If a mother killing her own unborn child isn't wrong, then really, is anything wrong?

[ding]

Now you're just repeating strawman that have already been burnt to the ground. I regard them as dependent lives who shouldn't have a legal right to gestate inside another independent life.

Says the guy treating SOME human lives as property to be destroyed as his massa sees fit.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

That is your opinion, yes.

 

[jc456]

That is your opinion, yes.

Facts

 

[Curried Goats]

Says the guy treating SOME human lives as property to be destroyed as his massa sees fit.

I'm treating them as biologically dependent on the willingness of the person they are gestating inside of to allow them to continue doing so.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

You mean like human life begins at conception?

Of course human life begins at conception,

Sanctity of life begins when your supernatural worship object tells you it does. Jewish folk say first breath; Catholics say conception; my money is on the Jews over the Catholics because they were here first and some of them talked directly to the god of Abraham.

 

[initforme]

This issue is now in the hands of voters. It is what it is and WHAT SHOULD BE.

 

[ding]

I'm treating them as biologically dependent on the willingness of the person they are gestating inside of to allow them to continue doing so.

So property to be disposed of at the will of their massa's. Got it.

 

[ding]

That is your opinion, yes.

Property has no rights. Owners of property have rights.

 

[dblack]

This issue is now in the hands of voters. It is what it is and WHAT SHOULD BE.

Our rights should never be up to the whim of majority rule

 

[jc456]

I'm treating them as biologically dependent on the willingness of the person they are gestating inside of to allow them to continue doing so.

You wrote that with a straight face?

 

[initforme]

Our rights should never be up to the whim of majority rule

It is what it is...so be it. While I don't agree totally I shall not fight. Not my battle as a lifelong christian.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Our rights should never be up to the whim of majority rule

It should not be up to minority rule.

 

[dblack]

It should not be up to minority rule.

What does that even mean???

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The minority vote should not rule the majority vote.

What does that even mean???

 

[dblack]

The minority vote should not rule the majority vote.

Yeah. What's that have to do with what I said? It's just a weird retort, but ubiquitous from liberals. Every time I point out that majority rule is often a bad idea, liberals throw out this "minority rule" nonsense. As if it's the only other alternative.

Our rights aren't up to majority rule. They depend on the Constitution, and therefore it requires much more than a simple majority to change them. Not "minority rule" (whatever that supposed to mean), but a super majority - real consensus.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Yes, majority rule by the Court, or by the voting public, not by the dumb butt maga minority,

 

[dblack]

Yes, majority rule by the Court, or by the voting public, not by the dumb butt maga minority,

What?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Why are you even voting if you think the fix is in.

 

[Dayton3]

Mind your own business.

Rule of thumb: inside someoit's everyne else's body? None of your fucking business.

It's is everyones business

 

[NotfooledbyW]

It's is everyones business

There is no harm to civil order so no business of the government to ban abortion for the purpose of keeping civil order.

Name the harm please.