How can Trump be charged federally in a state court?

He isn't. He is being charged under NY State law of falsifying business records with the intent of concealing a crime. That crime need not be a NT State crime. It can be Federal, or in any other jurisdiction. It does not even need to have been committed by Trump. He falsified the records to conceal a crime.
Horseshit.

Bragg was unable to detail any underlying crime.

This case is so weak it's pathetic.
 
We are all "above the law" every single day. We have mounds and reams and volumes of laws pertaining to us, from federal, state, county and local idiots whose boots you love to lick. If no one were "above the law" in truth nothing in this nation would ever get done. EVER.

You parrots really need to stop squawking that phrase.
So we are all allowed to ignore the law?

Is that your stupid contention StupidSue?
 
Because that is federal law, which is out of Bragg's jurisdiction.
BS.

Generally, a state cannot prosecute a federal crime. The federal government prosecutes federal crimes.

Criminal cases can fall under either state, federal, or concurrent jurisdiction. When a case falls under concurrent jurisdiction, both the state and the federal government can prosecute the crime based on their own laws. However, the state charge and the federal charge are usually slightly different.

Because it covers Manhattan, the Southern District of New York has long been one of the most active and influential federal trial courts in the United States. It often has jurisdiction over America's largest financial institutions and prosecution of white-collar crime and other federal crimes.
 
So you open your mouth and shit just falls out?

So. People are okay to break into our country ILLEGALLY, right? "No one is above the law"? But Trump can do everything LEGALLY but then somehow commit a crime Bragg can't name?

You all have lost the plot, exposed your whole backsides, and everyone can see it.

keep flailing
 
So. People are okay to break into our country ILLEGALLY, right? "No one is above the law"? But Trump can do everything LEGALLY but then somehow commit a crime Bragg can't name?

You all have lost the plot, exposed your whole backsides, and everyone can see it.

keep flailing
Nope.

A. I never made any such claims

B. You seem lost. This thread has zero to do with your favorite bogeyman

Lame attempt at distraction and completely idiotic to claim that “we are all above the law”
 
BS.
Generally, a state cannot prosecute a federal crime. The federal government prosecutes federal crimes.
Criminal cases can fall under either state, federal, or concurrent jurisdiction. When a case falls under concurrent jurisdiction, both the state and the federal government can prosecute the crime based on their own laws. However, the state charge and the federal charge are usually slightly different.
Because it covers Manhattan, the Southern District of New York has long been one of the most active and influential federal trial courts in the United States. It often has jurisdiction over America's largest financial institutions and prosecution of white-collar crime and other federal crimes.
You should have stopped after "the federal government prosecutes federal crimes", which agreed with the admiral.
Stop talking in generalities. Look at Braggs specific charges. They are total bullshit.
What are the odds that they will be tossed vs going to trial? IMHO 90/10 tossed, but it may take an appeal or two.
 
Nope.

A. I never made any such claims

B. You seem lost. This thread has zero to do with your favorite bogeyman

Lame attempt at distraction and completely idiotic to claim that “we are all above the law”

Are people who break in "above the law" to Democrats or no?
 
Not true. Where are you getting this bullshit? Are you making this up as you go? Many highly respected lawyers have stated repeatedly that there is no case and you are wrong.

trump-court-3-ap-ps-230404_1680634350470_hpEmbed_3x2_992.jpg


And our judicial system isn't run by talking heads on T.V.

Funny that Trump was sitting in court for "no case".

WW
 
And our judicial system isn't run by talking heads on T.V.
Funny that Trump was sitting in court for "no case".
WW
1. Trump was sitting in court due to "prosecutorial abuse"
2. Law professors are not "talking heads", they are legal experts and they say there is no case against Trump
 
1. Trump was sitting in court due to "prosecutorial abuse"
2. Law professors are not "talking heads", they are legal experts and they say there is no case against Trump
If you are referring to “the Dersh”… yea… he is at this point a talking head
 

Forum List

Back
Top