How many democrats said WMDs existed in Iraq?

[francoHFW]

Where are you totally misinformed, dupe?

I am not misinformed. I know that Bush never said Iraq was behind 9/11.

Only extraordinarily stupid people think he did.

And that is obviously how the Democrats rode the 9/11 truther wave into congress in the 2006 elections.

Where are you totally misinformed, dupe?

I am not misinformed. I know that Bush never said Iraq was behind 9/11.

Only extraordinarily stupid people think he did.

And that is obviously how the Democrats rode the 9/11 truther wave into congress in the 2006 elections.

Like 70% of the country in 2003. Hmmmm?
USATODAY.com - Poll: 70% believe Saddam, 9-11 link

US public thinks Saddam had role in 9/11

Seven in 10 Americans continue to believe that Iraq's Saddam Hussein had a role in the 11 September 2001 attacks, even though the Bush administration and congressional investigators say they have no evidence of this.


Terrorist attacks were about the ongoing war in Iraq according to AQ leader Osama bin Laden in his declaration of war against the USA. However the Bush administration never blamed it on Saddam Hussein. It was largely about Iraq, not Hussein.

Go get a library card, you ignorant fool.

What an idiot. lol. You know what innuendo is? W, Cheney et al were great at it...

There was no innuendo. Your weak and simple mind is very easily manipulated.

So how did 70% get that idea duh?

 

[Muhammed]

I am not misinformed. I know that Bush never said Iraq was behind 9/11.

Only extraordinarily stupid people think he did.

And that is obviously how the Democrats rode the 9/11 truther wave into congress in the 2006 elections.

I am not misinformed. I know that Bush never said Iraq was behind 9/11.

Only extraordinarily stupid people think he did.

And that is obviously how the Democrats rode the 9/11 truther wave into congress in the 2006 elections.

Like 70% of the country in 2003. Hmmmm?
USATODAY.com - Poll: 70% believe Saddam, 9-11 link

US public thinks Saddam had role in 9/11

Seven in 10 Americans continue to believe that Iraq's Saddam Hussein had a role in the 11 September 2001 attacks, even though the Bush administration and congressional investigators say they have no evidence of this.


Terrorist attacks were about the ongoing war in Iraq according to AQ leader Osama bin Laden in his declaration of war against the USA. However the Bush administration never blamed it on Saddam Hussein. It was largely about Iraq, not Hussein.

Go get a library card, you ignorant fool.

What an idiot. lol. You know what innuendo is? W, Cheney et al were great at it...

There was no innuendo. Your weak and simple mind is very easily manipulated.

So how did 70% get that idea duh?

Why shouldn't they? The ROI was the only country the USA was at war with at the time.

Why don't you just go to a library and educate yourself? Are you too fucking unintelligent to do that?

 

[Liminal]

I'm trying to find one democrat who didn't think Iraq had WMDs before the invasion of Iraq.

I haven't found any yet..or at least not any that can get elected.

Very good professor. Now let's see if we can guess from whom they received the intelligence that prompted them to make these decisions.

 

[PredFan]

I'm trying to find one democrat who didn't think Iraq had WMDs before the invasion of Iraq.

I haven't found any yet..or at least not any that can get elected.

Actually, there were WMDs in Iraq. Saddam used them on the Kurds a lot.

That happend years before the invasion . That's why we had a no fly zone .

Don't forget we had you when inspectors on the ground in Iraq. The bush chose to ignore them when they said they couldn't find any weapons.

Saddam used WMDs on the Kurds, only a brainless idiot would think he used them all and didn't have any more.

And ? That warrants an invasion/occupation?

Assad did the same . Where were u when Obama wanted to rocket his backside ?

Does it warrant an invasion? I didn't think so but why don't you ask the democrat politicians who voted yes? There were a lot of them.

Where was I? Right here saying what a stupid waste of money and lives it was. Later, I was saying we were giving money and arms to terrorist organizations fighting Assad. You know like ISIS.

 

[Campbell]

I'm trying to find one democrat who didn't think Iraq had WMDs before the invasion of Iraq.

I haven't found any yet..or at least not any that can get elected.

What we all knew was the 935 lies the Bush administration made up and told us:

Read It and Weep:

Iraq: The War Card: Orchestrated Deception on the Path to War.

The Republican party had been trying to find an excuse to jump Saddam Hussein ever since he tried to assassinate George Herbert Walker Bush in Qatar, circa 1993. This letter to Bill Clinton removes all doubt:

December 18, 1998

The Honorable William J. Clinton
President of the United States
Washington, DC

Dear Mr. President,

We are writing you because we are convinced that current American policy toward Iraq is not succeeding, and that we may soon face a threat in the Middle East more serious than any we have known since the end of the Cold War. In your upcoming State of the Union Address, you have an opportunity to chart a clear and determined course for meeting this threat. We urge you to seize that opportunity, and to enunciate a new strategy that would secure the interests of the U.S. and our friends and allies around the world.
That strategy should aim, above all, at the removal of Saddam Hussein's regime from power. We stand ready to offer our full support in this difficult but necessary endeavor. The policy of containment of Saddam Hussein has been steadily eroding over the past several months. As recent events have demonstrated, we can no longer depend on our partners in the Gulf War coalition to continue to uphold the sanctions or to punish Saddam when he blocks or evades UN inspections. Our ability to ensure that Saddam Hussein is not producing weapons of mass destruction, therefore, has substantially diminished. Even if full inspections were eventually to resume, which now seems highly unlikely, experience has shown that it is difficult if
not impossible to monitor Iraq's chemical and biological weapons production. The lengthy period during which the inspectors will have been unable to enter many Iraqi facilities has made it even less likely that they will be able to uncover all of Saddam's secrets. As a result, in the not-too-distant future we
will be unable to determine with any reasonable level of confidence whether Iraq does or does not possess such weapons. Such uncertainty will, by itself, have a seriously destabilizing effect on the entire Middle East. It hardly needs to be added that if Saddam does acquire the capability to deliver weapons of mass destruction, as he is almost certain to do if we continue along the present course, the safety of American troops in the region, of our friends and allies like Israel and the moderate Arab states, and a significant portion of the world's supply of oil will all be put at hazard. As you have rightly declared, Mr. President, the security of the world in the first part of the 21st century will be determined largely by how we handle this threat. Given the magnitude of the threat, the current policy, which depends for its success upon the
steadfastness of our coalition partners and upon the cooperation of Saddam Hussein, is dangerously inadequate.
The only acceptable strategy is one that eliminates the possibility that Iraq will be able to use or threaten to use weapons of mass destruction. In the near term, this means a willingness to undertake military action as diplomacy is clearly failing. In the long term, it means removing Saddam Hussein and his regime from power. That now needs to become the aim of American foreign policy.
We urge you to articulate this aim, and to turn your Administration's attention to implementing a strategy for removing Saddam's regime from power. This will require a full complement of diplomatic, political and military efforts. Although we are fully aware of the dangers and difficulties in implementing this policy, we believe the dangers of failing to do so are far greater. We believe the U.S. has the authority under existing UN resolutions to take the necessary steps, including military steps, to protect our vital interests in the Gulf. In any case, American policy cannot continue to be crippled by a misguided insistence on unanimity in the UN Security Council. We urge you to act decisively. If you act now to end the threat of weapons of mass destruction against the U.S. or its allies, you will be acting in the most fundamental national security interests of the country. If we accept a course of weakness and drift, we put our interests and our future at risk.

Sincerely,

Elliott Abrams Richard L. Armitag William J. Bennett
Jeffrey Bergner John Bolton Paula Dobriansky
Francis Fukuyama Robert Kagan Zalmay Khalilzad
William Kristol Richard Perle Peter W.Rodman
Donald Rumsfeld William Schneider, Jr. Vin Weber
Paul Wolfowitz R. James Woolsey Robert B. Zoellick

 

[Mac1958]

There was one (1) Commander In Chief, one (1) person with the responsibility of making the call: Invade or not.

That person was not dragged into sending us there. He and his staff pushed for it, as hard as they could.

His call. No one else's.
.

 

[Campbell]

There was one (1) Commander In Chief, one (1) person with the responsibility of making the call: Invade or not.

That person was not dragged into sending us there. He and his staff pushed for it, as hard as they could.

His call. No one else's.
.

You might add that Bush said he prayed about it for weeks and God told him to invade.

 

[Mac1958]

There was one (1) Commander In Chief, one (1) person with the responsibility of making the call: Invade or not.

That person was not dragged into sending us there. He and his staff pushed for it, as hard as they could.

His call. No one else's.

You might add that Bush said he prayed about it for weeks and God told him to invade.

He really said that?
.

 

[Mac1958]

There was one (1) Commander In Chief, one (1) person with the responsibility of making the call: Invade or not.

That person was not dragged into sending us there. He and his staff pushed for it, as hard as they could.

His call. No one else's.

You might add that Bush said he prayed about it for weeks and God told him to invade.

He really said that?
.

Yeah, looks like it did say it: George Bush: 'God told me to end the tyranny in Iraq'

Yikes. Somehow I missed that.

Maybe I saw it and just blocked it out...
.

 

[Campbell]

There was one (1) Commander In Chief, one (1) person with the responsibility of making the call: Invade or not.

That person was not dragged into sending us there. He and his staff pushed for it, as hard as they could.

His call. No one else's.

You might add that Bush said he prayed about it for weeks and God told him to invade.

He really said that?
.

Yeah, looks like it did say it: George Bush: 'God told me to end the tyranny in Iraq'

Yikes. Somehow I missed that.

Maybe I saw it and just blocked it out...
.

What absolutely amazes me is it appears that the families of the 4500 young dead Americans seem to have already forgiven Bush for that fiasco. If my only son had been killed there I would be stalking his war mongering ass. Did you know that during the war with Iraq Dick Cheney cleared about $30 million from his shares in Halliburton? That's what these chickenshit, chickenhawk wars are about......making the rich richer and getting the kids of poor people annihilated at a young age.