If RvW Is Overturned

That's bullshit, Boo. Sex is being promoted in all our schools. We are birthing infants and carving them up and selling them. Google the U.of Pittsburgh and the accolades they have received for selling the freshest baby parts around. And now, perinatal death bills are rearing their ugly heads around the country.

Since we don't mind indoctrination of our children by the teacher's union, why not indoctrinate them in how to not get pregnant instead of wisking them off to abortion clinics while the parents think their child is in math class...
We have age appropriate sex ed curriculums. Aborted fetuses can be used in medical experiments like most other medical waste. It's up to the parents as to what is done with the remains. Experiments on human tissue that was medical waste has been a great boon for mankind. Look at the HeLa cell line.

Federal law, passed unanimously by both parties, prevents post birth infanticide in every state.

Television (and internet) teaches them more (so much more) that the schools do.
 
As the 2nd give the right to bear arms, the 1st gives the right to bare bodies.

But both can have laws that limit that exercise.

What's so hard to understand about that?
What does "shall not be infringed" mean?
 
By Susie Madrak — May 3, 2022
In between his paeans to beer, Brett Kavanaugh repeatedly told senators during his 2018 nomination hearing that women’s right to an abortion has been affirmed.

“The Supreme Court has recognized the right to an abortion since the 1973 Roe v. Wade case — has affirmed it many times,” he told Lindsey Graham.




Kavanaugh stressed to Dianne Feinstein “the importance of the precedent” under the previous court rulings and a “woman has a constitutional right to obtain an abortion before viability.” He said plainly that Roe was "settled law."

Oh NO! The Kav was lying!

And Susan Collins should have been more "concerned"
 
No, you are saying children will not suffer as a result of child protective service agancies being overwhelmed is abortions are banned. and your basis is women will nto become pregnant at the same rate as now.
 
What is so bad about allowing each state to legislate the abortion laws according to what their citizens want? If their citizens don't like it then they can vote the bastards out in the next election and change the law. Why should people living in any state have any say at all over what people living in another state decide to do?
Or they could just take a bus to nearby state where they let women kill their babies. Inconvenient? Maybe. But it’s much worse for the baby.
 
By Susie Madrak — May 3, 2022
In between his paeans to beer, Brett Kavanaugh repeatedly told senators during his 2018 nomination hearing that women’s right to an abortion has been affirmed.

“The Supreme Court has recognized the right to an abortion since the 1973 Roe v. Wade case — has affirmed it many times,” he told Lindsey Graham.




Kavanaugh stressed to Dianne Feinstein “the importance of the precedent” under the previous court rulings and a “woman has a constitutional right to obtain an abortion before viability.” He said plainly that Roe was "settled law."

Oh NO! The Kav was lying!

And Susan Collins should have been more "concerned"
he was DRUNK!!!
 
No, you are saying children will not suffer as a result of child protective service agancies being overwhelmed is abortions are banned. and your basis is women will nto become pregnant at the same rate as now.
If children are not killed before birth, then they might suffer.
 
Or they could just take a bus to nearby state where they let women kill their babies. Inconvenient? Maybe. But it’s much worse for the baby.
that's a karen argument.
If children are not killed before birth, then they might suffer.
ah, but the poster was saying babies will be protected, and overurning Roe does nothing for childrne who will be in places where protective servesare are nonfucntional, and good christians don't want higher taxes.

Now for those who support overturning Roe, and are willing to walk the walk ... I respect them. But for the Xians ... gtfo.
 
You didn't answer my question. Is a fetus a human life, period?
It is a human imo....!!!

A fetus is a developing human being. When it has not reached the ability or stage in pregnancy to be born alive, then it is a non viable human foetus.
 
BlindBoo

You consider an Aborted Fetus “medical waste”? That was a living being, who would have gone on to 80 or 90 years or life. Robbed of playtime at recess, friends, parties, travel, love, family, maybe a rewarding career, possibly a wedding, children of one’s own, fun at sports events, going to the theatre, a nice dining experience at a fine restaurant, jumping the waves at the beach, walking around a park, etc., etc.

But liberals consider him or her “medical waste.”
 
Human yes, living yes. Viable, separate from the host, depends on the time of gestation, and even then it's not a clear cut line. With life, it never is.
Interesting little thought...

Ever been to a funeral for a 12 week miscarriage? Nope, and neither has anyone else.


Ever been to a funeral for someone who was brain dead before they died? Maybe. Lots of people have.

What distinguishes these two states (12 week fetus, 30 year old, brain dead human)? We easily see the similarities.

The difference is the connections, memories, the life experience, the social ties, etc.

A mother has these, and a fetus does not.
 
Interesting little thought...

Ever been to a funeral for a 12 week miscarriage? Nope, and neither has anyone else.


Ever been to a funeral for someone who was brain dead before they died? Maybe. Lots of people have.

What distinguishes these two states (12 week fetus, 30 year old, brain dead human)? We easily see the similarities.

The difference is the connections, memories, the life experience, the social ties, etc.

A mother has these, and a fetus does not.
It will be interesting to see the final opinion. Under the 14th, a "person" must be born. Under Casey, a State has a legitimate interest in the potential for life. But the 6 Republican Justices seem to want to overturn Casey in order to find a woman has no right to terminate a pregancy is state law prohibits that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top