Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You read the report...you can read for yourself.You made a claim that you can't back up. Nobody is surprised. That about sums it up.
I can link you the report.
All you folks on the left state that it was "obstruction of justice"...that is one hole.
You can find the rest.
... and still no Russian connectionlolwhy? so you can go NU UHN!!! w/o providing any links yourself? left's been doing that a lot lately. bitching at my links and calling them "right wing bullshit" yet, they provide nothing. how odd.Yes, I have....and it has numerous holes in it. Hell, you may as well ask me if I read the absurd Steele Dossier. Lol
Everyone knows it has many holes in the report. It even looks like freakin' swiss cheese.
OK, list all the holes then.
anyway -
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective
The dossier is actually a series of reports—16 in all—that total 35 pages. Written in 2016, the dossier is a collection of raw intelligence. Steele neither evaluated nor synthesized the intelligence. He neither made nor rendered bottom-line judgments. The dossier is, quite simply and by design, raw reporting, not a finished intelligence product.
In that sense, the dossier is similar to an FBI 302 form or a DEA 6 form. Both of those forms are used by special agents of the FBI and DEA, respectively, to record what they are told by witnesses during investigations. The substance of these memoranda can be true or false, but the recording of information is (or should be) accurate. In that sense, notes taken by a special agent have much in common with the notes that a journalist might take while covering a story—the substance of those notes could be true or false, depending on what the source tells the journalist, but the transcription should be accurate.
----------
so this is simply "Raw Data" and a collection of shit people said. NONE OF IT VERIFIED.
now, i showed my work, you show me where the info was verified before being taken to FISA for a warrant.
well you won't do this either so let me -
DOJ inspector general found Carter Page FISA extensions were illegally obtained, Joe diGenova says
The Justice Department inspector general has determined the three Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant extensions against onetime Trump campaign aide Carter Page were illegally obtained, attorney Joe diGenova said on Thursday.
so this "information" was NOT verified, yet said it was in order to obtain the warrants. is this ok? use unverified info to obtain warrants to "monitor" people? if so great. then the (R)'s next time around can use unverified info and get warrants also. you can't do this just ONE way.
now - for shits n grins:
Trump Intelligence Allegations
have you ever actually read the report? first few pages interesting, highlighted parts. how can this be so wrong? if ANY of this were true mueller would have found it, right? i mean lord knows he was looking.
your turn. provide links, not just snark, to prove your mindset.
You want me to provide a link that proves a negative? The guy said there were holes in the Mueller report, I asked him to prove it, he can't.
The Mueller report is an opinion, Mueller is not without fault.
Barr is/was muellers superior, Disagrees with Mueller’s opinion. Live with it bedwetter
Completely out of left field.
Quote the holes in the report then, I'm not a mind reader, I have no idea what you consider a hole.
Dude, it's obvious you haven't a clue what you'e talking about otherwise you would have at least shown some examples.
Point of the investigation was to investigate Russian interference. He found that. Also was told to investigate crimes he found while making his investigation. He did that. He also found many connections between Trump associates and Russia. Claiming no connection is a partisan and false claim. A lie. A talking point lie.so what's your point? that was the point of the investigation, and there wasn't anything as you just posted. So what?Nonsense, lots of Russian connections. No prosecutorial criminal conspiracy in Mueller's opinion, but that is not the same as "no connection".... and still no Russian connectionIf public support grows, they will impeach. Theory of the leadership in the House, the body tasked with impeachment proceedings, is that the Senate would acquit and do several negative things for Democrats. Hence, the game plan is to methodically put forth damaging information on Trump and build support for impeachment to a point where Republicans in the Senate will be seriously damaged if they acquit when overwhelming evidence proves Trump is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors.Or obstruction
The proof is that the demp are not impeaching
It's that simple.
Talk is cheap
yeah, how? he never fking looked at any device of the DNC. no one has. That's all fking show! tell me which federal agency has? it's all fairy dust....FAIRY DUST!!!!
no, we want the link that shows trump's guilt. we've been waiting three years now.why? so you can go NU UHN!!! w/o providing any links yourself? left's been doing that a lot lately. bitching at my links and calling them "right wing bullshit" yet, they provide nothing. how odd.Yes, I have....and it has numerous holes in it. Hell, you may as well ask me if I read the absurd Steele Dossier. LolHave you read it?
Everyone knows it has many holes in the report. It even looks like freakin' swiss cheese.
OK, list all the holes then.
anyway -
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective
The dossier is actually a series of reports—16 in all—that total 35 pages. Written in 2016, the dossier is a collection of raw intelligence. Steele neither evaluated nor synthesized the intelligence. He neither made nor rendered bottom-line judgments. The dossier is, quite simply and by design, raw reporting, not a finished intelligence product.
In that sense, the dossier is similar to an FBI 302 form or a DEA 6 form. Both of those forms are used by special agents of the FBI and DEA, respectively, to record what they are told by witnesses during investigations. The substance of these memoranda can be true or false, but the recording of information is (or should be) accurate. In that sense, notes taken by a special agent have much in common with the notes that a journalist might take while covering a story—the substance of those notes could be true or false, depending on what the source tells the journalist, but the transcription should be accurate.
----------
so this is simply "Raw Data" and a collection of shit people said. NONE OF IT VERIFIED.
now, i showed my work, you show me where the info was verified before being taken to FISA for a warrant.
well you won't do this either so let me -
DOJ inspector general found Carter Page FISA extensions were illegally obtained, Joe diGenova says
The Justice Department inspector general has determined the three Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant extensions against onetime Trump campaign aide Carter Page were illegally obtained, attorney Joe diGenova said on Thursday.
so this "information" was NOT verified, yet said it was in order to obtain the warrants. is this ok? use unverified info to obtain warrants to "monitor" people? if so great. then the (R)'s next time around can use unverified info and get warrants also. you can't do this just ONE way.
now - for shits n grins:
Trump Intelligence Allegations
have you ever actually read the report? first few pages interesting, highlighted parts. how can this be so wrong? if ANY of this were true mueller would have found it, right? i mean lord knows he was looking.
your turn. provide links, not just snark, to prove your mindset.
You want me to provide a link that proves a negative? The guy said there were holes in the Mueller report, I asked him to prove it, he can't.
Quote the holes in the report then, I'm not a mind reader, I have no idea what you consider a hole.
Dude, it's obvious you haven't a clue what you'e talking about otherwise you would have at least shown some examples.
Don't be an ass...go read the report
no, we want the link that shows trump's guilt. we've been waiting three years now.why? so you can go NU UHN!!! w/o providing any links yourself? left's been doing that a lot lately. bitching at my links and calling them "right wing bullshit" yet, they provide nothing. how odd.Yes, I have....and it has numerous holes in it. Hell, you may as well ask me if I read the absurd Steele Dossier. LolHave you read it?
Everyone knows it has many holes in the report. It even looks like freakin' swiss cheese.
OK, list all the holes then.
anyway -
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective
The dossier is actually a series of reports—16 in all—that total 35 pages. Written in 2016, the dossier is a collection of raw intelligence. Steele neither evaluated nor synthesized the intelligence. He neither made nor rendered bottom-line judgments. The dossier is, quite simply and by design, raw reporting, not a finished intelligence product.
In that sense, the dossier is similar to an FBI 302 form or a DEA 6 form. Both of those forms are used by special agents of the FBI and DEA, respectively, to record what they are told by witnesses during investigations. The substance of these memoranda can be true or false, but the recording of information is (or should be) accurate. In that sense, notes taken by a special agent have much in common with the notes that a journalist might take while covering a story—the substance of those notes could be true or false, depending on what the source tells the journalist, but the transcription should be accurate.
----------
so this is simply "Raw Data" and a collection of shit people said. NONE OF IT VERIFIED.
now, i showed my work, you show me where the info was verified before being taken to FISA for a warrant.
well you won't do this either so let me -
DOJ inspector general found Carter Page FISA extensions were illegally obtained, Joe diGenova says
The Justice Department inspector general has determined the three Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant extensions against onetime Trump campaign aide Carter Page were illegally obtained, attorney Joe diGenova said on Thursday.
so this "information" was NOT verified, yet said it was in order to obtain the warrants. is this ok? use unverified info to obtain warrants to "monitor" people? if so great. then the (R)'s next time around can use unverified info and get warrants also. you can't do this just ONE way.
now - for shits n grins:
Trump Intelligence Allegations
have you ever actually read the report? first few pages interesting, highlighted parts. how can this be so wrong? if ANY of this were true mueller would have found it, right? i mean lord knows he was looking.
your turn. provide links, not just snark, to prove your mindset.
You want me to provide a link that proves a negative? The guy said there were holes in the Mueller report, I asked him to prove it, he can't.
the hole is no statement of guilt. it's simple, you can link the part that shows guilt.Quote the holes in the report then, I'm not a mind reader, I have no idea what you consider a hole.
Dude, it's obvious you haven't a clue what you'e talking about otherwise you would have at least shown some examples.
Don't be an ass...go read the report
Yes, you should and when you make a claim about what's in it, quote it or at least find a link somewhere that backs up what you're saying.
Much better than throwing out an argument and then having others come to the conclusion that you just say shit for the sake of it.
no guilt presented right? not one word of guilt, correct? please post that link.no, we want the link that shows trump's guilt. we've been waiting three years now.why? so you can go NU UHN!!! w/o providing any links yourself? left's been doing that a lot lately. bitching at my links and calling them "right wing bullshit" yet, they provide nothing. how odd.Yes, I have....and it has numerous holes in it. Hell, you may as well ask me if I read the absurd Steele Dossier. Lol
Everyone knows it has many holes in the report. It even looks like freakin' swiss cheese.
OK, list all the holes then.
anyway -
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective
The dossier is actually a series of reports—16 in all—that total 35 pages. Written in 2016, the dossier is a collection of raw intelligence. Steele neither evaluated nor synthesized the intelligence. He neither made nor rendered bottom-line judgments. The dossier is, quite simply and by design, raw reporting, not a finished intelligence product.
In that sense, the dossier is similar to an FBI 302 form or a DEA 6 form. Both of those forms are used by special agents of the FBI and DEA, respectively, to record what they are told by witnesses during investigations. The substance of these memoranda can be true or false, but the recording of information is (or should be) accurate. In that sense, notes taken by a special agent have much in common with the notes that a journalist might take while covering a story—the substance of those notes could be true or false, depending on what the source tells the journalist, but the transcription should be accurate.
----------
so this is simply "Raw Data" and a collection of shit people said. NONE OF IT VERIFIED.
now, i showed my work, you show me where the info was verified before being taken to FISA for a warrant.
well you won't do this either so let me -
DOJ inspector general found Carter Page FISA extensions were illegally obtained, Joe diGenova says
The Justice Department inspector general has determined the three Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant extensions against onetime Trump campaign aide Carter Page were illegally obtained, attorney Joe diGenova said on Thursday.
so this "information" was NOT verified, yet said it was in order to obtain the warrants. is this ok? use unverified info to obtain warrants to "monitor" people? if so great. then the (R)'s next time around can use unverified info and get warrants also. you can't do this just ONE way.
now - for shits n grins:
Trump Intelligence Allegations
have you ever actually read the report? first few pages interesting, highlighted parts. how can this be so wrong? if ANY of this were true mueller would have found it, right? i mean lord knows he was looking.
your turn. provide links, not just snark, to prove your mindset.
You want me to provide a link that proves a negative? The guy said there were holes in the Mueller report, I asked him to prove it, he can't.
Neat, I'm waiting for the guy who made a claim to back it up.
You can read about the 10 examples of possible obstruction here:
These are the 10 episodes Mueller investigated for obstruction of justice
the hole is no statement of guilt. it's simple, you can link the part that shows guilt.Quote the holes in the report then, I'm not a mind reader, I have no idea what you consider a hole.
Dude, it's obvious you haven't a clue what you'e talking about otherwise you would have at least shown some examples.
Don't be an ass...go read the report
Yes, you should and when you make a claim about what's in it, quote it or at least find a link somewhere that backs up what you're saying.
Much better than throwing out an argument and then having others come to the conclusion that you just say shit for the sake of it.
These are the 10 episodes Mueller investigated for obstruction of justice
Yes it is...because none of it is even true.That's not a hole, dingus.
no guilt presented right? not one word of guilt, correct? please post that link.no, we want the link that shows trump's guilt. we've been waiting three years now.why? so you can go NU UHN!!! w/o providing any links yourself? left's been doing that a lot lately. bitching at my links and calling them "right wing bullshit" yet, they provide nothing. how odd.OK, list all the holes then.
anyway -
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective
The dossier is actually a series of reports—16 in all—that total 35 pages. Written in 2016, the dossier is a collection of raw intelligence. Steele neither evaluated nor synthesized the intelligence. He neither made nor rendered bottom-line judgments. The dossier is, quite simply and by design, raw reporting, not a finished intelligence product.
In that sense, the dossier is similar to an FBI 302 form or a DEA 6 form. Both of those forms are used by special agents of the FBI and DEA, respectively, to record what they are told by witnesses during investigations. The substance of these memoranda can be true or false, but the recording of information is (or should be) accurate. In that sense, notes taken by a special agent have much in common with the notes that a journalist might take while covering a story—the substance of those notes could be true or false, depending on what the source tells the journalist, but the transcription should be accurate.
----------
so this is simply "Raw Data" and a collection of shit people said. NONE OF IT VERIFIED.
now, i showed my work, you show me where the info was verified before being taken to FISA for a warrant.
well you won't do this either so let me -
DOJ inspector general found Carter Page FISA extensions were illegally obtained, Joe diGenova says
The Justice Department inspector general has determined the three Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant extensions against onetime Trump campaign aide Carter Page were illegally obtained, attorney Joe diGenova said on Thursday.
so this "information" was NOT verified, yet said it was in order to obtain the warrants. is this ok? use unverified info to obtain warrants to "monitor" people? if so great. then the (R)'s next time around can use unverified info and get warrants also. you can't do this just ONE way.
now - for shits n grins:
Trump Intelligence Allegations
have you ever actually read the report? first few pages interesting, highlighted parts. how can this be so wrong? if ANY of this were true mueller would have found it, right? i mean lord knows he was looking.
your turn. provide links, not just snark, to prove your mindset.
You want me to provide a link that proves a negative? The guy said there were holes in the Mueller report, I asked him to prove it, he can't.
Neat, I'm waiting for the guy who made a claim to back it up.
You can read about the 10 examples of possible obstruction here:
These are the 10 episodes Mueller investigated for obstruction of justice
In our country, one is innocent until proven guilty. so show the guilt! you are saying that. go for it, in the report.
Yes it is...because none of it is even true.That's not a hole, dingus.
You claimed "no connection", a factually incorrect statement.Point of the investigation was to investigate Russian interference. He found that. Also was told to investigate crimes he found while making his investigation. He did that. He also found many connections between Trump associates and Russia. Claiming no connection is a partisan and false claim. A lie. A talking point lie.so what's your point? that was the point of the investigation, and there wasn't anything as you just posted. So what?Nonsense, lots of Russian connections. No prosecutorial criminal conspiracy in Mueller's opinion, but that is not the same as "no connection".... and still no Russian connectionIf public support grows, they will impeach. Theory of the leadership in the House, the body tasked with impeachment proceedings, is that the Senate would acquit and do several negative things for Democrats. Hence, the game plan is to methodically put forth damaging information on Trump and build support for impeachment to a point where Republicans in the Senate will be seriously damaged if they acquit when overwhelming evidence proves Trump is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors.
I'm much smarter than you obviously, cause in order to make a claim, one would have to actually physically look into the claim. none of which ever fking happened.
No, but rather because some MORON claimed Trump has "been pretty bad,"
...because Job Growth never happened before Trump got to the WH?
what could would it do if you only reply back with snark and no point of your own?a link to much of anything at all as a reference point would be nice. otherwise you're just being antagonistic cause that's your goal.why? so you can go NU UHN!!! w/o providing any links yourself? left's been doing that a lot lately. bitching at my links and calling them "right wing bullshit" yet, they provide nothing. how odd.Yes, I have....and it has numerous holes in it. Hell, you may as well ask me if I read the absurd Steele Dossier. Lol
Everyone knows it has many holes in the report. It even looks like freakin' swiss cheese.
OK, list all the holes then.
anyway -
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective
The dossier is actually a series of reports—16 in all—that total 35 pages. Written in 2016, the dossier is a collection of raw intelligence. Steele neither evaluated nor synthesized the intelligence. He neither made nor rendered bottom-line judgments. The dossier is, quite simply and by design, raw reporting, not a finished intelligence product.
In that sense, the dossier is similar to an FBI 302 form or a DEA 6 form. Both of those forms are used by special agents of the FBI and DEA, respectively, to record what they are told by witnesses during investigations. The substance of these memoranda can be true or false, but the recording of information is (or should be) accurate. In that sense, notes taken by a special agent have much in common with the notes that a journalist might take while covering a story—the substance of those notes could be true or false, depending on what the source tells the journalist, but the transcription should be accurate.
----------
so this is simply "Raw Data" and a collection of shit people said. NONE OF IT VERIFIED.
now, i showed my work, you show me where the info was verified before being taken to FISA for a warrant.
well you won't do this either so let me -
DOJ inspector general found Carter Page FISA extensions were illegally obtained, Joe diGenova says
The Justice Department inspector general has determined the three Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant extensions against onetime Trump campaign aide Carter Page were illegally obtained, attorney Joe diGenova said on Thursday.
so this "information" was NOT verified, yet said it was in order to obtain the warrants. is this ok? use unverified info to obtain warrants to "monitor" people? if so great. then the (R)'s next time around can use unverified info and get warrants also. you can't do this just ONE way.
now - for shits n grins:
Trump Intelligence Allegations
have you ever actually read the report? first few pages interesting, highlighted parts. how can this be so wrong? if ANY of this were true mueller would have found it, right? i mean lord knows he was looking.
your turn. provide links, not just snark, to prove your mindset.
You want me to provide a link that proves a negative? The guy said there were holes in the Mueller report, I asked him to prove it, he can't.
It would be nice so when c h i g o provides that to demonstrate what he is talking about we will have that reference point.
on interference that's correct. I'm not even sure that russia actually did anything, since no one actually subpoena'd the DNC server. And, no one has presented on voter that changed their vote based on russia. you're free to accommodate that request anytime you feel like it. but we know you won't.You claimed "no connection", a factually incorrect statement.Point of the investigation was to investigate Russian interference. He found that. Also was told to investigate crimes he found while making his investigation. He did that. He also found many connections between Trump associates and Russia. Claiming no connection is a partisan and false claim. A lie. A talking point lie.so what's your point? that was the point of the investigation, and there wasn't anything as you just posted. So what?Nonsense, lots of Russian connections. No prosecutorial criminal conspiracy in Mueller's opinion, but that is not the same as "no connection".... and still no Russian connection
I'm much smarter than you obviously, cause in order to make a claim, one would have to actually physically look into the claim. none of which ever fking happened.
