Sky Dancer
Rookie
- Jan 21, 2009
- 19,307
- 1,320
I dont know who the first 2 guys are, and I KNOW that most christians will not vote for Michelle Bachman for president, and I seriously doubt she will be around in the presidential race after the first month of the primaries....she could be another Republicans vp candidate, which could help another candidates run about as much as sarah palin helped mccain....some will lean towards the candidate, but others will flee from voting for them because of the choice in vp's....is my prediction of the whole thing.I have no fear of Christians, I AM a Christian....
???????
The Christians led by Martin Ssempa and Scott Lively are scary. Michelle Bachmann is a Christian extremist running for POTUS. Yikes.
In addition to this, there shall be no religious test for presidential candidates according to our constitution....this covers a multitude of things, but it also covers michelle bachman's RIGHT to her own religious beliefs and her right to run for the presidency, without being prevented from running by people who differ with her own religious perspective....like it seems that you are calling for....? I think the woman is loony, on more than one account, some of her religious stances included.....that does not mean that I think we should stop her from running for the office of president....she can have a shot at it, as much as the next guy or gal....that is eligible.
You missed my point. Of course, Bachmann can run. The fact that this EXTREMIST is being taken seriously as a POTUS candidate tells us ALOT about the power of Christian theocrats in this country.
As for a religious litmus test, HW Bush said no atheist should vote or run for office. No Muslim, Buddhist or Hindu will ever be elected POTUS.
At this time, being a Christian is a litmus test for running for POTUS.