EconChick
Gold Member
- Feb 15, 2014
- 4,678
- 828
- 190
- Thread starter
- #221
The recent bombings and mortar attacks in Baghdad, including the attacks on checkpoints have been in the media. They just haven't been interpreted as indicating a capture of the road by ISIS. Nor has the attacks been viewed as hindering access to the road. If your criteria and interpretation are use it would mean the road was captured since the first day of the invasion. The road has been under constant attack since 2003. It has never been safe. As far as internet posting of Route Irish over the years, there are pages of them as well as youtube video's covering a decade of attacks on the road.[
Here, let me school you, genius. Taken or captured means ISIS has the ability to deny access to us and our allies. It means they've successfully carried out ambushes, planted IEDs, or have successfully attacked anywhere along the road that renders it inaccessible for our normal purposes.
.
Prove we don't have access to it
I already explained how I know.
Here, let me explain something else, idiot.
You and the other dolts who claim everything's got to be on the internet for it to be real crack the rest of us up.
You can't even find internet postings about all the activity that occurred on Route Irish over the years, can ya?????????
Does that mean they didn't happen?????? LOL.
Keep digging your hole, lib.
You have the Gruber disease, don't you?
You're trying to tell me enemy attacks on the road never hindered access, or operations? I can attest personally that you're wrong.The team I was with was disrupted numerous times.
I didn't say those attacks in the past didn't hinder access. I said the recent attacks were not hindering access. The road is still operational.
The road is ALWAYS operational. Denial of access is a different story.
Once ISIS displays the ability to deny access to Iris, it means IRAQ IS CERTAINLY NOT UNDER CONTROL.
You libs are missing the big picture as usual.