I need an answer to this question..

[Ame®icano]

I complimented information that should've come from our media, had they did their job, and I don't mind that came from Wikileaks. Actually, it didn't come from Wikileaks, it came from the DNC leaker(s), Wikileaks just published it.

On the second part of your post, what can I say... you kid can't do anything on your own.

Wikileaks has said they got the info from Gucifer 2.0. You Trump supporters are quite odd ducks that you selectively believe what someone says to fit your agenda.

a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%

b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.


Sure looks like the leaks helped the career criminal, huh?

You guys can't make up your minds. I thought you said all the polls were wrong.

Did ever occurred to you that polls were wrong before and after the Wikileaks?

No?

You have a reading comprehension problem. She just stated that the RESULTS matched the polls.

Polls were wrong in both cases, since nearly all favored Clinton.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Wrong, you just complimented the information from WikiLeaks. If it was not good enough to influence people's votes on the election then it wouldn't be quality stuff...

You just got caught talking out of both sides of your mouth.

I complimented information that should've come from our media, had they did their job, and I don't mind that came from Wikileaks. Actually, it didn't come from Wikileaks, it came from the DNC leaker(s), Wikileaks just published it.

On the second part of your post, what can I say... you kid can't do anything on your own.

Wikileaks has said they got the info from Gucifer 2.0. You Trump supporters are quite odd ducks that you selectively believe what someone says to fit your agenda.

a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%

b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.


Sure looks like the leaks helped the career criminal, huh?

You guys can't make up your minds. I thought you said all the polls were wrong.

Did ever occurred to you that polls were wrong before and after the Wikileaks?

No?

Has it not yet occurred to you that Bill's wife is a career criminal and congenital liar?

I know it's only been 20 + years that the information has been available......

 

[PoliticalChic]

No, that's what you're saying.

What I said is that Wikileaks stuff was much better than anything lefties used against Trump.

What you just confirmed, and I stated few posts earlier, is that you're still talking out of your ass.

Wrong, you just complimented the information from WikiLeaks. If it was not good enough to influence people's votes on the election then it wouldn't be quality stuff...

You just got caught talking out of both sides of your mouth.

I complimented information that should've come from our media, had they did their job, and I don't mind that came from Wikileaks. Actually, it didn't come from Wikileaks, it came from the DNC leaker(s), Wikileaks just published it.

On the second part of your post, what can I say... you kid can't do anything on your own.

Wikileaks has said they got the info from Gucifer 2.0. You Trump supporters are quite odd ducks that you selectively believe what someone says to fit your agenda.

a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%

b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.


Sure looks like the leaks helped the career criminal, huh?

Lewd-og doesn't get it.

Purposefully.


It's a requirement for being a Liberal.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I complimented information that should've come from our media, had they did their job, and I don't mind that came from Wikileaks. Actually, it didn't come from Wikileaks, it came from the DNC leaker(s), Wikileaks just published it.

On the second part of your post, what can I say... you kid can't do anything on your own.

Wikileaks has said they got the info from Gucifer 2.0. You Trump supporters are quite odd ducks that you selectively believe what someone says to fit your agenda.

a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%

b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.


Sure looks like the leaks helped the career criminal, huh?

You guys can't make up your minds. I thought you said all the polls were wrong.

Sooo....proven undeniably wrong....your defense is to change the subject?

How long have you been a Liberal?

I don't think she knows what liberal is, but I'm pretty sure she knows what's "popular".

By the way, I notice you're still calling them "liberals", but why?

Because that's the name that communist John Dewey stole for them and applied to the Socialist Party....

...it has been accepted in the colloquial.

You must be thinking of classical liberals, conservatives.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I complimented information that should've come from our media, had they did their job, and I don't mind that came from Wikileaks. Actually, it didn't come from Wikileaks, it came from the DNC leaker(s), Wikileaks just published it.

On the second part of your post, what can I say... you kid can't do anything on your own.

Wikileaks has said they got the info from Gucifer 2.0. You Trump supporters are quite odd ducks that you selectively believe what someone says to fit your agenda.

a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%

b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.


Sure looks like the leaks helped the career criminal, huh?

You guys can't make up your minds. I thought you said all the polls were wrong.

Sooo....proven undeniably wrong....your defense is to change the subject?

How long have you been a Liberal?

You didn't prove me wrong... I'm simply amused that you choose to accept a source whenever it fits your argument.

Data doesn't apply for Liberals?

It truly is a mental disorder.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Wikileaks has said they got the info from Gucifer 2.0. You Trump supporters are quite odd ducks that you selectively believe what someone says to fit your agenda.

a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%

b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.


Sure looks like the leaks helped the career criminal, huh?

You guys can't make up your minds. I thought you said all the polls were wrong.

Did ever occurred to you that polls were wrong before and after the Wikileaks?

No?

You have a reading comprehension problem. She just stated that the RESULTS matched the polls.

Polls were wrong in both cases, since nearly all favored Clinton.

It was the candidate that was wrong.

 

[Ame®icano]

Wikileaks has said they got the info from Gucifer 2.0. You Trump supporters are quite odd ducks that you selectively believe what someone says to fit your agenda.

a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%

b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.


Sure looks like the leaks helped the career criminal, huh?

You guys can't make up your minds. I thought you said all the polls were wrong.

Sooo....proven undeniably wrong....your defense is to change the subject?

How long have you been a Liberal?

I don't think she knows what liberal is, but I'm pretty sure she knows what's "popular".

By the way, I notice you're still calling them "liberals", but why?

Because that's the name that communist John Dewey stole for them and applied to the Socialist Party....

...it has been accepted in the colloquial.

You must be thinking of classical liberals, conservatives.

That's why I am not calling them liberals, since they're not.