If Dems refuse to denounce incitement to harassment and murder, make them own it

Millions of illegals vote in every election in California. The state registers them, guarantees protection for prosecution, and encourages them to vote.

So Nazi, do you think that voting for president should be restricted to California and New York? That the rest of the nation should be prohibited from voting?

Wow. Your'r having a really hard time hanging on to reality there, aren't you?


Lying won't work Nazi, even if you wrap it in faux mockery. For a person to be affected by mockery, they have to care what you say.

You're a lying Nazi fuck, what you spew is irrelevant.

{
A research group in New Jersey has taken a fresh look at postelection polling data and concluded that the number of noncitizens voting illegally in U.S. elections is likely far greater than previous estimates.

As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, which put Barack Obama in the White House.

The research organization Just Facts, a widely cited, independent think tank led by self-described conservatives and libertarians, revealed its number-crunching in a report on national immigration.

Just Facts President James D. Agresti and his team looked at data from an extensive Harvard/YouGov study that every two years questions a sample size of tens of thousands of voters. Some acknowledge they are noncitizens and are thus ineligible to vote.

Just Facts’ conclusions confront both sides in the illegal voting debate: those who say it happens a lot and those who say the problem nonexistent.}


Noncitizen illegal vote number higher than estimated

It would be a waste of time to show you where you are wrong, because you make it clear your mind is made up and facts just don't matter. You're nuts, and I'll pray for you.


Derp.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._supposed_to_worry_about_illegals_voting.html

Yep. American Thinker falls in the Derp category.


Poor Nazi - life is just a bitch for you. You honestly thought you had this nation defeated - then Trump won and it's you Nazi fucks who are defeated.
 
Wow. Your'r having a really hard time hanging on to reality there, aren't you?


Lying won't work Nazi, even if you wrap it in faux mockery. For a person to be affected by mockery, they have to care what you say.

You're a lying Nazi fuck, what you spew is irrelevant.

{
A research group in New Jersey has taken a fresh look at postelection polling data and concluded that the number of noncitizens voting illegally in U.S. elections is likely far greater than previous estimates.

As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, which put Barack Obama in the White House.

The research organization Just Facts, a widely cited, independent think tank led by self-described conservatives and libertarians, revealed its number-crunching in a report on national immigration.

Just Facts President James D. Agresti and his team looked at data from an extensive Harvard/YouGov study that every two years questions a sample size of tens of thousands of voters. Some acknowledge they are noncitizens and are thus ineligible to vote.

Just Facts’ conclusions confront both sides in the illegal voting debate: those who say it happens a lot and those who say the problem nonexistent.}


Noncitizen illegal vote number higher than estimated

It would be a waste of time to show you where you are wrong, because you make it clear your mind is made up and facts just don't matter. You're nuts, and I'll pray for you.


Derp.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._supposed_to_worry_about_illegals_voting.html

Yep. American Thinker falls in the Derp category.


Poor Nazi - life is just a bitch for you. You honestly thought you had this nation defeated - then Trump won and it's you Nazi fucks who are defeated.

Is that the way it looks in your reality?
 
Yeah? Against whites?

I’d better get very upset then. Maybe i can attack some negroes and blame it on “the left”?

You'll do violence against anyone if you think it will further your war against the United States Constitution.

You see whites as an impediment to your goal to establish a totalitarian state. Other than that, I doubt you care much about race.
 
No influential Dem is inciting murder.

You snowflakes need to get used to what happens when THE MINORITY TRIES TO RULE OVER THE MAJORITY in a free nation.

The majority will prevail. It is what it is.
So you're endorsing the use of violence against those you disagree with? Really?

Loser


In every case, Trump is talking about people who are trespassing against his rallies or who committed acts of violence themselves, like throwing tomatoes.


Trump is calling for violence, dope.


That you are a fucking liar does not alter reality, Nazi.
 
[

The majority of voters. There were at least 3 million more of us in the last election. It's a big part of why Trump hates being known as an illegitimate president.

Take a civics class, Nazi.

Millions of illegals voting in California does not remove the voice of the rest of America.

You think millions of illegals voted in California. You're pretty dumb, aren't you?


~~~~~~


The Left: An Unhinged Mob

If you think the leftist are unhinged now, wait until they lose the midterms in a few weeks.


It's gonna be epic!!!


It's going to be horrible, if the Nazicrats launch a full scale shooting war as I suspect they plan to do.
 
No influential Dem is inciting murder.

You snowflakes need to get used to what happens when THE MINORITY TRIES TO RULE OVER THE MAJORITY in a free nation.

The majority will prevail. It is what it is.

And when the majority is the right, incite violence which yes......can lead to death.

The only people I see getting killed or murdered here are Democrats and left wingers - by radical right wingers. And yet as usual, the right is crying "Victim".

For a generation, sexual assault statistics have shown that 1 in 3 women experience a sexual assault, in their lifetime. Most are assaulted by men they know, and yet they don't report it. Who are the "real victims", men who are accused without iron clad evidence. Not the women who have been assaulted or raped. Not according to right wingers. In the court of "he said/she said", even multiple similar accusations by unconnected women aren't sufficient evidence. It took 60 women to stop Bill Cosby. 19 women have accused Donald Trump and he was elected President.

But it wasn't the 60 women who were drugged and sexually assaulted by Bill Cosby who are the victims. It's poor old Bill, having his life ruined by these women who signed non-disclosure agreements.

I don't support anybody who comes out with crimes committed against them by somebody 5, 10, 15, 36 years ago. Sorry.

I also don't support people who say they have been violated with zero evidence to prove so. But that's the way our country works. A personal example:

Several years back I heard my address being called out on the police scanner. By the time I got my shoes on and went outside, I had five squad cars around my house. There was a guy in my driveway I never seen before. Apparently he was there to pick up his kids that my tenant (their uncle) was baby sitting. He refused to give the father his daughters because he was stone drunk, so the drunk refused to move his car.

The cops asked if he could park his car in my parking lot. I was not happy about it and asked the cop why this guy isn't going to jail for DUI? The officer replied because they have no evidence he was driving drunk; it would never hold up in court. Public intoxication was out of the picture too since when they came, he was on private property--mine. He was not trespassing because he came there to pickup his children.

There was only one way he could have got to my house, and that was by driving there drunk as a skunk. But in our justice system, we protect the guilty even if we have 99% proof they were guilty of something.
 
And what majority might that be?

The majority of voters. There were at least 3 million more of us in the last election. It's a big part of why Trump hates being known as an illegitimate president.

A couple big cities don’t decide the election, why is that so hard for idiots to understand?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm sure you think that is relevant somehow. If you think votes from big cities should count less than any other vote in the country, you should work to have the constitution changed.

Well, each state only gets two Senators to represent them. On your line of thinking, Rhode Island should only have one Senator and Texas should have twelve.

You seem to be confused. Each state does have 2 Senators, but that has nothing to do with vote totals. 100 votes for a particular office are still 100 votes. the number of Senators per state had no effect on Trump's vote count.

The point I'm making is that our founders didn't want mob rule, they didn't want total democracy. When they created the Congress, they made it so people had representatives in the house that equaled their population, but not in the Senate where you get two Senators whether you had 5,000 people in your state or 50,000. That gave everybody equity in our government.

In other words, the city of New York has over 7 million people. Just in that one city alone, they have more people than the six lowest populated states in the country. Now, do you think it would be fair that one city has more power than six states when it comes to the presidency?

The EC gives us a similar equity that we have in our Congress. We don't allow mob rule for obvious reasons. That's why our founders created it.

As for popular vote, it doesn't mean crap because we don't know what the popular vote would actually be like unless we had elections using the popular vote. Candidates would campaign differently; they would spend most of their time and money in the most populated states. More people would likely vote since their vote would not be a waste of time. For instance, it's a waste of time for a Republican to vote in the state of California because your vote doesn't count for anything using the EC. It would count if we were using the popular vote.
 
If Dems refuse to denounce incitement to harassment and murder, make them own it

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...rassment_and_murder_make_them_emownem_it.html
With Steve Scalise still needing canes to walk after surviving an attempted mass assassination of GOP congressmen; Maxine Waters loudly urging Democrats to harass Republicans whenever they venture out, even to "gasoline stations"; paid demonstrators pounding on the doors of the Supreme Court while the newest justice was sworn in; and the rank and file urging the murder of Justice Kavanaugh, the Republic now faces a crisis of political violence.
So far, nobody of standing in the Democratic Party is calling out the thugs operating as the Dems' enforcers.
I suspect that the political calculus among Republicans has been to let Waters shoot off her mouth and alienate more and more independent voters. But the risk of violence is such that this may be foolish. It is now time for President Trump to start calling them out, reinforced by as many voices as possible, telling the public that if they don't condemn it, they approve of the violence and harassment.
The worst among the Democrats have free rein to speak and act on their murderous fantasies.
Once political violence becomes common, the toothpaste is difficult to put back in the tube.


~~~~~~
The timid GOPers should be calling the Dims out left and right. Yes, make them own the uncalled for rhetoric, the childishness, the incitement to violence.
Sometimes rational people (voters) need to have the obvious told to them. Then they get it. Otherwise, the GOP is letting the Lame Stream Media continue to create the narratives.
We have witnessed more than two years of the most vile and hate-filled actions from the Progressive Marxist Socialists/DSA, the MSM, #OWS, #BLM, # Antifa, and militant snowflakes. It's time for a real reckoning that demands justice and the rule of law.
Really, the only thing that has surprised me about the Kavanaugh hearings is that people seem honestly astounded by the actions of the Democrats. Come on folks! Look back in history and they have used the same attacks since the Democrats have been a political party. They accused Lincoln of visiting "houses of ill repute" and almost any opponent they wanted to destroy, they accused of being a homosexual.
They are free to make these accusations and make wild promises because they have a solid base of Dead Dog Democrats, and they know it. We all know these people, There is nothing we can do about the Dead Dog Democrats. Fortunately, they are not the majority.
The thing that is different today is that we have the internet and we can quickly discover the protesters are being paid. We also noticed that Kavanaugh is an open book while Ford was quickly removed from the record. Nothing to hide? Then why hide?
IMO, let the Moonbat lunatics in the Democrat for Socialist America Party have free run to bay at the moon at full volume, and publicize their ravings. (When your opponents are busily engaged in destroying themselves do not get in their way!!!

YOU HAVE ZERO UNBIASED, FACTUAL PROOF THAT THE PARANOIA YOU ARE SPEWING FORTH WILL HAPPEN. ZERO.

ALL this is is the Trumpbots realization that their political power is fading. They will probably lose the House (and possibly the Senate) in a few weeks. And they will lose the White House in 2020.

Why the fuck would the left becpissed now that they are getting political power back?

I am FAR more worried about whacko, Trumpbot, gun bunnies shooting up the streets in anger over losing their power than I am the nonsense you are spewing forth.

You should be, because that's what happened in 2008, isn't it?
 
No influential Dem is inciting murder.

You snowflakes need to get used to what happens when THE MINORITY TRIES TO RULE OVER THE MAJORITY in a free nation.

The majority will prevail. It is what it is.

And when the majority is the right, incite violence which yes......can lead to death.

The only people I see getting killed or murdered here are Democrats and left wingers - by radical right wingers. And yet as usual, the right is crying "Victim".

For a generation, sexual assault statistics have shown that 1 in 3 women experience a sexual assault, in their lifetime. Most are assaulted by men they know, and yet they don't report it. Who are the "real victims", men who are accused without iron clad evidence. Not the women who have been assaulted or raped. Not according to right wingers. In the court of "he said/she said", even multiple similar accusations by unconnected women aren't sufficient evidence. It took 60 women to stop Bill Cosby. 19 women have accused Donald Trump and he was elected President.

But it wasn't the 60 women who were drugged and sexually assaulted by Bill Cosby who are the victims. It's poor old Bill, having his life ruined by these women who signed non-disclosure agreements.
Keep your head in the sand much? You watch Maddow don’t you?:auiqs.jpg:

Republicans are the ones with their heads in the sand. I'm watching a criminal administration violating human rights on the board - the rights of CHILDREN. One that criminally abuses the public purse, and one which operates to the detriment of the US government - cutting taxes increasing the deficit, starting trade wars, and trashing all previously negotiated agreements and treaties.
 
No influential Dem is inciting murder.

You snowflakes need to get used to what happens when THE MINORITY TRIES TO RULE OVER THE MAJORITY in a free nation.

The majority will prevail. It is what it is.

And when the majority is the right, incite violence which yes......can lead to death.

The only people I see getting killed or murdered here are Democrats and left wingers - by radical right wingers. And yet as usual, the right is crying "Victim".

For a generation, sexual assault statistics have shown that 1 in 3 women experience a sexual assault, in their lifetime. Most are assaulted by men they know, and yet they don't report it. Who are the "real victims", men who are accused without iron clad evidence. Not the women who have been assaulted or raped. Not according to right wingers. In the court of "he said/she said", even multiple similar accusations by unconnected women aren't sufficient evidence. It took 60 women to stop Bill Cosby. 19 women have accused Donald Trump and he was elected President.

But it wasn't the 60 women who were drugged and sexually assaulted by Bill Cosby who are the victims. It's poor old Bill, having his life ruined by these women who signed non-disclosure agreements.
Keep your head in the sand much? You watch Maddow don’t you?:auiqs.jpg:

Republicans are the ones with their heads in the sand. I'm watching a criminal administration violating human rights on the board - the rights of CHILDREN. One that criminally abuses the public purse, and one which operates to the detriment of the US government - cutting taxes increasing the deficit, starting trade wars, and trashing all previously negotiated agreements and treaties.

Which is within the right of the majority to do. There are no civil rights of children being violated in this country.
 
No influential Dem is inciting murder.

You snowflakes need to get used to what happens when THE MINORITY TRIES TO RULE OVER THE MAJORITY in a free nation.

The majority will prevail. It is what it is.

And when the majority is the right, incite violence which yes......can lead to death.

The only people I see getting killed or murdered here are Democrats and left wingers - by radical right wingers. And yet as usual, the right is crying "Victim".

For a generation, sexual assault statistics have shown that 1 in 3 women experience a sexual assault, in their lifetime. Most are assaulted by men they know, and yet they don't report it. Who are the "real victims", men who are accused without iron clad evidence. Not the women who have been assaulted or raped. Not according to right wingers. In the court of "he said/she said", even multiple similar accusations by unconnected women aren't sufficient evidence. It took 60 women to stop Bill Cosby. 19 women have accused Donald Trump and he was elected President.

But it wasn't the 60 women who were drugged and sexually assaulted by Bill Cosby who are the victims. It's poor old Bill, having his life ruined by these women who signed non-disclosure agreements.
Keep your head in the sand much? You watch Maddow don’t you?:auiqs.jpg:

Republicans are the ones with their heads in the sand. I'm watching a criminal administration violating human rights on the board - the rights of CHILDREN. One that criminally abuses the public purse, and one which operates to the detriment of the US government - cutting taxes increasing the deficit, starting trade wars, and trashing all previously negotiated agreements and treaties.
I like a President that operates to the detriment of the U.S. Government, which is the biggest threat to my life and my freedom. No one is buying your bullshit that Trump runs a criminal administration that violates human rights. He's exactly the president this country needs.
 
Last edited:
No influential Dem is inciting murder.

You snowflakes need to get used to what happens when THE MINORITY TRIES TO RULE OVER THE MAJORITY in a free nation.

The majority will prevail. It is what it is.

And when the majority is the right, incite violence which yes......can lead to death.

The only people I see getting killed or murdered here are Democrats and left wingers - by radical right wingers. And yet as usual, the right is crying "Victim".

For a generation, sexual assault statistics have shown that 1 in 3 women experience a sexual assault, in their lifetime. Most are assaulted by men they know, and yet they don't report it. Who are the "real victims", men who are accused without iron clad evidence. Not the women who have been assaulted or raped. Not according to right wingers. In the court of "he said/she said", even multiple similar accusations by unconnected women aren't sufficient evidence. It took 60 women to stop Bill Cosby. 19 women have accused Donald Trump and he was elected President.

But it wasn't the 60 women who were drugged and sexually assaulted by Bill Cosby who are the victims. It's poor old Bill, having his life ruined by these women who signed non-disclosure agreements.

I don't support anybody who comes out with crimes committed against them by somebody 5, 10, 15, 36 years ago. Sorry.

I also don't support people who say they have been violated with zero evidence to prove so. But that's the way our country works. A personal example:

Several years back I heard my address being called out on the police scanner. By the time I got my shoes on and went outside, I had five squad cars around my house. There was a guy in my driveway I never seen before. Apparently he was there to pick up his kids that my tenant (their uncle) was baby sitting. He refused to give the father his daughters because he was stone drunk, so the drunk refused to move his car.

The cops asked if he could park his car in my parking lot. I was not happy about it and asked the cop why this guy isn't going to jail for DUI? The officer replied because they have no evidence he was driving drunk; it would never hold up in court. Public intoxication was out of the picture too since when they came, he was on private property--mine. He was not trespassing because he came there to pickup his children.

There was only one way he could have got to my house, and that was by driving there drunk as a skunk. But in our justice system, we protect the guilty even if we have 99% proof they were guilty of something.

What state was this? In some states all that's needed for DUI is have the keys on your person. The car could be parked. You could be passed out drunk in your living room. If the keys are on you that's enough.
 
[

The majority of voters. There were at least 3 million more of us in the last election. It's a big part of why Trump hates being known as an illegitimate president.

Take a civics class, Nazi.

Millions of illegals voting in California does not remove the voice of the rest of America.

You think millions of illegals voted in California. You're pretty dumb, aren't you?


~~~~~~


The Left: An Unhinged Mob

If you think the leftist are unhinged now, wait until they lose the midterms in a few weeks.


It's gonna be epic!!!


It's going to be horrible, if the Nazicrats launch a full scale shooting war as I suspect they plan to do.


You've predicted a shooting war so many times. What will you do if you are disappointed again?
 
That’s the truth of it :21: liberals are cowards.

Where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that all 'liberals are cowards'?

I guarantee you cannot provide even one.
Attacks on Kavanaugh and his family were cowardly. Give me a second...I will post one for you dick head.

A) you said 'liberals are cowards'. That means ALL of them are cowards.

I will ask you again, please provide a link to unbiased proof that all liberals are cowards.
I guarantee that you cannot.

Which means your statement is nonsense.

B) why are you fixated on the head of my penis? Some sort of homosexual fantasy or something?
A.) abortion is cowardly and ALL Democrats want to kill babies.
B. ) judging by your avatar if you have a penis it would be the size of and look like a pop rivet.:21:

“All democrats want to kill babies."

Whaddya say Mac1958, is this guy PC?
Um, well, no. Obviously.

My goodness. Get me out of your head.
.
 
Last edited:
Where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that all 'liberals are cowards'?

I guarantee you cannot provide even one.
Attacks on Kavanaugh and his family were cowardly. Give me a second...I will post one for you dick head.

A) you said 'liberals are cowards'. That means ALL of them are cowards.

I will ask you again, please provide a link to unbiased proof that all liberals are cowards.
I guarantee that you cannot.

Which means your statement is nonsense.

B) why are you fixated on the head of my penis? Some sort of homosexual fantasy or something?
A.) abortion is cowardly and ALL Democrats want to kill babies.
B. ) judging by your avatar if you have a penis it would be the size of and look like a pop rivet.:21:

“All democrats want to kill babies."

Whaddya say Mac1958, is this guy PC?
Um, well, no. Obviously.

My goodness. Get me out of your head.
.

You failed again. If you ever decide to apply your standards across the spectrum, you might convince someone that you are interested in making improvements to the level of discourse.

As an aside, how did you like the way Eddie Glaude and Rebecca Traister put a damper on Bill Maher's anti-PC rant last night? Did you actually listen to.what they were saying, or were you deafened due to outrage over someone feeling the need to issue an apology?
 
Attacks on Kavanaugh and his family were cowardly. Give me a second...I will post one for you dick head.

A) you said 'liberals are cowards'. That means ALL of them are cowards.

I will ask you again, please provide a link to unbiased proof that all liberals are cowards.
I guarantee that you cannot.

Which means your statement is nonsense.

B) why are you fixated on the head of my penis? Some sort of homosexual fantasy or something?
A.) abortion is cowardly and ALL Democrats want to kill babies.
B. ) judging by your avatar if you have a penis it would be the size of and look like a pop rivet.:21:

“All democrats want to kill babies."

Whaddya say Mac1958, is this guy PC?
Um, well, no. Obviously.

My goodness. Get me out of your head.
.

You failed again. If you ever decide to apply your standards across the spectrum, you might convince someone that you are interested in making improvements to the level of discourse.

As an aside, how did you like the way Eddie Glaude and Rebecca Traister put a damper on Bill Maher's anti-PC rant last night? Did you actually listen to.what they were saying, or were you deafened due to outrage over someone feeling the need to issue an apology?
I'm sure that's all very interesting.

Thanks so much.

Please get me out of your head.
.
 

Forum List

Back
Top