If you don't want guns don't buy them?

[Rustic]

Most of these mass shootings are done by leftists...

Sanity And socialism cannot coexist...

that's delusional, nutter.

but thanks for playing.

the Nazi sym[pathizer Dylan klepbold and the white supremacist dylann roof were not democrats.

damn, do you lie just for fun?

...most were

 

[jillian]

unfettered gun ownership is no one's right.

Wrong. It's all Americans right.

Serious question Jill: Why should Pedophiles NOT own guns? Should they NOT defend themselves?

Prediction: You'll just laugh and not answer.

pedophiles shouldn't own guns because they have committed crimes against another person. fair enough?

i'm not laughing and I did answer. I was sort of expecting someone to ask that.

That would usually make them felons, and thus banned from ownership anyway.

and what do you do to the drinking buddy who sells them the gun?

That's already illegal. Prosecute the bastard, don't make me wait 3-6 months for a gun because of it.

i'm ok with you having to wait. sorry. you don't have a right to instant gratification.

btw, you'll be pleased to know there is an active shooter and another mass shooting in san bernadino California.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

inconvenience is not an issue. no one has a right against inconvenience in purchasing a weapon when there is a societal interest.

Is that true?

Tell me "Counselor"... what legal principle legitimately infringes upon the convenience of the citizen to purchase a firearm, to which they are otherwise Constitutionally entitled?

I'm intrigued...

(Reader, you'll want to pay attention here... shit's about to get real)

Mr fucktard, sir:

We have EQUAL RIGHTS?


Which right authorizes you to investigate to see if I am qualified to bear arms?

We hold these truths to be self-evident,

that all men are created equal,

that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,"


.

So you support the opinion that the Government can infringe our rights for no other reason then they chose too? THAT IS what Jillian is arguing after all.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Mr fucktard, sir:
.

SHhhhhh... Dumbass.

I'm workin' here.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Wrong. It's all Americans right.

Serious question Jill: Why should Pedophiles NOT own guns? Should they NOT defend themselves?

Prediction: You'll just laugh and not answer.

pedophiles shouldn't own guns because they have committed crimes against another person. fair enough?

i'm not laughing and I did answer. I was sort of expecting someone to ask that.

That would usually make them felons, and thus banned from ownership anyway.

and what do you do to the drinking buddy who sells them the gun?

That's already illegal. Prosecute the bastard, don't make me wait 3-6 months for a gun because of it.

i'm ok with you having to wait. sorry. you don't have a right to instant gratification.

btw, you'll be pleased to know there is an active shooter and another mass shooting in san bernadino California.

It is still safer then being near a highway.

 

[jillian]

inconvenience is not an issue. no one has a right against inconvenience in purchasing a weapon when there is a societal interest.

Is that true?

Tell me "Counselor"... what legal principle legitimately infringes upon the convenience of the citizen to purchase a firearm, to which they are otherwise Constitutionally entitled?

I'm intrigued...

(Reader, you'll want to pay attention here... shit's about to get real)

Mr fucktard, sir:

We have EQUAL RIGHTS?


Which right authorizes you to investigate to see if I am qualified to bear arms?

We hold these truths to be self-evident,

that all men are created equal,

that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,"


.

me, personally? none.

the government? has every right to investigate you to make sure you're not a risk. and, again, even the wingiest of the wingers said, in Heller, that reasonable regulation is permissible. the extent of that regulation is what is up for grabs.

but why would you think the government couldn't examine your record to make sure you're not a wackjob before they put a gun in your hands. (the fact that reading your posts on this messageboard might give them all the reason they need to decline your request is a whole other story).

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

inconvenience is not an issue. no one has a right against inconvenience in purchasing a weapon when there is a societal interest.

i'm ok with you having to wait. sorry. you don't have a right to instant gratification.

Is that true?

Tell me "Counselor"... what legal principle legitimately infringes upon the convenience of the citizen to purchase a firearm, to which they are otherwise Constitutionally entitled?

I'm intrigued...

(Reader, you'll want to pay attention here... shit's about to get real)

 

[The Rabbi]

Skull Pilot said "If you don't want a gun don't buy one" yet that is so beside the point

first, who says there aren't guns in my home?

second, that doesn't mean we shouldn't keep guns away from people who shouldn't have them... the nutters, the criminals, the spouse abusers, pedophiles...


most normal people understand the need to restrict gun ownership in those cases.

Whats your plan for restricting guns from who shouldnt have them?
WHo the fuck are you to say who shouldnt have one?
Libs occupy a different plane of reality.

 

[Mad Scientist]

Most of these mass shootings are done by leftists...

Sanity And socialism cannot coexist...

that's delusional, nutter.

but thanks for playing.

the Nazi sym[pathizer Dylan klepbold and the white supremacist dylann roof were not democrats.

damn, do you lie just for fun?

He said MOST. Cant you read? No one enjoys mass shootings except for you Anti Gun Nutters. You care not for the health of anyone just the Political Advantage you can gain.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

the government? has every right to investigate you to make sure you're not a risk.

Golly... So the Government has rights?

The last I heard, Government doesn't have any right which does not exist in the least of those who consent to be governed.

SO with that being inarguable... you're saying then that every citizen has a right to investigate the risk potential of others?

Fascinatin'... .

 

[jillian]

Most of these mass shootings are done by leftists...

Sanity And socialism cannot coexist...

that's delusional, nutter.

but thanks for playing.

the Nazi sym[pathizer Dylan klepbold and the white supremacist dylann roof were not democrats.

damn, do you lie just for fun?

He said MOST. Cant you read? No one enjoys mass shootings except for you Anti Gun Nutters. You care not for the health of anyone just the Political Advantage you can gain.

again, i'm not "Anti gun" whatever that means. i'm in favor of keeping them away from people who shouldn't have them.

and "most" is a lie. if there's one who's a lefty i'd be surprised. but what the heck..... why interfere with righgtwinwut spew.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

inconvenience is not an issue. no one has a right against inconvenience in purchasing a weapon when there is a societal interest.

Is that true?

Tell me "Counselor"... what legal principle legitimately infringes upon the convenience of the citizen to purchase a firearm, to which they are otherwise Constitutionally entitled?

I'm intrigued...

(Reader, you'll want to pay attention here... shit's about to get real)

Mr fucktard, sir:

We have EQUAL RIGHTS?


Which right authorizes you to investigate to see if I am qualified to bear arms?

We hold these truths to be self-evident,

that all men are created equal,

that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,"


.

me, personally? none.

the government? has every right to investigate you to make sure you're not a risk. and, again, even the wingiest of the wingers said, in Heller, that reasonable regulation is permissible. the extent of that regulation is what is up for grabs.

but why would you think the government couldn't examine your record to make sure you're not a wackjob before they put a gun in your hands. (the fact that reading your posts on this messageboard might give them all the reason they need to decline your request is a whole other story).

You miss the point as usual, crooks aren't going to go through legal channels to purchase weapons.. they don't now.

 

[jillian]

the government? has every right to investigate you to make sure you're not a risk.

Golly... So the Government has rights?

The last I heard, Government doesn't have any right which does not exist in the least of those who consent to be governed.

ok... the government has the power....

does that make you feel better?

WE have the right to be protected from criminals and crazies having guns.

 

[jillian]

inconvenience is not an issue. no one has a right against inconvenience in purchasing a weapon when there is a societal interest.

Is that true?

Tell me "Counselor"... what legal principle legitimately infringes upon the convenience of the citizen to purchase a firearm, to which they are otherwise Constitutionally entitled?

I'm intrigued...

(Reader, you'll want to pay attention here... shit's about to get real)

Mr fucktard, sir:

We have EQUAL RIGHTS?


Which right authorizes you to investigate to see if I am qualified to bear arms?

We hold these truths to be self-evident,

that all men are created equal,

that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,"


.

me, personally? none.

the government? has every right to investigate you to make sure you're not a risk. and, again, even the wingiest of the wingers said, in Heller, that reasonable regulation is permissible. the extent of that regulation is what is up for grabs.

but why would you think the government couldn't examine your record to make sure you're not a wackjob before they put a gun in your hands. (the fact that reading your posts on this messageboard might give them all the reason they need to decline your request is a whole other story).

You miss the point as usual, crooks aren't going to go through legal channels to purchase weapons.. they don't now.

and murderers are still going to commit murder but we don't throw up our hands and say not to legislate against killing people.

 

[The Rabbi]

the government? has every right to investigate you to make sure you're not a risk.

Golly... So the Government has rights?

The last I heard, Government doesn't have any right which does not exist in the least of those who consent to be governed.

ok... the government has the power....

does that make you feel better?

WE have the right to be protected from criminals and crazies having guns.

No actually they dont. CHeck Second Amendment, US Constitution.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

the government? has every right to investigate you to make sure you're not a risk.

Golly... So the Government has rights?

The last I heard, Government doesn't have any right which does not exist in the least of those who consent to be governed.

ok... the government has the power....

does that make you feel better?

WE have the right to be protected from criminals and crazies having guns.

Except NOTHING you have proposed protects you and denies rights to millions.

 

[The Rabbi]

inconvenience is not an issue. no one has a right against inconvenience in purchasing a weapon when there is a societal interest.

Is that true?

Tell me "Counselor"... what legal principle legitimately infringes upon the convenience of the citizen to purchase a firearm, to which they are otherwise Constitutionally entitled?

I'm intrigued...

(Reader, you'll want to pay attention here... shit's about to get real)

Mr fucktard, sir:

We have EQUAL RIGHTS?


Which right authorizes you to investigate to see if I am qualified to bear arms?

We hold these truths to be self-evident,

that all men are created equal,

that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,"


.

me, personally? none.

the government? has every right to investigate you to make sure you're not a risk. and, again, even the wingiest of the wingers said, in Heller, that reasonable regulation is permissible. the extent of that regulation is what is up for grabs.

but why would you think the government couldn't examine your record to make sure you're not a wackjob before they put a gun in your hands. (the fact that reading your posts on this messageboard might give them all the reason they need to decline your request is a whole other story).

You miss the point as usual, crooks aren't going to go through legal channels to purchase weapons.. they don't now.

and murderers are still going to commit murder but we don't throw up our hands and say not to legislate against killing people.

Fallacy.
We have laws against murder not to prevent murders but to punish people who do it because murder in and of itself is wrong.
How is owning a gun in and of itself wrong?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

the government? has every right to investigate you to make sure you're not a risk.

Golly... So the Government has rights?

The last I heard, Government doesn't have any right which does not exist in the least of those who consent to be governed.

ok... the government has the power....

does that make you feel better?

WE have the right to be protected from criminals and crazies having guns.

Where is that right written? Sorry, I don't recall ever reading the "right to be protected from criminals and crazies having guns" in any document.

 

[Contumacious]

inconvenience is not an issue. no one has a right against inconvenience in purchasing a weapon when there is a societal interest.

Is that true?

Tell me "Counselor"... what legal principle legitimately infringes upon the convenience of the citizen to purchase a firearm, to which they are otherwise Constitutionally entitled?

I'm intrigued...

(Reader, you'll want to pay attention here... shit's about to get real)

Mr fucktard, sir:

We have EQUAL RIGHTS?


Which right authorizes you to investigate to see if I am qualified to bear arms?

We hold these truths to be self-evident,

that all men are created equal,

that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,"


.

So you support the opinion that the Government can infringe our rights for no other reason then they chose too? THAT IS what Jillian is arguing after all.

IF I CAN NOT INFRINGE ON YOUR RIGHTS NEITHER CAN THE GOVERNMENT

We hold these truths to be self-evident,

that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,

deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Most of these mass shootings are done by leftists...

Sanity And socialism cannot coexist...

that's delusional, nutter.

but thanks for playing.

the Nazi sym[pathizer Dylan klepbold and the white supremacist dylann roof were not democrats.

damn, do you lie just for fun?

He said MOST. Cant you read? No one enjoys mass shootings except for you Anti Gun Nutters. You care not for the health of anyone just the Political Advantage you can gain.

again, i'm not "Anti gun" whatever that means. i'm in favor of keeping them away from people who shouldn't have them.

and "most" is a lie. if there's one who's a lefty i'd be surprised. but what the heck..... why interfere with righgtwinwut spew.

Everyone here is in favor of keeping guns away from people that shouldn't have them.

But what you are missing is the fact that NO LAW will keep people that shouldn't have guns from getting them. Laws are only obeyed by law-abiding people, criminals by definition do not follow the law.

So your suggestion on making laws more stringent, simply isn't going to work and will only hinder law abiding people.