How can there ever be peace here?

[Billo_Really]

Well hey, no one wants to free the Palestinians from Israel more than me. Thanks for agreeing with me. Israel needs our help to find a way to send the Palestinians back to their indigenous homelands. We can call it a --- one state solution.

They are in their indigenous homeland, asshole!

It's the Israeli's who need to get the fuck out.

 

[JStone]

Berlin Walls? The one in Berlin was built to prevent East Germans from reaching freedom.
The one in Israel was built to prevent "Palestinians" from bombing Israelis.
If the "Palestinians" want to reach freedom in another Arab country, I'm sure Israel will let them leave.

Those walls are being built in an area, the Israeli's have no legal right to be in. It would be like your neighbor building a fence on your front lawn that prevents you from getting to your driveway.

You know much about oral copulation and that's all, gay boy http://www.usmessageboard.com/5143970-post567.html

Eugene Rostow, Legal Scholar, Former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank Eugene V. Rostow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The British Mandate recognized the right of the Jewish people to "close settlement" in the whole of the Mandated territory [Palestine]. The Jewish right of settlement in Palestine west of the Jordan river, that is, in Israel, the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, was made unassailable. That right has never been terminated and cannot be terminated except by a recognized peace between Israel and its neighbors. And perhaps not even then, in view of Article 80 of the U.N. Charter, "the Palestine article," which provides that "nothing in the Charter shall be construed ... to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments...."

The mandate implicitly denies Arab claims to national political rights in the area in favor of the Jews; the mandated territory was in effect reserved to the Jewish people for their self-determination and political development, in acknowledgment of the historic connection of the Jewish people to the land. Lord Curzon, who was then the British Foreign Minister, made this reading of the mandate explicit. There remains simply the theory that the Arab inhabitants of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have an inherent 'natural law' claim to the area. Neither customary international law nor the United Nations Charter acknowledges that every group of people claiming to be a nation has the right to a state of its own."
Resolved: are the settlements legal? Israeli West Bank policies

 

[Billo_Really]

Berlin Walls? The one in Berlin was built to prevent East Germans from reaching freedom.
The one in Israel was built to prevent "Palestinians" from bombing Israelis.
If the "Palestinians" want to reach freedom in another Arab country, I'm sure Israel will let them leave.

Those walls are being built in an area, the Israeli's have no legal right to be in. It would be like your neighbor building a fence on your front lawn that prevents you from getting to your driveway.

You know much about oral copulation and that's all, gay boy http://www.usmessageboard.com/5143970-post567.html

Eugene Rostow, Legal Scholar, Former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank Eugene V. Rostow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The British Mandate recognized the right of the Jewish people to "close settlement" in the whole of the Mandated territory [Palestine]. The Jewish right of settlement in Palestine west of the Jordan river, that is, in Israel, the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, was made unassailable. That right has never been terminated and cannot be terminated except by a recognized peace between Israel and its neighbors. And perhaps not even then, in view of Article 80 of the U.N. Charter, "the Palestine article," which provides that "nothing in the Charter shall be construed ... to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments...."

The mandate implicitly denies Arab claims to national political rights in the area in favor of the Jews; the mandated territory was in effect reserved to the Jewish people for their self-determination and political development, in acknowledgment of the historic connection of the Jewish people to the land. Lord Curzon, who was then the British Foreign Minister, made this reading of the mandate explicit. There remains simply the theory that the Arab inhabitants of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have an inherent 'natural law' claim to the area. Neither customary international law nor the United Nations Charter acknowledges that every group of people claiming to be a nation has the right to a state of its own."
Resolved: are the settlements legal? Israeli West Bank policies

Listen asshole, I gave you applicable portion of the Mandate that does not apply to the jews, yet you still play dumb. Here it is again...

“The following provisions of the Mandate for Palestine are not applicable to the territory known as Trans-Jordan, which comprises all territory lying to the east of a line drawn from ... up the centre of the Wady Araba, Dead Sea and River Jordan. ... His Majesty’s Government accept full responsibility as Mandatory for Trans-Jordan.”

Not applicable means just that. The Jewish Mandate is "not applicable" east of the Jordan River and over a 100 UN resolutions bear this out.

 

[Hossfly]

Those walls are being built in an area, the Israeli's have no legal right to be in. It would be like your neighbor building a fence on your front lawn that prevents you from getting to your driveway.

You know much about oral copulation and that's all, gay boy http://www.usmessageboard.com/5143970-post567.html

Eugene Rostow, Legal Scholar, Former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank Eugene V. Rostow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Listen asshole, I gave you applicable portion of the Mandate that does not apply to the jews, yet you still play dumb. Here it is again...

“The following provisions of the Mandate for Palestine are not applicable to the territory known as Trans-Jordan, which comprises all territory lying to the east of a line drawn from ... up the centre of the Wady Araba, Dead Sea and River Jordan. ... His Majesty’s Government accept full responsibility as Mandatory for Trans-Jordan.”

Not applicable means just that. The Jewish Mandate is "not applicable" east of the Jordan River and over a 100 UN resolutions bear this out.

WGAF? Looks like the Israelis go where they want to.When they want to.who's to stop them?. The UM?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Berlin Walls? The one in Berlin was built to prevent East Germans from reaching freedom.
The one in Israel was built to prevent "Palestinians" from bombing Israelis.
If the "Palestinians" want to reach freedom in another Arab country, I'm sure Israel will let them leave.

Those walls are being built in an area, the Israeli's have no legal right to be in. It would be like your neighbor building a fence on your front lawn that prevents you from getting to your driveway.

"Palestine" doesn't own the land the fence is built on.
I own my front lawn.

 

[JStone]

Those walls are being built in an area, the Israeli's have no legal right to be in. It would be like your neighbor building a fence on your front lawn that prevents you from getting to your driveway.

You know much about oral copulation and that's all, gay boy http://www.usmessageboard.com/5143970-post567.html

Eugene Rostow, Legal Scholar, Former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank Eugene V. Rostow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Listen asshole, I gave you applicable portion of the Mandate that does not apply to the jews, yet you still play dumb. Here it is again...

“The following provisions of the Mandate for Palestine are not applicable to the territory known as Trans-Jordan, which comprises all territory lying to the east of a line drawn from ... up the centre of the Wady Araba, Dead Sea and River Jordan. ... His Majesty’s Government accept full responsibility as Mandatory for Trans-Jordan.”

Not applicable means just that. The Jewish Mandate is "not applicable" east of the Jordan River and over a 100 UN resolutions bear this out.

Gay Boy, not one UN resolution is binding. D'oh

Now, go back to your oral copulation which is all you know about http://www.usmessageboard.com/5143970-post567.html

 

[Billo_Really]

"Palestine" doesn't own the land the fence is built on.
I own my front lawn.

This has nothing to do with the Palestinian's.

It has to do with Israel building illegal structures on land that isn't their's.

 

[Billo_Really]

...not one UN resolution is binding.

But the Mandate is. And it clearly shows the area east of the Jordan River was not part of what was given to the jews.

As far as UN resolutions go, they may not be binding, but they do show where the world community stands on this issue and it's not with you.

 

[JStone]

"Palestine" doesn't own the land the fence is built on.
I own my front lawn.

This has nothing to do with the Palestinian's.

It has to do with Israel building illegal structures on land that isn't their's.

Gay Boy, you know about oral copulation http://www.usmessageboard.com/5143970-post567.html International law, not so much

Eugene Rostow, Legal Scholar, Former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank Eugene V. Rostow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The British Mandate recognized the right of the Jewish people to "close settlement" in the whole of the Mandated territory [Palestine]. The Jewish right of settlement in Palestine west of the Jordan river, that is, in Israel, the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, was made unassailable. That right has never been terminated and cannot be terminated except by a recognized peace between Israel and its neighbors. And perhaps not even then, in view of Article 80 of the U.N. Charter, "the Palestine article," which provides that "nothing in the Charter shall be construed ... to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments...."

The mandate implicitly denies Arab claims to national political rights in the area in favor of the Jews; the mandated territory was in effect reserved to the Jewish people for their self-determination and political development, in acknowledgment of the historic connection of the Jewish people to the land. Lord Curzon, who was then the British Foreign Minister, made this reading of the mandate explicit. There remains simply the theory that the Arab inhabitants of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have an inherent 'natural law' claim to the area. Neither customary international law nor the United Nations Charter acknowledges that every group of people claiming to be a nation has the right to a state of its own."
Resolved: are the settlements legal? Israeli West Bank policies

 

[Billo_Really]

Eugene Rostow, Legal Scholar, Former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank Eugene V. Rostow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The British Mandate recognized the right of the Jewish people to "close settlement" in the whole of the Mandated territory [Palestine]. The Jewish right of settlement in Palestine west of the Jordan river, that is, in Israel, the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, was made unassailable. That right has never been terminated and cannot be terminated except by a recognized peace between Israel and its neighbors. And perhaps not even then, in view of Article 80 of the U.N. Charter, "the Palestine article," which provides that "nothing in the Charter shall be construed ... to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments...."

The mandate implicitly denies Arab claims to national political rights in the area in favor of the Jews; the mandated territory was in effect reserved to the Jewish people for their self-determination and political development, in acknowledgment of the historic connection of the Jewish people to the land. Lord Curzon, who was then the British Foreign Minister, made this reading of the mandate explicit. There remains simply the theory that the Arab inhabitants of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have an inherent 'natural law' claim to the area. Neither customary international law nor the United Nations Charter acknowledges that every group of people claiming to be a nation has the right to a state of its own."
Resolved: are the settlements legal? Israeli West Bank policies

Repeating shit doesn't prove your argument, it proves your insanity.

Insanity is when someone keeps doing the same thing and expecting different results.

All your posts do, is prove just how stupid and juvenile you are.

 

[JStone]

Eugene Rostow, Legal Scholar, Former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank Eugene V. Rostow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The British Mandate recognized the right of the Jewish people to "close settlement" in the whole of the Mandated territory [Palestine]. The Jewish right of settlement in Palestine west of the Jordan river, that is, in Israel, the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, was made unassailable. That right has never been terminated and cannot be terminated except by a recognized peace between Israel and its neighbors. And perhaps not even then, in view of Article 80 of the U.N. Charter, "the Palestine article," which provides that "nothing in the Charter shall be construed ... to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments...."

The mandate implicitly denies Arab claims to national political rights in the area in favor of the Jews; the mandated territory was in effect reserved to the Jewish people for their self-determination and political development, in acknowledgment of the historic connection of the Jewish people to the land. Lord Curzon, who was then the British Foreign Minister, made this reading of the mandate explicit. There remains simply the theory that the Arab inhabitants of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have an inherent 'natural law' claim to the area. Neither customary international law nor the United Nations Charter acknowledges that every group of people claiming to be a nation has the right to a state of its own."
Resolved: are the settlements legal? Israeli West Bank policies

Repeating shit doesn't prove your argument, it proves your insanity.

Insanity is when someone keeps doing the same thing and expecting different results.

All your posts do, is prove just how stupid and juvenile you are.

Gay Boy, you're done.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

"Palestine" doesn't own the land the fence is built on.
I own my front lawn.

This has nothing to do with the Palestinian's.

It has to do with Israel building illegal structures on land that isn't their's.

I know it has nothing to do with the "Palestinians", they're imaginary.

The previous owners of the land were the Ottoman Empire.

 

[P F Tinmore]

"Palestine" doesn't own the land the fence is built on.
I own my front lawn.

This has nothing to do with the Palestinian's.

It has to do with Israel building illegal structures on land that isn't their's.

I know it has nothing to do with the "Palestinians", they're imaginary.

The previous owners of the land were the Ottoman Empire.

Israel has been attacking imaginary people for over 60 years and has not won yet.

 

[JStone]

This has nothing to do with the Palestinian's.

It has to do with Israel building illegal structures on land that isn't their's.

I know it has nothing to do with the "Palestinians", they're imaginary.

The previous owners of the land were the Ottoman Empire.

Israel has been attacking imaginary people for over 60 years and has not won yet.

The Misery of Arabs/Apple R&D In Israel

Apple will open a research and development center in Israel that will focus on semiconductors

The R&D center in Herzliya, Israel’s version of Silicon Valley, would be Apple’s first outside California

Earlier this week, Israeli media reported Apple was in advanced talks to buy Anobit, an Israeli maker of flash storage technology, for $400-$500 million

It is so sad and frustrating to see APPLE investing in Israel, while we as Arabs are not able to attract these investments to our countries! I don’t know what our leaders are doing to create proper environment for such investments!

I would prefer seeing APPLE as well as MICROSOFT having their R&D in Lebanon or any other Arab Country instead of being in ISRAEL!

WISH THE ARAB LEADERS WILL WAKE UP AND CARE FOR DEVELOPING THEIR COUNTRIES AND SOCIETIES INSTEAD OF APPLYING DICTATORSHIP AND KILL THEIR PEOPLE!
The Misery of Arabs ! Apple R&D in ISRAEL! | What do You Think ?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yA4wnqRAuhI]Apple to set up Israel development center - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qH1mYikmYzo]Apple to Acquire Anobit? - YouTube[/ame]

Apple today confirmed earlier reports it has acquired Israel-based flash memory startup Anobit....which makes flash memory technology found in the iPhone, iPad, and MacBook Air.. The deal was reported to be worth $400 million to $500 million.
Apple confirms Anobit acquisition | Apple - CNET News

 

[Lipush]

This has nothing to do with the Palestinian's.

It has to do with Israel building illegal structures on land that isn't their's.

I know it has nothing to do with the "Palestinians", they're imaginary.

The previous owners of the land were the Ottoman Empire.

Israel has been attacking imaginary people for over 60 years and has not won yet.

Well, when you put it THAT way, that's kinda sad.

Since they believe ISRAELIS are "imaginary" as well, they have seem to attack an imaginary state from all directions for years, and still not win, either.

This is all just one big pathetic situation

 

[P F Tinmore]

I know it has nothing to do with the "Palestinians", they're imaginary.

The previous owners of the land were the Ottoman Empire.

Israel has been attacking imaginary people for over 60 years and has not won yet.

Well, when you put it THAT way, that's kinda sad.

Since they believe ISRAELIS are "imaginary" as well, they have seem to attack an imaginary state from all directions for years, and still not win, either.

This is all just one big pathetic situation

Why don't you post a map of Israel that does not have the 1949 armistice lines.

2. The Armistice Demarcation Line is not to be construed in any sense as a political or territorial boundary,...

The Avalon Project : Egyptian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, February 24, 1949

 

[JStone]

Quran 60:4 We are clear of you and of whatever ye worship besides Allah: we have rejected you, and there has arisen, between us and you, enmity and hatred for ever,- unless ye believe in Allah and Him alone"

 

[Billo_Really]

I know it has nothing to do with the "Palestinians", they're imaginary.

The previous owners of the land were the Ottoman Empire.

You can call it whatever you want, but it doesn't change the fact that the arabs were the majority land owners in that area at that time.

 

[Billo_Really]

Why don't you post a map of Israel that does not have the 1949 armistice lines.

Here is Jewish Israel.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Why don't you post a map of Israel that does not have the 1949 armistice lines.

Here is Jewish Israel.

Interesting, but it says Jewish Palestine not Jewish Israel. Those things they call international boundaries, whose borders are those?

1. The Armistice Demarcation Line shall follow the international boundary between the Lebanon and Palestine.

The Avalon Project : Lebanese-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, March 23, 1949

Hmmm, it doesn't say Lebanon and Israel.