Lewdog
Gold Member
Like a police force, they came in after the crime and looked for evidenceSo far we have CIA, FBI and NSA confirming Russian involvementWhich of the many Intel Agencies that are making claims about Russian hacking have EVER been granted access to the DNC servers in question?
I ASK THAT because the FBI NEVER got access to the DNC servers. Instead the DNC hire CrowdStrike. Which is almost EXCLUSIVELY funded by Google. The same Google who was on the WHouse guest login far more than any other commercial organization. And all of the analysis I've seen is largely based on THEIR opinions.
Did anyone ask the lying bastard DNI -- if they EVER got direct access to the DNC servers for forensics? If so WHEN? And was all the forensic data preserved?
We have Trump, Breitbart and Hannity denying it
Doesn't much matter WHO is confirming what does it? Not if the confirmers never used the THOUSANDS of Counter Cyber experts that YOU pay for. And if the evidence NEVER was put under Top Secret clearance protocol.
Why do you think ANYONE has a leg to stand on in politics and government if NONE of their agencies were involved in investigating and securing the servers?
The footprints led right back to the Russians
The footprints were never analyzed. Only CrowdStrike has been mentioned as a source of "evidence". Why do we NEED 7 different Counter Hacking groups if all we need to do is call up a "Google affiliate" company?
Fire all their asses.
Wrong a British firm came to the same conclusion... and so did Germany's intelligence agency.