Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
- Feb 8, 2011
- 110,434
- 39,503
Ummm, California is a donor state which means they give more than they take. Dumbass.'If California continues to rebel against the United States, the Army can march in and fuck it up'
Between mudslides, earthquakes, fires, floods, Illegals, fruits, flakes, and nuts - God, Illegals, and Liberals are 'f*ing it up' just fine all by themselves. Stripping them of all federal funds will just help expedite their demise.
Which States Are Givers and Which Are Takers?
California took a Trillion dollars of Porkulus. Donor it ain't. When the Atlantic or other leftist sources compile their junk statistics, they carefully avoid including such expenditures.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act | Federal Funds Information for States
Further, the whole "red state takes welfare" bullshit you Soros drones spew is a fabrication;
{
Clearly, the so-called red states are far more likely overall to vote for a Republican presidential candidate than his Democratic counterpart when compared to the supposed blue states. But look at New Mexico, West Virginia, New Hampshire, Nevada, and Colorado. New Mexico, Virginia, and New Hampshire have been evenly split on presidential candidates since 1980. Nevada and Colorado voted for both Bush 43 wins, and Colorado even went Republican during the 1996 Clinton landslide.
At the senatorial level, how can you call North Dakota, Louisiana, and West Virginia "red states" when their voting record is overwhelmingly Democratic over the past three decades? Even South Dakota and New Mexico fail the "red state" test. West Virginia hasn't had a Republican senator since before 1960!}
Articles: The Myth of Red State Welfare