If you're a Reagan Republican and a Trump supporter ...

[kaz]

Exactly, you think the "working class" are people who live life skating by with as little work as possible. Leftist much?

That does not work.

Communists centered their whole revolution on fighting for the working class. It worked better for the factory workers than it did the peasants (who usually radicalized as anarchists during communist uprisings)

The "working class" are not the ones who work, Darlene. They're the ones who work as little as possible. Here's how you know that isn't what I said. I didn't say that. What is wrong with you? Seriously?

 

[bripat9643]

The lesser of two evils is still evil.

Like I said, it is a very dangerous and counterproductive attitude.

Exactly

So you're OK with allowing a greater evil?

So you're in favor of melting the polar ice caps?

Let's try to have an adult conversation, OK?

If you have no trouble with Hillary winning, then you are for allowing a greater evil. That's undeniable.

Well, pussy, I never said I "have no trouble with Hillary winning." Stick your finger up your pussy, finger boy. You're just losing it

Of course you have said that. You keep saying the Hillary is no worse than Trump.

 

[kaz]

I've said I want neither of them to be President, they both suck. You said I'm content to allow Hillary to be President, which I've never said. Stop projectile vomiting your shit. We're screwed either way. I'm "content to allow" neither of them to be President. You're saying I need to vote for one of them or I'm in favor of the other. Which is a load of crap

We are not equally screwed either way. Trump is proposing some good things. About the only thing I dislike are his threat to impose tariffs and his plan for maternity leave. He wants to appoint good judges, cut government regulations, and cut government in general.

Clinton, on the other hand, would be a complete disaster. Our 2nd Amendment rights would be the first thing to go. Our First Amendment rights would be next. She would legalize 30 million illegal aliens and open the flood gates for more. How you imagine there is any equivalence between the two defies comprehension.

Trump keeps pounding his anti-capitalist message. He's a lot more threat to actually do the crap he's proposing than Hillary is. I doubt she's going to follow through with reducing free trade

His message is not "anti-capitalist" any more than George W Bush's message was capitalist. Trump may be against free trade, but he's not against free enterprise. Being for the TPP doesn't mean you favor free trade. The TPP is a nightmare that destroys American sovereignty.

The idea that Trump is more of a threat to capitalism than Hillary is a joke. You obviously aren't to be taken seriously. You keep making ridiculous statements like that.

Look man. You've made a lot of good points through the years. But you're being a stupid twat right now.

I never said "Trump is more of a threat to capitalism than Hillary."

Shove it up your vagina

Of course you did. Allow me to quote you:

"Trump keeps pounding his anti-capitalist message. He's a lot more threat to actually do the crap he's proposing than Hillary is. I doubt she's going to follow through with reducing free trade"

I said he's more likely to do what he's threatening to do. Which is true. That isn't synonymous with the crap you said. Don't help me, quote what I actually said

 

[bripat9643]

We are not equally screwed either way. Trump is proposing some good things. About the only thing I dislike are his threat to impose tariffs and his plan for maternity leave. He wants to appoint good judges, cut government regulations, and cut government in general.

Clinton, on the other hand, would be a complete disaster. Our 2nd Amendment rights would be the first thing to go. Our First Amendment rights would be next. She would legalize 30 million illegal aliens and open the flood gates for more. How you imagine there is any equivalence between the two defies comprehension.

Trump keeps pounding his anti-capitalist message. He's a lot more threat to actually do the crap he's proposing than Hillary is. I doubt she's going to follow through with reducing free trade

His message is not "anti-capitalist" any more than George W Bush's message was capitalist. Trump may be against free trade, but he's not against free enterprise. Being for the TPP doesn't mean you favor free trade. The TPP is a nightmare that destroys American sovereignty.

The idea that Trump is more of a threat to capitalism than Hillary is a joke. You obviously aren't to be taken seriously. You keep making ridiculous statements like that.

Look man. You've made a lot of good points through the years. But you're being a stupid twat right now.

I never said "Trump is more of a threat to capitalism than Hillary."

Shove it up your vagina

Of course you did. Allow me to quote you:

"Trump keeps pounding his anti-capitalist message. He's a lot more threat to actually do the crap he's proposing than Hillary is. I doubt she's going to follow through with reducing free trade"

I said he's more likely to do what he's threatening to do. Which is true. That isn't synonymous with the crap you said. Don't help me, quote what I actually said

Hillary wil have the power to do what she wants after she stacks the SC with bootlicking leftwing goons.

 

[Onyx]

Supporting the lesser of two evils is the base argument for moral statism.

There is a reason why I said that attitude is dangerous and counterproductive.

We anarchists have long held the moral high ground by rejecting evil in all its forms.

 

[kaz]

Exactly

So you're OK with allowing a greater evil?

So you're in favor of melting the polar ice caps?

Let's try to have an adult conversation, OK?

If you have no trouble with Hillary winning, then you are for allowing a greater evil. That's undeniable.

Well, pussy, I never said I "have no trouble with Hillary winning." Stick your finger up your pussy, finger boy. You're just losing it

Of course you have said that. You keep saying the Hillary is no worse than Trump.

In the end, no. I'm tired of repeating the same points.

Everything bad about Trump applies to Hillary. There are things Trump says that I agree with.

However, Trump is more likely to follow through with the bad shit he's threatening to do.

What about that is unclear to you?

 

[kaz]

Trump keeps pounding his anti-capitalist message. He's a lot more threat to actually do the crap he's proposing than Hillary is. I doubt she's going to follow through with reducing free trade

His message is not "anti-capitalist" any more than George W Bush's message was capitalist. Trump may be against free trade, but he's not against free enterprise. Being for the TPP doesn't mean you favor free trade. The TPP is a nightmare that destroys American sovereignty.

The idea that Trump is more of a threat to capitalism than Hillary is a joke. You obviously aren't to be taken seriously. You keep making ridiculous statements like that.

Look man. You've made a lot of good points through the years. But you're being a stupid twat right now.

I never said "Trump is more of a threat to capitalism than Hillary."

Shove it up your vagina

Of course you did. Allow me to quote you:

"Trump keeps pounding his anti-capitalist message. He's a lot more threat to actually do the crap he's proposing than Hillary is. I doubt she's going to follow through with reducing free trade"

I said he's more likely to do what he's threatening to do. Which is true. That isn't synonymous with the crap you said. Don't help me, quote what I actually said

Hillary wil have the power to do what she wants after she stacks the SC with bootlicking leftwing goons.

And decades of Republican dominated courts have gotten us what exactly?

 

[Onyx]

The "working class" are not the ones who work, Darlene. They're the ones who work as little as possible. Here's how you know that isn't what I said. I didn't say that. What is wrong with you? Seriously?

Obviously you did not comphrehend my post, because I did not accuse you of saying that.

You did call him leftist for attacking the working class (or so you perceived), and upholding the working class has long been a communist tenant.

Left wing is not anti-worker. It is a lot of other things, but not that.

 

[Staidhup]

Decades of a conservative court preserved the Constitution.

 

[Onyx]

Decades of a conservative court preserved the Constitution.

That is part of the problem.

Any examples though?

 

[bripat9643]

So you're OK with allowing a greater evil?

So you're in favor of melting the polar ice caps?

Let's try to have an adult conversation, OK?

If you have no trouble with Hillary winning, then you are for allowing a greater evil. That's undeniable.

Well, pussy, I never said I "have no trouble with Hillary winning." Stick your finger up your pussy, finger boy. You're just losing it

Of course you have said that. You keep saying the Hillary is no worse than Trump.

In the end, no. I'm tired of repeating the same points.

Everything bad about Trump applies to Hillary. There are things Trump says that I agree with.

However, Trump is more likely to follow through with the bad shit he's threatening to do.

What about that is unclear to you?

"Bad shit" like what, imposing a few tariffs? You think that's worse than abolishing the 2nd Amendment, and the first? opening the flood gates for illegal aliens and legalizing 30 million of them? Increasing government spending by $1 trillion?

 

[bripat9643]

His message is not "anti-capitalist" any more than George W Bush's message was capitalist. Trump may be against free trade, but he's not against free enterprise. Being for the TPP doesn't mean you favor free trade. The TPP is a nightmare that destroys American sovereignty.

The idea that Trump is more of a threat to capitalism than Hillary is a joke. You obviously aren't to be taken seriously. You keep making ridiculous statements like that.

Look man. You've made a lot of good points through the years. But you're being a stupid twat right now.

I never said "Trump is more of a threat to capitalism than Hillary."

Shove it up your vagina

Of course you did. Allow me to quote you:

"Trump keeps pounding his anti-capitalist message. He's a lot more threat to actually do the crap he's proposing than Hillary is. I doubt she's going to follow through with reducing free trade"

I said he's more likely to do what he's threatening to do. Which is true. That isn't synonymous with the crap you said. Don't help me, quote what I actually said

Hillary wil have the power to do what she wants after she stacks the SC with bootlicking leftwing goons.

And decades of Republican dominated courts have gotten us what exactly?

We still have some semblance of a 2nd Amendment and a 1st Amendment, which will disappear if Hillary is elected.

 

[oreo]

I imagine most Reaganites will be voting for Hillary Clinton or a 3rd party--Gary Johnson more liberal than Darell Castle (not sure if Castle is on all 50 state ballots) but that's probably who Utah is going to favor. Honestly I don't know much about either of these candidates but have heard that Castle is more conservative than Johnson.

But clearly the most qualified candidate is Hillary Clinton, and Republicans are endorsing her like crazy. Bush Sr. told his daughter that he will be voting for her, but refused to admit it publicly. You can bet G.W. & Jeb will be voting for her, and I imagine most Republican Senators and House members will also be voting for her. Every ballot is a "secret ballot."

We recommend Hillary Clinton for president | Editorials | Dallas News
ANOTHER Major Republican Endorses Hillary...Trump Is LIVID, Fears Campaign Is OVER
Trump sends unprecedented numbers of GOP fleeing to Clinton
Republicans for Hillary? - CNNPolitics.com

And there's a reason for that. Many Republicans have praised Hillary Clinton in the past, and like her, "when they're not campaigning against her." So it's no surprise they're kicking this ASS CLOWN Trump to the curb to endorse and vote for her.
Republicans Have Praised Hillary Clinton’s Secretary Of State Tenure
Hillary's secret weapon? GOP praise

And this is the silver bullet that was shot into the ass of the Chimpanzee nominee.

A reaganite vote for Hillary? You must be joking. That's like saying Stalin would have voted for Calvin Coolidge.

I just gave you several links to show you that is exactly what's happening. Reaganites will be voting for Hillary Clinton or a 3rd party. You have nominated a man with NO honor, NO respect, NO dignity, and the only loyalty he has ever shown anyone is to himself & Russia. The most incompetent, unqualified, dangerous candidate in this nation's history, your chimpanzee nominee Donald Trump.
Donald Trump is a unique threat to American democracy

Reaganites are pragmatic (can see through the bullshit.) They're intelligent. They are solely focused on fiscal conservatism, a smaller more effective government. They aren't swayed by the Reich wing nutcase, book of dummie's conspiracy theories. They have respect and honor and they're sure not going to support someone who stated in his book "My personal Vietnam was sleeping with married women."
Donald Trump Calls Sleeping Around His ‘Personal Vietnam’

Nor would they support any candidate (that claimed to be a Republican) that just proposed another entitlement program--"child care subsidies."
Donald Trump Proposes Child-Care Subsidies

Unfortunately for you and all the others from the nutcase Reich wing, Reaganites are the majority of the Republican party whom you have been attacking for the last several years and calling them "rino's, establishment", etc. And they have no LOYALTY to this new party of Trump. That is stuffed full of ignorance, anger, fear, bigotry, misogyny and extremism. They decided long ago, (after Trump won the nomination) that there was no way in HELL that they were going to support or vote for Donald Trump. Their 2016 platform suits them well. Full of oppression, bigotry, extremism and division.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/19/opinion/the-most-extreme-republican-platform-in-memory.html?_r=1

And when you can't get the RED-EST of the RED to support the Republican nominee this race was LOST the very second that Trump was declared the nominee of this party.
In the reddest part of Colorado, some Republicans rethink their loyalty
Open Letter To Donald Trump From a #NeverTrumper

And here's another add made by REAGANITES FOR CLINTON.

 

[kaz]

So you're in favor of melting the polar ice caps?

Let's try to have an adult conversation, OK?

If you have no trouble with Hillary winning, then you are for allowing a greater evil. That's undeniable.

Well, pussy, I never said I "have no trouble with Hillary winning." Stick your finger up your pussy, finger boy. You're just losing it

Of course you have said that. You keep saying the Hillary is no worse than Trump.

In the end, no. I'm tired of repeating the same points.

Everything bad about Trump applies to Hillary. There are things Trump says that I agree with.

However, Trump is more likely to follow through with the bad shit he's threatening to do.

What about that is unclear to you?

"Bad shit" like what, imposing a few tariffs? You think that's worse than abolishing the 2nd Amendment, and the first? opening the flood gates for illegal aliens and legalizing 30 million of them? Increasing government spending by $1 trillion?

I always thought anarchists were like the elephant's graveyard. You gave up, it's over. I'm glad to meet an anarchist who still believes and hasn't quit. In the words of Dante:

All ye who enter here abandon all hope ...

While I'm glad to meet an anarchist who still believes. I don't. It's over. We're tilting at windmills. Whatever battle we win here or lose there doesn't matter. Our grandchildren won't know what liberty is whatever we do

 

[kaz]

Look man. You've made a lot of good points through the years. But you're being a stupid twat right now.

I never said "Trump is more of a threat to capitalism than Hillary."

Shove it up your vagina

Of course you did. Allow me to quote you:

"Trump keeps pounding his anti-capitalist message. He's a lot more threat to actually do the crap he's proposing than Hillary is. I doubt she's going to follow through with reducing free trade"

I said he's more likely to do what he's threatening to do. Which is true. That isn't synonymous with the crap you said. Don't help me, quote what I actually said

Hillary wil have the power to do what she wants after she stacks the SC with bootlicking leftwing goons.

And decades of Republican dominated courts have gotten us what exactly?

We still have some semblance of a 2nd Amendment and a 1st Amendment, which will disappear if Hillary is elected.

It'll disappear anyway. We aren't discussing if, only when

 

[Staidhup]

Trump is by no stretch of imagination a Reagan, however, no worse and possibly better then the alternative. Continuing down the same path for another 8 years will accomplish nothing more then further bankrupt the country, fill the pockets of the rich, shrink the middle class, expand the ranks of working poor and solidify the transformation to a socialist government.

 

[Onyx]

You think that's worse than abolishing the 2nd Amendment, and the first? opening the flood gates for illegal aliens and legalizing 30 million of them? Increasing government spending by $1 trillion?

Hillary has gave no indication of abolishing the second amendment, nor is it even close to being realistic on several accounts. The most obvious reason is that she does not have the power to do that, and both candidates are having their strings pulled anyways.

Where did she state she was going to provide amnesty for 30 million immigrants? Part of her rhetoric is securing the borders, and since illegal immigration has been >1% during the second term of the Obama administration, I would say the threat is overblown and that the immigration crisis is over.

One trillion is kind of extreme, but if your concern is government spending, then note that Trump wants to build a golden wall and increase the size of the military. (a huge threat for any anti-government militants) I do not expect anything less than one war and several interventions with Trump, and that comes from a very solidified understanding of this fools psyche.

You are also marginalizing the problem with Trump's anti trade beliefs. They are very dangerous, and indicative of his ulterior motives.

 

[bripat9643]

If you have no trouble with Hillary winning, then you are for allowing a greater evil. That's undeniable.

Well, pussy, I never said I "have no trouble with Hillary winning." Stick your finger up your pussy, finger boy. You're just losing it

Of course you have said that. You keep saying the Hillary is no worse than Trump.

In the end, no. I'm tired of repeating the same points.

Everything bad about Trump applies to Hillary. There are things Trump says that I agree with.

However, Trump is more likely to follow through with the bad shit he's threatening to do.

What about that is unclear to you?

"Bad shit" like what, imposing a few tariffs? You think that's worse than abolishing the 2nd Amendment, and the first? opening the flood gates for illegal aliens and legalizing 30 million of them? Increasing government spending by $1 trillion?

I always thought anarchists were like the elephant's graveyard. You gave up, it's over. I'm glad to meet an anarchist who still believes and hasn't quit. In the words of Dante:

All ye who enter here abandon all hope ...

While I'm glad to meet an anarchist who still believes. I don't. It's over. We're tilting at windmills. Whatever battle we win here or lose there doesn't matter. Our grandchildren won't know what liberty is whatever we do

Allowing Hillary Clinton to win is the definition of "giving up." You just admitted you think that the election is "pointless" no matter who you vote for.

 

[Onyx]

Trump is by no stretch of imagination a Reagan, however, no worse and possibly better then the alternative. Continuing down the same path for another 8 years will accomplish nothing more then further bankrupt the country, fill the pockets of the rich, shrink the middle class, expand the ranks of working poor and solidify the transformation to a socialist government.

Trump is not off the beaten track.

He comes across as more moderate than George W. Bush, Mitt Romney, and John Mccain.

 

[Onyx]

While I'm glad to meet an anarchist who still believes. I don't. It's over. We're tilting at windmills. Whatever battle we win here or lose there doesn't matter. Our grandchildren won't know what liberty is whatever we do

What a downer.

I thought I told you earlier to go join your local Goth scene.

The state squeezed the life out of you, yet you still support the state. Talk about sycophancy....