How to Explain Climate Change to Neanderthals

[jc456]

Getting caught fudging data doesn't help either.

Of course, it was the deniers fudging the satellite data that got caught, but you knew that already.

where?

At the University of Alabama at Huntsville, Your MessiahRushie's official climatologist Roy Spencer and his partner in crime John Christy got caught fudging the satellite data turning warming into cooling by using the opposite sign to correct for diurnal satellite drift. The deniers, of course, said the UAH data was the only accurate data and used the fudged UAH data to discredit all the honest and accurate ground data, and they continue to this day to discredit the ground data even after the fudged UAH data was exposed. Deniers just pretend they never heard about the fudged UAH satellite data so they can keep on lying.

August 9, 2007

RUSH: I got a note here from our official climatologist Roy Spencer, University of Alabama at Huntsville. He is a genuine scientist

too funny, you got nothing do you, more lies.

 

[edthecynic]

Getting caught fudging data doesn't help either.

Of course, it was the deniers fudging the satellite data that got caught, but you knew that already.

No asshole I didn't already know that. Take your BS and pound sand

Deniers always play dumb so they can keep on lying.

The fact remains the only people who ACTUALLY got caught fudging the data were Christy and Spencer at the UAH. The deniers accuse everyone else other than them to muddy the waters.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Getting caught fudging data doesn't help either.

Of course, it was the deniers fudging the satellite data that got caught, but you knew that already.

No asshole I didn't already know that. Take your BS and pound sand

Deniers always play dumb so they can keep on lying.

The fact remains the only people who ACTUALLY got caught fudging the data were Christy and Spencer at the UAH. The deniers accuse everyone else other than them to muddy the waters.

Liar...

More Countries Caught Manipulating Their Climate Data

First NASA, Now NOAA Caught Fudging “Climate Change” Data

The scandal of fiddled global warming data

 

[jc456]

Getting caught fudging data doesn't help either.

Of course, it was the deniers fudging the satellite data that got caught, but you knew that already.

No asshole I didn't already know that. Take your BS and pound sand

Deniers always play dumb so they can keep on lying.

The fact remains the only people who ACTUALLY got caught fudging the data were Christy and Spencer at the UAH. The deniers accuse everyone else other than them to muddy the waters.

which you can't prove so you lie. dah, dah, dah, dah, dah, dah, dah, dah. dah.

 

[tinydancer]

Here's my bitch guys. Because our politicians know that to "save the planet" they can milk the consumer oh heavens a million times over "for the planet" and "for the children" jack shit is being done to halt true pollution and damage to the environment.

Just Flint and So Cal has me wanting to bazooka barf and those are only two enviro issues. Politicians don't give a shit except the next election and they want the glamour and the glitz of saving the planet for photo ops even though they can't even fix a freaking pot hole.

 

[jc456]

Getting caught fudging data doesn't help either.

Of course, it was the deniers fudging the satellite data that got caught, but you knew that already.

No asshole I didn't already know that. Take your BS and pound sand

Deniers always play dumb so they can keep on lying.

The fact remains the only people who ACTUALLY got caught fudging the data were Christy and Spencer at the UAH. The deniers accuse everyone else other than them to muddy the waters.

Liar...

More Countries Caught Manipulating Their Climate Data

First NASA, Now NOAA Caught Fudging “Climate Change” Data

The scandal of fiddled global warming data

like how he posted up a date to make it look like it was a post? funny shit the length of a libturd's stupid. They believe they are the smartest and yet continue to look as the stupid. More libturd's stupid is not unusual though.

 

[boedicca]

How To Explain Climate Change To A Neanderthal


There...a severely DUMBED down explanation for the slower folks who just can't seem to grasp the concept

^^^ Speaking of Slower Folks ^^^^

 

[edthecynic]

Getting caught fudging data doesn't help either.

Of course, it was the deniers fudging the satellite data that got caught, but you knew that already.

where?

At the University of Alabama at Huntsville, Your MessiahRushie's official climatologist Roy Spencer and his partner in crime John Christy got caught fudging the satellite data turning warming into cooling by using the opposite sign to correct for diurnal satellite drift. The deniers, of course, said the UAH data was the only accurate data and used the fudged UAH data to discredit all the honest and accurate ground data, and they continue to this day to discredit the ground data even after the fudged UAH data was exposed. Deniers just pretend they never heard about the fudged UAH satellite data so they can keep on lying.

August 9, 2007

RUSH: I got a note here from our official climatologist Roy Spencer, University of Alabama at Huntsville. He is a genuine scientist

too funny, you got nothing do you, more lies.

Like the deniers play dumb so they can keep on lying.

Which begs the question, how is it that you "data experts" never heard of Christy and Spencer at the UAH getting caught fudging the data, and when the correct sign was used to calculate the diurnal satellite drift, the satellite data suddenly matched exactly the ground data that was supposed to be the cooked data?

 

[jc456]

Getting caught fudging data doesn't help either.

Of course, it was the deniers fudging the satellite data that got caught, but you knew that already.

where?

At the University of Alabama at Huntsville, Your MessiahRushie's official climatologist Roy Spencer and his partner in crime John Christy got caught fudging the satellite data turning warming into cooling by using the opposite sign to correct for diurnal satellite drift. The deniers, of course, said the UAH data was the only accurate data and used the fudged UAH data to discredit all the honest and accurate ground data, and they continue to this day to discredit the ground data even after the fudged UAH data was exposed. Deniers just pretend they never heard about the fudged UAH satellite data so they can keep on lying.

August 9, 2007

RUSH: I got a note here from our official climatologist Roy Spencer, University of Alabama at Huntsville. He is a genuine scientist

too funny, you got nothing do you, more lies.

Like the deniers play dumb so they can keep on lying.

Which begs the question, how is it that you "data experts" never heard of Christy and Spencer at the UAH getting caught fudging the data, and when the correct sign was used to calculate the diurnal satellite drift, the satellite data suddenly matched exactly the ground data that was supposed to be the cooked data?

because it a figment of your imagination. So?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Another science fail, find me a Neanderthal that is living...

Are you white? You're likely to have 1-4% Neanderthal DNA.

So then the question becomes, Are you living?

You have more DNA in common with a Bananna then you do with a Neanderthal if that was true ~ according to the evolutionist


Humans share 50% DNA with bananas: The fascinating facts about the scientific world around us



But since I am a creationist it sucks to be you

 

[edthecynic]

Getting caught fudging data doesn't help either.

Of course, it was the deniers fudging the satellite data that got caught, but you knew that already.

No asshole I didn't already know that. Take your BS and pound sand

Deniers always play dumb so they can keep on lying.

The fact remains the only people who ACTUALLY got caught fudging the data were Christy and Spencer at the UAH. The deniers accuse everyone else other than them to muddy the waters.

Liar...

More Countries Caught Manipulating Their Climate Data

First NASA, Now NOAA Caught Fudging “Climate Change” Data

The scandal of fiddled global warming data

You only prove that deniers lie in packs.

As ten millions of circles can never make a square, so the united voice of myriads cannot lend the smallest foundation to falsehood.

OLIVER GOLDSMITH, The Vicar of Wakefield

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Getting caught fudging data doesn't help either.

Of course, it was the deniers fudging the satellite data that got caught, but you knew that already.

No asshole I didn't already know that. Take your BS and pound sand

Deniers always play dumb so they can keep on lying.

The fact remains the only people who ACTUALLY got caught fudging the data were Christy and Spencer at the UAH. The deniers accuse everyone else other than them to muddy the waters.

Liar...

More Countries Caught Manipulating Their Climate Data

First NASA, Now NOAA Caught Fudging “Climate Change” Data

The scandal of fiddled global warming data

You only prove that deniers lie in packs.

As ten millions of circles can never make a square, so the united voice of myriads cannot lend the smallest foundation to falsehood.

OLIVER GOLDSMITH, The Vicar of Wakefield

Get lost, Sparky and take your gloBULL warming BS with you

 

[jc456]

Getting caught fudging data doesn't help either.

Of course, it was the deniers fudging the satellite data that got caught, but you knew that already.

No asshole I didn't already know that. Take your BS and pound sand

Deniers always play dumb so they can keep on lying.

The fact remains the only people who ACTUALLY got caught fudging the data were Christy and Spencer at the UAH. The deniers accuse everyone else other than them to muddy the waters.

Liar...

More Countries Caught Manipulating Their Climate Data

First NASA, Now NOAA Caught Fudging “Climate Change” Data

The scandal of fiddled global warming data

You only prove that deniers lie in packs.

As ten millions of circles can never make a square, so the united voice of myriads cannot lend the smallest foundation to falsehood.

OLIVER GOLDSMITH, The Vicar of Wakefield

and yet you continue.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

How To Explain Climate Change To A Neanderthal


There...a severely DUMBED down explanation for the slower folks who just can't seem to grasp the concept

A lack of intelligence and knowledge is only part of the problem, the primary problem is far too many on the right are hostile to addressing GCC for purely partisan reasons, having nothing to do with the facts and merits of the issue.

 

[edthecynic]

Getting caught fudging data doesn't help either.

Of course, it was the deniers fudging the satellite data that got caught, but you knew that already.

No asshole I didn't already know that. Take your BS and pound sand

The fact remains the only people who ACTUALLY got caught fudging the data were Christy and Spencer at the UAH. The deniers accuse everyone else other than them to muddy the waters.

which you can't prove so you lie. dah, dah, dah, dah, dah, dah, dah, dah. dah.

Like I said, the denier data "experts" always play dumb so they can keep on lying. Deniers always play dumb so they can keep on lying. Every error Christy and Spencer made just happened to make the data colder!

UAH satellite temperature dataset - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The UAH TLT dataset was a source of controversy in the 1990s as, at that time, it showed little increase in global mean temperature, at odds with surface measurements. Since then a number of errors in the way the atmospheric temperatures were derived from the raw radiance data have been discovered and corrections made by Christy et al. at UAH.

The largest of these errors was demonstrated in a 1998 paper by Frank Wentz and Matthias Schabel of RSS. In that paper they showed that the data needed to be corrected for orbital decay of the MSU satellites. As the satellites' orbits gradually decayed towards the earth the area from which they received radiances was reduced, introducing a false cooling trend.[9]

Even after the correction for satellite decay UAH continued to infer lower TLT temperatures than RSS based on the same raw data. For example Mears et al. at RSS found 0.193 °C/decade for lower troposphere up to July 2005, compared to +0.123 °C/decade found by UAH for the same period.

Much of the remaining disparity was resolved by the three papers in Science, 11 August 2005, which pointed out errors in the UAH 5.1 record and the radiosonde record in the tropics.[10]

NOAA-11 played a significant role in a 2005 study by Mears et al. identifying an error in the diurnal correction that leads to the 40% jump in Spencer and Christy's trend from version 5.1 to 5.2.[11]

Christy et al. asserted in a 2007 paper that the tropical temperature trends from radiosondes matches more closely with their v5.2 UAH-TLT dataset than with RSS v2.1.[12]

Much of the difference, at least in the Lower troposphere global average decadal trend between UAH and RSS, has been removed with the release of RSS version 3.3 in January 2011. RSS and UAH TLT are now within 0.003 K/decade of one another.

 

[jc456]

How To Explain Climate Change To A Neanderthal


There...a severely DUMBED down explanation for the slower folks who just can't seem to grasp the concept

A lack of intelligence and knowledge is only part of the problem, the primary problem is far too many on the right are hostile to addressing GCC for purely partisan reasons, having nothing to do with the facts and merits of the issue.

facts a word you have no idea the meaning. You should really learn about it though, it helps out in a debate.

 

[edthecynic]

Of course, it was the deniers fudging the satellite data that got caught, but you knew that already.

where?

At the University of Alabama at Huntsville, Your MessiahRushie's official climatologist Roy Spencer and his partner in crime John Christy got caught fudging the satellite data turning warming into cooling by using the opposite sign to correct for diurnal satellite drift. The deniers, of course, said the UAH data was the only accurate data and used the fudged UAH data to discredit all the honest and accurate ground data, and they continue to this day to discredit the ground data even after the fudged UAH data was exposed. Deniers just pretend they never heard about the fudged UAH satellite data so they can keep on lying.

August 9, 2007

RUSH: I got a note here from our official climatologist Roy Spencer, University of Alabama at Huntsville. He is a genuine scientist

too funny, you got nothing do you, more lies.

Like the deniers play dumb so they can keep on lying.

Which begs the question, how is it that you "data experts" never heard of Christy and Spencer at the UAH getting caught fudging the data, and when the correct sign was used to calculate the diurnal satellite drift, the satellite data suddenly matched exactly the ground data that was supposed to be the cooked data?

because it a figment of your imagination. So?

No, it is proof the deniers pretend to be uninformed so they can keep on lying.

 

[jc456]

Getting caught fudging data doesn't help either.

Of course, it was the deniers fudging the satellite data that got caught, but you knew that already.

No asshole I didn't already know that. Take your BS and pound sand

The fact remains the only people who ACTUALLY got caught fudging the data were Christy and Spencer at the UAH. The deniers accuse everyone else other than them to muddy the waters.

which you can't prove so you lie. dah, dah, dah, dah, dah, dah, dah, dah. dah.

Like I said, the denier data "experts" always play dumb so they can keep on lying. Deniers always play dumb so they can keep on lying. Every error Christy and Spencer made just happened to make the data colder!

UAH satellite temperature dataset - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The UAH TLT dataset was a source of controversy in the 1990s as, at that time, it showed little increase in global mean temperature, at odds with surface measurements. Since then a number of errors in the way the atmospheric temperatures were derived from the raw radiance data have been discovered and corrections made by Christy et al. at UAH.

The largest of these errors was demonstrated in a 1998 paper by Frank Wentz and Matthias Schabel of RSS. In that paper they showed that the data needed to be corrected for orbital decay of the MSU satellites. As the satellites' orbits gradually decayed towards the earth the area from which they received radiances was reduced, introducing a false cooling trend.[9]

Even after the correction for satellite decay UAH continued to infer lower TLT temperatures than RSS based on the same raw data. For example Mears et al. at RSS found 0.193 °C/decade for lower troposphere up to July 2005, compared to +0.123 °C/decade found by UAH for the same period.

Much of the remaining disparity was resolved by the three papers in Science, 11 August 2005, which pointed out errors in the UAH 5.1 record and the radiosonde record in the tropics.[10]

NOAA-11 played a significant role in a 2005 study by Mears et al. identifying an error in the diurnal correction that leads to the 40% jump in Spencer and Christy's trend from version 5.1 to 5.2.[11]

Christy et al. asserted in a 2007 paper that the tropical temperature trends from radiosondes matches more closely with their v5.2 UAH-TLT dataset than with RSS v2.1.[12]

Much of the difference, at least in the Lower troposphere global average decadal trend between UAH and RSS, has been removed with the release of RSS version 3.3 in January 2011. RSS and UAH TLT are now within 0.003 K/decade of one another.

since when is Christy a climate scientist? I'm lost at where you're going, but you came off the rails a long time ago.

 

[jc456]

where?

At the University of Alabama at Huntsville, Your MessiahRushie's official climatologist Roy Spencer and his partner in crime John Christy got caught fudging the satellite data turning warming into cooling by using the opposite sign to correct for diurnal satellite drift. The deniers, of course, said the UAH data was the only accurate data and used the fudged UAH data to discredit all the honest and accurate ground data, and they continue to this day to discredit the ground data even after the fudged UAH data was exposed. Deniers just pretend they never heard about the fudged UAH satellite data so they can keep on lying.

August 9, 2007

RUSH: I got a note here from our official climatologist Roy Spencer, University of Alabama at Huntsville. He is a genuine scientist

too funny, you got nothing do you, more lies.

Like the deniers play dumb so they can keep on lying.

Which begs the question, how is it that you "data experts" never heard of Christy and Spencer at the UAH getting caught fudging the data, and when the correct sign was used to calculate the diurnal satellite drift, the satellite data suddenly matched exactly the ground data that was supposed to be the cooked data?

because it a figment of your imagination. So?

No, it is proof the deniers pretend to be uninformed so they can keep on lying.

or not

 

[edthecynic]

Of course, it was the deniers fudging the satellite data that got caught, but you knew that already.

No asshole I didn't already know that. Take your BS and pound sand

The fact remains the only people who ACTUALLY got caught fudging the data were Christy and Spencer at the UAH. The deniers accuse everyone else other than them to muddy the waters.

which you can't prove so you lie. dah, dah, dah, dah, dah, dah, dah, dah. dah.

Like I said, the denier data "experts" always play dumb so they can keep on lying. Deniers always play dumb so they can keep on lying. Every error Christy and Spencer made just happened to make the data colder!

UAH satellite temperature dataset - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The UAH TLT dataset was a source of controversy in the 1990s as, at that time, it showed little increase in global mean temperature, at odds with surface measurements. Since then a number of errors in the way the atmospheric temperatures were derived from the raw radiance data have been discovered and corrections made by Christy et al. at UAH.

The largest of these errors was demonstrated in a 1998 paper by Frank Wentz and Matthias Schabel of RSS. In that paper they showed that the data needed to be corrected for orbital decay of the MSU satellites. As the satellites' orbits gradually decayed towards the earth the area from which they received radiances was reduced, introducing a false cooling trend.[9]

Even after the correction for satellite decay UAH continued to infer lower TLT temperatures than RSS based on the same raw data. For example Mears et al. at RSS found 0.193 °C/decade for lower troposphere up to July 2005, compared to +0.123 °C/decade found by UAH for the same period.

Much of the remaining disparity was resolved by the three papers in Science, 11 August 2005, which pointed out errors in the UAH 5.1 record and the radiosonde record in the tropics.[10]

NOAA-11 played a significant role in a 2005 study by Mears et al. identifying an error in the diurnal correction that leads to the 40% jump in Spencer and Christy's trend from version 5.1 to 5.2.[11]

Christy et al. asserted in a 2007 paper that the tropical temperature trends from radiosondes matches more closely with their v5.2 UAH-TLT dataset than with RSS v2.1.[12]

Much of the difference, at least in the Lower troposphere global average decadal trend between UAH and RSS, has been removed with the release of RSS version 3.3 in January 2011. RSS and UAH TLT are now within 0.003 K/decade of one another.

since when is Christy a climate scientist? I'm lost at where you're going, but you came off the rails a long time ago.

John Christy, not Chris Christie, you blockhead!!!