalin.[3] As Communist International General Secretary Georgi Dimitroff told the Seventh World Congress of the Comintern in 1935:
"Comrades, you remember the ancient tale of the capture of Troy. Troy was inaccessible to the armies attacking her, thanks to her impregnable walls. And the attacking army, after suffering many sacrifices, was unable to achieve victory until, with the aid of the famous Trojan horse, it managed to penetrate to the very heart of the enemy’s camp."[4]

C. S. Lewis on Diabolical Democracy Socialism and Public Education Conservative Colloquium


Buckley endorsed Chambers’ analysis of modern liberalism as a watered-down version of Communist ideology. The New Deal, Chambers insists, is not liberal democratic but “revolutionary” in its nature and intentions, seeking “a basic change in the social and, above all, the power relationships within the nation.”

"I am for socialism, disarmament, and, ultimately, for abolishing the state itself... I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal."
--- Roger Nash Baldwin

 

[PaintMyHouse]

China wasn't Socialist. it was Communist,.

too stupid and 100% liberal of course!! Like the USSR( union of soviet socialist republics) was communist and not socialist? Marx conceived of socialism as route to communism and Lenin implemented it as such. result is always the same whether liberals mess with our housing industry or all industries, they mess it up badly.

Do you understand now?

The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.


This was precisely the tactic of “infiltration” advocated by Lenin and Stalin.[3] As Communist International General Secretary Georgi Dimitroff told the Seventh World Congress of the Comintern in 1935:
"Comrades, you remember the ancient tale of the capture of Troy. Troy was inaccessible to the armies attacking her, thanks to her impregnable walls. And the attacking army, after suffering many sacrifices, was unable to achieve victory until, with the aid of the famous Trojan horse, it managed to penetrate to the very heart of the enemy’s camp."[4]

C. S. Lewis on Diabolical Democracy Socialism and Public Education Conservative Colloquium


Buckley endorsed Chambers’ analysis of modern liberalism as a watered-down version of Communist ideology. The New Deal, Chambers insists, is not liberal democratic but “revolutionary” in its nature and intentions, seeking “a basic change in the social and, above all, the power relationships within the nation.”

"I am for socialism, disarmament, and, ultimately, for abolishing the state itself... I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal."
--- Roger Nash Baldwin

China - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

China wasn't Socialist. it was Communist,.

too stupid and 100% liberal of course!! Like the USSR( union of soviet socialist republics) was communist and not socialist? Marx conceived of socialism as route to communism and Lenin implemented it as such. result is always the same whether liberals mess with our housing industry or all industries, they mess it up badly.

Do you understand now?

The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.


This was precisely the tactic of “infiltration” advocated by Lenin and Stalin.[3] As Communist International General Secretary Georgi Dimitroff told the Seventh World Congress of the Comintern in 1935:
"Comrades, you remember the ancient tale of the capture of Troy. Troy was inaccessible to the armies attacking her, thanks to her impregnable walls. And the attacking army, after suffering many sacrifices, was unable to achieve victory until, with the aid of the famous Trojan horse, it managed to penetrate to the very heart of the enemy’s camp."[4]

C. S. Lewis on Diabolical Democracy Socialism and Public Education Conservative Colloquium


Buckley endorsed Chambers’ analysis of modern liberalism as a watered-down version of Communist ideology. The New Deal, Chambers insists, is not liberal democratic but “revolutionary” in its nature and intentions, seeking “a basic change in the social and, above all, the power relationships within the nation.”

"I am for socialism, disarmament, and, ultimately, for abolishing the state itself... I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal."
--- Roger Nash Baldwin

China - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

dear we call all post links. Can you express yourself?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

China wasn't Socialist. it was Communist,.

too stupid and 100% liberal of course!! Like the USSR( union of soviet socialist republics) was communist and not socialist? Marx conceived of socialism as route to communism and Lenin implemented it as such. result is always the same whether liberals mess with our housing industry or all industries, they mess it up badly.

Do you understand now?

The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.


This was precisely the tactic of “infiltration” advocated by Lenin and Stalin.[3] As Communist International General Secretary Georgi Dimitroff told the Seventh World Congress of the Comintern in 1935:
"Comrades, you remember the ancient tale of the capture of Troy. Troy was inaccessible to the armies attacking her, thanks to her impregnable walls. And the attacking army, after suffering many sacrifices, was unable to achieve victory until, with the aid of the famous Trojan horse, it managed to penetrate to the very heart of the enemy’s camp."[4]

C. S. Lewis on Diabolical Democracy Socialism and Public Education Conservative Colloquium


Buckley endorsed Chambers’ analysis of modern liberalism as a watered-down version of Communist ideology. The New Deal, Chambers insists, is not liberal democratic but “revolutionary” in its nature and intentions, seeking “a basic change in the social and, above all, the power relationships within the nation.”

"I am for socialism, disarmament, and, ultimately, for abolishing the state itself... I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal."
--- Roger Nash Baldwin

China - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

dear we call all post links. Can you express yourself?

I already did, and you've already shown that you don't know what the hell you are talking about.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Yup, and our wonderful constitution was designed for an agrarian society. .

dear we know as a liberal you oppose outdated Constitution and outdated Founders so no surprise liberals spied for Stalin and gave him the bomb! You are very honest. Most liberals will try to claim the Founders were liberal!

Can you straighten them out? With all of your education you are a well qualified to do it don't you agree??

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

China wasn't Socialist. it was Communist,.

too stupid and 100% liberal of course!! Like the USSR( union of soviet socialist republics) was communist and not socialist? Marx conceived of socialism as route to communism and Lenin implemented it as such. result is always the same whether liberals mess with our housing industry or all industries, they mess it up badly, and standards of living decline in proportion to liberal activity.

Do you understand now?

The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.


This was precisely the tactic of “infiltration” advocated by Lenin and Stalin.[3] As Communist International General Secretary Georgi Dimitroff told the Seventh World Congress of the Comintern in 1935:
"Comrades, you remember the ancient tale of the capture of Troy. Troy was inaccessible to the armies attacking her, thanks to her impregnable walls. And the attacking army, after suffering many sacrifices, was unable to achieve victory until, with the aid of the famous Trojan horse, it managed to penetrate to the very heart of the enemy’s camp."[4]

C. S. Lewis on Diabolical Democracy Socialism and Public Education Conservative Colloquium


Buckley endorsed Chambers’ analysis of modern liberalism as a watered-down version of Communist ideology. The New Deal, Chambers insists, is not liberal democratic but “revolutionary” in its nature and intentions, seeking “a basic change in the social and, above all, the power relationships within the nation.”

"I am for socialism, disarmament, and, ultimately, for abolishing the state itself... I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal."
--- Roger Nash Baldwin

China - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

dear we call all post links. Can you express yourself?

I already did, and you've already shown that you don't know what the hell you are talking about.

too stupid and 100% liberal of course!! Like the USSR( union of soviet socialist republics) was communist and not socialist? Marx conceived of socialism as route to communism and Lenin implemented it as such. result is always the same whether liberals mess with our housing industry or all industries, they mess it up badly.

Do you understand now?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

China wasn't Socialist. it was Communist,.

too stupid and 100% liberal of course!! Like the USSR( union of soviet socialist republics) was communist and not socialist? Marx conceived of socialism as route to communism and Lenin implemented it as such. result is always the same whether liberals mess with our housing industry or all industries, they mess it up badly, and standards of living decline in proportion to liberal activity.

Do you understand now?

The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.


This was precisely the tactic of “infiltration” advocated by Lenin and Stalin.[3] As Communist International General Secretary Georgi Dimitroff told the Seventh World Congress of the Comintern in 1935:
"Comrades, you remember the ancient tale of the capture of Troy. Troy was inaccessible to the armies attacking her, thanks to her impregnable walls. And the attacking army, after suffering many sacrifices, was unable to achieve victory until, with the aid of the famous Trojan horse, it managed to penetrate to the very heart of the enemy’s camp."[4]

C. S. Lewis on Diabolical Democracy Socialism and Public Education Conservative Colloquium


Buckley endorsed Chambers’ analysis of modern liberalism as a watered-down version of Communist ideology. The New Deal, Chambers insists, is not liberal democratic but “revolutionary” in its nature and intentions, seeking “a basic change in the social and, above all, the power relationships within the nation.”

"I am for socialism, disarmament, and, ultimately, for abolishing the state itself... I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal."
--- Roger Nash Baldwin

China - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

dear we call all post links. Can you express yourself?

I already did, and you've already shown that you don't know what the hell you are talking about.

too stupid and 100% liberal of course!! Like the USSR( union of soviet socialist republics) was communist and not socialist? Marx conceived of socialism as route to communism and Lenin implemented it as such. result is always the same whether liberals mess with our housing industry or all industries, they mess it up badly.

Do you understand now?

Why did you call China Socialist then?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

too stupid and 100% liberal of course!! Like the USSR( union of soviet socialist republics) was communist and not socialist? Marx conceived of socialism as route to communism and Lenin implemented it as such. result is always the same whether liberals mess with our housing industry or all industries, they mess it up badly, and standards of living decline in proportion to liberal activity.

Do you understand now?

The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.


This was precisely the tactic of “infiltration” advocated by Lenin and Stalin.[3] As Communist International General Secretary Georgi Dimitroff told the Seventh World Congress of the Comintern in 1935:
"Comrades, you remember the ancient tale of the capture of Troy. Troy was inaccessible to the armies attacking her, thanks to her impregnable walls. And the attacking army, after suffering many sacrifices, was unable to achieve victory until, with the aid of the famous Trojan horse, it managed to penetrate to the very heart of the enemy’s camp."[4]

C. S. Lewis on Diabolical Democracy Socialism and Public Education Conservative Colloquium


Buckley endorsed Chambers’ analysis of modern liberalism as a watered-down version of Communist ideology. The New Deal, Chambers insists, is not liberal democratic but “revolutionary” in its nature and intentions, seeking “a basic change in the social and, above all, the power relationships within the nation.”

"I am for socialism, disarmament, and, ultimately, for abolishing the state itself... I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal."
--- Roger Nash Baldwin

China - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

dear we call all post links. Can you express yourself?

I already did, and you've already shown that you don't know what the hell you are talking about.

too stupid and 100% liberal of course!! Like the USSR( union of soviet socialist republics) was communist and not socialist? Marx conceived of socialism as route to communism and Lenin implemented it as such. result is always the same whether liberals mess with our housing industry or all industries, they mess it up badly.

Do you understand now?

Why did you call China Socialist then?

China was liberal/socialist killing about 65 million human beings very slowly. Now they are switching to capitalism and about as many who once starved to death can afford to buy cars.
Capitalism is a Republican miracle.

 

[mikegriffith1]

Hitler hated religion and murdered tens of thousands of priests, pastors, nuns, and regular church members. Early on he acted like he was friendly, or at worst neutral, toward religion, but as he consolidated his power he made his hostility toward Christianity crystal clear.

Hitler was a huge fan of Darwin's and appealed to "survival of the fittest" as part of his justification for the Holocaust.

Hitler was for state authority--not always control, but authority--over everything. He was willing to allow a certain amount of private enterprise, etc., but he reserved the right to take control of any business, any industry, any anything, if he felt the need to do so.

Hitler wanted strict state control over the education system. He wanted centralized control over what was taught and who could teach.

Conservatives opposes all of these things. Liberals, on the other hand, are increasingly hostile to Christianity, accept Darwinism as established fact (it is not), believe in virtually unlimited government control over the private sector (Obamacare being the latest sad example), and believe the government should have monopolistic control over education.

Look at the 5-4 Supreme Court decision a few years ago where the liberals on the court ruled that a local government can invoke eminent domain to seize your house against your will "for the greater public good" even if they just want to rezone your land for commercial use (not for a public highway or a public park, etc.).

And how in the world can liberals express outrage over the Holocaust when they have directly enabled and even participated in the holocaust of abortion, which has killed over 50 million babies?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

And how in the world can liberals express outrage over the Holocaust when they have directly enabled and even participated in the holocaust of abortion, which has killed over 50 million babies?

well the 50 million abortions was so women could be feminist, free of love, and free of family. They now can have sex with whomever they choose and kill the baby that results. This is considered better than the old Republican way when you loved the person with whom you have sex and loved the child that resulted. In the old days you had to put up with family; now you are liberal, feminist and free of all that old fashioned rot.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Hitler hated religion and murdered tens of thousands of priests, pastors, nuns, and regular church members. Early on he acted like he was friendly, or at worst neutral, toward religion, but as he consolidated his power he made his hostility toward Christianity crystal clear.

Hitler was a huge fan of Darwin's and appealed to "survival of the fittest" as part of his justification for the Holocaust.

Hitler was for state authority--not always control, but authority--over everything. He was willing to allow a certain amount of private enterprise, etc., but he reserved the right to take control of any business, any industry, any anything, if he felt the need to do so.

Hitler wanted strict state control over the education system. He wanted centralized control over what was taught and who could teach.

Conservatives opposes all of these things. Liberals, on the other hand, are increasingly hostile to Christianity, accept Darwinism as established fact (it is not), believe in virtually unlimited government control over the private sector (Obamacare being the latest sad example), and believe the government should have monopolistic control over education.

Look at the 5-4 Supreme Court decision a few years ago where the liberals on the court ruled that a local government can invoke eminent domain to seize your house against your will "for the greater public good" even if they just want to rezone your land for commercial use (not for a public highway or a public park, etc.).

And how in the world can liberals express outrage over the Holocaust when they have directly enabled and even participated in the holocaust of abortion, which has killed over 50 million babies?

Liberals are most hostile to Christianity yet they appease the most despotic religion in the world......one that blames women for sins of the man and views homosexuality as punishable by death.