JoeMoma
Platinum Member
- Nov 22, 2014
- 22,978
- 10,705
Okay thanks. It's nice that we no longer have the mile long layers of quotes, but having only the previous quote is sometimes hard to follow.He is talking about congress.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay thanks. It's nice that we no longer have the mile long layers of quotes, but having only the previous quote is sometimes hard to follow.He is talking about congress.
Is it a human life or not?If it is not viable it will not live. Most all abortions are performed when the fetus is not viable. Period.
We have age appropriate sex ed curriculums. Aborted fetuses can be used in medical experiments like most other medical waste. It's up to the parents as to what is done with the remains. Experiments on human tissue that was medical waste has been a great boon for mankind. Look at the HeLa cell line.That's bullshit, Boo. Sex is being promoted in all our schools. We are birthing infants and carving them up and selling them. Google the U.of Pittsburgh and the accolades they have received for selling the freshest baby parts around. And now, perinatal death bills are rearing their ugly heads around the country.
Since we don't mind indoctrination of our children by the teacher's union, why not indoctrinate them in how to not get pregnant instead of wisking them off to abortion clinics while the parents think their child is in math class...
Truth.dodge.
What does "shall not be infringed" mean?As the 2nd give the right to bear arms, the 1st gives the right to bare bodies.
But both can have laws that limit that exercise.
What's so hard to understand about that?
In many cases, states choose simply not enforce federal law. California and Immigration law for example.Federal law, passed unanimously by both parties, prevents post birth infanticide in every state.
What does "well regulated" mean?What does "shall not be infringed" mean?
No, you are saying children will not suffer as a result of child protective service agancies being overwhelmed is abortions are banned. and your basis is women will nto become pregnant at the same rate as now.Truth.
Or they could just take a bus to nearby state where they let women kill their babies. Inconvenient? Maybe. But it’s much worse for the baby.What is so bad about allowing each state to legislate the abortion laws according to what their citizens want? If their citizens don't like it then they can vote the bastards out in the next election and change the law. Why should people living in any state have any say at all over what people living in another state decide to do?
he was DRUNK!!!By Susie Madrak — May 3, 2022
In between his paeans to beer, Brett Kavanaugh repeatedly told senators during his 2018 nomination hearing that women’s right to an abortion has been affirmed.
“The Supreme Court has recognized the right to an abortion since the 1973 Roe v. Wade case — has affirmed it many times,” he told Lindsey Graham.
Kavanaugh stressed to Dianne Feinstein “the importance of the precedent” under the previous court rulings and a “woman has a constitutional right to obtain an abortion before viability.” He said plainly that Roe was "settled law."
Oh NO! The Kav was lying!
And Susan Collins should have been more "concerned"
If children are not killed before birth, then they might suffer.No, you are saying children will not suffer as a result of child protective service agancies being overwhelmed is abortions are banned. and your basis is women will nto become pregnant at the same rate as now.
That is for the SCOTUS to interpret, then reinterpret, then reinterpret, then reinterpret, then reinterpret, etc.I'm sure, but it still says that the people have the right to bear arms.
Human yes, living yes. Viable, separate from the host, depends on the time of gestation, and even then it's not a clear cut line. With life, it never is.Is it a human life or not?
Have you forgotten #cut the check? lol.
that's a karen argument.Or they could just take a bus to nearby state where they let women kill their babies. Inconvenient? Maybe. But it’s much worse for the baby.
ah, but the poster was saying babies will be protected, and overurning Roe does nothing for childrne who will be in places where protective servesare are nonfucntional, and good christians don't want higher taxes.If children are not killed before birth, then they might suffer.
It is a human imo....!!!You didn't answer my question. Is a fetus a human life, period?
Interesting little thought...Human yes, living yes. Viable, separate from the host, depends on the time of gestation, and even then it's not a clear cut line. With life, it never is.
It will be interesting to see the final opinion. Under the 14th, a "person" must be born. Under Casey, a State has a legitimate interest in the potential for life. But the 6 Republican Justices seem to want to overturn Casey in order to find a woman has no right to terminate a pregancy is state law prohibits that.Interesting little thought...
Ever been to a funeral for a 12 week miscarriage? Nope, and neither has anyone else.
Ever been to a funeral for someone who was brain dead before they died? Maybe. Lots of people have.
What distinguishes these two states (12 week fetus, 30 year old, brain dead human)? We easily see the similarities.
The difference is the connections, memories, the life experience, the social ties, etc.
A mother has these, and a fetus does not.